{"id":25124,"date":"2025-01-13T15:38:00","date_gmt":"2025-01-13T12:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-01-13T15:38:00","modified_gmt":"2025-01-13T12:38:00","slug":"aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   HAKAN \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n<p>   (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/1782)<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024<\/p>\n<p>   B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n<p>   \u00dcyeler<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n<p>   Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Hakan \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n<p>   Vekili<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Av. G\u00f6k\u00e7en YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>1. Ba\u015fvuru, baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lma i\u015fleminin yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca iptal edilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro levhas\u0131na avukat olarak yaz\u0131lma talebiyle ilgili baroya ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun talebi T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan karar itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine TBB ilk karar\u0131nda \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>3. Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine Ankara 10. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) TBB&#8217;ye kar\u015f\u0131 iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>4. Mahkeme 28\/5\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131 ile dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda FET\u00d6\/PDY&#8217;ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti oldu\u011fu, mesle\u011fin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona erene kadar beklenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>5. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 12. \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin 5\/11\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131 ile kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>6. Ba\u015fvurucu 28\/11\/2020 tarihinde nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 28\/12\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>7. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n<p>8. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lma i\u015fleminin Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan iptal edilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k), TBB&#8217;nin 25\/2\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun baro levhas\u0131na kaydedildi\u011fini, ma\u011fdur s\u0131fat\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131p ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7esinin ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131na ve avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin hizmet gereklerine dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru formundaki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>9. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesine dolay\u0131s\u0131yla serbest avukatl\u0131k yapmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Mesleki hayata y\u00f6nelik bu t\u00fcr tedbirlerin ya da m\u00fcdahalelerin hangi durumlarda \u00f6zel hayat ba\u011flam\u0131nda uygulanabilir oldu\u011fu hususunda belirlenen \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler Tamer Mahmuto\u011flu ([GK], B. No: 2017\/38953, 23\/7\/2020 , \u00a7\u00a7 84-96) karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu kararda kabul edildi\u011fi \u015fekilde, somut ba\u015fvurunun sonuca dayal\u0131 nedenlerle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenebilir nitelikte oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>10. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet \u00c7etinkaya ve D.K., ([GK], B. No: 2018\/27392, 15\/4\/2021; B.A.Y. ([GK], B. No: 2019\/19788, 5\/7\/2022).<\/p>\n<p>11. Anayasa Mahkemesinin, baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lma taleplerinin reddine ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurularla ilgili bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131 bulundu\u011funu hat\u0131rlatmak gerekir. Bu kapsamda Mehmet \u00c7etinkaya ve D.K. karar\u0131nda, mevzuatta bir ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131n baro levhas\u0131na kayda engel olu\u015fturdu\u011funa dair d\u00fczenlenme olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mahkemelerin ilgili mevzuattaki d\u00fczenlemeleri makul olmayacak bi\u00e7imde geni\u015fletici ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir yoruma tabi tuttu\u011funu vurgulayarak ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle baro siciline kayd\u0131n iptali \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir (Mehmet \u00c7etinkaya ve D.K., \u00a7\u00a7 48, 49). Tamer Mahmuto\u011flu karar\u0131nda ise avukatl\u0131k hizmetinin kamuda istihdam kabul edilerek baro siciline kayd\u0131n reddi incelenmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda Anayasa Mahkemesi mesleklerini serbest \u015fekilde icra eden avukatlar\u0131n kamu hizmetinde istihdam edildiklerinin kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mahkemelerin ilgili mevzuattaki d\u00fczenlemeleri makul olmayacak bi\u00e7imde geni\u015fletici ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir yoruma tabi tuttuklar\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayarak m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Tamer Mahmuto\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 115-118).<\/p>\n<p>12. Bu bilgiler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut ba\u015fvuru incelendi\u011finde, ba\u015fvurucunun baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lma talebi TBB taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmesine ra\u011fmen, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren mahkemece avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan ve ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma bulundu\u011fundan bahisle dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda somut ba\u015fvuruda Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u00c7etinkaya ve D.K. karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finden an\u0131lan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun aleyhinde karar verilmesi nedeniyle Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n<p>13. Ba\u015fvurucu ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>14. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan GK, B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) GK, B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n<p>15. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n<p>A. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n<p>B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 10. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2019\/2189, K.2020\/787) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>E. 446,90 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.446,90 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 31\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 31\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 HAKAN \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/1782) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Hakan \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK Vekili : Av. G\u00f6k\u00e7en YA\u015eAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lma i\u015fleminin yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca iptal edilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro levhas\u0131na avukat olarak yaz\u0131lma talebiyle ilgili baroya ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun talebi T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan karar itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine TBB ilk karar\u0131nda \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir. 3. Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine Ankara 10. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) TBB&#8217;ye kar\u015f\u0131 iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 28\/5\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131 ile dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda FET\u00d6\/PDY&#8217;ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti oldu\u011fu, mesle\u011fin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona erene kadar beklenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. 5. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 12. &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AYM&#039;nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM&#039;nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 HAKAN \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/1782) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Hakan \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK Vekili : Av. G\u00f6k\u00e7en YA\u015eAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lma i\u015fleminin yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca iptal edilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro levhas\u0131na avukat olarak yaz\u0131lma talebiyle ilgili baroya ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun talebi T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan karar itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine TBB ilk karar\u0131nda \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir. 3. Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine Ankara 10. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) TBB&#8217;ye kar\u015f\u0131 iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 28\/5\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131 ile dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda FET\u00d6\/PDY&#8217;ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti oldu\u011fu, mesle\u011fin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona erene kadar beklenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. 5. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 12. &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-13T12:38:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-13T12:38:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1236,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-13T12:38:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 HAKAN \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/1782) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Hakan \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK Vekili : Av. G\u00f6k\u00e7en YA\u015eAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lma i\u015fleminin yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca iptal edilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro levhas\u0131na avukat olarak yaz\u0131lma talebiyle ilgili baroya ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun talebi T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan karar itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine TBB ilk karar\u0131nda \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir. 3. Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine Ankara 10. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) TBB&#8217;ye kar\u015f\u0131 iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 28\/5\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131 ile dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda FET\u00d6\/PDY&#8217;ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti oldu\u011fu, mesle\u011fin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona erene kadar beklenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. 5. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 12. &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-01-13T12:38:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"6 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-01-13T12:38:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":1236,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-01-13T12:38:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-1782-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/1782 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25124\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}