T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
H.\u00d6. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/21079)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 10\/1\/2025 – 32778<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI VER\u0130LD\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u00c7a\u011flar \u00d6NCEL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
H.\u00d6.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, mahkeme kararlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesis edilememesi ve bu hususta cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedenleriyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 8\/2\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc sunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekleri ile Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) \u00fczerinden temin edilen belgelere g\u00f6re olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu ile T.\u00d6. 27\/10\/2013 tarihinde evlenmi\u015ftir. Bu evlilikten 29\/12\/2014 do\u011fumlu m\u00fc\u015fterek bir \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru \u00d6ncesi Olaylar<\/p>\n
1. \u00c7ocukla Ki\u015fisel \u0130li\u015fki Kurulmas\u0131 Amac\u0131yla Ba\u015fvurucunun A\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 Davayla \u0130lgili S\u00fcre\u00e7<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, e\u015finin m\u00fc\u015fterek konuttan ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine 25\/3\/2016 tarihinde ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkinin tesisi amac\u0131yla Eski\u015fehir 2. Aile Mahkemesi nezdinde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde; e\u015finin s\u0131k s\u0131k \u00e7ocu\u011fu da alarak ailesinin yan\u0131na gitti\u011fini, on be\u015f ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u00e7ocu\u011fu yaln\u0131zca d\u00f6rt ay g\u00f6rebildi\u011fini beyan ederek ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. An\u0131lan Mahkeme, ayn\u0131 tarihte davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurucunun her ay\u0131n 1. ve 3. hafta sonu pazar g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 10.00 ile 15.00 aras\u0131nda ve din\u00ee bayramlar\u0131n 2. g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 10.00-15.00 aras\u0131nda anne konutundan al\u0131nmak ve teslim saatinde anne konutuna teslim edilmek sureti ile \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine karar vermi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar 2\/5\/2016 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in Eski\u015fehir 8. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden (\u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc) talepte bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan T.\u00d6.ye m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun ilgili Mahkemece kurulan ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkiye g\u00f6re belirlenen g\u00fcn ve saatlerde ba\u015fvurucuya teslim edilmesi i\u00e7in muht\u0131ra tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Akabinde d\u00fczenlenen 2\/5\/2016 tarihli tutanak ile \u00e7ocu\u011fun ba\u015fvurucuya teslim edildi\u011fi ancak daha sonraki tutanaklarda \u00e7ocu\u011fun tesliminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilemedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu 23\/12\/2020 tarihinde Eski\u015fehir 3. \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesine (\u0130cra Mahkemesi) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. \u015eik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde; T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn 26\/12\/2016 ile 20\/12\/2020 tarihleri aras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 16 ayr\u0131 tutanakla belirlendi\u011fi \u00fczere m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk ile \u015fahsi ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131n\u0131 engelledi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. \u0130cra Mahkemesi 17\/2\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131nda; ba\u015fvurucunun ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkinin engellendi\u011fi tarihten itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 ay i\u00e7inde \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle 20\/12\/2020 tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eylemlere ili\u015fkin davalar\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesine ancak 20\/12\/2020 tarihli eylemi nedeniyle daval\u0131 e\u015f hakk\u0131nda 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra \u0130fl\u00e2s Kanunu’nun m\u00fclga 341. maddesi gere\u011fince alt\u0131 aya kadar tazyik hapsi uygulanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn an\u0131lan karara itiraz\u0131 26\/2\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn 8\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u0130cra Mahkemesine sundu\u011fu kanun yarar\u0131na bozma dilek\u00e7esinde yer alan talebi \u00fczerine Mahkemece ayn\u0131 tarihte infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Akabinde Eski\u015fehir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) 21\/12\/2021 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile kanun yarar\u0131na bozma yoluna gidilmedi\u011fi bildirildi\u011finden \u0130cra Mahkemesince T.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda infaz\u0131n devam\u0131na dair ek karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, \u0130cra Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 30\/12\/2021 tarihli yaz\u0131 ile T.\u00d6. hakk\u0131ndaki infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu yaz\u0131da; 24\/11\/2021 tarihli ve 7343 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun gere\u011fince 3\/7\/2005 tarihli ve 5395 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanunu’nun 41. maddesine ekleme yap\u0131larak ceza miktarlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fti\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir. \u0130cra Mahkemesi 31\/12\/2021 tarihinde; infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131na, ayr\u0131ca 6 aya kadar tazyik hapsine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131larak T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn \u00e7ocuk teslimi emrine muhalefet su\u00e7undan 5395 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 41\/F maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince 3 g\u00fcn disiplin hapsiyle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu 23\/12\/2021 tarihinde Eski\u015fehir 1. \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesine ba\u015fvururak \u015fahsi ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlara ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket eden T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Bu Mahkemenin 28\/12\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile ilgili mevzuat gere\u011fince somut olayda i\u015flemi yapan m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu yerdeki aile mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu bildirilerek \u015fik\u00e2yetin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, Eski\u015fehir 5. Aile Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fleme al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve icra dosyas\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fini ancak T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn \u00e7ocu\u011fu ka\u00e7\u0131rarak icra h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini yerine getirmedi\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu sebeple T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn 2016-2022 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli tekrar etti\u011fi eylemleri nedeniyle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. An\u0131lan Mahkemece 4\/1\/2022 tarihinde talebin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; 7343 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 5395 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a eklenen madde 41\/A ve devam\u0131 maddeleri gere\u011fince ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki temininin Adli Destek Ma\u011fdur Hizmetleri M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile yerine getirilmesinde ola\u011fan ihlale ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak Aile Mahkemesince yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131l\u0131p ceza verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Somut olayda b\u00f6yle bir i\u015flemin yerine getirilmedi\u011fini belirten Mahkemece ayr\u0131ca 5395 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 41\/F maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re i\u015flemi yapan m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu yerdeki aile mahkemesinin yetkili ve g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu, bu birimin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerlerde ise icra mahkemelerinin yetkili ve g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu karara itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine Eski\u015fehir 1. Aile Mahkemesince 7\/1\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede hen\u00fcz 7343 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015fen 5395 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin y\u00f6netmelik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddedildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 10\/2\/2022 tarihinde 2022\/20069 ve 2022\/20108 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvurular ile aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. Bo\u015fanma Davas\u0131 \u00d6ncesi Ba\u015fvurucu Aleyhine Verilen Tedbir Kararlar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00fcre\u00e7<\/p>\n
a. Birinci Tedbire \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00fcre\u00e7<\/p>\n
17. T.\u00d6. 7\/5\/2018 tarihinde Eski\u015fehir Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunarak ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fa cinsel istismarda bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve can g\u00fcvenliklerinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine Eski\u015fehir Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan 8\/3\/2012 tarihli ve 6284 say\u0131l\u0131 Ailenin Korunmas\u0131 ve Kad\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131 \u015eiddetin \u00d6nlenmesine Dair Kanun’un 3. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u00e7) bendi gere\u011fince \u00e7ocuk ve T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn \u00fc\u00e7 ay s\u00fcre ile ge\u00e7ici koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, T.\u00d6. ve \u00e7ocuk lehinde koruma karar\u0131 verilmesi amac\u0131yla Eski\u015fehir 3. Aile Mahkemesinden talepte bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
18. \u0130lgili Mahkeme Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebinin kabul\u00fc ile 6284 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a), (c) ve (d) bentleri uyar\u0131nca 60 g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle ge\u00e7erli olmak \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucunun T.\u00d6.ye ve \u00e7ocu\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fiddete veya korkuya y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmamas\u0131na, T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn ikametg\u00e2h\u0131na yakla\u015fmamas\u0131na ve ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00e2ller sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na yakla\u015fmamas\u0131na 9\/5\/2018 tarihinde karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan karara itiraz\u0131 18\/7\/2018 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. T.\u00d6. 6\/7\/2018 tarihinde Eski\u015fehir 3. Aile Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak ba\u015fvurucunun rahats\u0131z edici davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131na devam etmesi nedeniyle tedbir karar\u0131ndaki s\u00fcrenin uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 10\/7\/2018 tarihinde talebin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki iddialar\u0131n soyut beyanlardan ibaret oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
b. \u0130kinci Tedbire \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00fcre\u00e7 <\/p>\n
20. \u00d6te yandan T.\u00d6. ayn\u0131 Mahkemeye sundu\u011fu 28\/8\/2018 tarihli dilek\u00e7ede; ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fiddet ve tehditlerinin artmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7ocuk ile ba\u015fvurucu aras\u0131ndaki \u015fahsi ili\u015fki karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve 6284 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri gere\u011fince gerekli tedbirlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan Mahkemece 28\/8\/2018 tarihinde talebin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurucunun iki ay s\u00fcre ile \u015fiddet, tehdit ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeye y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmamas\u0131na; ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebi dava yolu ile karara ba\u011flanabilece\u011finden s\u00f6z konusu talebin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. Daha sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te T.\u00d6. Eski\u015fehir 3. Aile Mahkemesinden koruma tedbirinin uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015f, an\u0131lan Mahkemece 26\/10\/2018 tarihinde koruma tedbirlerinin iki ay s\u00fcre ile uzat\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
c. Di\u011fer Tedbir Kararlar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00fcre\u00e7<\/p>\n
22. Eski\u015fehir Valili\u011fi \u015eiddet \u00d6nleme ve \u0130zleme Merkezi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (\u0130dare) 5\/11\/2018 tarihinde Eski\u015fehir 2. Aile Mahkemesine yaz\u0131 g\u00f6ndererek T.\u00d6. ve \u00e7ocuk lehinde tedbir karar\u0131 verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Talep yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ekinde yer alan sosyal inceleme raporunda; ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7ocu\u011fun an\u00fcs\u00fcne parmak sokarak cinsel istismarda bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi, \u00e7ocuk ile yap\u0131lan uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde s\u00f6z konusu iddian\u0131n kuvvetle muhtemel do\u011fru oldu\u011funun belirlendi\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
23. Eski\u015fehir 2. Aile Mahkemesi 13\/11\/2018 tarihinde talebin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurucunun 6284 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131ncaT.\u00d6.ye ve \u00e7ocu\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fiddete veya korkuya y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmamas\u0131na, ayn\u0131 maddenin (\u00e7) bendi uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucu ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda 25\/3\/2016 tarihinde tesis edilen \u015fahsi ili\u015fkinin refakat\u00e7i e\u015fli\u011finde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca kararda, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda talep edilen konuta ve okula yakla\u015fmama tedbirinin reddedildi\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
24. T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn talebi \u00fczerine Eski\u015fehir 5. Aile Mahkemesince 4\/4\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Eski\u015fehir 2. Aile Mahkemesince verilen tedbirlerin \u00fc\u00e7 ay s\u00fcre ile uzat\u0131lmas\u0131na, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn ve \u00e7ocu\u011fun konutuna, T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn i\u015fyerine ve \u00e7ocu\u011fun okuluna yakla\u015fmamas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
25. Devam eden s\u00fcre\u00e7te T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn talepleri \u00fczerine Eski\u015fehir 5. Aile Mahkemesince 2\/5\/2019, 8\/7\/2019, 16\/12\/2019, 6\/3\/2020, 8\/5\/2020, 4\/9\/2020 ve 3\/11\/2020 tarihlerinde ba\u015fvurucunun T.\u00d6.ye ve \u00e7ocu\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fiddete veya korkuya y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmamas\u0131na; ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00e2ller sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na yakla\u015fmamas\u0131na dair tedbir kararlar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
26. S\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcre\u00e7te Eski\u015fehir Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilen 20\/9\/2019 tarihli yaz\u0131da ba\u015fvurucu ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine ili\u015fkin 25\/3\/2016 tarihli karar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 konusunda teredd\u00fct olu\u015ftu\u011fu belirtilerek g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f sorulmu\u015ftur. An\u0131lan Mahkeme 20\/9\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131nda; tedbir karar\u0131 ile korunmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanan ki\u015finin m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk oldu\u011funu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi s\u00fcre\u00e7te ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisine dair uygulaman\u0131n devam etmeyece\u011fini belirterek 6284 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 5. maddesinin (d) bendinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucunun 3\/11\/2020 tarihli tedbir karar\u0131na itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine Eski\u015fehir 1. Aile Mahkemesince verilen itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin 5\/11\/2020 tarihli kararda ise \u00e7ocukla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkiye engel bir tedbir mevcut olmay\u0131p 6284 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 5. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendinde ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00e2ller sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla karar verildi\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. Eski\u015fehir 5. Aile Mahkemesince 3\/3\/2021 tarihinde T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn tedbirlerin uzat\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin talebinin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7u nedeniyle yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada beraat karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, istinaf talebinin de reddine karar verildi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6nceki tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecek bir eyleminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ceza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00fcre\u00e7<\/p>\n
29. T.\u00d6., ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7ocu\u011fa cinsel istismarda bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k nezdinde \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 28\/5\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede; \u00e7ocu\u011fun beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun an\u00fcs\u00fcne parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131 soktu\u011funu ifade etti\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca fiziksel bir bulgu tespit edilmemi\u015f ise de \u00e7ocuk izlem raporunda \u00e7ocu\u011fun geli\u015fim d\u00f6nemi itibar\u0131yla hayal \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc cinsel senaryolar \u00fcretmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirildi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
30. Eski\u015fehir 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan beraatine 24\/4\/2019 tarihlinde karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; ba\u015fvurucunun at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine ili\u015fkin hi\u00e7bir somut bulgunun mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, e\u015fler aras\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayetine ili\u015fkin husumet bulundu\u011fu da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde s\u00f6z konusu iddian\u0131n iftira ya da yanl\u0131\u015f anla\u015f\u0131lma gibi bir\u00e7ok sebebe dayanabilece\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan karar, istinaf ve temyiz a\u015famalar\u0131 neticesinde 13\/10\/2022 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Bo\u015fanma Davas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00fcre\u00e7<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvurucu 24\/4\/2018 tarihinde Eski\u015fehir 1. Aile Mahkemesinde \u00e7ocukla \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisi talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde 25\/3\/2016 tarihli \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine ili\u015fkin karara ra\u011fmen T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn \u00e7ocuk ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesine izin vermedi\u011fini, bu nedenle ancak icra yolu ile \u015fahsi ili\u015fki kurabildi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015f; ayr\u0131ca \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fcmesi ve anneye ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n azalmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u015fahsi ili\u015fki s\u00fcrelerinin art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
32. Akabinde T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn ayn\u0131 Mahkemede 7\/9\/2018 tarihinde bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mas\u0131 \u00fczerine Mahkemece \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisi talepli dava ile bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 birle\u015ftirilerek \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisi i\u00e7in uzman raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
33. 30\/9\/2019 tarihli uzman raporunda; \u00e7ocu\u011fun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadeler ve psikiyatrik tedavi s\u00fcrecindeki ifade ve tepkileri g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu a\u015famada \u00e7ocu\u011fun ba\u015fvurucu ile ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkiye haz\u0131r olmayabilece\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki alg\u0131 ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceleri do\u011frultusunda destek s\u00fcreci ge\u00e7irmeden \u015fahsi ili\u015fki kurmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olumsuz etkileyebilece\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Raporda ayr\u0131ca anne ve baban\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fa yakla\u015f\u0131m bi\u00e7imleri ve aralar\u0131ndaki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fman\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fa yans\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi i\u00e7in her iki ebeveyn hakk\u0131nda dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n faydal\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocukla ba\u015fvurucu aras\u0131nda \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6ncelikle sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131na olaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
34. Devam eden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucunda taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ve ba\u015fvurucu ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda her ay\u0131n 1. ve 3. cumartesi g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 10.00-17.00 aras\u0131nda ve din\u00ee bayramlar\u0131n 2. g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 10.00-17.00 aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na, karar kesinle\u015ftikten sonra ili\u015fkinin bu \u015fekilde devam\u0131na 21\/11\/2019 tarihinde karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
35. An\u0131lan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bo\u015fanmaya ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131 kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan 24\/12\/2019 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu ve T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn h\u00fckm\u00fcn di\u011fer k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki istinaf talebi gere\u011fince Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 28. Hukuk Dairesi (Daire) taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda istinaf talebinin kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn kusur tespiti, velayet, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki, nafaka ve tazminatlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na 2\/3\/2021 tarihinde karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; uzman raporunda belirtilen hususlara ra\u011fmen \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda da dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmadan \u015fahsi ili\u015fkiye karar verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde devam eden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucunun beklenmesi gerekti\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
36. Dairenin istinaf talebini kabul etmesinin ard\u0131ndan Eski\u015fehir 1. Aile Mahkemesince 12\/4\/2021 tarihinde yeniden yarg\u0131lamaya ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f, 9\/9\/2021 tarihli 2. celsede T.\u00d6. taraf\u0131ndan Dairenin karar\u0131nda belirtilen eksikliklerin giderilmesi talep edilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece ayn\u0131 celsede \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcm ile ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde (bkz. \u00a7 34) karar verilerek yarg\u0131lamaya son verilmi\u015ftir. Taraflar\u0131n istinaf talebi \u00fczerine Dairece -2\/3\/2021 tarihli kararda yer alan gerek\u00e7elerle- Mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na 29\/12\/2021 tarihinde karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
37. Mahkemece 2\/2\/2022 tarihinde \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc kez yarg\u0131lamaya ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f ve bireysel ba\u015fvuru tarihine kadar \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine ili\u015fkin ba\u015fkaca bir karar verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
38. Bunun \u00fczerine 8\/2\/2022 tarihinde mevcut ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin olarak bireysel ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
39. Komisyonca 2022\/20069 ve 2022\/20108 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvurular\u0131n 2022\/21079 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvuru ile birle\u015ftirilmesine, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru Sonras\u0131 Geli\u015fen Olaylar<\/p>\n
40. Dairenin karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Eski\u015fehir 1. Aile Mahkemesinde \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisi, tazminat ve nafaka talepli davan\u0131n yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na devam edilmi\u015ftir. T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn Mahkemeye sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7e ile Dairenin karar\u0131 nedeniyle 25\/3\/2016 tarihli \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine dair karar\u0131n\u0131n da kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemenin 3\/6\/2022 tarihli ara karar\u0131nda; Dairenin karar\u0131 neticesinde Eski\u015fehir 2. Aile Mahkemesince 25\/3\/2016 tarihinde verilen \u015fahsi ili\u015fki karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ayr\u0131ca bir karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
41. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 13\/4\/2023 tarihli 7. celsesine kadar ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde devam eden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n neticesinin beklenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan davada ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011finin belirlenmesi \u00fczerine Mahkemece aradan ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre de dikkate al\u0131narak velayet ve \u015fahsi ili\u015fki konusunda yeniden pedagog, psikolog ve sosyal hizmet uzman\u0131ndan olu\u015fan uzman bilirki\u015fi heyeti nezdinde g\u00f6zlem yap\u0131larak rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
42. Bu do\u011frultuda d\u00fczenlenen 18\/5\/2023 tarihli sosyal inceleme raporunda; 30\/9\/2019 tarihli rapor gere\u011fince (bkz. \u00a7 33) \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmi\u015fse de \u00e7ocu\u011fun h\u00e2lihaz\u0131rda Osmangazi \u00dcniversitesi Hastanesinde (\u00dcniversite Hastanesi) psikiyatrik tedavi g\u00f6rmekte oldu\u011fu belirtilerek an\u0131lan tedbir yerine ba\u015fvurucu ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir ili\u015fki kurulup kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi amac\u0131yla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki s\u00fcrecine ba\u015flanmadan \u00f6nce 5395 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, T.\u00d6. ve \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na olaca\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
43. Devam eden s\u00fcre\u00e7te Mahkemece \u00f6nce dosyan\u0131n karar vermek \u00fczere incelemeye al\u0131nmas\u0131na, akabinde 15\/6\/2023 tarihli 9. celsede; Dairenin karar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek taraflar hakk\u0131nda dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na ve \u00e7ocu\u011fun tedavisi ile ilgilenen hekimden \u00e7ocu\u011fun ba\u015fvurucu ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin telafisi g\u00fc\u00e7 bir sonuca yol a\u00e7\u0131p a\u00e7mayaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
44. 15\/9\/2023 tarihli dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri uygulama de\u011ferlendirme raporunda, taraflarla yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler sonucunda \u00e7ocu\u011fun ba\u015fvurucu ile sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisinin bu a\u015famada m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Mahkemece ilgili hekimden talep edilen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn olumlu olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde yeniden dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekli oldu\u011fu, aksi h\u00e2lde bu tedbire gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
45. 13\/7\/2023 tarihli 10. celsede \u00f6nceki ara karar\u0131 gereklerinin yerine getirilmesine karar verilmi\u015f; m\u00fcteakip celsede ise ba\u015fvurucu, \u00e7ocuk ve T.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda \u015fahsi ili\u015fki ve velayete ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmesi i\u00e7in \u00dcniversite Hastanesine sevk karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. \u00dcniversite Hastanesince ba\u015fvurucu ve T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn velayetine engel bir psikopatolojileri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015f, \u00e7ocu\u011fa ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlenen 22\/9\/2023 tarihli raporda ise \u00e7ocu\u011fun ba\u015fvurucu ile g\u00fcnd\u00fcz saatleriyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak ve uzman g\u00f6zetmen e\u015fli\u011finde \u015fahsi ili\u015fki kurabilece\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbirinin, taraflar\u0131n tamam\u0131 i\u00e7in de dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
46. Mahkemece 9\/11\/2023 tarihli 13. celsede Dairenin karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda 5395 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucu ve T.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda iki ay s\u00fcre ile dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri ve \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda iki ay s\u00fcre ile sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
47. Devam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan 18\/1\/2024 tarihli son celsede \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayetinin T.\u00d6.ye verilmesine, ba\u015fvurucu ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131ndaki \u015fahsi ve sosyal ili\u015fkinin temini a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan; her ay\u0131n 2. ve 4. haftas\u0131 cumartesi g\u00fcn\u00fc 10.00-17.00 saatleri aras\u0131nda, din\u00ee bayramlar\u0131n 2. ve 3. g\u00fcn\u00fc 10.00-17.00 saatleri aras\u0131nda tedbiren uzman g\u00f6zetmen e\u015fli\u011finde g\u00fcnd\u00fczl\u00fc \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine, karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde bu ili\u015fkinin devam\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karara ili\u015fkin istinaf incelemesi devam etmektedir.<\/p>\n
48. Ba\u015fvurucu, mevcut bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131na ili\u015fkin 11\/6\/2024 tarihli ek beyan\u0131nda s\u00fcreci \u00f6zetleyerek kamu kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n ve yarg\u0131 mercilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 uygulamalar\u0131 nedeniyle sekiz y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u00e7ocu\u011fu ile \u015fahsi ili\u015fki kuramad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
49. \u0130lgili hukuk i\u00e7in bkz. M.\u015e.N. (2), B. No: 2018\/27095, 4\/7\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 73-96.<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
50. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Adli Yard\u0131m Talebi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
51. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru har\u00e7 ve giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011funu belirterek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
52. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmayan adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Aile Hayat\u0131na Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
53. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine dair kararlara ra\u011fmen \u00e7ocu\u011funu g\u00f6remedi\u011fini, T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareketlerinin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yetkili makamlar\u0131n ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki konusunda gerekli \u00e7abay\u0131 g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca \u00e7ocukla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131 konusunda etkili bir hukuk yolunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131 mercilerinin \u00e7eli\u015fkili kararlar vermesi nedeniyle \u00e7ocu\u011fu ile uzun y\u0131llard\u0131r sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ileti\u015fim kuramad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
54. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; konuya ili\u015fkin mevzuata ve Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na yer verilerek somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
55. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201cHerkes, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesini isteme hakk\u0131na sahiptir. \u00d6zel hayat\u0131n ve aile hayat\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011fine dokunulamaz.\u201d<\/p>\n
56. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n “Ailenin korunmas\u0131 ve \u00e7ocuk haklar\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 41. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201cAile, T\u00fcrk toplumunun temelidir ve e\u015fler aras\u0131nda e\u015fitli\u011fe dayan\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Devlet, ailenin huzur ve refah\u0131 ile \u00f6zellikle anan\u0131n ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve aile planlamas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011fretimi ile uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in gerekli tedbirleri al\u0131r, te\u015fkilat\u0131 kurar.<\/p>\n
Her \u00e7ocuk, korunma ve bak\u0131mdan yararlanma, y\u00fcksek yarar\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131k\u00e7a, ana ve babas\u0131yla ki\u015fisel ve do\u011frudan ili\u015fki kurma ve s\u00fcrd\u00fcrme hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<\/p>\n
Devlet, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc istismara ve \u015fiddete kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 koruyucu tedbirleri al\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n
57. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 16). \u0130ddialar\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fcn, aile mahkemelerinin ara kararlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7ocu\u011funu g\u00f6rememesine ve kararlar\u0131n infaz\u0131 konusunda cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nmamas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
a. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
58. Ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
b. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
i. Genel \u0130lkeler<\/p>\n
59. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda devlet i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusu olan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck, sadece belirtilen hakka keyf\u00ee surette m\u00fcdahaleden ka\u00e7\u0131nmakla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmay\u0131p \u00f6ncelikli olan bu negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe ek olarak aile hayat\u0131na etkili bir bi\u00e7imde sayg\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri de i\u00e7ermektedir. S\u00f6z konusu pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler, bireyler aras\u0131 ili\u015fkiler alan\u0131nda olsa da aile ya\u015fam\u0131na sayg\u0131y\u0131 sa\u011flamaya y\u00f6nelik tedbirlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lar (Murat At\u0131lgan, B. No: 2013\/9047, 7\/5\/2015, \u00a7 26).<\/p>\n
60. Devletin pozitif tedbirler alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc konusunda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddeleri, ebeveynin \u00e7ocu\u011fuyla b\u00fct\u00fcnle\u015fmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ve kamusal makamlar\u0131n bu t\u00fcr tedbirleri alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir. 41. maddede her \u00e7ocu\u011fun y\u00fcksek yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131k\u00e7a anne ve babas\u0131yla ki\u015fisel ve do\u011frudan ili\u015fki kurma ve s\u00fcrd\u00fcrme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmektedir (Serpil Toros, B. No: 2013\/6382,9\/3\/2016, \u00a7 69).<\/p>\n
61. Kamusal makamlar s\u00f6z konusu aile ili\u015fkilerinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilirli\u011fi ve olay\u0131n taraflar\u0131 aras\u0131nda i\u015f birli\u011finin tesisi noktas\u0131nda kendilerinden beklenen en \u00fcst\u00fcn gayreti g\u00f6stermek zorunda olmakla birlikte bu alanda zorlay\u0131c\u0131 tedbirlere ba\u015fvurma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc t\u00fcm taraflar\u0131n menfaati, \u00f6zellikle de \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmak durumundad\u0131r. Anne veya baba ile ileti\u015fimin bu menfaatleri tehlikeye soktu\u011funun tespiti h\u00e2linde de kamusal makamlar\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu menfaatler aras\u0131nda adil bir denge tesis etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri bulunmaktad\u0131r (M.M.E. ve T.E., B. No: 2013\/2910, 5\/11\/201, \u00a7 133).<\/p>\n
62. Anne, baba ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n birlikte ya\u015fama hakk\u0131 aile hayat\u0131n\u0131n esasl\u0131 bir unsuru olup anne ve baba taraf\u0131ndan di\u011fer e\u015fe tan\u0131nan velayet ve ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki haklar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde engellenmesi durumunda da devletin bireylerin haklar\u0131n\u0131 koruyan d\u00fczenleyici yarg\u0131sal bir \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131 ve fiilen hayata ge\u00e7irilecek uygun tedbirlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin bir g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda velayet ve ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisine dair kararlar\u0131n icras\u0131na ili\u015fkin problemler, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren \u00f6nemli bir dava grubudur (Marcus Frank Cerny [GK], B. No: 2013\/5126, 2\/7\/2015, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
63. Bu kapsamda \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmek suretiyle devletin yasal bir altyap\u0131 kurma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulundu\u011funu ve \u00e7ocu\u011fun geli\u015fimini olumsuz y\u00f6nde etkileyebilecek hususlar\u0131 en aza indiren y\u00f6ntemlerle ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki sa\u011flanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmek gerekir.<\/p>\n
64. \u00d6te yandan mevzuat\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131yla ilgili sorunlar\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6zmek \u00f6ncelikle yarg\u0131 mercilerinin yetkisi ve sorumluluk alan\u0131ndad\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 ba\u015fvuru konusu dava a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan en \u00f6nemli unsur olup olay\u0131n t\u00fcm taraflar\u0131 ile do\u011frudan temas h\u00e2linde bulunan yarg\u0131 mercilerinin olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmek a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan daha avantajl\u0131 konumda bulundu\u011fu da tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesinin rol\u00fc ise bu kurallar\u0131n yorumunun Anayasa\u2019ya uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirlemekle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle Anayasa Mahkemesi, yarg\u0131 mercileri taraf\u0131ndan izlenen usul\u00fc denetlemekte ve \u00f6zellikle mahkemelerin ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na ve velayete ili\u015fkin mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini yorumlay\u0131p uygularken Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddelerindeki g\u00fcvenceleri g\u00f6zetip g\u00f6zetmedi\u011fini incelemektedir (M.M.E. ve T.E., B. No: 2013\/2910, 5\/11\/2015, \u00a7 135).<\/p>\n
ii. \u0130lkelerin Olaya Uygulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n
65. Ba\u015fvurucu baba taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ocu\u011fu ile ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurma hakk\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun annesince engellendi\u011fi, yarg\u0131 mercilerince \u00e7eli\u015fkili kararlar verilmesi ve gerekli tedbirlerin al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilmektedir. Bu iddia kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu icra s\u00fcrecindeki takip i\u015flemleri, ilgili mahkemelerin ve icra dairesinin tutumu, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci gibi bir dizi kamusal i\u015flem ve eylemlerin bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. Bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirme, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisinde kamusal makamlarca \u00fcstlenilmesi gereken pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin yerine getirilip getirilmedi\u011fini sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ortaya koyabilir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. M.\u015e.N. (2), \u00a7 109).<\/p>\n
66. Ba\u015fvurucunun bo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce \u015fahsi ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti\u011fi veilgili Aile Mahkemesince verilen 25\/3\/2016 tarihli kararla ba\u015fvurucu ile \u00e7ocu\u011fu aras\u0131nda \u015fahsi ili\u015fkinin tesis edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan karara ra\u011fmen T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn \u00e7ocu\u011fu ka\u00e7\u0131rmaya y\u00f6nelik eylemleri nedeniyle \u015fahsi ili\u015fki karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ancak \u0130cra Mahkemesinin karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun 20\/7\/2020 tarihli tutanak ile belirlenen d\u00f6neme kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrede T.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle yaln\u0131zca s\u00f6z konusu tarihte ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tespit edilen eylem gere\u011fince yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanabilece\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 9).<\/p>\n
67. Di\u011fer taraftan ba\u015fvurucunun -iddia olunan- \u015fiddet i\u00e7erikli davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 nedeniyle aile mahkemelerince 6284 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda tedbir kararlar\u0131 verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Her ne kadar Eski\u015fehir 5. Aile Mahkemesinin 20\/9\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131nda (bkz. \u00a7 26) tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015fse de taraflar aras\u0131ndaki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda verilen 21\/11\/2019 tarihli karar ile ba\u015fvurucu ve \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda yeniden ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesis edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim \u0130cra Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 20\/12\/2020 tarihinde T.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda tazyik hapsine karar verildi\u011fi de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda mahkemelerin ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7ocu\u011fuyla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde gereken \u00f6ncelikli ad\u0131mlar\u0131 att\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
68. Bununla birlikte an\u0131lan tazyik hapsine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n ivedi \u015fekilde uygulanamamas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu karara y\u00f6nelik kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebine ve mevzuatta yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Nitekim kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebinin reddedilmesinin ve mevzuat de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin ard\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan uyarlama yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n sonucunda T.\u00d6.n\u00fcn \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn disiplin hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
69. \u00d6te yandan 7\/9\/2018 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda \u015fahsi ili\u015fki tesisine karar verilmi\u015fse de Dairece, A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucunun beklenmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaati ile istinaf talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda verilen karan\u0131n hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 koruma amac\u0131yla hareket etti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
70. B\u00f6ylelikle yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde yarg\u0131 mercilerinin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u00f6zellikle \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zeten ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda di\u011fer aile bireylerinin haklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin kurulmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak nitelikte kararlar verdikleri sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
71. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddelerinin ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130 TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
C. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
D. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmesine 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/21079 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 H.\u00d6. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/21079) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 10\/1\/2025 – 32778 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI VER\u0130LD\u0130 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR Raport\u00f6r : \u00c7a\u011flar \u00d6NCEL Ba\u015fvurucu : H.\u00d6. \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, mahkeme kararlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesis edilememesi ve bu hususta cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedenleriyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 8\/2\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc sunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekleri ile Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) \u00fczerinden temin edilen belgelere g\u00f6re olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Ba\u015fvurucu ile T.\u00d6. 27\/10\/2013 tarihinde evlenmi\u015ftir. Bu evlilikten 29\/12\/2014 do\u011fumlu m\u00fc\u015fterek bir \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. A. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru \u00d6ncesi Olaylar 1. \u00c7ocukla Ki\u015fisel \u0130li\u015fki Kurulmas\u0131 Amac\u0131yla Ba\u015fvurucunun A\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 Davayla \u0130lgili S\u00fcre\u00e7 6. Ba\u015fvurucu, e\u015finin m\u00fc\u015fterek konuttan ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine 25\/3\/2016 tarihinde ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkinin tesisi amac\u0131yla Eski\u015fehir …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n