T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
M.\u015e.A. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/14078)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 3\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan SARA\u00c7<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
M.\u015e.A.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve ceza infaz kurumundaki k\u00f6t\u00fc ko\u015fullar ve h\u00fccre disiplin cezas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bal\u0131kesir 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince h\u00fckmedilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 nedeniyle bireysel ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla T\u00fcrko\u011flu 1 No.lu L Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucuya haftal\u0131k spor faaliyeti etkinli\u011finde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 topla demir kap\u0131 \u00fczerinde bulunan ikaz lambas\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulunca 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 44. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca iki g\u00fcn s\u00fcre ile h\u00fccreye koyma disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Kahramanmara\u015f \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde lambay\u0131 kasten k\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u015fut \u00e7ekmesi neticesinde istemeden topun ikaz lambas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade eden ba\u015fvurucu; duru\u015fmada bizatihi savunma yapmak istedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 11\/2\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…07\/01\/2020 tarihli tutanak incelendi\u011finde; h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn hal\u0131 saha faaliyeti esnas\u0131nda futbol topunun de\u011fmesi sonucu kap\u0131 ikaz lambas\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hasar\u0131n 110 TL oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn maddi zarar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak istemedi\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
… h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn futbol ma\u00e7\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 esnada kurumun ikaz uyar\u0131 lambas\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve olu\u015fan maddi zarar\u0131 da kar\u015f\u0131lamak istemedi\u011fini, itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde de meydana gelen olay\u0131 kasti ve bilerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmedi\u011fini beyan etse de; 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 CGT\u0130HK 44\/2-a maddesinin kurum tesislerine ara\u00e7 ve gere\u00e7lerine zarar vermek lafz\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7erdi\u011fi, bu haliyle verilen zarar\u0131n kas\u0131tl\u0131 olmasa da madde h\u00fckm\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla … 2 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma cezas\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na dair a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur.”<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz da Kahramanmara\u015f 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 16\/3\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin cezas\u0131 27-29\/3\/2020 tarihleri aras\u0131nda infaz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Nihai karar\u0131n 23\/3\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu 14\/4\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lama imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak, ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. S\u00f6zl\u00fc Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu; Disiplin Kurulunca hakk\u0131nda verilen disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yette ve bu Mahkemenin verdi\u011fi ret karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131nda duru\u015fmada s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma yapmak istedi\u011fini beyan etmesine ra\u011fmen Mahkemenin dosya \u00fczerinden inceleme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k)g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, konuya ili\u015fkin olarak Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na yer verildikten sonra, yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmelerde bu i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi, somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikteki ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 Talet \u015eanl\u0131 [GK] (B. No: 2017\/20526, 17\/1\/2023) karar\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda 16\/5\/2001 tarihli ve 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun 6. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cDisiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine infaz h\u00e2kimi, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131ktan ve talep edilen di\u011fer delilleri toplay\u0131p de\u011ferlendirdikten sonra karar\u0131n\u0131 verir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklu, savunmas\u0131n\u0131, haz\u0131r bulunmak ve vekaletnamesini ibraz etmek ko\u015fuluyla avukat\u0131yla birlikte veya avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yapabilir. \u0130nfaz h\u00e2kimi gerekli g\u00f6rmesi durumunda h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda da alabilir.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f, s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fckm\u00fcn esas olarak disiplin cezalar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce ilgilinin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n infaz h\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan dinlenmesini ve talep edilen di\u011fer delillerin toplan\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesini gerektirdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ya da tutuklunun mahkeme huzurunda bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n usul hukuku ba\u011flam\u0131nda duru\u015fma veya farkl\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerle sa\u011flanabilece\u011fine, nitekim an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019da infaz h\u00e2kiminin s\u00f6z konusu savunmay\u0131 duru\u015fma a\u00e7mak suretiyle ya da duru\u015fma yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n odas\u0131nda veya duru\u015fma salonunda yahut ceza infaz kurumunda almas\u0131na imk\u00e2n tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edilen kararda, Kanun\u2019da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00f6z konusu usuldeki temel amac\u0131n disiplin yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 uygulanan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ya da tutuklunun h\u00e2kim kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda meram\u0131n\u0131 anlatabilmesini, dosyada aleyhine olan delillere etkili bir \u015fekilde kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kabilmesini sa\u011flamak oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu tespit ve de\u011ferlendirmeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kararda; 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 6. maddesinde disiplin cezalar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette ba\u015fvurucuya, savunmas\u0131n\u0131 h\u00e2kim \u00f6n\u00fcnde bizzat haz\u0131r bulunmak suretiyle veya avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla dile getirme imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin ba\u015fvurucunun bu y\u00f6ndeki talebini dikkate almaks\u0131z\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetin esas\u0131n\u0131 dosya \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendirerek karara ba\u011flamas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleyi kanunilik unsurundan yoksun b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Talet \u015eanl\u0131, \u00a7\u00a7 48-69).<\/p>\n
15. Somut ba\u015fvuruda da ba\u015fvurucunun ba\u015ftan itibaren yarg\u0131sal makamlar \u00f6n\u00fcnde s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak savunma yapmak istedi\u011fine dair taleplerinin bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, yarg\u0131sal merciler taraf\u0131ndan bu hakk\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Talet \u015eanl\u0131 karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucunun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda; yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemelerin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tarafl\u0131 olarak karar verdi\u011fi, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi, disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ilgili tutanaklar ile di\u011fer belgelere ula\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yarg\u0131 mercilerinin kararlar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011fu \u015feklinde \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin de bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle birlikte adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 g\u00f6zetilerek belirtilen \u015fik\u00e2yetler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu; basit bir olay nedeniyle iki g\u00fcn h\u00fccre disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu cezan\u0131n insanl\u0131k onuruyla ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu bunun yan\u0131nda; cezan\u0131n infaz edildi\u011fi disiplin ko\u011fu\u015funun ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok k\u00f6t\u00fc oldu\u011funu, hijyenden yoksun oldu\u011funu, kas\u0131tl\u0131 baz\u0131 eylemlerle cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n kendisi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, pandemi d\u00f6neminde bu ko\u015fullarda h\u00fccre cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz edilmesinin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele te\u015fkil etti\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
19. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, konuya ili\u015fkin olarak Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na yer verildikten sonra yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmelerde bu i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda hukuka uygun olarak ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131ndan mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131lan tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler, genel olarak Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin ortak alan\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kalan di\u011fer temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlere sahiptir. Bununla birlikte ceza infaz kurumunda tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz sonucu olarak su\u00e7un \u00f6nlenmesi ve disiplinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gibi ceza infaz kurumunda g\u00fcvenli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kabul edilebilir makul gerekliliklerin oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde sahip olunan haklar s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir (Turan G\u00fcnana,B. No: 2013\/3550, 19\/11\/2014, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi, ceza infaz kurumunda tutulan bir mahpusun i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu \u015fartlar\u0131n insan onuruna yak\u0131\u015f\u0131r bir \u015fekilde olmas\u0131n\u0131 da koruma alt\u0131na almaktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple infaz\u0131n y\u00f6ntemi ve infaz s\u00fcrecindeki davran\u0131\u015flar, mahpuslara \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckten mahrum kalman\u0131n do\u011fal sonucu olan ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz elem seviyesinden daha fazla s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 veya eziyet vermemelidir (Turan G\u00fcnana, \u00a7 39).<\/p>\n
22. Tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi iddialar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndensa\u011flanmas\u0131 gereken bir ba\u015fvuru yolunun etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusuyolun ihlali \u00f6nleyebilmesi ve tamamlay\u0131c\u0131 bir unsur olarak tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan zarar g\u00f6ren ki\u015filere makul bir tazminat imk\u00e2n\u0131 sunabilmesi gerekir. E\u015f ifadeyle yol, \u00f6nleyici ve telafi edici niteli\u011fe sahip olmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet edilen tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131 ortadan kalkmam\u0131\u015f ise yaln\u0131zca telafi edici yollar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalan ki\u015filere yap\u0131lanlar\u0131 k\u0131smen veya z\u0131mnen me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015f ve devletin tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 standartlara y\u00fckseltme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kabul edilemez bir \u015fekilde azaltm\u0131\u015f olur (K.A.[GK], B. No: 2014\/13044, 11\/11\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72).<\/p>\n
23. \u015eik\u00e2yet edilen tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131; ki\u015finin disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n sona ermesi,ki\u015finin tahliye edilmesi veya ko\u015fullar\u0131n sonradan d\u00fczeltilmesi gibi bir nedenle sona ermi\u015f ise art\u0131k tutulmadan kaynaklanan ihlalin devam etti\u011fi s\u00f6ylenemez. Ayr\u0131ca sona eren tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n gelece\u011fe y\u00f6nelik olarak d\u00fczeltilmesinin istenmesinde hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu itibarla h\u00fccre disiplin cezalar\u0131n infaz edilen mahpuslar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mevcut ihlali \u00f6nleyici ya da tutma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n gelece\u011fe y\u00f6nelik olarak d\u00fczeltilmesini temin edici hukuk yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 anlam\u0131n\u0131 yitirmekte, bu durumda u\u011fran\u0131lan zararlar\u0131 tazmin edici mekanizmalar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeterli h\u00e2le gelmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fccre disiplin cezas\u0131 sona eren mahpuslar\u0131n, disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz edildi\u011fi s\u00fcre\u00e7teki tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan etkili hukuk yolunun tazminat davas\u0131 yolu oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir (idari g\u00f6zetimi sona eren yabanc\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. B.T. [GK], B. No: 2014\/15769, 30\/11\/2017, \u00a7 49).<\/p>\n
24. Somut olayda haftal\u0131k spor faaliyeti etkinli\u011finde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 topla demir kap\u0131 \u00fczerinde bulunan ikaz lambas\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucuya iki g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle h\u00fccreye koyma disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015f ve bu ceza infaz edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; iki g\u00fcn h\u00fccre cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, bu cezan\u0131n infaz edilme \u015fartlar\u0131 ve disiplin ko\u011fu\u015funun fiziki ko\u015fullar\u0131nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikteba\u015fvurucu, tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n sona ermesinin sonras\u0131nda tazminat davas\u0131 yolunu t\u00fcketti\u011fine dair herhangi bir bilgi ve belge sunmam\u0131\u015f, bahsi ge\u00e7en yolun etkisiz oldu\u011funu da \u00f6ne s\u00fcrmemi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucunun hukuk sisteminde mevcut yarg\u0131sal yollar\u0131 t\u00fcketmeden ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle, ba\u015fvurucunun k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine dair iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ile yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 1.000 TL maddi ve 100.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir. (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
28. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun manevi tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin de reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
C. 1. S\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
D. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK BULUNMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Kahramanmara\u015f \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2020\/278, K.2020\/287) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 3\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 3\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/14078 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 M.\u015e.A. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/14078) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 3\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Hasan SARA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : M.\u015e.A. \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve ceza infaz kurumundaki k\u00f6t\u00fc ko\u015fullar ve h\u00fccre disiplin cezas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bal\u0131kesir 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince h\u00fckmedilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 nedeniyle bireysel ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla T\u00fcrko\u011flu 1 No.lu L Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) bulunmaktad\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucuya haftal\u0131k spor faaliyeti etkinli\u011finde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 topla demir kap\u0131 \u00fczerinde bulunan ikaz lambas\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulunca 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 44. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca iki g\u00fcn s\u00fcre ile h\u00fccreye koyma disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Kahramanmara\u015f \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde lambay\u0131 kasten k\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n