T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
O\u011eUZ \u00c7EL\u0130KO\u011eLU BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/37438)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan SARA\u00c7<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
O\u011fuz \u00c7EL\u0130KO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumu taraf\u0131ndan verilen disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itirazda davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Band\u0131rma 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda \u0130nfaz Kurumunda baz\u0131 mahpuslar ile kavga etmesi nedeniyle disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda kavgaya kar\u0131\u015fan ba\u015fvurucu ile birlikte di\u011fer iki ki\u015finin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu) 2\/4\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya “h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131 daha az cezay\u0131 gerektiren \u015fekilde kasten yaralamak” eylemi nedeniyle (3) g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma disiplin cezas\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Disiplin Kurulu karar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya 7\/4\/2021 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz Kurumu s\u00f6z konusu Disiplin Kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 48. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nn (a) bendi gere\u011fince onaylanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Band\u0131rma \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 24\/6\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki (3) g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 onaylam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; 16\/5\/2001 tarihli ve 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi Kanunu’nun 5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle bu karar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi tarihten itibaren s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde \u015fik\u00e2yet yoluyla infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, an\u0131lan karar 7\/4\/2021 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi h\u00e2lde ba\u015fvurucunun karara itiraz etmedi\u011fi, bu itibarla Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu cezan\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131 talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesinin gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131na dair bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 Band\u0131rma A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) itiraz etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde, ilgili Disiplin Kurulu karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet yoluna ba\u015fvurdu\u011funu ancak buna dair dilek\u00e7esinin \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan yok edildi\u011fini, dilek\u00e7esinin i\u015fleme al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu 7\/7\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. \u0130tiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren Band\u0131rma A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) 12\/7\/2021 tarihinde, karar\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131nda verilen s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine iletilmek \u00fczere \u0130nfaz Kurumuna teslim etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinin Kurum taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine g\u00f6nderilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla Band\u0131rma Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) 27\/12\/2021 tarihinde su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 25\/1\/2022 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun soyut iddias\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyonca, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lama imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak, ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu, ilgili disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde itiraz etmesine ra\u011fmen dilek\u00e7esinin kayda al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n kaybedildi\u011fini, itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde de buna ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n\u0131 dile getirmesine ra\u011fmen yarg\u0131sal mercilerce ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 b\u00f6ylece adil yarg\u0131lanma ve etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
13. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n\u0131 soyut bir \u015fekilde ifade etti\u011fi, bu hakk\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l ve ne \u015fekilde etkilendi\u011fi hususunda yeterli a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun ne \u015fekilde bir ma\u011fduriyet ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve dezavantajl\u0131 duruma d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yeterince ortaya koyup koymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekilen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca, yarg\u0131sal mercilerin kararlar\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e bulundu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvencesini de kapsamaktad\u0131r (daha geni\u015f de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Abdullah Top\u00e7u, B. No: 2014\/8868, 19\/4\/2017, \u00a7 75). Nitekim Anayasa’n\u0131n 141. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cB\u00fct\u00fcn mahkemelerin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d denilerek mahkemelere kararlar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli yazma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00fcklenmi\u015ftir. Mahkemelerin an\u0131lan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, yarg\u0131lamada ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen her t\u00fcrl\u00fc iddia ve savunmaya karar gerek\u00e7esinde ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 yan\u0131t vermesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lamaz. Ancak mahkemeler, kendilerine sunulan t\u00fcm iddialara yan\u0131t vermek zorunda de\u011filse de (Yasemin Ek\u015fi, B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 56) mahkemelerin davan\u0131n esas sorunlar\u0131n\u0131 inceledikleri gerek\u00e7eli karardan anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir kararda tam olarak hangi unsurlar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi davan\u0131n niteli\u011fine ve \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Muhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k ve somut bir bi\u00e7imde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde davayla do\u011frudan ilgili olan bu hususlara mahkemelerce makul bir gerek\u00e7e ile yan\u0131t verilmesi gerekir (Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7 35). Aksi bir tutumla mahkemenin davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili oldu\u011funu kabul etti\u011fi bir husus hakk\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli bir yan\u0131t vermemesi veya yan\u0131t vermeyi gerektiren usul veya esasa dair iddialar\u0131 cevaps\u0131z b\u0131rakmas\u0131 hak ihlaline neden olabilecektir (Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 39).<\/p>\n
17. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucu disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde itirazda bulundu\u011fu, buna ra\u011fmen \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinin \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fleme konulup \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine g\u00f6nderilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131nda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine sundu\u011fu itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bu iddia dile getirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne etki edebilecek nitelikteki bu iddia hakk\u0131nda yarg\u0131 mercilerince herhangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve de\u011ferlendirmede bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu itibarla, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonucuna etkili olabilecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 bir iddia ve itiraz\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Di\u011fer taraftan bu ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Zira gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, taraflara yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kurallara uygun bi\u00e7imde incelenip incelenmedi\u011fini bilmelerine imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayan bir hak olup yarg\u0131lama sonucuna y\u00f6nelik bir teminat sa\u011flamaz. Bu itibarla Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtti\u011fi ihlal gerek\u00e7elerini g\u00f6zeterek ve s\u00f6z konusu iddiayla ilgili olarak yeniden bir de\u011ferlendirme yaparak gereken karar\u0131 vermek yine yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin takdirindedir.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu; yeniden yarg\u0131lama talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Band\u0131rma \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2021\/1838, K. 2021\/1943) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/37438 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 O\u011eUZ \u00c7EL\u0130KO\u011eLU BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/37438) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Hasan SARA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : O\u011fuz \u00c7EL\u0130KO\u011eLU \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumu taraf\u0131ndan verilen disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itirazda davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Band\u0131rma 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda \u0130nfaz Kurumunda baz\u0131 mahpuslar ile kavga etmesi nedeniyle disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda kavgaya kar\u0131\u015fan ba\u015fvurucu ile birlikte di\u011fer iki ki\u015finin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu) 2\/4\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya “h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131 daha az cezay\u0131 gerektiren \u015fekilde kasten yaralamak” eylemi nedeniyle (3) g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma disiplin cezas\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. 4. Disiplin Kurulu karar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya 7\/4\/2021 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz Kurumu s\u00f6z konusu Disiplin Kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 48. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nn (a) bendi gere\u011fince onaylanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n