T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
ABDULLAH MUTLU DANI\u015eMAN BA\u015eVURUSU (2)<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/21556)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan SARA\u00c7<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Abdullah Mutlu DANI\u015eMAN<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mahir ORAK<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, tarafs\u0131z ko\u011fu\u015fa ge\u00e7me talebinin reddine ili\u015fkin olarak ceza infaz kurumu idaresi taraf\u0131ndan verilen kararda kullan\u0131lan ifadeler nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu; Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma, kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131na doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan \u0130zmir 3 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) bireysel ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak tutulmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu; Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (\u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu) sundu\u011fu 14\/1\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile kuruma giri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilk g\u00fcnden beri ceza infaz kurumunun uygun g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ko\u011fu\u015fta kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dilek\u00e7e tarihi itibar\u0131yla ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lusu tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclere ayr\u0131lan tarafl\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fta oldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, daha \u00f6nce tarafl\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fun ne oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fini, ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde de hi\u00e7bir olumsuz tutum ve davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ederek denetime tabi tutularak ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z\/tarafs\u0131z ko\u011fu\u015fa ge\u00e7me talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu 1\/2\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun talebinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
” Tutuklu Abdullah Mutlu DANI\u015eMAN’\u0131n talebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden durum de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, kurumumuza giri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 10.05.2017 tarihinden bu yana su\u00e7 grubuna mensup ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lusu tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclere ayr\u0131lan tarafl\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015flarda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, FET\u00d6\/PDY ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne sempatisinin devam etti\u011fi, an\u0131lan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc i\u00e7erisinde aktif \u00fcye oldu\u011fu, tarafs\u0131z ko\u011fu\u015fa ge\u00e7me talep dilek\u00e7esinde yer alan beyan\u0131n\u0131n samimi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir pi\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, uzun s\u00fcren infaz s\u00fcrecinin sonlar\u0131na do\u011fru ger\u00e7ek niyetini gizleyerek s\u0131rf a\u00e7\u0131k infaz kurumuna veya denetimli serbestli\u011fe ayr\u0131lmak i\u00e7in tarafs\u0131z ko\u011fu\u015fa ge\u00e7me talebinde bulundu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde icrai bir harekette bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve aktif bir \u00e7aba i\u00e7erisine girmedi\u011fi, daha \u00f6nce kuruma \u00e7e\u015fitli ama\u00e7larla vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu di\u011fer dilek\u00e7elerinde de bir pi\u015fmanl\u0131\u011fa rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylelikle tarafs\u0131z ko\u011fu\u015fa ge\u00e7me talebinde bulunurken s\u00f6z konusu beyan\u0131n\u0131n samimi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortada oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, azami 60 g\u00fcnl\u00fck bir deneme s\u00fcresine tabi tutulmaks\u0131z\u0131n talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaat ve neticesine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. …”<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan verilen bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet yoluyla Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetini inceleyen \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 10\/2\/2021 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yetin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…Hakimli\u011fimizce yap\u0131lan incelemede, tutuklunun ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ko\u011fu\u015fa ge\u00e7meyi talep etti\u011fi, ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131ndaki yo\u011funluk, kapasite doluluklar\u0131, fiziki imkan yetersizlikleri ile tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin bakiye ceza s\u00fcreleri ve su\u00e7 t\u00fcrlerine g\u00f6re grupland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi hususunun bilindi\u011fi, kuruma g\u00f6zlem yapma, de\u011fi\u015fiklikte bulunma ve karar vermede takdir yetkisi tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu takdir yetkisinin k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair somut herhangi bir delil ve\/veya olay\u0131n dosyam\u0131z aras\u0131na girmedi\u011fi, ‘talepte bulunan halen tutuklu olup h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu a\u015fmada a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa ayr\u0131lma konusunda de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lam\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131’ g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle, \u0130zmir 3 Nolu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen 01\/02\/2021 tarih 2021\/462 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu vicdani kanaati ile, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine dair a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir. …”<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan verilen bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) nezdinde itiraz etmi\u015ftir. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, 8\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc s\u0131fat\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Karar\u0131n 31\/3\/2021 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu 29\/4\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulunun kendisi hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi kararda yer alan ifadelerin (bkz. \u00a7 3) masumiyet karinesini ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
9. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, masumiyet karinesine ili\u015fkin Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi ile Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na yer verdikten sonra yap\u0131lacak bu de\u011ferlendirmelerde bu i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilirken \u00f6zellikle hukuk ve idari yarg\u0131lama bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gereken \u00f6nemli hususlardan biri, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan makam\u0131n ilgili ki\u015fiye su\u00e7 isnat edip etmedi\u011fi ve ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 sorgulay\u0131p sorgulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Kamu otoriteleri veya g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ki\u015fiyle ilgili olarak yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci bir mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcyle kesinlik kazanmadan su\u00e7lulu\u011fa dair herhangi bir kanaat ifade edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ya da ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyet d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir kararla sona ermesine ra\u011fmen sona ermeye ili\u015fkin kararda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7lu olabilece\u011finin ifade edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 durumunda masumiyet karinesinin ihlali s\u00f6z konusu olabilecektir. Bu kapsamda karar vericilerin kulland\u0131klar\u0131 dil kritik \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r (Mustafa Ak\u0131n, B. No: 2013\/2696, 9\/9\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 38, 39).<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m G\u00fcven\u00e7 (B. No: 2017\/32945, 11\/2\/2021) karar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131 devam etmekteyken ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulunca tehlikeli tutuklu stat\u00fcs\u00fc grubuna d\u00e2hil edilmesine ili\u015fkin karardaki ifadeleri de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi mezk\u00fbr karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ifadelerin su\u00e7lulu\u011fa dair bir kanaat ifade etti\u011fi ve bu anlamda masumiyet karinesini zedeler nitelikte oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (an\u0131lan kararda bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 58-61).<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u0130smet Karabulut (2) (B. No. 2020\/24390, 5\/10\/2023)karar\u0131nda da ilk derece mahkemesince mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilen fakat h\u00fckm\u00fcn kanun yollar\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu bir h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fcn\u00fcn benzer \u015fik\u00e2yetlerine ili\u015fkin olarak, hakk\u0131nda yarg\u0131lama devam etti\u011finden karar kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e karar\u0131n hangi a\u015famada (ilk derece, istinaf yahut temyiz) oldu\u011funun masumiyet karinesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir \u00f6neminin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131nda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmeden ba\u015fvurucunun aktif \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olarak nitelendirilmesi nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemesine konu somut olayda da \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ”an\u0131lan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc i\u00e7erisinde aktif \u00fcye oldu\u011fu,.. \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde icrai bir harekette bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve aktif bir \u00e7aba i\u00e7erisine girmedi\u011fi” \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirmelerde bulunmu\u015ftur. Mevcut ba\u015fvuruda da bireysel ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmeyen h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fc ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda aktif \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011funa dair ifadelere yer verilmesi nedeniyle mevcut i\u00e7tihatlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir husus bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. ve 38. maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edilmesi nedeniyle 100.000 TL maddi ve 100.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
17. \u0130ncelenen ba\u015fvuruda ceza infaz kurumu idaresi taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan kararda kullan\u0131lan ifadeler nedeniyle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinin birinci ve 38. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. \u0130hlal \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zleme Kurulu karar\u0131 ile ona at\u0131f yapan \u0130nfaz Hakimli\u011fi karar\u0131ndan kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda masumiyet karinesinin ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi mahkemece yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
19. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesi ile 38. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan masumiyet karinesinin \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin masumiyet karinesinin ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 1. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2021\/1162, K.2021\/1163) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 18.800 TL vekalet \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/21556 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 ABDULLAH MUTLU DANI\u015eMAN BA\u015eVURUSU (2) (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/21556) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/9\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Hasan SARA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : Abdullah Mutlu DANI\u015eMAN Vekili : Av. Mahir ORAK \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, tarafs\u0131z ko\u011fu\u015fa ge\u00e7me talebinin reddine ili\u015fkin olarak ceza infaz kurumu idaresi taraf\u0131ndan verilen kararda kullan\u0131lan ifadeler nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu; Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma, kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131na doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan \u0130zmir 3 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) bireysel ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak tutulmaktad\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu; Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (\u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu) sundu\u011fu 14\/1\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile kuruma giri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilk g\u00fcnden beri ceza infaz kurumunun uygun g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ko\u011fu\u015fta kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dilek\u00e7e tarihi itibar\u0131yla ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lusu tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclere ayr\u0131lan tarafl\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fta oldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, daha \u00f6nce tarafl\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fun ne oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fini, ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde de hi\u00e7bir olumsuz tutum ve davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ederek denetime tabi tutularak ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z\/tarafs\u0131z …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n