T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
CEM\u0130L EL\u00c7\u0130 VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2018\/10582)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Olcay \u00d6ZCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Cemil EL\u00c7\u0130 ve di\u011ferleri (bkz. ekli tablo)<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Vedat BARUT<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ilgili mevzuat uyar\u0131nca hak sahibi olarak tespit edilen depremzedelere kal\u0131c\u0131 konut tahsis edilmemesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvurucular nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc farkl\u0131 tarihlerde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra s\u00fcresinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
2. Komisyon taraf\u0131ndan 8\/8\/2019 tarihinde 2018\/25829, 2018\/26202, 2018\/27039, 2018\/27052, 2018\/27638, 2018\/27646, 2018\/27651, 2018\/29202, 2018\/29218, 2018\/29227, 2018\/29290, 2018\/29688, 2018\/31444, 2018\/31455, 2018\/35589, 2018\/35848, 2018\/35860, 2018\/35867, 2018\/35984, 2018\/36034, 2018\/36071, 2018\/36145, 2019\/386, 2019\/387, 2019\/391, 2019\/506, 2019\/507, 2019\/508 ve 2019\/9090 say\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015fvurular\u0131n 2018\/10582 say\u0131l\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmesine ve incelemenin 2018\/10582 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucular, bireysel ba\u015fvuru har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layacak gelirleri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmayan adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurucu Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z’\u0131n \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131 <\/p>\n
5. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 51. maddesi ile Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) 83. maddesi gere\u011fi ba\u015fvurucunun istismar edici, yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 ve benzeri nitelikteki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131yla bireysel ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a k\u00f6t\u00fcye kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvuru reddedilir ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ilgilinin 2.000 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131ndan fazla olmamak \u00fczere disiplin para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilir.<\/p>\n
6. An\u0131lan d\u00fczenlemelerde, genel olarak bir hakk\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ama\u00e7 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ve ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131 zarara sokacak \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuk d\u00fczenince himaye edilmeyece\u011fini ifade eden hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvuru alan\u0131nda \u00f6zel olarak ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu ba\u011flamda bireysel ba\u015fvuru usul\u00fcn\u00fcn amac\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan ve Anayasa Mahkemesinin ba\u015fvuruyu gere\u011fi gibi incelemesini engelleyen davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (S.\u00d6., B. No: 2013\/7087, 18\/9\/2014, \u00a7 28; Mehmet G\u00fcven Ulusoy [GK], B. No: 2013\/1013, 2\/7\/2015, \u00a7 31).<\/p>\n
7. Bu kapsamda \u00f6zellikle Anayasa Mahkemesini yan\u0131ltmak amac\u0131yla ger\u00e7ek olmayan maddi vakalara dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 veya bu nitelikte bilgi ve belge sunulmas\u0131, ba\u015fvurunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi noktas\u0131nda esasl\u0131 olan bir unsur hakk\u0131nda bilgi verilmemesi, ba\u015fvurunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi s\u00fcrecinde vuku bulan ve s\u00f6z konusu de\u011ferlendirmeyi etkileyecek nitelikte yeni ve \u00f6nemli geli\u015fmeler hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesinin bilgilendirilmemesi suretiyle ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131nda do\u011fru bir kanaat olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi, medeni ve me\u015fru ele\u015ftiri s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla bireysel ba\u015fvuru amac\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak surette hakaret, tehdit veya tahrik edici bir \u00fcslup kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu ba\u015fvuru yolu kapsam\u0131nda ihlalin tespiti ile ihlal ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ama\u00e7la ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak surette i\u00e7eriksiz bir ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilebilecektir (S.\u00d6., \u00a7 29; Mehmet G\u00fcven Ulusoy, \u00a7 32; Osman Sand\u0131k\u00e7\u0131, B. No: 2013\/6297, 10\/3\/2016; Selman Kapan ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/7302, 20\/4\/2016).<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z 2\/8\/2018 tarihinde vefat etmi\u015ftir. Buna ra\u011fmen Av. Vedat Barut 5\/12\/2018 tarihinde Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z’\u0131n anayasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvuru formunda Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z’\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden bahsetmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Kamu g\u00fcc\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan hakk\u0131 ihlal edilen ki\u015finin bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapmadan \u00f6nce \u00f6lmesi durumunda \u00f6len ki\u015fi ad\u0131na bir ba\u015fkas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r (Abdurrehman Uray, B. No: 2013\/6140, 5\/11\/2014, \u00a7 30).<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvuru tarihinden \u00f6nce vefat etmi\u015f ba\u015fvurucu ad\u0131na vek\u00e2let ili\u015fkisi sona ermi\u015f olan avukat taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Bu durumda Av. Vedat Barut hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesini yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte ba\u015fvuru yapmas\u0131 nedeniyle 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 51. maddesi ve \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 83. maddesi uyar\u0131nca takdiren 2.000 TL disiplin para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Ba\u015fvurucular Cemil El\u00e7i, Selhattin Pekdo\u011fan, Mehmet Yuva, H\u00fcsna Bing\u00f6l ve Hava Tuta\u015f’\u0131n \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131 <\/p>\n
12. 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 49. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n incelenmesinde, bu Kanun ve \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fckte h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan h\u00e2llerde ilgili usul kanunlar\u0131n\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fine uygun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
13. \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn 84. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n incelenmesinde, kararlar\u0131n infaz\u0131nda Kanun ve \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fckte h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan h\u00e2llerde ilgili usul kanunlar\u0131n\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fine uygun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
14. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun “Dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda taraflardan birinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 55. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Taraflardan birinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc h\u00e2linde, miras\u00e7\u0131lar miras\u0131 kabul veya reddetmemi\u015fse, bu hususta kanunla belirlenen s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7inceye kadar dava ertelenir. Bununla beraber h\u00e2kim, gecikmesinde sak\u0131nca bulunan h\u00e2llerde, talep \u00fczerine davay\u0131 takip i\u00e7in kayy\u0131m atanmas\u0131na karar verebilir.”<\/p>\n
15. 22\/11\/2001 tarihli ve 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 606. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Miras, \u00fc\u00e7 ay i\u00e7inde reddolunabilir.<\/p>\n
Bu s\u00fcre, yasal miras\u00e7\u0131lar i\u00e7in miras\u00e7\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 daha sonra \u00f6\u011frendikleri ispat edilmedik\u00e7e mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6\u011frendikleri; vasiyetname ile atanm\u0131\u015f miras\u00e7\u0131lar i\u00e7in mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n tasarrufunun kendilerine resmen bildirildi\u011fi tarihten i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar.”<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesi bireysel ba\u015fvuru devam ederken ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6lmesi durumunda \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihinden sonra makul bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde kendili\u011finden Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak ba\u015fvuruya devam etmek istedi\u011fini bildiren miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n menfaatlerinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da g\u00f6zeterek ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015ftir [di\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndan bkz. Ayten Ye\u011feno\u011flu, B. No: 2015\/1685, 23\/5\/2018 (\u00f6l\u00fcmden yakla\u015f\u0131k \u00fc\u00e7 ay sonra); Fatma \u00dclker Akkaya, B. No: 2014\/18979, 22\/2\/2018 (\u00f6l\u00fcmden iki ay sonra)]. Miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u015fvuruyu devam ettirme y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iradelerini Anayasa Mahkemesine bildirmedi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde ise d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmektedir (\u015e\u00fckran \u00c7opuraslan, B. No: 2014\/4695, 14\/9\/2017, \u00a7 22;Ha\u015fim \u00d6zpolat, B. No: 2014\/3140, 21\/9\/2017, \u00a7 19; Abbas \u00c7elik ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2014\/749, 7\/3\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 26-29; Ali Sedat Y\u00fccelik ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2015\/2574, 9\/5\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 22-25).<\/p>\n
17. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu Cemil El\u00e7i’nin 3\/4\/2018 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunduktan sonra 6\/3\/2023 tarihinde, ba\u015fvurucu Selhattin Pekdo\u011fan’\u0131n 26\/9\/2018 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunduktan sonra 23\/8\/2022 tarihinde, ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yuva’n\u0131n 27\/8\/2018 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunduktan sonra 25\/1\/2022 tarihinde, ba\u015fvurucu H\u00fcsna Bing\u00f6l’\u00fcn 26\/9\/2018 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunduktan sonra 20\/8\/2020 tarihinde ve ba\u015fvurucu Hava Tuta\u015f’\u0131n da 28\/12\/2018 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunduktan sonra 6\/10\/2019 tarihinde vefat etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n vekiline ve miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na yap\u0131lan tebligata ra\u011fmen miras\u00e7\u0131lar ba\u015fvuruyu devam ettirmek istediklerine ili\u015fkin taleplerini Anayasa Mahkemesine iletmediklerinden ve ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesini devam ettirmeyi gerekli k\u0131lan ve \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn 80. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen nedenlerden birinin de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurunun an\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden d\u00fc\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvurucular Cemil El\u00e7i, Selhattin Pekdo\u011fan, Mehmet Yuva, H\u00fcsna Bing\u00f6l ve Hava Tuta\u015f y\u00f6n\u00fcndend\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131 <\/p>\n
19. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Sedat \u015eanl\u0131 (B. No: 2018\/6812, 3\/7\/2019) karar\u0131nda somut ihlal iddias\u0131 i\u00e7in uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede an\u0131lan kararda; deprem sebebiyle 15\/5\/1959 tarihli ve 7269 say\u0131l\u0131 Umumi Hayatlara M\u00fcessir Afetler Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Al\u0131nacak Tedbirlerle Yap\u0131lacak Yard\u0131mlara Dair Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re konut edinme y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir me\u015fru beklentisi bulunan ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden aradan k\u0131rk y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n bir s\u00fcre ge\u00e7ti\u011fi h\u00e2lde ba\u015fvuru konusu konuta ait tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenip d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut ba\u015fvuruda, an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu do\u011frultuda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucular; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100). \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Ba\u015fvurucu Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. Av. Vedat Barut’un 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 51. maddesi ve Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 83. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 2.000 TL disiplin para cezas\u0131 ile CEZALANDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurucular Cemil El\u00e7i, Selhattin Pekdo\u011fan, Mehmet Yuva, H\u00fcsna Bing\u00f6l ve Hava Tuta\u015f y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc nedeniyle D\u00dc\u015eMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
E. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere ekli listenin (D) s\u00fctununda (hakk\u0131nda ihlal karar\u0131 verilmeyen ba\u015fvurucular Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z, Cemil El\u00e7i, Selhattin Pekdo\u011fan, Mehmet Yuva, H\u00fcsna Bing\u00f6l ve Hava Tuta\u015f’a ili\u015fkin birinci, ikinci, dokuzuncu, on birinci, yirmi \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve yirmi yedinci s\u0131rada bulunan mahkemeler hari\u00e7) g\u00f6sterilen idare mahkemelerine G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tazminata ili\u015fkin taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
H. 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin ba\u015fvurucular Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z, Cemil El\u00e7i, Selhattin Pekdo\u011fan, Mehmet Yuva, H\u00fcsna Bing\u00f6l ve Hava Tuta\u015f d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
\u0130. Ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurusu reddedilen ba\u015fvurucu Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z y\u00f6n\u00fcnden al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 294,70 TL harc\u0131n Av. Vedat Barut’tan TAHS\u0130L\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
J. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
K. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
L. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvuruculardan Abdulhamit Y\u0131ld\u0131z d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 17\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2018\/10582 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 CEM\u0130L EL\u00c7\u0130 VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2018\/10582) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Olcay \u00d6ZCAN Ba\u015fvurucular : Cemil EL\u00c7\u0130 ve di\u011ferleri (bkz. ekli tablo) Ba\u015fvurucular Vekili : Av. Vedat BARUT \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ilgili mevzuat uyar\u0131nca hak sahibi olarak tespit edilen depremzedelere kal\u0131c\u0131 konut tahsis edilmemesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvurucular nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc farkl\u0131 tarihlerde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra s\u00fcresinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. 2. Komisyon taraf\u0131ndan 8\/8\/2019 tarihinde 2018\/25829, 2018\/26202, 2018\/27039, 2018\/27052, 2018\/27638, 2018\/27646, 2018\/27651, 2018\/29202, 2018\/29218, 2018\/29227, 2018\/29290, 2018\/29688, 2018\/31444, 2018\/31455, 2018\/35589, 2018\/35848, 2018\/35860, 2018\/35867, 2018\/35984, 2018\/36034, 2018\/36071, 2018\/36145, 2019\/386, 2019\/387, 2019\/391, 2019\/506, 2019\/507, 2019\/508 ve 2019\/9090 say\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015fvurular\u0131n 2018\/10582 say\u0131l\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmesine ve incelemenin 2018\/10582 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME 3. Ba\u015fvurucular, bireysel ba\u015fvuru har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layacak gelirleri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. 4. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n