{"id":148748,"date":"2025-07-17T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-07-17T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T09:00:00","slug":"aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM’nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n

ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n

\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

NURAN \u00c7EL\u0130K BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n

(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/40849)<\/p>\n

Karar Tarihi: 11\/6\/2025<\/p>\n

\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n

\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n

R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n

Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n

\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n

Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Tahir Hami TOPA\u00c7<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Nuran \u00c7EL\u0130K<\/p>\n

Vekilleri<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Av. Adil AKTAY<\/p>\n

Av. Utku \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131 AKTAY<\/p>\n

I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n

1. Ba\u015fvuru; kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin ge\u00e7 \u00f6denmesi nedeniyle karar\u0131n icras\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu bedelin de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle de m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Komisyonca makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan k\u0131smi kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. Ba\u015fvurucu 23\/11\/2007 tarihinde kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atmaya dayal\u0131 10.000 TL tutarl\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bilirki\u015fi raporunda tazminat bedelinin 44.820 TL olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ancak Mersin 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kalarak 10.000 TL’nin dava tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte ba\u015fvurucuya verilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm kanun yolundan ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bunun ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu bu kez 6\/7\/2017 tarihinde bilirki\u015fi raporunda belirtilen miktar ile kesinle\u015fen davaya konu miktar aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131n, yani 34.820 TL’nin ilk dava tarihi olan 23\/11\/2007 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek faizi ile birlikte tahsili talebiyle ikinci bir dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mersin 6. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015f; bu h\u00fck\u00fcm kanun yolundan ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 14\/7\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 11\/8\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n

4. Ba\u015fvurucu; kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin makul s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mesine kar\u015f\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, bu nedenle bedelin de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

5. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc sunmu\u015f ve \u00f6demenin 9\/3\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

A. Kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z El Atma Bedelinin Ge\u00e7 \u00d6denmesi Nedeniyle Karar\u0131n \u0130cras\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n

6. Ba\u015fvurucu, kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin makul s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mesine kar\u015f\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, bedelin 9\/3\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6dendi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun temel \u015fik\u00e2yetinin kendisi i\u00e7in ekonomik bir de\u011fer ifade eden ve kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131na dayanan alaca\u011f\u0131n ge\u00e7 \u00f6denmesi oldu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun belirtti\u011fi ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvencelerinden olan karar\u0131n icras\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

7. Anayasa Mahkemesi Veysi Ado ([GK], B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda, 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesinde 28\/3\/2023 tarihli ve 7445 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe g\u00f6re 9\/3\/2023 tarihi (bu tarih d\u00e2hil) itibar\u0131yla derdest olan, yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurulara ili\u015fkin olarak Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 neticesine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 maddeye g\u00f6re an\u0131lan tarih itibar\u0131yla derdest olan mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7 veya eksik icra edildi\u011fi ya da hi\u00e7 icra edilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n da Tazminat Komisyonunca incelenebilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7 veya eksik icra edildi\u011fi ya da hi\u00e7 icra edilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren somut ba\u015fvuru y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

8. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

B. Kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z El Atma Bedelinin De\u011fer Kayb\u0131na U\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 Nedeniyle M\u00fclkiyet Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n

9. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Ali \u015eim\u015fek ve di\u011ferleri ([1. B.], B. No: 2014\/2073, 6\/7\/2017), Mehmet Akdo\u011fan ve di\u011ferleri ([1. B.], B. No: 2013\/817, 19\/12\/2013), Kadir \u00c7akar ([1. B.], B. No: 2015\/18908, 21\/3\/2018), Han\u0131m \u00c7eyiz ve Mehmet G\u00fcnd\u00fcz ([1. B.], B. No: 2015\/19289, 17\/7\/2018), T\u00fcrkan Poyraz ([1. B.], B. No: 2015\/15388, 13\/9\/2018) ve Emine Dilek Onaran ve di\u011ferleri ([1. B.], B. No: 2017\/19987, 12\/2\/2020) kararlar\u0131nda kamula\u015ft\u0131rma ve kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedellerinin enflasyon kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri inceleyerek uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede kamula\u015ft\u0131rma ve kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedellerinin enflasyon kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde de\u011fer kayb\u0131nau\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuruculara \u015fahsi olarak a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 ve ola\u011fan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fini belirterek m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan enflasyon kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen miktara ili\u015fkin davan\u0131n 6\/7\/2017 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, miktara ili\u015fkin yasal faizin ilk dava tarihi olan 23\/11\/2007 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fletilmesine karar verildi\u011finin ve tutar\u0131n 9\/3\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6dendi\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmek gerekir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 6\/7\/2017 tarihinden \u00f6demenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 9\/3\/2022 tarihine kadar bedelin enflasyon etkisiyle \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde de\u011fer kaybetti\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda an\u0131lan kararlarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

10. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n

11. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ile maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100). \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n

A. 1. Kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin ge\u00e7 \u00f6denmesi nedeniyle karar\u0131n icras\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

2. Kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

B. Kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle Anayasa’n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Mersin 6. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine (E.2018\/254, K.2019\/43) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n

G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 11\/6\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 11\/6\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR NURAN \u00c7EL\u0130K BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/40849) Karar Tarihi: 11\/6\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Tahir Hami TOPA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : Nuran \u00c7EL\u0130K Vekilleri : Av. Adil AKTAY Av. Utku \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131 AKTAY I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin ge\u00e7 \u00f6denmesi nedeniyle karar\u0131n icras\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu bedelin de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle de m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Komisyonca makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan k\u0131smi kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 23\/11\/2007 tarihinde kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atmaya dayal\u0131 10.000 TL tutarl\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bilirki\u015fi raporunda tazminat bedelinin 44.820 TL olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ancak Mersin 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kalarak 10.000 TL’nin dava tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte ba\u015fvurucuya verilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm kanun yolundan ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bunun ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu bu kez 6\/7\/2017 tarihinde bilirki\u015fi raporunda belirtilen miktar ile kesinle\u015fen davaya konu miktar aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131n, yani 34.820 TL’nin ilk dava tarihi olan 23\/11\/2007 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek faizi ile birlikte tahsili talebiyle ikinci bir …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAYM'nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM'nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR NURAN \u00c7EL\u0130K BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/40849) Karar Tarihi: 11\/6\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Tahir Hami TOPA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : Nuran \u00c7EL\u0130K Vekilleri : Av. Adil AKTAY Av. Utku \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131 AKTAY I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin ge\u00e7 \u00f6denmesi nedeniyle karar\u0131n icras\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu bedelin de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle de m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Komisyonca makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan k\u0131smi kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 23\/11\/2007 tarihinde kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atmaya dayal\u0131 10.000 TL tutarl\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bilirki\u015fi raporunda tazminat bedelinin 44.820 TL olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ancak Mersin 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kalarak 10.000 TL’nin dava tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte ba\u015fvurucuya verilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm kanun yolundan ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bunun ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu bu kez 6\/7\/2017 tarihinde bilirki\u015fi raporunda belirtilen miktar ile kesinle\u015fen davaya konu miktar aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131n, yani 34.820 TL’nin ilk dava tarihi olan 23\/11\/2007 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek faizi ile birlikte tahsili talebiyle ikinci bir …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T09:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"AYM’nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T09:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1511,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T09:00:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM’nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR NURAN \u00c7EL\u0130K BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/40849) Karar Tarihi: 11\/6\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Tahir Hami TOPA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : Nuran \u00c7EL\u0130K Vekilleri : Av. Adil AKTAY Av. Utku \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131 AKTAY I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma bedelinin ge\u00e7 \u00f6denmesi nedeniyle karar\u0131n icras\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu bedelin de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle de m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Komisyonca makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan k\u0131smi kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 23\/11\/2007 tarihinde kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atmaya dayal\u0131 10.000 TL tutarl\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bilirki\u015fi raporunda tazminat bedelinin 44.820 TL olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ancak Mersin 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kalarak 10.000 TL’nin dava tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte ba\u015fvurucuya verilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm kanun yolundan ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bunun ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu bu kez 6\/7\/2017 tarihinde bilirki\u015fi raporunda belirtilen miktar ile kesinle\u015fen davaya konu miktar aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131n, yani 34.820 TL’nin ilk dava tarihi olan 23\/11\/2007 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek faizi ile birlikte tahsili talebiyle ikinci bir …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-07-17T09:00:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"7 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"AYM’nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-07-17T09:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":1511,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-07-17T09:00:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-40849-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM’nin 2021\/40849 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148748\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}