T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
CELAL ORTAKAYA BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/34111)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 15\/4\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Volkan \u00c7AKMAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Celal ORTAKAYA<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. M\u00fcsl\u00fcm BARAN<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, T\u00fcrkiye ile Suriye aras\u0131nda kalan s\u0131n\u0131r hatt\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen \u015f\u00fcpheli \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun k\u0131z karde\u015fi K.O. 6\/11\/2014 tarihinde \u015eanl\u0131urfa’n\u0131n Suru\u00e7 il\u00e7esine yak\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r hatt\u0131nda, Suriye’nin Ayn El Arap (Kobani) b\u00f6lgesinde ya\u015fananlar\u0131 protesto etmek, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapmak i\u00e7in toplanan ve s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 ge\u00e7meye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, aralar\u0131nda milletvekillerinin de bulundu\u011fu grubun i\u00e7inde yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kolluk kuvvetlerinin m\u00fcdahalesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ya\u015fanan olaylar sonucu -o s\u0131rada s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n di\u011fer taraf\u0131nda oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan- K.O. yaralanm\u0131\u015f ve kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumunda hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. Olay sonras\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan otopsi i\u015flemine ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlenen 7\/11\/2014 tarihli tutanakta, v\u00fccutta ate\u015fli silah \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc tespit edilemedi\u011fi belirtilerek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn muhtemel ate\u015fli silah \u015farapnel par\u00e7as\u0131 isabetine ba\u011fl\u0131 yayg\u0131n kafatas\u0131 ve kaide k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131 ile beyin harabiyeti ve kanamas\u0131 sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun izin alarak otopsi i\u015flemine getirdi\u011fi ve otopsi s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunan doktor S.K. ise “muhtemel \u015farapnel par\u00e7as\u0131 isabeti” ifadesine kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutana\u011fa \u015ferh d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
3. 6\/11\/2014 tarihli tutanakta; g\u00f6steri yapan gruplarca s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n iki yakas\u0131ndan g\u00fcvenlik kuvvetlerine ta\u015f ile sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunuldu\u011fu, g\u00fcvenlik kuvvetlerinin gaz s\u0131kmak suretiyle kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k verdi\u011fi ve jandarma ekiplerinin durumu kontrol alt\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. 19\/11\/2014 tarihinde al\u0131nan ifadesinde C.U. olay yerinde bulundu\u011funu, s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 ge\u00e7en grupta oldu\u011funu, K.O.nun ise hemen arkas\u0131nda s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 ge\u00e7en grupta yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u0131rada asker\u00ee ara\u00e7 ve ate\u015fli silah sesleri duydu\u011funu, arkas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6n\u00fcp bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda K.O.yu yerde g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, cesedin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ate\u015fin kesildi\u011fini, K.O.n\u0131n nas\u0131l vuruldu\u011funu g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Karakollar\u0131n onar\u0131m i\u015flerini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan eden M.\u015e. 19\/11\/2014 tarihli ifadesinde olay g\u00fcn\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131r boyunda karga\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin gazla m\u00fcdahale etti\u011fini, askerlerin silah kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n Suriye taraf\u0131ndan ise top at\u0131\u015f\u0131 sesleri geldi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 22\/11\/2014 tarihli ifadesinde bas\u0131ndan edindi\u011fi bilgilere (video kay\u0131tlar\u0131) g\u00f6re karde\u015finin g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ate\u015f sonucu \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, sorumlulardan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Kara Kuvvetleri Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 3. Hudut Alay\u0131 3. Hudut Tabur Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Suru\u00e7 Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne sunulan 16\/12\/2014 tarihli yaz\u0131da birliklerin olayda silah kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, gaz fi\u015fekleri ile m\u00fcdahalede bulundu\u011fu ve ellerinde olaya dair g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kayd\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Emniyet birimlerinin 2015 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Mart ay\u0131nda \u00e7e\u015fitli haber ajanslar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik inceleme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak bu kay\u0131tlarda K.O.nun yaralanma an\u0131na dair bir g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6rg\u00fc tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n r\u00f6portajlar\u0131n\u0131n (K.O.nun askerlerce vuruldu\u011funu iddia eden) oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca haber ajanslar\u0131na r\u00f6portaj veren ki\u015filerin kimliklerinin tespit edilerek bu ki\u015filerin olayla ilgili bilgisinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131n\u0131n da tutana\u011fa ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 6\/11\/2014 tarihli tutanakta imzas\u0131 olan ve ge\u00e7ici askerlik g\u00f6revini ifa eden E.Z. 8\/1\/2015 tarihli ifadesinde olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ate\u015fli silah kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gaz fi\u015fe\u011fi kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yaralanma olay\u0131na \u015fahit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Suru\u00e7 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) 6\/11\/2015 tarihinde g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 vererek dosyay\u0131 Diyarbak\u0131r 7. Kolordu Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Asker\u00ee Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. Asker\u00ee Savc\u0131l\u0131k konuya ili\u015fkin olarak ilgili birimlerle yaz\u0131\u015fma yapm\u0131\u015f ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadelerine ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ge\u00e7ici askerlik g\u00f6revini ifa etmekte olan K.K. 20\/1\/2016 tarihli ifadesinde s\u0131n\u0131rda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6steride s\u0131n\u0131r ihlali ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, silah kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gaz fi\u015fe\u011fi ile grubun da\u011f\u0131t\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n di\u011fer taraf\u0131nda \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar, bombalamalar oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Olaya ili\u015fkin tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvurulan asker\u00ee personel (6 ki\u015fi) 2016 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Nisan ay\u0131nda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ve birbiriyle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fen ifadelerinde, olayda silah kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6stericileri s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n di\u011fer taraf\u0131ndan gelecek \u015farapnel par\u00e7alar\u0131 ve mermilere kar\u015f\u0131 uyard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in gereken s\u00fcreyi verdi\u011fini, gaz fi\u015fe\u011fi ile m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Asker\u00ee personel \u00d6.E. ise 21\/6\/2016 tarihli ifadesinde olay g\u00fcn\u00fc gaz fi\u015fe\u011fi kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sadece s\u00f6zl\u00fc uyar\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n di\u011fer taraf\u0131nda DEA\u015e-PYD aras\u0131nda ya\u015fanan \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma alanda bulunan K.O.nun yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sonra cesedinin \u00fclke s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7ine al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, K.O.yu kimin vurdu\u011funu tespit etmenin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Asker\u00ee Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n K.O. ile s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 ge\u00e7ti\u011fi iddia edilen \u015fah\u0131slar hakk\u0131nda tahkikat yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak kimlik bilgilerine, adreslerine ula\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131 7\/10\/2016 tarihli tutanakla kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 10\/10\/2016 tarihli tutanakta da haber ajanslar\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen video kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n elde edilemedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131lan Anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle asker\u00ee yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucu dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 19\/10\/2017 tarihinde daim\u00ee arama karar\u0131 vermi\u015f ve dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin sonunu 6\/11\/2019 olarak belirlemi\u015ftir. Kararda olaya ili\u015fkin olarak g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7leri taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kayd\u0131 al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, elde edilen di\u011fer g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin incelenmesi sonucu silah ate\u015flendi\u011fi hususunda bir tespit yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, K.O.nun DEA\u015e-PYD \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda gelen \u015farapnel par\u00e7as\u0131 ile yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, t\u00fcm ara\u015ft\u0131rmalara ra\u011fmen me\u00e7hul \u015f\u00fcphelilere ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te ba\u015fvurucunun talebiyle \u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Adli T\u0131p Ana Bilim Dal\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 13\/7\/2016 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda kesin \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeninin anla\u015f\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in feth-i kabir yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca yine ba\u015fvurucunun talebi \u00fczerine adli bili\u015fim uzman\u0131 olan bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 15\/2\/2017 tarihli raporda, bir internet sitesinden elde edilen 17 dakikal\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcn\u00fcn analiz edildi\u011fi, asker\u00ee ara\u00e7tan 12 saniye boyunca seri, manuel ate\u015f a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde tespit yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu s\u00f6z konusu raporlar\u0131 Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa sunarak daim\u00ee arama karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve feth-i kabir yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n kesin \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeninin tespiti i\u00e7in bilirki\u015fi raporu d\u00fczenlenmesi talebi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucu haz\u0131rlanan Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 1. Adli T\u0131p \u0130htisas Dairesinin 30\/1\/2018 tarihli raporunda mevcut verilerle kesin \u00f6l\u00fcm sebebinin belirlenemeyece\u011fi, feth-i kabir yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine \u00e7e\u015fitli haber ajanslar\u0131n\u0131n olayla ilgili olarak yapt\u0131klar\u0131 kay\u0131tlar\u0131 i\u00e7eren medyan\u0131n incelenmesi sonucu Van Jandarma Kriminal Laboratuvar Amirli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 25\/4\/2018 tarihli uzmanl\u0131k raporunda; laboratuvarda y\u00fcz kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc iyile\u015ftirme, kurgu manip\u00fclasyon tespiti gibi teknik incelemeler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerine ait z\u0131rhl\u0131 ara\u00e7tan ate\u015f edilip edilmedi\u011fi, edildiyse istikametinin ne oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde talep edilen incelemelerin yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131yla K.O.nun cesedi feth-i kabir ile \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00fcrece bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda feth-i kabir i\u015fleminin 14\/5\/2018 tarihinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak eksik kalan k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015flemin 18\/2\/2019 tarihinde tekrarland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Morg \u0130htisas Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 10\/4\/2019 tarihli raporda, biri oksipital kemikte (kafan\u0131n arka alt k\u0131sm\u0131nda bulunan kemik) bir di\u011feri ise frontotemporal (al\u0131n b\u00f6lgesi) b\u00f6lgede olmak \u00fczere iki ate\u015fli silah ge\u00e7i\u015f defekti bulundu\u011fu, otopsideki bulgular de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde bu ge\u00e7i\u015f defektleri aras\u0131nda ate\u015fli silah trajesi (merminin v\u00fccutta izledi\u011fi yol) bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ate\u015fli silah yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 kafa, y\u00fcz, alt \u00e7ene k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131 ve kafa i\u00e7i de\u011fi\u015fimler sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Bu rapor \u00fczerine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, Adli T\u0131p Kurumundan, \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ilk ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi zaman d\u00fczenlenen otopsi raporu ile 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda Morg \u0130htisas Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor aras\u0131nda farkl\u0131l\u0131k bulundu\u011funu belirterek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn \u015farapnel par\u00e7as\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa ate\u015fli silah mermisi isabetine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak m\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi, bu konuda kesin bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda rapor d\u00fczenlenmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 1. Adli T\u0131p \u0130htisas Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 23\/3\/2020 tarihli raporda \u00f6zetle eldeki veriler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde K.O.nun v\u00fccuduna bir ate\u015fli silah mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fi isabet etti\u011fi, sa\u011f omuz arka b\u00f6lgeden v\u00fccuda giren merminin sa\u011fdan sola seyirle ense b\u00f6lgesini katederek sol oksipital b\u00f6lgeden kafatas\u0131na girdi\u011fi, beyin dokusunu katetmek suretiyle sol frontotemporal b\u00f6lgeden v\u00fccudu terk etti\u011fi belirtilerek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ate\u015fli silah yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 kafatas\u0131, y\u00fcz kemik k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131yla birlikte beyin kanamas\u0131, beyin doku harabiyeti sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmi\u015ftir. Raporun sunulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu 10\/9\/2020 tarihinde, rapordaki ifadeleri de al\u0131nt\u0131layarak soru\u015fturman\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu 30\/10\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu, k\u0131z karde\u015finin askerler taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinin eksiklikler i\u00e7erdi\u011fini, delillerin gere\u011fi gibi toplanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ge\u00e7 hareket edildi\u011fini, olay\u0131n \u00fczerinden y\u0131llar ge\u00e7tikten sonra \u00f6l\u00fcm sebebinin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn kapat\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; somut s\u00fcreci ve insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131 aktararak somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zellikleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. \u015e\u00fcpheli bir \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in -mutlak surette gerekli olmasa da- y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n ilgili kamu makamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan nas\u0131l sonland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n beklenmesi, bireysel ba\u015fvuru ile getirilen koruma mekanizmas\u0131n\u0131n ikincil niteli\u011fine uygun olacakt\u0131r (Rahil Dink ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2012\/848, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7 77; H\u00fcseyin Caru\u015f [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/7812, 6\/10\/2015, \u00a7 46). Bununla birlikte \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n veya a\u00e7\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011finin ve ileride de etkili bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclece\u011fi konusunda en ufak ger\u00e7ek\u00e7i bir \u015fans bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n fark\u0131na var\u0131lmas\u0131 veya var\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekmesi h\u00e2linde \u00f6lenin yak\u0131nlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular incelenmelidir (Rahil Dink ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 77; H\u00fcseyin Caru\u015f, \u00a7 47). Somut s\u00fcrece bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda meydana gelmi\u015f \u015f\u00fcpheli bir \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinin hen\u00fcz tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan son Adli T\u0131p Kurumu raporunun al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan sonra kamu makamlar\u0131nca soru\u015fturmaya y\u00f6nelik bir i\u015flem tesis edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle somut durumda hen\u00fcz soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona ermemi\u015fse de \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn \u00fczerinden mevcut durum itibar\u0131yla 10 y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve adli makamlarca uzun s\u00fcredir hareketsiz kal\u0131nmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi kural\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kabul edilebilirlik ba\u011flam\u0131nda bir eksiklik i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu yan\u0131nda \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fini de iddia etmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lacak incelemede g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin mutlak zorunlu bir durumda ve kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 g\u00fcce nispeten orant\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde silahl\u0131 g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurup ba\u015fvurmad\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmeli, bu de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131rken ba\u015fka hususlar yan\u0131nda g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin eylemlerinin planlanmas\u0131 ve kontrol\u00fc d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere olay\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn a\u015famalar\u0131 hesaba kat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r (Anayasa Mahkemesinin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin maddi boyutunun incelenmesi konusunda benimsedi\u011fi genel ilkeler i\u00e7in \u00e7ok say\u0131da karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. Seyfullah Turan ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2014\/1982, 9\/11\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 143-148; Mahpulah \u00d6zarslan [2. B.], B. No: 2016\/12544, 15\/9\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 45-49). Somut s\u00fcrece bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda K.O. s\u0131n\u0131r hatt\u0131nda, DEA\u015e-PYD aras\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir b\u00f6lgede ate\u015fli silah \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc isabetine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. S\u00fcre\u00e7te elde edilen verilere bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn kamu g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn kullan\u0131m\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak vuku buldu\u011fu yorumunu getirmeyi sa\u011flayacak kesin ve birbiriyle uyumlu veri s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia hakk\u0131nda var\u0131lacak sonu\u00e7tan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden eksiksiz bir inceleme yapmak i\u00e7in gerekli olan makul \u015f\u00fcphenin \u00f6tesinde kan\u0131t, ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131nda mevcut de\u011fildir. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucunun ihlal iddialar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak inceleme zorunlu olarak ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r (ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin maddi boyutu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lamasa da ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu kapsam\u0131nda incelenen ba\u015fvurular i\u00e7in bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. A\u0131sha Fares [1. B.], B. No: 2015\/18701, 31\/10\/2018; Mah\u0131n Parjan\u0131 ve di\u011ferleri [2. B.], B. No: 2015\/19219, 10\/10\/2019; Ahmet Kortak ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/14603, 10\/12\/2019; Y\u0131lmaz Adl\u0131\u011f [1. B.], B. No: 2017\/16475, 8\/7\/2020).<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri ba\u011flam\u0131nda devlet, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in olu\u015fturulan yasal ve idari \u00e7er\u00e7evenin gere\u011fi gibi uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bu hakka y\u00f6nelik ihlallerin durdurulup cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak etkili bir yarg\u0131sal sistem kurmakla da y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheli her \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri [2. B.], B. No: 2012\/752, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 52, 54; Cemil Dan\u0131\u015fman [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/6319, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 43, 95; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 97).<\/p>\n
19. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi iddia edilen \u00f6l\u00fcm olaylar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi gereken soru\u015fturma, \u015f\u00fcphesiz ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu t\u00fcr soru\u015fturman\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n resen harekete ge\u00e7erek \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri tespit etmesi, soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmas\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, soru\u015fturman\u0131n veya sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 ve me\u015fru menfaatlerini korumak i\u00e7in \u00f6len ki\u015finin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine gerekli oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kat\u0131labilmesi gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma sonucunda al\u0131nan karar; soru\u015fturmada elde edilen t\u00fcm bulgular\u0131n kapsaml\u0131, nesnel ve tarafs\u0131z bir analizine dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 57, 58; Cemil Dan\u0131\u015fman, \u00a7\u00a7 98-100; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 99). S\u00f6z\u00fc edilen soru\u015fturman\u0131n temel amac\u0131, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 koruyan mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve vuku bulan \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131nda sorumlular ile sorumluluklar\u0131 tespit etmektir (Cemil Dan\u0131\u015fman, \u00a7 97; Narin Kurt [GK], B. No: 2018\/2540, 1\/12\/2022, \u00a7 91).<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucunun yak\u0131n\u0131 K.O. T\u00fcrkiye ile Suriye aras\u0131nda kalan ve DEA\u015e-PYD aras\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131r hatt\u0131nda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6steri\/bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ate\u015fli silah \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc isabet etmesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde elde edilen veriler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn nas\u0131l, hangi y\u00f6nden ate\u015flenen silah sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tespit edilememi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu \u015f\u00fcpheli \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131na dair soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ilk dikkat \u00e7eken husus olay yeri incelemesi veya ke\u015fif yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir kay\u0131t bulunmamas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Olaya d\u00e2hil olan, olayla ilgili bilgisi bulunan tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadelerinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7te asker\u00ee personelin ifadesine olay\u0131n \u00fczerinden bir y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n s\u00fcre sonra ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu g\u00f6zlenmi\u015ftir. Bu durum soru\u015fturman\u0131n ciddiyeti hakk\u0131nda olumsuz bir izlenim olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r zira olu\u015f ko\u015fullar\u0131 ilk etapta net belirlenemeyen, kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kayd\u0131 almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131nda tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadelerinin olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7in kritik \u00f6nemde oldu\u011fu ve vakit kaybetmeksizin al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadeleri aras\u0131nda gaz fi\u015fe\u011fi kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olup bu \u00e7eli\u015fki hakk\u0131nda kamu makamlar\u0131nca bir ara\u015ft\u0131rmada (yeniden ifade al\u0131nmas\u0131 vs.) bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu \u00e7eli\u015fki ve ifadelerin olay\u0131n \u00fczerinden uzun s\u00fcre sonra al\u0131nmas\u0131 soru\u015fturman\u0131n \u00f6zensizli\u011fine dair \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. Di\u011fer taraftan olayla ilgili \u00e7e\u015fitli mecralardan elde edilen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde inceleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ancak bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Son olarak 25\/4\/2018 tarihli incelemede laboratuvar\u0131n inceleme kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan bir \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131m yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla beraber ayn\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler \u00fczerinde olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatmaya yard\u0131m edecek bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme i\u00e7in -gerekti\u011finde farkl\u0131 birimlerden yard\u0131m al\u0131narak- giri\u015fimlerde bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. T\u00fcm bu hususlara ek olarak 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda meydana gelmi\u015f bir \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn hemen ard\u0131ndan otopsi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n olay\u0131n \u00fczerinden d\u00f6rt y\u0131l ge\u00e7tikten sonra iki ayr\u0131 feth-i kabir i\u015flemi yap\u0131lmak suretiyle son olarak 2020 y\u0131l\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen raporla \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ilk otopsi raporunda belirtildi\u011finden farkl\u0131 sebeple (\u015farapnel de\u011fil, ate\u015fli silah mermisi ile) meydana geldi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 da soru\u015fturmada \u00f6zensizlik oldu\u011fu izlenimini art\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. Zira ge\u00e7 yap\u0131lan bu belirleme, zaman\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde soru\u015fturman\u0131n seyrini etkileme, delillere ve olay\u0131n olu\u015f ko\u015fullar\u0131na farkl\u0131 bir yakla\u015f\u0131m benimsenmesini muhtemel k\u0131lacak niteliktedir.<\/p>\n
24. Aktar\u0131lan sebeplerle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ve yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekenlere h\u00fckmedilmesi ile 500.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, hen\u00fcz sona ermedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen, tespit edilen eksiklikleri giderecek soru\u015fturma\/inceleme i\u015flemlerini yerine getirmek suretiyle soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmakt\u0131r (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100; Ay\u015fe E\u015flik [2. B.], B. No: 2014\/15969, 21\/6\/2017, \u00a7 48).<\/p>\n
28. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya net 225.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen eksiklikleri giderecek soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini yerine getirmek \u00fczere Suru\u00e7 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2017\/2121) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 225.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, fazlaya ili\u015fkin tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 446,90 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.446,90 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 15\/4\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 15\/4\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/34111 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR CELAL ORTAKAYA BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/34111) Karar Tarihi: 15\/4\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Volkan \u00c7AKMAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Celal ORTAKAYA Vekili : Av. M\u00fcsl\u00fcm BARAN I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, T\u00fcrkiye ile Suriye aras\u0131nda kalan s\u0131n\u0131r hatt\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen \u015f\u00fcpheli \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucunun k\u0131z karde\u015fi K.O. 6\/11\/2014 tarihinde \u015eanl\u0131urfa’n\u0131n Suru\u00e7 il\u00e7esine yak\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r hatt\u0131nda, Suriye’nin Ayn El Arap (Kobani) b\u00f6lgesinde ya\u015fananlar\u0131 protesto etmek, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapmak i\u00e7in toplanan ve s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 ge\u00e7meye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, aralar\u0131nda milletvekillerinin de bulundu\u011fu grubun i\u00e7inde yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kolluk kuvvetlerinin m\u00fcdahalesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ya\u015fanan olaylar sonucu -o s\u0131rada s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n di\u011fer taraf\u0131nda oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan- K.O. yaralanm\u0131\u015f ve kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumunda hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. Olay sonras\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan otopsi i\u015flemine ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlenen 7\/11\/2014 tarihli tutanakta, v\u00fccutta ate\u015fli silah \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc tespit edilemedi\u011fi belirtilerek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn muhtemel ate\u015fli silah \u015farapnel par\u00e7as\u0131 isabetine ba\u011fl\u0131 yayg\u0131n kafatas\u0131 ve kaide k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131 ile beyin harabiyeti ve kanamas\u0131 sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun izin alarak otopsi i\u015flemine getirdi\u011fi ve otopsi s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunan doktor S.K. ise “muhtemel \u015farapnel par\u00e7as\u0131 isabeti” ifadesine kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutana\u011fa \u015ferh d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 3. 6\/11\/2014 tarihli …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141572","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n