{"id":134888,"date":"2025-07-03T19:06:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-03T16:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-07-03T19:06:00","modified_gmt":"2025-07-03T16:06:00","slug":"yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>12. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesi<br \/>\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM\/KARAR : Esastan Ret<br \/>\n\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ihalenin feshi \u015fikayeti sebebiyle yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile ihalenin feshine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Karar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka ve daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lular taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince taraflar\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 alacakl\u0131 banka ve daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lular taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>I. DAVA<br \/>\n\u015eikayet\u00e7i pey s\u00fcren 3. ki\u015fi isteminde; \u015fikayet\u00e7i &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan elektronik ortamda ihalede 1.810.000,00 TL teklif vermek isterken, klavye ma\u011fduriyeti ya\u015fayarak sehven 18.010.000,00 TL teklif verildi\u011fini, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin hatal\u0131 bi\u00e7imde verdi\u011fi teklifi farketti\u011fini ve hemen vermek istedi\u011fi ger\u00e7ek teklif olan 1.810.000,00 TL teklifi verdi\u011fini, sonras\u0131nda taraflar\u0131nca &#8230; \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn arand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca talimat icra dosyas\u0131na taraflar\u0131nca talep dilek\u00e7esi sunuldu\u011funu fakat taleplerinin reddedildi\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7i ad\u0131na 18.010.000,00 TL bedelle birinci a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada ihale olundu\u011funu, ihale bedelinin \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada en y\u00fcksek teklifi veren ikinci ki\u015fi Nil Atmaca&#8217;ya 2.641.000,00 TL&#8217;ye ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ihale edildi\u011fini, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin ihale bedelleri aras\u0131ndaki farktan sorumlulu\u011funun g\u00fcndeme gelebilece\u011fini beyan ederek taleplerinin kabul\u00fc ile ihalenin feshine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. CEVAP<br \/>\n1. Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; elektronik ortam\u0131nda ba\u015flayan art\u0131rma sonras\u0131nda 21.01.2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ihalede ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n elektronik ortamda sunulan en y\u00fcksek 18.010.000,00 TL bedelle \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi \u015fikayet\u00e7i &#8230;&#8217;ya ihale edildi\u011fini, fakat ihale bedelinin yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, birinci a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada en y\u00fcksek teklifi veren Nil Atmaca&#8217;ya ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ihale edildi\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nman\u0131n muhammen bedelinin \u00e7ok \u00fczerinde ihale edildi\u011fini, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin ihalenin feshini istemekte hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, istemin taraflar\u0131n zarar\u0131na neden oldu\u011funu, ihalenin feshi \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, \u015fikayetin reddi ile \u015fikayet\u00e7i &#8230; aleyhine ihale bedelinin %10&#8217;u oran\u0131nda para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bor\u00e7lulara dava dilek\u00e7esinin usul\u00fcne uygun tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte dosya kapsam\u0131na cevap dilek\u00e7esi sunmad\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; ilgili yarg\u0131tay ilamlar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, ihaleye konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n muhammen bedeline, art\u0131rma tutana\u011f\u0131ndaki s\u00fcr\u00fclen peylere g\u00f6re e-sat\u0131\u015f portal\u0131 \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan 18.010.000,00 TL&#8217;lik teklifin maddi hata oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc ile \u015fikayet\u00e7inin \u015fikayetinin kabul\u00fcne ve ihalenin feshine, ancak daval\u0131 taraf davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na sebebiyet vermedi\u011finden kar\u015f\u0131 taraf aleyhine yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<br \/>\nA. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka vekili ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bor\u00e7lular vekili ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri<br \/>\n1. Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esinde; cevap dilek\u00e7esindeki itiraz sebeplerini tekrar etti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr ve \u015fikayet\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan sehven ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen 18.010.000,00 TL&#8217;nin ihale kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 say\u0131s\u0131na hi\u00e7bir etkisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin de ihale s\u00fcrecine zarar verilmedi\u011fini isteminde belirtti\u011fi, ihale olunan bedel olduk\u00e7a y\u00fcksek olup, \u00e7ok say\u0131da ihale kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131na ra\u011fmen, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sanki ger\u00e7ek bedelinin alt\u0131nda bir bedelle ihale olunmu\u015f gibi karar verilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, ihalenin feshi \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmadan ihalenin feshinin istenemeyece\u011fi, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlar dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ihalenin feshini isteyen ki\u015finin hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bor\u00e7lular vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esinde; \u015fikayet\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan sehven ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen 18.010.000,00 TL&#8217;nin ihale kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 say\u0131s\u0131na hi\u00e7bir etkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu, yerel mahkemenin bu y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, y\u00fcksek kat\u0131l\u0131mla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ihale neticesinde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n g\u00fcncel de\u011ferinin de \u00fczerinde bir bedelle Nil Atmaca&#8217;ya ihale oldu\u011fu, mahkemenin ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sanki ger\u00e7ek bedelinin alt\u0131nda bir bedelle ihale olunmu\u015f gibi karar vermesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, zarar unsurunun olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fikayette hukuki yarar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7<br \/>\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; \u015fikayet\u00e7inin elektronik ortamda pey s\u00fcrmesinden sonra ihale g\u00fcn\u00fcnde ihale salonunda haz\u0131r bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131n somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta \u00f6nem arz etmedi\u011fi, \u0130\u0130K&#8217;n\u0131n 133\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u015fikayet\u00e7inin iki ihale bedeli aras\u0131ndaki farktan sorumlulu\u011fu do\u011fabilece\u011finden, ihalenin feshini istemekte hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ve \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleriyle kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka vekili ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bor\u00e7lular vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>V. TEMY\u0130Z<br \/>\nA. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<br \/>\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka vekili ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bor\u00e7lular vekili ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>B. Temyiz Sebepleri<br \/>\n1. Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka vekilinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde; istinaf ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esindeki itiraz sebeplerinin tekrar edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr ve icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce ihale feshedilmedi\u011finden ve yeni bir ihale yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015fikayet\u00e7inin aradaki farktan sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 gibi bir durumun s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bor\u00e7lular vekilinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde; istinaf ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esindeki itiraz sebeplerinin tekrar edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr ve \u015fikayet\u00e7inin, alacakl\u0131 bankan\u0131n talebi olmadan iki ihale aras\u0131ndaki farktan sorumlu olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu, alacakl\u0131 bankan\u0131n bu hususta bir talebi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ihale bedelinin borcu kar\u015f\u0131lamaya yeter durumda oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>C. Gerek\u00e7e<br \/>\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<br \/>\nUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, ihalenin feshine y\u00f6nelik \u015fikayet istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<br \/>\n1. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 369 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 370 ve 371 inci maddeleri,<br \/>\n2. 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u0130K md.133\/2,<br \/>\n3. 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u0130K md.134<\/p>\n<p>3. De\u011ferlendirme<br \/>\n1. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin nihai kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 371 inci maddesinde yer alan sebeplerden birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. Temyizen incelenen karar, taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131na, dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131 ile hukuki ili\u015fkinin nitelendirilmesine, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lama ve ispat kurallar\u0131 ile kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re usul ve kanuna uygun olup kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka vekili ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bor\u00e7lular vekili taraf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen nedenler karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>VI. KARAR<br \/>\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle ;<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 370 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>Al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 179,90&#8217;ar TL temyiz harc\u0131ndan, evvelce al\u0131nan har\u00e7 varsa mahsubu ile eksik harc\u0131n temyiz edenlerden tahsiline,<\/p>\n<p>Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<br \/>\n06.03.2023 tarihinde oy birli\u011finde karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bYarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 06.03.2023 tarihli, 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesi H\u00dcK\u00dcM\/KARAR : Esastan Ret \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ihalenin feshi \u015fikayeti sebebiyle yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile ihalenin feshine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka ve daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lular taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince taraflar\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 alacakl\u0131 banka ve daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lular taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA \u015eikayet\u00e7i pey s\u00fcren 3. ki\u015fi isteminde; \u015fikayet\u00e7i &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan elektronik ortamda ihalede 1.810.000,00 TL teklif vermek isterken, klavye ma\u011fduriyeti ya\u015fayarak sehven 18.010.000,00 TL teklif verildi\u011fini, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin hatal\u0131 bi\u00e7imde verdi\u011fi teklifi farketti\u011fini ve hemen vermek istedi\u011fi ger\u00e7ek teklif olan 1.810.000,00 TL teklifi verdi\u011fini, sonras\u0131nda taraflar\u0131nca &#8230; \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn arand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca talimat icra dosyas\u0131na taraflar\u0131nca talep dilek\u00e7esi sunuldu\u011funu fakat taleplerinin reddedildi\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7i ad\u0131na 18.010.000,00 TL bedelle birinci a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada ihale olundu\u011funu, ihale bedelinin \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada en y\u00fcksek &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesi H\u00dcK\u00dcM\/KARAR : Esastan Ret \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ihalenin feshi \u015fikayeti sebebiyle yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile ihalenin feshine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka ve daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lular taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince taraflar\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 alacakl\u0131 banka ve daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lular taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA \u015eikayet\u00e7i pey s\u00fcren 3. ki\u015fi isteminde; \u015fikayet\u00e7i &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan elektronik ortamda ihalede 1.810.000,00 TL teklif vermek isterken, klavye ma\u011fduriyeti ya\u015fayarak sehven 18.010.000,00 TL teklif verildi\u011fini, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin hatal\u0131 bi\u00e7imde verdi\u011fi teklifi farketti\u011fini ve hemen vermek istedi\u011fi ger\u00e7ek teklif olan 1.810.000,00 TL teklifi verdi\u011fini, sonras\u0131nda taraflar\u0131nca &#8230; \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn arand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca talimat icra dosyas\u0131na taraflar\u0131nca talep dilek\u00e7esi sunuldu\u011funu fakat taleplerinin reddedildi\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7i ad\u0131na 18.010.000,00 TL bedelle birinci a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada ihale olundu\u011funu, ihale bedelinin \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada en y\u00fcksek &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-03T16:06:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-03T16:06:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1375,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-03T16:06:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesi H\u00dcK\u00dcM\/KARAR : Esastan Ret \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : &#8230; \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ihalenin feshi \u015fikayeti sebebiyle yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile ihalenin feshine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 taraf alacakl\u0131 banka ve daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lular taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince taraflar\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 alacakl\u0131 banka ve daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lular taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA \u015eikayet\u00e7i pey s\u00fcren 3. ki\u015fi isteminde; \u015fikayet\u00e7i &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan elektronik ortamda ihalede 1.810.000,00 TL teklif vermek isterken, klavye ma\u011fduriyeti ya\u015fayarak sehven 18.010.000,00 TL teklif verildi\u011fini, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin hatal\u0131 bi\u00e7imde verdi\u011fi teklifi farketti\u011fini ve hemen vermek istedi\u011fi ger\u00e7ek teklif olan 1.810.000,00 TL teklifi verdi\u011fini, sonras\u0131nda taraflar\u0131nca &#8230; \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn arand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca talimat icra dosyas\u0131na taraflar\u0131nca talep dilek\u00e7esi sunuldu\u011funu fakat taleplerinin reddedildi\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7i ad\u0131na 18.010.000,00 TL bedelle birinci a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada ihale olundu\u011funu, ihale bedelinin \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada en y\u00fcksek &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-07-03T16:06:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"7 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-07-03T16:06:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1375,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-07-03T16:06:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-12-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-13451-e-2023-1392-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2022\/13451 E., 2023\/1392 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}