T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
FERHAT ARSLANER VE G\u00dcRKAN EK\u0130C\u0130KOL BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/11153)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 12\/3\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130smail \u015eAH\u0130N<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1.Ferhat ARSLANER<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
2. G\u00fcrkan EK\u0130C\u0130KOL<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, a\u00e7\u0131k\/kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklarla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeyi sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde belirlenmesi talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular, ba\u015fvuru tarihinde silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan Marmara 7 No.lu L Tipi ve \u0130zmir 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak cezalar\u0131n\u0131 infaz etmekte iken daha sonradan denetimli serbestlik tedbirleri uygulanmak suretiyle tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ceza infaz kurumundayken okul \u00e7a\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucular \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu belirterek a\u00e7\u0131k\/kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn hafta sonuna al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u0130nfaz Kurumuna yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun reddedilmesi \u00fczerine \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimliklerine \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimlikleri \u015fik\u00e2yetleri reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
i. COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nan tedbirler gere\u011fince okullar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmayarak uzaktan e\u011fitim sistemi ile e\u011fitimlere devam edildi\u011fi ve herhangi bir hak ma\u011fduriyetinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130nfaz Kurumunda kapasite \u00fcst\u00fc mahpus bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, personel atamalar\u0131 ve ge\u00e7ici g\u00f6revlendirmeler gibi nedenlerle personel say\u0131s\u0131ndaki bariz azalma olu\u015ftu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015f; revir, hastane, duru\u015fmalar, a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 ziyaretler, ziyaret\u00e7ileri kabul ve kontrol i\u015flemleri, oda ve ko\u011fu\u015flarda yap\u0131lan genel ve k\u0131smi aramalar ve avukat ziyaretleri yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yo\u011funlu\u011fu art\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. Mahpuslar\u0131n sevk i\u015flemleri, ko\u011fu\u015flarda meydana gelen asayi\u015fi bozucu olaylara ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel toplu hareketlere m\u00fcdahale, mahpuslar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu\u015flar\u0131na sevki, psikiyatri ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n (huzurda) kulland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, g\u00fcvenlik kameralar\u0131n\u0131n takibi, s\u00fcreli ve s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar ile iletilerin kontrol\u00fc, kuruma intikal ettirilen koliler ve ziyaret\u00e7ilerin refakatlerinde getirdikleri e\u015fyalar\u0131n kontrol\u00fc ve mahpuslar\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile ilgili i\u015flemler gibi kurum i\u00e7i i\u015flem ve faaliyetlerin yetersiz say\u0131daki personel ile yerine getirildi\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. Hafta sonlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ile telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ayn\u0131 personelin hafta sonlar\u0131 da g\u00f6reve gelmelerini gerektirece\u011fi, bu durumun ise hafta sonlar\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan personele hafta i\u00e7i izin verilmesine yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 ve asayi\u015f ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrebilece\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re ziyaret g\u00fcnleri ve saatleri ile bir h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklunun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilece\u011fi ziyaret\u00e7i say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n kurumun fiziki yap\u0131s\u0131 ve kapasitesi dikkate al\u0131narak belirlenece\u011finin, yine h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme g\u00fcn ve saatleri, kurumda bulunan telefon adedi, ba\u015fvuru s\u0131ras\u0131, kurumun asayi\u015f ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak idare taraf\u0131ndan belirlenece\u011finin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. Kurumda mevcut mahpus ve personel say\u0131s\u0131, mahpuslar\u0131n su\u00e7 t\u00fcrlerinin \u00e7e\u015fitlili\u011fi itibar\u0131yla ziyaret ve telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saat ve g\u00fcnlerinin \u00e7ak\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, mahpuslar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 i\u00e7in haftal\u0131k ziyaret ve telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin hafta sonuna al\u0131nmas\u0131 durumunda toplam personel say\u0131s\u0131, hafta sonu \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilecek personel say\u0131s\u0131, \u00f6zellikle hafta sonu avukat g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin olmas\u0131, bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lan mahpus profili ile bunlar\u0131n risk d\u00fczeyleri birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, Kurum g\u00fcvenli\u011finin ve ki\u015fi g\u00fcvenli\u011finin tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015febilece\u011fi, kurum d\u00fczeninin bozulabilece\u011fi belirtilerek Kurumun takdir hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131nda mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itirazlar\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemeleri taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurular, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucular s\u0131ras\u0131yla 25\/2\/2020 ve 7\/1\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. 2021\/4826 numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131n\u0131n konu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuki irtibat\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 2020\/11153 numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmesine ve incelemenin 2020\/11153 numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
9. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucular; \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenimlerine devam etmesi nedeniyle hafta i\u00e7i a\u00e7\u0131k\/kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere gelemedi\u011fini ve telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla ileti\u015fiminin zay\u0131flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ma\u011fdur edildiklerini belirtmi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fu \u00f6rg\u00fcn e\u011fitime devam edenlerin hafta sonu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yapabileceklerine dair daha \u00f6nce ald\u0131klar\u0131 kararlara ra\u011fmen idare ile mahkemelerin taleplerini reddetti\u011fini belirten ba\u015fvurucular, uygulaman\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na ve uluslararas\u0131 d\u00fczenlemelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, taleplerinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle e\u011fitim- \u00f6\u011fretim hakk\u0131, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 ve anayasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 verdi\u011fi cevaplarda iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvuru, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
14. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n haftal\u0131k telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme g\u00fcn ve saatlerinin \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde tespit edilmesi gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin genel ilkeler Anayasa Mahkemesinin Yeliz Erten ([2. B.], B. No: 2020\/99, 11\/3\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 34-38) karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddeleri ebeveynin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla b\u00fct\u00fcnle\u015fmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ve kamusal makamlar\u0131n bu t\u00fcr tedbirleri alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir. Mahkemeler, idari makamlar ve yasama organ\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ilgilendiren b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerde \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi ve aile ili\u015fkilerinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde hareket edilmesi devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin gere\u011fidir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n baz\u0131 haklar\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz sonucu olsa da ceza infaz kurumu idaresi h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n ailesiyle temas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak tedbirler almak zorundad\u0131r. Bu tedbirler al\u0131n\u0131rken \u00e7ocu\u011fun y\u00fcksek yarar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek kamu d\u00fczeni ve su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi ile aile hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir denge sa\u011flanmal\u0131 ve bu konuda ikna edici gerek\u00e7eler ortaya konmal\u0131d\u0131r. Telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131 konusunda tespit edilen bu ilkeler, a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin \u00e7ocuk ve ebeveynin aile ba\u011flar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrecek \u015fekilde temas etmesini sa\u011flamas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da ge\u00e7erlidir (Ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde bkz. Kenan G\u00fclbay [2. B.], B. No: 2020\/9239, 8\/6\/2023, \u00a7 10; Enes Akelma ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2020\/37466, 8\/2\/2024, \u00a7 10; \u015eaban Cino\u011flu [2. B.], B. No: 2020\/8674, 8\/6\/2023, \u00a7 9).<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan Yeliz Erten ve ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki di\u011fer kararlar\u0131nda (Yeliz Erten,\u00a7 43, Kenan G\u00fclbay, \u00a7 12; Enes Akelma ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 12; \u015eaban Cino\u011flu, \u00a7 11) \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n da g\u00f6zetilerek aile ili\u015fkilerinin devaml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde hareket edilmedi\u011fi, telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme ve ziyaret g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn hafta sonu olacak \u015fekilde ayarlanmas\u0131n\u0131n kurumun g\u00fcvenli\u011fini ne \u015fekilde tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrece\u011finin ilgili kararlarda somut ve yeterli \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan devletten beklenen pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin yerine getirilmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fcn e\u011fitime devam etti\u011fi ve a\u00e7\u0131k\/kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ile telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131n hafta i\u00e7i kulland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015femedi\u011fi konusunda bir teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Buna ra\u011fmen idari ve yarg\u0131sal makamlar, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n talepleri ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 da g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne alarak aile ili\u015fkilerinin devaml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde hareket etmemi\u015f; kararlar\u0131nda telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme ve ziyaret g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn hafta sonu olacak \u015fekilde ayarlanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130nfaz Kurumunun g\u00fcvenli\u011fini ne \u015fekilde tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrece\u011fine y\u00f6nelik ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7elere yer vermemi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle somut ba\u015fvuruda yukar\u0131da de\u011finilen kararlarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Bu do\u011frultuda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucular; ihlalin tespitine, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve 500.000 TL ve 1.000.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucular tahliye edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fundan yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. \u00d6te yandan eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin b\u00fct\u00fcn sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan manevi zarar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruculara ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 34.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM <\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n B\u0130RLE\u015eT\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
B. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
C. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
D. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvuruculara net 34.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n AYRI AYRI \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Silivri 1. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2019\/5190, K.2019\/5299), Silivri A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (2020\/41 D.\u0130\u015f), Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2020\/3142, K.2020\/3205), Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (2020\/2738 D.\u0130\u015f) ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE12\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 12\/3\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/11153 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR FERHAT ARSLANER VE G\u00dcRKAN EK\u0130C\u0130KOL BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/11153) Karar Tarihi: 12\/3\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u0130smail \u015eAH\u0130N Ba\u015fvurucular : 1.Ferhat ARSLANER : 2. G\u00fcrkan EK\u0130C\u0130KOL I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, a\u00e7\u0131k\/kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklarla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeyi sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde belirlenmesi talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular, ba\u015fvuru tarihinde silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan Marmara 7 No.lu L Tipi ve \u0130zmir 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak cezalar\u0131n\u0131 infaz etmekte iken daha sonradan denetimli serbestlik tedbirleri uygulanmak suretiyle tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ceza infaz kurumundayken okul \u00e7a\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucular \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu belirterek a\u00e7\u0131k\/kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn hafta sonuna al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u0130nfaz Kurumuna yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun reddedilmesi \u00fczerine \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimliklerine \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimlikleri \u015fik\u00e2yetleri reddetmi\u015ftir. 4. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda; i. COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nan tedbirler gere\u011fince okullar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmayarak uzaktan e\u011fitim sistemi ile e\u011fitimlere devam edildi\u011fi ve herhangi bir hak ma\u011fduriyetinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130nfaz Kurumunda kapasite \u00fcst\u00fc mahpus bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, personel atamalar\u0131 ve ge\u00e7ici g\u00f6revlendirmeler gibi nedenlerle personel say\u0131s\u0131ndaki bariz …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n