{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","provider_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru","author_name":"Hukuki Haber.net","author_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/","title":"AYM'nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"U4Ico7CTL3\"><a href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\">AYM&#8217;nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/embed\/#?secret=U4Ico7CTL3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abAYM&#8217;nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00bb &#8212; Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" data-secret=\"U4Ico7CTL3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>","description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR AL\u0130 KO\u00c7 VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/11771) Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : C. Ece YALIM Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Ali KO\u00c7 2. Umahan KO\u00c7 3. Mehmet KO\u00c7 Vekili : Av. Figen ELALDI I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ihtiyati tedbirinin uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular taraf\u0131ndan azledilen avukat M.S.\u00d6. vekalet \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine icra takibi ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n icra takibine itiraz etmeleri \u00fczerine M.S.\u00d6. taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine K\u00fctahya 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinde Mahkeme) 17\/7\/2012 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 M.S.\u00d6. dava dilek\u00e7esinde K\u00fctahya 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin (1.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi) 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular ad\u0131na vekil olarak dosyay\u0131 takip etti\u011fini, hi\u00e7 bir hakl\u0131 sebep bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve \u00fccret \u00f6denmeksizin karar celsesinden \u00f6nce vekillikten azledildi\u011fini, davan\u0131n kazan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, son celsede vekil olarak bulunan avukat i\u00e7in 10.050,00 TL avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdir edildi\u011fini, vekalet \u00fccretini alabilmek amac\u0131yla ilams\u0131z icra yoluyla takip ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n takibi durdurdu\u011funu, bor\u00e7lular\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 ayr\u0131ca 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bulunan alaca\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k tedbir konulmas\u0131na karar &hellip;"}