{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","provider_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru","author_name":"Hukuki Haber.net","author_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/","title":"AYM'nin 2019\/36380 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yeRvNCXs5D\"><a href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2019-36380-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\">AYM&#8217;nin 2019\/36380 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2019-36380-basvuru-numarali-karari\/embed\/#?secret=yeRvNCXs5D\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abAYM&#8217;nin 2019\/36380 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00bb &#8212; Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" data-secret=\"yeRvNCXs5D\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>","description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MEHMET BAKIRLI BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/36380) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 21\/2\/2025 &#8211; 32820 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Osman KODAL Ba\u015fvurucu : Mehmet BAKIRLI Vekili : Av. S\u00fcleyman CO\u015eKUN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131lan davada faiz ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihinin ve t\u00fcr\u00fc ile davan\u0131n niteli\u011finin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesine y\u00f6nelik ikinci \u0131slah talebinin kabul edilmemesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 28\/10\/2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u00d6demi\u015f 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinde (i\u015f mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla) 16\/12\/2015 ve 10\/2\/2016 tarihlerinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalarla toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 3\/1\/2017 tarihli \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile 12\/12\/2016 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporu do\u011frultusunda as\u0131l dava dilek\u00e7esinde talep etti\u011fi 17.000 TL alaca\u011f\u0131 32.094,05 TL&#8217;ye birle\u015fen davada talep etti\u011fi 10.080 TL &hellip;"}