{"id":97210,"date":"2025-05-26T12:27:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-26T09:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-05-26T12:27:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-26T09:27:00","slug":"yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n

1. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 :ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 sonunda, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi, Tetkik Hakimi …\u2019un raporu okundu, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n

-KARAR-<\/p>\n

Dava, muris muvazaas\u0131 hukuksal nedenine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan e\u015fi …\u2019n\u0131n 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131n \u00bd pay\u0131n\u0131 o\u011flu olan daval\u0131ya sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle devretti\u011fini, temlikin mirastan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 ve muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, daval\u0131 ad\u0131na olan tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile terekeye iadesine veya miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 18.000 TL bedel kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n ikinci e\u015fi olup, temlik tarihinde mirasb\u0131rakan ile evli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan miras hakk\u0131n\u0131n da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n temlik tarihinde miras\u00e7\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, temlikin de miras\u00e7\u0131lardan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

1949 do\u011fumlu mirasb\u0131rakan …\u2019n\u0131n 22.09.2014 tarihinde \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile geride miras\u00e7\u0131 olarak davac\u0131 ikinci e\u015fi … ile ilk e\u015fi …\u2019ten olma daval\u0131 o\u011flu … ve …ten olma dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 …, … ve…\u2019n\u0131n kald\u0131klar\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n davac\u0131 ikinci e\u015fi ile 21.06.2010 tarihinde evlendi\u011fi, dava konusu 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131(1.206 m2\u2019lik Avlulu \u0130ki Katl\u0131 … Ev ) ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00bd pay\u0131n\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rakarak kalan \u00bd pay\u0131n\u0131 14.06.2010 tarihinde daval\u0131 o\u011flu Ramazan\u2019a sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle temlik etti\u011fi kayden sabittir.<\/p>\n

Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, uygulamada ve \u00f6\u011fretide “muris muvazaas\u0131” olarak tan\u0131mlanan muvazaa, niteli\u011fi itibariyle nisbi (mevsuf-vas\u0131fl\u0131) muvazaa t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr. S\u00f6z konusu muvazaada miras b\u0131rakan ger\u00e7ekten s\u00f6zle\u015fme yapmak ve tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 devretmek istemektedir. Ancak miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 miras hakk\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rakmak i\u00e7in esas amac\u0131n\u0131 gizleyerek, ger\u00e7ekte ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamak istedi\u011fi tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131, tapuda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 resmi s\u00f6zle\u015fmede iradesini sat\u0131\u015f veya \u00f6l\u00fcnceye kadar bakma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131klamak suretiyle devretmektedir.<\/p>\n

Bu durumda, yerle\u015fmi\u015f Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda ve 01.04.1974 tarih 1\/2 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrdeki s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ek iradelerine uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, gizli ba\u011f\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi de T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunun 706., T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunun 237. (Bor\u00e7lar Kanunun 213.) ve Tapu Kanunun 26. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekil ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan yoksun bulundu\u011fundan, sakl\u0131 pay sahibi olsun veya olmas\u0131n miras hakk\u0131 \u00e7i\u011fnenen t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar dava a\u00e7arak resmi s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin muvazaa nedeni ile ge\u00e7ersizli\u011finin tespitini ve buna dayan\u0131larak olu\u015fturulan tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptalini isteyebilirler.<\/p>\n

Hemen belirtmek gerekir ki; bu t\u00fcr uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131, adil ve do\u011fru bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilmesi, daval\u0131ya yap\u0131lan temlikin ger\u00e7ek y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn di\u011fer bir s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n as\u0131l irade ve amac\u0131n\u0131n duraksamaya yer b\u0131rakmayacak bi\u00e7imde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Bir i\u00e7 sorun olan ve gizlenen ger\u00e7ek irade ve amac\u0131n tespiti ve ayd\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 genellikle zor oldu\u011fundan bu y\u00f6ndeki delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131lmas\u0131 yan\u0131nda birlikte ve do\u011fru \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirilmesi de b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Bunun i\u00e7in de \u00fclke ve y\u00f6renin gelenek ve g\u00f6renekleri, toplumsal e\u011filimleri, olaylar\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi yapmakta hakl\u0131 ve makul bir nedeninin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 yan\u0131n al\u0131m g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sat\u0131\u015f bedeli ile s\u00f6zle\u015fme tarihindeki ger\u00e7ek de\u011fer aras\u0131ndaki fark, taraflar ile miras b\u0131rakan aras\u0131ndaki be\u015feri ili\u015fki gibi olgulardan yararlan\u0131lmas\u0131nda zorunluluk vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 01.03.2000 tarih 2000\/1-126 Esas, 2000\/143 Karar ilam\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, 1.4.1974 tarih \u00bd say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130nan\u00e7lar\u0131 Birle\u015ftime karar\u0131nda\u201d bir kimsinen miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 miras hakk\u0131ndan yoksun etmek amac\u0131yla tapu sicilinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mal\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ekte ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamak istedi\u011fi halde, tapu sicil memuru \u00f6n\u00fcnde iradesini sat\u0131\u015f do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi durumunda sakl\u0131 pay sahibi olsun ya da olmas\u0131n miras hakk\u0131 \u00e7i\u011fnenen t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrdeki sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve gizlenen ba\u011f\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin de bi\u00e7im ko\u015fulundan yoksun bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek a\u00e7abilecekleri bu dava hakk\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenen Medeni Kanunun 565 ve 669. maddelerinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 haklara etkili olam\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Gerek karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinden, gerekse ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olan sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden b\u00f6yle bir davan\u0131n temlikin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yanlar\u0131n a\u00e7abilece\u011fini kabul etme olana\u011f\u0131 yoktur. Aksine de\u011finilen kararda belirli bir miras\u00e7\u0131 veya miras\u00e7\u0131lardan s\u00f6z edilmeyip genel \u201cmiras\u00e7\u0131 s\u00f6zc\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kullan\u0131lmak \u201cmiras hakk\u0131 \u00e7i\u011fnenen t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u201d denmek suretiyle temlik tarihinde mevcut ve sonradan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilecek miras\u00e7\u0131lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f de\u011fildir. Nitekim 22.05.1987 tarih 4\/5 say\u0131l\u0131 inan\u00e7lar\u0131 birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde de \u201cmirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temliki tasarruflardan zarar g\u00f6ren miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n \u201cdava a\u00e7abilecekleri belirtilmi\u015ftir. O halde muvazaal\u0131 temlik tarihinde miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n ba\u015fka bir miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, miras\u00e7\u0131dan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma iradesinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterlidir. Esasen muvazaal\u0131 temlikten bir veya bir ka\u00e7 miras\u00e7\u0131 de\u011fil, t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n zarar g\u00f6rece\u011fi a\u015fikard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun 580. maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u201cmiras\u00e7\u0131 olabilmek i\u00e7in mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc an\u0131nda mirasa ehil olarak sa\u011f olmak \u015fartt\u0131r.\u201d Ba\u015fka bir ko\u015ful s\u00f6z konusu olamaz.Yine ayn\u0131 kanunun 599.maddesinde\u201dmiras\u00e7\u0131lar, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile miras\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak, kanun gere\u011fince kazan\u0131rlar. Kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ayr\u0131k durumlar sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere miras\u00e7\u0131lar, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n ayni haklar\u0131n\u0131, alacaklar\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 haklar\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r ve ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar \u00fczerindeki zilyetliklerini do\u011frudan do\u011fruya kazan\u0131rlar ve mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n bor\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ki\u015fisel olarak sorumlu olurlar\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc getirilmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun de\u011finilen a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda bir miras\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n daha \u00f6nce de\u011fil, murisin \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihinde (miras\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lma tarihinde)miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011fa ehil ve sa\u011f olmas\u0131 esast\u0131r. \u0130stikrar kazanm\u0131\u015f Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda murisin muvazaal\u0131 temliki yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ile bundan sonra ana rahmine d\u00fc\u015fen \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda dava hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hi\u00e7 bir fark g\u00f6zetilmemi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun 500.maddesinin \u201cevlatl\u0131k ve altsoyu, evl\u00e2t edinene kan h\u0131s\u0131m\u0131 gibi miras\u00e7\u0131 olurlar \u201c h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince f\u00fcruu ve evl\u00e2tl\u0131k aras\u0131nda bir ay\u0131r\u0131m yapmak da olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r. Bunun yan\u0131nda mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n ba\u015fka bir miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n muvazaa nedeniyle dava a\u00e7\u0131p tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile terekeye d\u00f6nd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde temlik tarihinden sonra miras\u00e7\u0131 olan ki\u015finin o ta\u015f\u0131nmaza pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda malik olaca\u011f\u0131 ku\u015fkusuzdur.<\/p>\n

H\u00e2l b\u00f6yle olunca, muvazaal\u0131 temlik tarihinden sonra miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 kazanan miras\u00e7\u0131ya muvazaa nedeniyle dava a\u00e7mak hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmamas\u0131 izah\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 bir \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015fturur, muvazaal\u0131 i\u015flemlerin h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilkelere, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine, s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen inan\u00e7lar birle\u015ftirme kararlar\u0131na, Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n yerle\u015fmi\u015f i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na ters bir sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur. \u00d6yle ise miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n muvazaal\u0131 temlikinden sonra evl\u00e2t edindi\u011fi, veya evlendi\u011fi ki\u015finin yahut ana rahmine d\u00fc\u015fen \u00e7ocu\u011funun muris muvazaas\u0131na dayanarak tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 iptal ve tescil davalar\u0131nda 1.4.1974 tarih \u00bd say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130nan\u00e7lar\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulama yeri bulaca\u011f\u0131, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak somut olayda da davac\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi kabul edilerek, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilke ve olgular g\u00f6zetilmek suretiyle i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilmesi, taraf delillerinin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u00fczere karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerindedir. Kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 3.maddesi yollamas\u0131 ile) 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK’un 428.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, al\u0131nan pe\u015fin harc\u0131n temyiz edene geri verilmesine, 11.03.2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 11.03.2019 tarihli, 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 sonunda, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi, Tetkik Hakimi …\u2019un raporu okundu, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. -KARAR- Dava, muris muvazaas\u0131 hukuksal nedenine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan e\u015fi …\u2019n\u0131n 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131n \u00bd pay\u0131n\u0131 o\u011flu olan daval\u0131ya sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle devretti\u011fini, temlikin mirastan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 ve muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, daval\u0131 ad\u0131na olan tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile terekeye iadesine veya miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 18.000 TL bedel kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n ikinci e\u015fi olup, temlik tarihinde mirasb\u0131rakan ile evli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan miras hakk\u0131n\u0131n da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n temlik tarihinde miras\u00e7\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, temlikin de miras\u00e7\u0131lardan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. 1949 do\u011fumlu mirasb\u0131rakan …\u2019n\u0131n 22.09.2014 tarihinde \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile geride miras\u00e7\u0131 olarak davac\u0131 ikinci e\u015fi … ile ilk e\u015fi …\u2019ten olma daval\u0131 o\u011flu … ve …ten olma dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 …, … ve…\u2019n\u0131n kald\u0131klar\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n davac\u0131 ikinci e\u015fi ile …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 sonunda, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi, Tetkik Hakimi …\u2019un raporu okundu, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. -KARAR- Dava, muris muvazaas\u0131 hukuksal nedenine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan e\u015fi …\u2019n\u0131n 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131n \u00bd pay\u0131n\u0131 o\u011flu olan daval\u0131ya sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle devretti\u011fini, temlikin mirastan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 ve muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, daval\u0131 ad\u0131na olan tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile terekeye iadesine veya miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 18.000 TL bedel kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n ikinci e\u015fi olup, temlik tarihinde mirasb\u0131rakan ile evli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan miras hakk\u0131n\u0131n da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n temlik tarihinde miras\u00e7\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, temlikin de miras\u00e7\u0131lardan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. 1949 do\u011fumlu mirasb\u0131rakan …\u2019n\u0131n 22.09.2014 tarihinde \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile geride miras\u00e7\u0131 olarak davac\u0131 ikinci e\u015fi … ile ilk e\u015fi …\u2019ten olma daval\u0131 o\u011flu … ve …ten olma dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 …, … ve…\u2019n\u0131n kald\u0131klar\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n davac\u0131 ikinci e\u015fi ile …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-26T09:27:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-26T09:27:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1564,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-26T09:27:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 sonunda, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi, Tetkik Hakimi …\u2019un raporu okundu, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. -KARAR- Dava, muris muvazaas\u0131 hukuksal nedenine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan e\u015fi …\u2019n\u0131n 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131n \u00bd pay\u0131n\u0131 o\u011flu olan daval\u0131ya sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle devretti\u011fini, temlikin mirastan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 ve muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, daval\u0131 ad\u0131na olan tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile terekeye iadesine veya miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 18.000 TL bedel kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n ikinci e\u015fi olup, temlik tarihinde mirasb\u0131rakan ile evli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan miras hakk\u0131n\u0131n da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n temlik tarihinde miras\u00e7\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, temlikin de miras\u00e7\u0131lardan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. 1949 do\u011fumlu mirasb\u0131rakan …\u2019n\u0131n 22.09.2014 tarihinde \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile geride miras\u00e7\u0131 olarak davac\u0131 ikinci e\u015fi … ile ilk e\u015fi …\u2019ten olma daval\u0131 o\u011flu … ve …ten olma dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 …, … ve…\u2019n\u0131n kald\u0131klar\u0131, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n davac\u0131 ikinci e\u015fi ile …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-26T09:27:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-05-26T09:27:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1564,"publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-26T09:27:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-1-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-6514-e-2019-1735-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2016\/6514 E., 2019\/1735 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97210\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}