“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Daire : B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 DA\u0130RE
\nKarar Y\u0131l\u0131 : 1988
\nKarar No : 355
\nEsas Y\u0131l\u0131 : 1988
\nEsas No : 336
\nKarar Tarihi : 19\/12\/988<\/p>\n
2960 SAYILI BO\u011eAZ\u0130\u00c7\u0130 KANUNUNUN 3. MADDES\u0130N\u0130N (G) BEND\u0130N\u0130N, 3194 SAYILI \u0130MAR KANUNUNUN 47. MADDES\u0130YLE DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130K H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130N\u0130N VE BO\u011eAZ\u0130\u00c7\u0130NDE \u0130MAR AFFINI \u00d6NG\u00d6REN 3194 SAYILI YASANIN GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 7. MADDES\u0130N\u0130N 1. FIKRASININ ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130NCE \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u00dcZER\u0130NE NASIL B\u0130R UYGULAMA YAPILACA\u011eI VE KAZANILMI\u015e HAKLARIN NE \u015eEK\u0130LDE DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LECE\u011e\u0130 HK.<\/p>\n
\u0130sti\u015fari d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce isteminin konusunu, 18.11.1983 g\u00fcn ve 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 3.5.1985 g\u00fcn ve 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun 47.maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 3. maddesinin (g) bendinde yer alan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 7.maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal edilmesi \u00fczerine, 3194 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 9.5.1985 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi 11.12.1986 g\u00fcn\u00fcne kadar olan s\u00fcreyle Anayasa mahkemesince iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi 11.12.1986 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden ilan edildi\u011fi 18.4.1987 g\u00fcn\u00fcne kadar olan s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm b\u00f6lgesinde ruhsat alan ve konut yapan ilgililerin in\u015faatlar\u0131n\u0131n durumlar\u0131na g\u00f6re kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n saptanmas\u0131 ve Ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal edilen ve Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm b\u00f6lgesindeki yap\u0131lara imar aff\u0131 getiren 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici 7.maddesinin 1.f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n da uygulama ve m\u00fcktesep hak y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011ferlendirilmesi hususlar\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Anayasan\u0131n, 153. maddesinde, hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal karar\u0131 verilen, kanun, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname veya bunlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n resmi gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkaca\u011f\u0131, iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmeyece\u011fi, Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Resmi Gazetede hemen yay\u0131mlanaca\u011f\u0131 ve yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme ve yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131, idare makamlar\u0131n\u0131, ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015fileri ba\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 2949 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 53. maddesi de Anayasan\u0131n 153. maddesine uygun olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin amac\u0131, hi\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesiz iptal kararlar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce yap\u0131lan i\u015flem ve uygulamalarla \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n elde etti\u011fi kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n ve kamu d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hukuk Devleti ilkesinin gere\u011fidir. Hukuk Devletinde b\u00fct\u00fcn devlet faaliyetlerinin hukuk kurallar\u0131na uygun olmas\u0131 \u00f6nemli ve temel bir ilkedir. \u0130dari i\u015flemlerin geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmezli\u011fi ilkesi de kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcden ve idarenin faaliyetlerini genel planda s\u0131n\u0131rlayan bir ilkedir.
\nKazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak, objektif bir hukuk kural\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filere uygulanmas\u0131yla objektif ve genel hukuki durumun ki\u015fisel bir i\u015flemle \u00f6zel hukuki duruma d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesidir.
\nKazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hakk\u0131n her olaya g\u00f6re incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak kavram\u0131n\u0131n bir fonksiyonellik i\u00e7erdi\u011fi doktrinde kabul edilmi\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131yla Dan\u0131\u015ftay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda da kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak kavram\u0131n\u0131n konu ve kapsam\u0131n\u0131n kesin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7izilmedi\u011fi ve her olaya g\u00f6re, de\u011fi\u015fken olmas\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutularak, konunun \u00f6zelli\u011fine g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirme yoluna gidildi\u011fi g\u00f6zlenmektedir.<\/p>\n
\u0130sti\u015fari d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce istemine konu olan olayda, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i alan\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesinde uyulacak esaslar\u0131 belirleyen 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011faz i\u00e7i Kanununun 3.maddesinin (g) bendiyle, \u00f6zellikle, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm b\u00f6lgesinde konut yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015fken, 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun 47.maddesiyle bu b\u00f6lgede s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 yap\u0131la\u015fmaya olanak sa\u011flam\u0131\u015f ve bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn Anayasa Mahkemesiyle iptal edilmesiyle s\u00f6z konusu alandaki mevcut yap\u0131la\u015fmada m\u00fcktesep haklar\u0131n genel olarak saptanmas\u0131 sorunu ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanunu ve buna ili\u015fkin mevzuat, 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve bu konuya ili\u015fkin Dan\u0131\u015ftay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 birlikte incelendi\u011finde, imar i\u015flerinde ilgililer y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n do\u011fumunun saptanmas\u0131nda; yap\u0131 ruhsat\u0131, yap\u0131 kullanma izni gibi i\u015flemle rin ve in\u015faata ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tamamlanmam\u0131\u015fsa hangi seviyede bulundu\u011fu durumlar\u0131n\u0131n ve bunlar\u0131n tarihlerinin \u00f6nemli bir etken oldu\u011fu ve bu kavram ve esaslardan hareket edilerek olay\u0131na g\u00f6re ki\u015filerin imar i\u015flerindeki haklar\u0131n\u0131n kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir hak te\u015fkil edip etmedi\u011fi konusunda bir sonuca gidildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
Duraksama konusu hususlar iki d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 soruldu\u011fundan, inceleme de bu esasa g\u00f6re yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A- \u0130lk d\u00f6nem, 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 9.5.1985 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden Anayasa Mahkemesinin iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi 11.12.1986 g\u00fcnleri aras\u0131ndaki s\u00fcreti kapsamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu tarihler aras\u0131nda kalan s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yap\u0131 ruhsat\u0131 verilmi\u015f ve in\u015faata ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f ve 18.4.1987 tarihine kadar in\u015faat\u0131 tamamlanm\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lar, ilgilileri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bu haklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 gerekece\u011fi, Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler, (yap\u0131 ruhsat\u0131, yap\u0131 kullanma izni vb.) daha sonra Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal edilmi\u015f bir Yasaya dayal\u0131 olsalar bile, Yasan\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131ras\u0131nda ve Yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131ndan, 18.4.1987 tarihine kadar bitirilmi\u015f yap\u0131lar\u0131n dayanaklar\u0131 olan ve yap\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 anda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan hukuka uygun i\u015flemlerin geri al\u0131nmalar\u0131na, di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla, idari i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 andan itibaren b\u00fct\u00fcn hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla birlikte ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na hukuki olanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bununla beraber, 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun, genel esaslar\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 3., orman alanlar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 4.maddeleri h\u00fck\u00fcmleri g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutularak, Kanunun 1.maddesinde “… \u0130stanbul Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i alan\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcrel ve tarihi de\u011ferlerini ve do\u011fal g\u00fczelliklerini kamu yarar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek korumak ve geli\u015ftirmek ve bu alanda n\u00fcfus yo\u011funlu\u011funu artt\u0131racak yap\u0131lanmay\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamak…” olarak belirlenen amac\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmek ve bu amaca uygun olmamakla beraber Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal edilen h\u00fckme dayal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131la\u015fan alanlar\u0131n kurtar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve \u00e7arp\u0131kl\u0131klar\u0131n giderilmesi i\u00e7in, yeni bir imar plan\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve bu plan gere\u011fince kamula\u015ft\u0131rma yoluna gidilmesi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilece\u011fi, 9.5.1985-11.12.1986 g\u00fcnleri aras\u0131ndaki s\u00fcrede ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n 18.4.1987 tarihinden sonra in\u015faatlar\u0131 tamamlanm\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden idare taraf\u0131ndan oturmaya uygun hale gelme durumunun ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131l\u0131rken imar mevzuat\u0131 esaslar\u0131ndan hareket edilmesi ve yine Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun amac\u0131 ve genel esaslar\u0131 g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilmeksizin yap\u0131 sahiplerinin kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n\u0131n 18.4.1987 g\u00fcn\u00fcndeki duruma g\u00f6re her biri i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 saptanmas\u0131 gerekece\u011fi, 9.5.1985-11.12.1986 g\u00fcnleri aras\u0131ndaki s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde in\u015faata ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f olmakla birlikte hen\u00fcz in\u015faatlar\u0131 tamamlanmam\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden durumun 18.4.1987 tarihi g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak yap\u0131lar\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilerek korunmas\u0131 gerekli bir hakk\u0131n mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n saptanmas\u0131 gerekece\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Bu g\u00fcne de\u011fin hi\u00e7 in\u015faata ba\u015flanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde ise ilgililer lehine kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir haktan s\u00f6z edilemiyece\u011fi, yap\u0131 ruhsat\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n, hukuka uygun olarak verilmesine ra\u011fmen bu hususun tek ba\u015f\u0131na hak kazand\u0131rma\u011fa yeterli say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, idarenin kolluk yetkilerine dayanarak verdi\u011fi izinleri (ruhsatlar\u0131) kamu d\u00fczeni ve kamu yarar\u0131 ilkelerinden hareketle geri alabilme yetkisinin mevcut bulundu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
B- \u0130kinci d\u00f6nem, Anayasa mahkemesinin iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi 11.12.1986 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden Resmi gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 18.4.1987 g\u00fcn\u00fcne kadar olan s\u00fcreyi i\u00e7ine almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n kesin oldu\u011fu ve Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlan mas\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi ve yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme, yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131, idare makamlar\u0131n\u0131, ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015fileri ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ba\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususuna yukar\u0131da de\u011finilmi\u015fti. Ancak, konuyla ilgili Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n radyo, televizyon ve gazetelerde, karar\u0131n verildi\u011fi g\u00fcn ve sonraki g\u00fcnlerde haber olarak verilmesiyle idare ve ki\u015filer y\u00f6n\u00fcnden alenile\u015fmi\u015f bulundu\u011fu da bilinen bir ger\u00e7ektir. Bu ger\u00e7ek kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda karar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 11.12.1986 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden sonra idarenin bir yap\u0131 ruhsat\u0131 vermemesi ve yap\u0131lmakta olanlar hakk\u0131nda da yap\u0131lar\u0131n durumlar\u0131na g\u00f6re
\nuygun \u00f6nlemleri almas\u0131 gerekirdi.<\/p>\n
11.12.1986 tarihinde Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n duyuruldu\u011fu g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; iptal edildi\u011fi bilinen bir kanuna g\u00f6re verilmi\u015f imar ruhsatlar\u0131na dayal\u0131 in\u015faatlar s\u00f6z konusu olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, idarenin bu tarihten sonra yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemlerin hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez. Ancak, bu t\u00fcr i\u015flemlerin dahi subjektif oldu\u011fu yads\u0131namaz.
\n\u0130dari i\u015flemin geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 teorisinin uygulama alan\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda i\u015flemin hak do\u011furup do\u011furmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 da hukuka uygunlu\u011fu kadar \u00f6nemlidir. Nitekim, Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n 26.9.1952 g\u00fcnl\u00fc E:1952\/15, K:1952\/244 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131nda bu ger\u00e7ek \u015fu bi\u00e7imde vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. “Kanunsuz bir terfi i\u015fleminin, bundan faydalanan memur lehine m\u00fcktesep bir hak do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u015fikar olmakla beraber bu terfiin de s\u00fcbjektif baz\u0131 tesir ve neticeler has\u0131l etti\u011fine \u015f\u00fcphe edilemez. B\u00f6yle olunca kanunsuz bir terfiin her zaman geri al\u0131nabilece\u011fini kabul etmek terfiin kanunsuzlu\u011fu dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bunun tesir ve neticelerini tehdit eden m\u00fcphemiyet ve karars\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hudutsuz bir \u015fekilde devam\u0131na yol a\u00e7mak olur ki, bu hal idare hukuku sahas\u0131nda da tatbik yeri bulan istikrar esas\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmaz.”<\/p>\n
Hukuka auk\u0131r\u0131 bir i\u015flemin ise kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak do\u011furabilece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek pek kolay olmamakla beraber, sakat bir i\u015flemin de bundan yararlananlar lehine bir hak do\u011furabilece\u011fi ve subjektif sonu\u00e7lar meydana getirece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Yok i\u015flemler, ilgilinin hilesine dayal\u0131 i\u015flemler, idarenin a\u00e7\u0131k hatas\u0131 sonucu yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler ve hemen hak do\u011furmaya elveri\u015fli olmayan i\u015flemlerin kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir hak do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131 da tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bunlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki idarenin baz\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flemlerinin, hukuka uygun olmasalar bile ilgili lehine yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuki durumlar\u0131n belli bir s\u00fcreden sonra de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi idarenin istikrar\u0131 ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fer.<\/p>\n
Bu i\u015flemler hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olsalar bile yarg\u0131sal ba\u015fvurma s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7irildikten sonra hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu durum idari i\u015flemin ki\u015fisel sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilkesinin do\u011fal bir sonucu dur. Bu bak\u0131mdan 11.12.1986-18.4.1987 g\u00fcnleri aras\u0131nda imar ruhsat\u0131 ve rilmi\u015f ve bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde in\u015faatlar\u0131 tamamlanm\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lar\u0131n ilgilileri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yukar\u0131daki esaslar g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak ve hukuk d\u00fczeninde korun maya de\u011fer bir hakk\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n saptanmas\u0131 ko\u015fuluyla hukuki durumlar\u0131 n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekece\u011fi,<\/p>\n
11.12.1986-18.4.1987 g\u00fcnleri aras\u0131nda imar ruhsat\u0131 verilmesine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k in\u015faatlar\u0131 al\u0131nan s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde tamamlanm\u0131\u015f yap\u0131larda da, subjektif hakk\u0131n do\u011fumunun saptanmas\u0131 ve ilgilileri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden korunmaya de\u011fer bulundu\u011fu nisbette hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi yolunda i\u015flemler yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekece\u011fi, 11.12.1986-18.4.1987 g\u00fcnleri aras\u0131nda yap\u0131m\u0131na hi\u00e7 ba\u015flanmam\u0131\u015f olmakla birlikte 18.4.1987 tarihinden sonra yap\u0131mlar\u0131na ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f ve tamamlanm\u0131\u015f veya bu g\u00fcne de\u011fin tamamlanmam\u0131\u015f veyahut bu g\u00fcne kadar in\u015faata ba\u015flanmam\u0131\u015f ruhsat sahiplerinin do\u011fmu\u015f bir haklar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu nedenle 18.4.1987 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden sonra in\u015faatlar\u0131na ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f olan yap\u0131lar\u0131n ilgilileri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden korunmaya de\u011fer bir haktan s\u00f6z edilemiyece\u011fi, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i imar aff\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici 7.maddesinin 1.f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda uygulama ve ilgililerin m\u00fcktesep haklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden durumun de\u011ferlendirilmesi konusuna gelince, Ge\u00e7ici 7.maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda, “\u0130stanbul ve \u00c7anakkale Bo\u011fazlar\u0131nda 2981 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Aff\u0131 Kanununa g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurulan yap\u0131lar, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 3.maddesinin \u0130stanbul ve \u00c7anakkale bo\u011fazlar\u0131 ile ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma Kanunu ile 2981 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 14.maddesinin (f) f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re ve bitmi\u015f olmalar\u0131 ko\u015fulu ile 5 misli bina in\u015faat harc\u0131 al\u0131narak af kapsam\u0131na dahil edilir. Ayn\u0131 Kanunun ilgili ekli cetveline g\u00f6re har\u00e7 ayr\u0131ca tahsil edilir. Afla ilgili Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i alan\u0131ndaki tesbit ve de\u011ferlendirme i\u015flemleri mutlaka ilgili belediyelerce yap\u0131l\u0131r ve en ge\u00e7 6 ay i\u00e7inde tamamlanarak sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r…” denilmektedir.<\/p>\n
Madde metninden anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 49.maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re ge\u00e7ici maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck tarihi olan 9.5.1985 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden itibaren en ge\u00e7 6 ay i\u00e7inde i\u015flemler sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131ndan Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm b\u00f6lgesinde imar aff\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen ge\u00e7ici 7.maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc tamamlam\u0131\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu maddeye g\u00f6re elde edilen haklar\u0131n geri al\u0131nmalar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir hak olarak korunmalar\u0131 gerekece\u011fi m\u00fctalaa k\u0131l\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u200bDan\u0131\u015ftay 1. Dairesi’nin 19.12.1988 tarihli ve E:1988\/336, K:1988\/355 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Daire : B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 DA\u0130RE Karar Y\u0131l\u0131 : 1988 Karar No : 355 Esas Y\u0131l\u0131 : 1988 Esas No : 336 Karar Tarihi : 19\/12\/988 2960 SAYILI BO\u011eAZ\u0130\u00c7\u0130 KANUNUNUN 3. MADDES\u0130N\u0130N (G) BEND\u0130N\u0130N, 3194 SAYILI \u0130MAR KANUNUNUN 47. MADDES\u0130YLE DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130K H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130N\u0130N VE BO\u011eAZ\u0130\u00c7\u0130NDE \u0130MAR AFFINI \u00d6NG\u00d6REN 3194 SAYILI YASANIN GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 7. MADDES\u0130N\u0130N 1. FIKRASININ ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130NCE \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u00dcZER\u0130NE NASIL B\u0130R UYGULAMA YAPILACA\u011eI VE KAZANILMI\u015e HAKLARIN NE \u015eEK\u0130LDE DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LECE\u011e\u0130 HK. \u0130sti\u015fari d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce isteminin konusunu, 18.11.1983 g\u00fcn ve 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 3.5.1985 g\u00fcn ve 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun 47.maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 3. maddesinin (g) bendinde yer alan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 7.maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal edilmesi \u00fczerine, 3194 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 9.5.1985 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi 11.12.1986 g\u00fcn\u00fcne kadar olan s\u00fcreyle Anayasa mahkemesince iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi 11.12.1986 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden ilan edildi\u011fi 18.4.1987 g\u00fcn\u00fcne kadar olan s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm b\u00f6lgesinde ruhsat alan ve konut yapan ilgililerin in\u015faatlar\u0131n\u0131n durumlar\u0131na g\u00f6re kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n saptanmas\u0131 ve Ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal edilen ve Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm b\u00f6lgesindeki yap\u0131lara imar aff\u0131 getiren 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici 7.maddesinin 1.f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n da uygulama ve m\u00fcktesep hak y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011ferlendirilmesi hususlar\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Anayasan\u0131n, 153. maddesinde, hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal karar\u0131 verilen, kanun, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname veya …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-95379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n