T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
6. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2010\/12449 E., 2011\/1410 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
Mahalli mahkemesinden verilmi\u015f bulunan yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 payda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131na dair karar daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Dava, daval\u0131lar … ve …’\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.
\n4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 696. maddesi gere\u011fince payda\u015fl\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131karma karar\u0131 verilebilmesi i\u00e7in bir payda\u015f\u0131n tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131yla di\u011fer payda\u015flar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcne veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 olan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini a\u011f\u0131r suretle ihlal etmesi ve bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 y\u00fcz\u00fcnden m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkisinin devam\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ekilmez hale gelmesi gerekmektedir. Maddede bahsedilen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin a\u011f\u0131r surette ihlali deyiminden kusurun \u00f6zel bir yo\u011funlukta ve \u00f6nemde bulunmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u011f\u0131r surette ihlal unsurunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilmesi i\u00e7in, payda\u015f\u0131n kasten ve bilerek m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkisinin devam\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekilmez hale getirmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Olay\u0131m\u0131zda; davac\u0131lar dava dilek\u00e7esinde daval\u0131lar\u0131n payda\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu dava konusu 91 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ait ortak gider ve vergi borcunu \u00f6demeyerek di\u011fer payda\u015flara y\u00fck getirdi\u011fini, daval\u0131lar\u0131n s\u00fcrekli bor\u00e7lanarak haklar\u0131nda icra takibi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve alacakl\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz hakk\u0131nda ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na sebebiyet vererek ortak kullan\u0131m\u0131 imkans\u0131z hale getirdiklerini belirterek daval\u0131lar\u0131n ortakl\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015flerdir. Davac\u0131lar\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bu sebepler, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunun 696. maddesinde a\u00e7\u0131klanan, daval\u0131lar\u0131n di\u011fer payda\u015flara kar\u015f\u0131 olan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini a\u011f\u0131r surette ihlal etti\u011fi ve m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkisinin devam\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekilmez hale getirdi\u011fini g\u00f6stermedi\u011finden davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile HUMK.nun 428.maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, istek halinde pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edene iadesine, 15.02.2011 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
6. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2009\/6241 E., 2009\/9713 K.<\/p>\n
PAYDA\u015eIN \u00c7IKARILMASI
\nELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u0130LE M\u00dcLK\u0130YET<\/p>\n
4721 S. T\u00dcRK MEDEN\u0130 KANUNU [ Madde 696 ]<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Mahalli mahkemesinden verilmi\u015f bulunan yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 payda\u015fl\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131karma davas\u0131na dair karar davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetine tabi ta\u015f\u0131nmazda payda\u015fl\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lma istemine ili\u015fkin olup, mahkemece istemin reddine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 vekili dilek\u00e7esiyle miras b\u0131rakanlar\u0131 M\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026 G\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026 ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131yken \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle kendilerine intikal eden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n daval\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki payda\u015flar\u0131ndan paylar\u0131n\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n ise pay\u0131n\u0131 devretmeye yana\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirerek daval\u0131n\u0131n payla\u015fl\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015f mahkemece daval\u0131n\u0131n pay\u0131n\u0131 satmamaktan ibaret eyleminin Medeni Kanununun 696\/a maddesindeki payda\u015f\u0131n y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc a\u011f\u0131r surette ihlal mahiyetinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetine tabi ta\u015f\u0131nmazlarda elbirli\u011fi hali devam etti\u011fi s\u00fcrece payda\u015flardan birinin payda\u015fl\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n bu nedenle reddi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle reddedilmesi do\u011fru de\u011filse de sonu\u00e7 itibariyle do\u011fru olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn gerek\u00e7esinin bu \u015fekilde d\u00fczeltilerek, d\u00fczeltilmi\u015f gerek\u00e7eyle ONANMASINA, temyiz harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na mahal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 10.11.2009 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 15.02.2011 tarihli, 2010\/12449 E., 2011\/1410 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 10.11.2009 tarihli, 2009\/6241 E., 2009\/9713 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi 2010\/12449 E., 2011\/1410 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi Mahalli mahkemesinden verilmi\u015f bulunan yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 payda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131na dair karar daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. Dava, daval\u0131lar … ve …’\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 696. maddesi gere\u011fince payda\u015fl\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131karma karar\u0131 verilebilmesi i\u00e7in bir payda\u015f\u0131n tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131yla di\u011fer payda\u015flar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcne veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 olan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini a\u011f\u0131r suretle ihlal etmesi ve bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 y\u00fcz\u00fcnden m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkisinin devam\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ekilmez hale gelmesi gerekmektedir. Maddede bahsedilen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin a\u011f\u0131r surette ihlali deyiminden kusurun \u00f6zel bir yo\u011funlukta ve \u00f6nemde bulunmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u011f\u0131r surette ihlal unsurunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilmesi i\u00e7in, payda\u015f\u0131n kasten ve bilerek m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkisinin devam\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekilmez hale getirmesi gerekir. Olay\u0131m\u0131zda; davac\u0131lar dava dilek\u00e7esinde daval\u0131lar\u0131n payda\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu dava konusu 91 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ait ortak gider ve vergi borcunu \u00f6demeyerek di\u011fer payda\u015flara y\u00fck getirdi\u011fini, daval\u0131lar\u0131n s\u00fcrekli bor\u00e7lanarak haklar\u0131nda icra takibi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve alacakl\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz hakk\u0131nda ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na sebebiyet vererek ortak kullan\u0131m\u0131 imkans\u0131z hale getirdiklerini belirterek daval\u0131lar\u0131n ortakl\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015flerdir. Davac\u0131lar\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bu sebepler, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunun …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n