T.C.<\/p>\n
16. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2019\/1349 E., 2019\/4517 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Mahkemesi :Ceza Dairesi
\nSu\u00e7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma<\/p>\n
H\u00fck\u00fcm : 1-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda; TCK\u2019n\u0131n 314\/2, 62, 53, 58\/9, 63 ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckmedilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine<\/p>\n
2-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda; TCK\u2019n\u0131n 314\/2, 62, 53, 54, 58\/9, 63 ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckmedilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddi<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle;
\nTemyiz edenlerin s\u0131fat\u0131, ba\u015fvurular\u0131n s\u00fcresi, karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi, ve temyiz sebeplerine g\u00f6re dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;
\nSan\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda tayin olunan cezan\u0131n s\u00fcresi itibariyle yasal \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin duru\u015fma isteminin CMK’n\u0131n 299. maddesi gere\u011fince REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
Duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n
I- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz taleplerinin incelenmesinde;
\nAdil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131, \u0130HAS’n\u0131n 6, Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddeleri ile teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nan, hukuk devletinin temel gerekleri aras\u0131nda kabul edilegelmi\u015f bir hak olarak, yarg\u0131lama sonunda verilen karar\u0131n adil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ziyade adil bir karara ula\u015f\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli imkanlar\u0131n sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, s\u00fcrecin d\u00fcr\u00fcst y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin, baz\u0131 asgari g\u00fcvenceler i\u00e7eren bir hakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 6\/3-b maddesine g\u00f6re su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 alt\u0131nda olan herkes, “savunmas\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in gerekli zamana ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma” hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Gerekli zamandan anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve m\u00fcdafiinin savunma i\u00e7in zorunlu haz\u0131rl\u0131klar\u0131 yapabilecekleri s\u00fcredir. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesinin yerle\u015fik uygulamalar\u0131na (1003 Albert and Le Compte\/Belgium, 10.02.1983, 1004 X and Y\/Austria, (Commission, admissibility), Appl. No:7909\/77, 12.10.2978. 1005 Huber\/Austria, (Commission, admissibility), Appl. No: 5523\/72, 05.10.1974.) g\u00f6re s\u00fcrenin yeterlili\u011fi, her olay \u00f6zelinde; davan\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcdafiin bu davadaki i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n gelmi\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u015fama, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ya da m\u00fcdafiin yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki tutumlar\u0131 (AYM.Ufuk R.\u00c7obano\u011flu Ba\u015fvurusu 01.02.2017 tarih 2014\/6971 no) gibi k\u0131staslar g\u00f6zetilerek yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00f6neten hakim taraf\u0131ndan belirlenmelidir. Her halde verilecek s\u00fcrenin, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n alelacele yap\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131 ve fakat makul s\u00fcrede de tamamlanaca\u011f\u0131 teminat\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7ermesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesinin, 01.02.2017 tarih 2014\/6971 nolu Ufuk R. \u00c7obano\u011flu ve 25.03.2015 tarih 2013\/1966 nolu A. Zeki \u00dc\u00e7ok ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda da ifade olundu\u011fu \u00fczere; her ne kadar Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde \u00f6zel s\u0131n\u0131rlama nedenleri \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise de, bu hak mutlak haklardan de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
Bu nedenle hakk\u0131n nesnel s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131yla \u00e7at\u0131\u015fan di\u011fer hak ve ilkeler dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131, aralar\u0131nda bir denge kurulmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130HAS’n\u0131n 6\/3-b ve Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen “savunmas\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in gerekli zamana ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma” hakk\u0131n\u0131n, S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 6\/1.maddesine paralel Anayasan\u0131n 141. maddesinde yer alan, “davalar\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131” ilkesi ile birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve bu iki hak\/ilke aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin kurulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Buna g\u00f6re; savunma i\u00e7in tan\u0131nacak zaman\u0131n, hem yarg\u0131laman\u0131n aceleye getirilmemesini temin etmesi, hem de yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 olumsuz etkileyecek uzunlukta olmamas\u0131 gerekecektir. (Ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde \u0130nceo\u011flu Sibel Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131 sh.324)<\/p>\n
Bu c\u00fcmleden olarak; mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n, do\u011frudan yarg\u0131lamaya konu fiil ve bu fiilin hukuki de\u011ferlendirmesine dair makul s\u00fcrede yap\u0131lacak savunmalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 uzatmaya matuf, hi\u00e7 bir hukuk d\u00fczenince korunmayan “hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131” niteli\u011findeki davran\u0131\u015flara m\u00fcsaade etmemesinin, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 203\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince tan\u0131nan duru\u015fman\u0131n y\u00f6netim ve d\u00fczenini sa\u011flama yetki ve sorumlulu\u011funun bir gere\u011fi oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Somut olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 03.02.2017 tarihli celsede haz\u0131r bulunup ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yapan, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 sundu\u011fu 11.07.2017 tarihli celsede esasa ili\u015fkin savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 yapmak \u00fczere s\u00fcre talep eden, talebi kabul edilerek 02.10.2017 tarihine talik edilen celseye kat\u0131l\u0131p yeniden s\u00fcre talep eden san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine mahkemece tekrar esas hakk\u0131ndaki savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 yapmak \u00fczere bir sonraki celseye kadar s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi, bu celseyi takip eden 12.10.2017 tarihli karar duru\u015fmas\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmayarak ba\u015fka dosyalar\u0131n duru\u015fmalar\u0131na kat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile mazeret dilek\u00e7esi verdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclen m\u00fcdafiin yoklu\u011funda, CMK 188\/1-2 ve 216\/3. maddelerinin tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 yetkiye istinaden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n tamamlan\u0131p h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na nazaran, davan\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k derecesi, m\u00fcdafiinin bu davadaki i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n gelmi\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u015fama san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve m\u00fcdafiinin yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki tutumlar\u0131 itibariyle san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin, kendisine verilen yeterli s\u00fcreye ra\u011fmen karar celsesine kat\u0131lmayarak s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak 10.10.2017 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak m\u00fctalaaya ve esasa ili\u015fkin savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 mahkemeye bildirdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki savunmalar\u0131n hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun oldu\u011fu belirlenerek vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki usuli i\u015flemlerin kanuna uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan t\u00fcm delillerin hukuka uygun olarak elde edildi\u011finin belirlendi\u011fi a\u015famalarda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n temyiz denetimini sa\u011flayacak bi\u00e7imde eksiksiz olarak sergilendi\u011fi, \u00f6zleri de\u011fi\u015ftirmeksizin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n kesin, tutarl\u0131 ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeyen verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemlerin do\u011fru olarak nitelendirildi\u011fi ve kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen su\u00e7 tipine uydu\u011fu, yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n kanuni ba\u011flamda \u015fahsile\u015ftirilmek suretiyle uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedenler yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden CMK\u2019n\u0131n 302\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince temyiz davas\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine, ancak;
\nPolis memuru olarak g\u00f6rev yaparken ihra\u00e7 edilen san\u0131\u011fa ait adli Emanetin 2017\/1138 s\u0131ras\u0131nda kay\u0131tl\u0131 silah ve \u015farj\u00f6r\u00fcn ilgili y\u00f6netmelikte belirtilen i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in idareye teslimine karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde m\u00fcsaderesine karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n
Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, ancak yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerektirmeyen bu hususun 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 303. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn m\u00fcsadereye ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak yerine “Adli Emanetin 2017\/1138 s\u0131ras\u0131nda kay\u0131tl\u0131 K\u0131r\u0131kkale marka 9 mm. \u00e7ap\u0131nda 52517\/7979005 seri numaral\u0131 tabanca ve 1 adet \u015farj\u00f6r\u00fcn ilgili y\u00f6netmelikte belirtilen i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in idareye teslimine” ibaresi yaz\u0131lmak suretiyle sair y\u00f6nleri usul ve kanuna uygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n
II- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz taleplerinin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan onanarak kesinle\u015fen Dairemizin ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdi\u011fi 24.04.2017 tarih, 2015\/3 Esas, 2017\/3 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ByLock ileti\u015fim sisteminin FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n kullanmalar\u0131 amac\u0131yla olu\u015fturulan ve m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran bu su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn bir k\u0131s\u0131m mensuplar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lan bir a\u011f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle; \u00f6rg\u00fct talimat\u0131 ile bu a\u011fa dahil olundu\u011funun ve gizlili\u011fi sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in haberle\u015fme amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin kanaate ula\u015ft\u0131racak teknik verilerle tespiti halinde, ki\u015finin \u00f6rg\u00fctle ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren delil oldu\u011funun kabul edildi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak, ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu kabul etmeyen san\u0131k …\u2019in ByLock uygulamas\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde teknik verilerle tespiti halinde ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funa dair delilin at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan belirleyici nitelikte olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, ilgili birimlerden ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 ByLock de\u011ferlendirme raporu getirtilerek de\u011ferlendirilip, temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda dosyaya UYAP \u00fczerinden g\u00f6nderilen 20.12.2017 tarihli veri inceleme raporu ile ilgili olarak bu rapora dayanak te\u015fkil eden Garson adl\u0131 gizli tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha \u00f6nce hakim huzurunda al\u0131nan ifade tutana\u011f\u0131 ile CMK’n\u0131n 134. maddesine g\u00f6re al\u0131nan hakimlik karar\u0131 ve varsa ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 analiz raporunun soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p temin edilip, duru\u015fmada san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafiine okunarak diyecekleri sorulduktan sonra bir karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k … ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebeplerden dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutuklulukta ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcreler, mevcut delil durumu ve su\u00e7 vasf\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak tahliye taleplerinin reddiyle tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na, 28.02.2019 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 20.02.2019 tarih ve 7165 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 304. maddesi uyar\u0131nca dosyan\u0131n Hatay 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 26.06.2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.
\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 26.06.2019 tarihli, 2019\/1349 E., 2019\/4517 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. 16. Ceza Dairesi 2019\/1349 E., 2019\/4517 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Mahkemesi :Ceza Dairesi Su\u00e7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma H\u00fck\u00fcm : 1-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda; TCK\u2019n\u0131n 314\/2, 62, 53, 58\/9, 63 ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckmedilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine 2-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda; TCK\u2019n\u0131n 314\/2, 62, 53, 54, 58\/9, 63 ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckmedilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddi B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle; Temyiz edenlerin s\u0131fat\u0131, ba\u015fvurular\u0131n s\u00fcresi, karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi, ve temyiz sebeplerine g\u00f6re dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc; San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda tayin olunan cezan\u0131n s\u00fcresi itibariyle yasal \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin duru\u015fma isteminin CMK’n\u0131n 299. maddesi gere\u011fince REDD\u0130NE, Duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan incelemede; I- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz taleplerinin incelenmesinde; Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131, \u0130HAS’n\u0131n 6, Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddeleri ile teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nan, hukuk devletinin temel gerekleri aras\u0131nda kabul edilegelmi\u015f bir hak olarak, yarg\u0131lama sonunda verilen karar\u0131n adil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ziyade adil bir karara ula\u015f\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli imkanlar\u0131n sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, s\u00fcrecin d\u00fcr\u00fcst y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin, baz\u0131 asgari g\u00fcvenceler i\u00e7eren bir hakt\u0131r. S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 6\/3-b maddesine g\u00f6re su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 alt\u0131nda olan herkes, “savunmas\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in gerekli zamana …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n