T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0<\/p>\n
7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2022\/7187 E., 2023\/5982 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 14. Hukuk Dairesi
\nSAYISI : 2020\/1416 E., 2022\/1448 K.
\nKARAR : Davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc
\n\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Salihli 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nSAYISI : 2018\/81 Esas, 2020\/19 Karar<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptal ve tescil davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Karar\u0131n daval\u0131lar vekilince istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fma istemli temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 05.12.2023 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Belli edilen g\u00fcnde daval\u0131lar vekili avukat … ile davac\u0131 vekili avukat … geldiler. Ba\u015fka gelen olmad\u0131. A\u00e7\u0131k duru\u015fmaya ba\u015fland\u0131. Gelenlerin s\u00f6zl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenildikten sonra a\u00e7\u0131k duru\u015fman\u0131n bitti\u011fi bildirildi. \u0130\u015f karara b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131. Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlenerek dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I. DAVA
\nDavac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; taraflar\u0131n karde\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131 mirasb\u0131rakanlar\u0131 …’den intikal eden 2019 ada 15 parsel zemin kat 1 numaral\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn miras\u00e7\u0131lar ad\u0131na intikal ettirildi\u011fini, ayn\u0131 ada parsel 1. kat 2 numaral\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ise 18.05.1989 tarihinde mirasb\u0131rakan taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 …’e ba\u011f\u0131\u015f suretiyle devredildi\u011fini, miras\u00e7\u0131lar aras\u0131nda 01.09.1998 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen yaz\u0131l\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye g\u00f6re davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131lar\u0131n zemin kat\u0131n alt\u0131nda bodrum olarak bulunan b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ile kat irtifak\u0131na ge\u00e7ilip \u00fcste \u00e7\u0131kacak ikinci kat\u0131n …’a, 3. Kat\u0131n Necdet’e, arka bah\u00e7ede bulunan m\u00fc\u015ftemilattaki evin ve olursa \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lacak 4. Kat\u0131n da davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescil ettirilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde anla\u015fma yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye istinaden zemin kattaki hissesini daval\u0131 …’a devretti\u011fini, davac\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmedeki edimini yerine getirdi\u011fi halde daval\u0131lar\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket ederek dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki yap\u0131lar\u0131 y\u0131kt\u0131rarak y\u00fcklenici ile kat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi akdettiklerini ve davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan haklar\u0131n\u0131 inkar ettiklerini belirterek dava konusu 2019 ada 15 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki 3. katta \u00fcretilecek ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tamam\u0131 ile 4. katta \u00fcretilecek ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n 1\/3 hissesinin iptali ile davac\u0131 ad\u0131na tescilini olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n rayi\u00e7 bedelinin tespiti ile yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131lardan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. CEVAP
\nDaval\u0131 … vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; dava harc\u0131n\u0131n eksik yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n 01.09.1998 tarihinde hissesini sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla tapuda devretti\u011finden de t\u00fcm haklar\u0131n\u0131n sona erdi\u011fini, davaya dayanak s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00fczerinden 20 sene ge\u00e7ti\u011finden a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n iyi niyetli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile davaya dayanak s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n edimi yerine getirdi\u011fi, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin noterde veya resmi makam \u00f6n\u00fcnde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ancak adi yaz\u0131l\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin i\u00e7eri\u011finin taraflarca inkar edilmemesi ve davac\u0131n\u0131n edimi yerine getirdikten sonra daval\u0131lar\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrmesi T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunun 2 nci maddesine g\u00f6re “d\u00fcr\u00fcst davranma kural\u0131” ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede taliki \u015fart\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, taliki \u015fart\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi halinde kural olarak borcun ifas\u0131n\u0131n istenemeyece\u011fi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla daval\u0131lar\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131lar\u0131n dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer ile ki\u015fisel hak sa\u011flayan ba\u015fka bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme yapmas\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n haklar\u0131na halel getirmeyece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF
\nA. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131lar vekilleri istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri
\nDaval\u0131lar vekilleri istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131n\u0131n dava konusu s\u00f6zle\u015fme kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bedel almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan gelen bedeli almakla ta\u015f\u0131nmazla m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkisinin kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davaya dayanak s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin yasaya uygun \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmemesi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu, Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7esinde g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131n\u0131n somut olaya uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kabul anlam\u0131na gelmemek \u00fczere taraflar aras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen s\u00f6zle\u015fmedeki payla\u015f\u0131m oranlar\u0131nda davac\u0131 lehine a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 orans\u0131zl\u0131k bulundu\u011funu, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm tesciline y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde Mahkemece ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn tesciline karar verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bilirki\u015fi raporunun 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 266 nc\u0131 maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defilerinin yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde reddedildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7 itibariyle do\u011fru oldu\u011fu ancak dava konusu s\u00f6zle\u015fme “miras payla\u015f\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi” oldu\u011fu halde, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince “sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi” olarak kabul edilmekle, hatal\u0131 hukuki nitelendirme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 297 nci maddesine g\u00f6re “delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesi ile sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen vak\u0131alarla bunlardan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 ve hukuki sebeplerin” somut olaya uygun saptanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, belirtilen hususun yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektiren bir konu olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7esinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmek suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnde yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle daval\u0131lar vekillerinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
V. TEMY\u0130Z
\nA. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131lar vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. Temyiz Sebepleri
\nDaval\u0131lar vekili duru\u015fma talepli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince \u00f6n inceleme celsesinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi talepleri olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irildi\u011fini, dava konusu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmedi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n hissesini bedeli kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00fczerinde art\u0131k bir miras ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fme miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olarak nitelendirilse dahi davada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n doldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki hisselerini bedeli kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda daval\u0131 …’a devretmekle s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile ileri s\u00fcrebilece\u011fi ayni bir hakk\u0131n\u0131n kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tapudaki resmi akit kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye de\u011fer verilemeyece\u011fini, y\u00fcklenici firmayla yap\u0131lan anla\u015fma gere\u011fince 9 ve 10 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin y\u00fcklenici firmaya verilmesi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince bu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin 1\/3 pay\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131ya tesciline karar verildi\u011fini, Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n bor\u00e7lar\u0131n nispili\u011fi ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi aleyhine bor\u00e7 kurulamamas\u0131 ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil etti\u011fini, dava konusu s\u00f6zle\u015fmede gabin halinin bulundu\u011funu, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131lar lehine bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e
\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme
\nUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptal ve tescil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde alacak istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130lgili Hukuk
\n1. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 676 nc\u0131 maddesi “Miras\u00e7\u0131lar aras\u0131nda paylar\u0131n olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 ve fiilen al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya aralar\u0131nda yapacaklar\u0131 payla\u015fma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 ba\u011flar. Payla\u015fma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle miras\u00e7\u0131lar, tereke mallar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin miras paylar\u0131 oran\u0131nda payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesini de kabul edebilirler. Payla\u015fma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun 676 nc\u0131 maddesi (743 say\u0131l\u0131 MK. md. 611\u2013612), miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n tereke \u00fczerinde yapacaklar\u0131 taksimin, keza miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n birbirleri ile miras paylar\u0131n\u0131n temliki konusundaki yapacaklar\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin ayn\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n 677 nci maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince ge\u00e7erli olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yaz\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 ko\u015fulunu \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Her iki halde de, yap\u0131lacak tasarruflar\u0131n murisin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesinin olanakl\u0131 bulundu\u011fu sabittir. \u00d6te yandan, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun 678. maddesi d\u00fczenlemesi ile de, murisin sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ileride (murisin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra) intikal edecek terekedeki hakk\u0131yla ilgili olarak bir miras\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131larla veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fi ile yapaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin ge\u00e7erli olabilmesi i\u00e7in yaz\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n da s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yer almas\u0131 ve onun kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesinin zorunlu oldu\u011fu kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 19 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir;<\/p>\n
“Bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn ve i\u00e7eri\u011finin belirlenmesinde ve yorumlanmas\u0131nda, taraflar\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kla veya ger\u00e7ek ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gizlemek i\u00e7in kulland\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00f6zc\u00fcklere bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, ger\u00e7ek ve ortak iradeleri esas al\u0131n\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
3. De\u011ferlendirme
\n1. Taraflar aras\u0131nda mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n vefat\u0131ndan sonra d\u00fczenlenen s\u00f6zle\u015fme “Miras Taksim S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi” niteli\u011findedir. Bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile mirasb\u0131rakandan intikal eden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki yap\u0131n\u0131n, gelecekte y\u0131k\u0131l\u0131p yeniden yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde miras\u00e7\u0131lara kalacak yerler belirlenmi\u015ftir. Her ne kadar daha sonra bir k\u0131s\u0131m miras\u00e7\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan miras paylar\u0131n\u0131 tapuda sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle daval\u0131 …’a temlik etmi\u015f iseler de bu sat\u0131\u015f ger\u00e7ek anlamda bir devir niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p 01.09.1998 tarihli miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin icras\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir i\u015flemdir. S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin imzalanmas\u0131ndan sonra kay\u0131t malikleri Zeynep ve Beray dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz hakk\u0131nda 29.06.2017 tarihli Kat Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130n\u015faat S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve 14.01.2019 tarihli d\u00fczeltme beyannamesi ile, bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda arsa sahibi s\u0131fat\u0131yla 4, 7, 8 ve 9 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin maliki olmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. O halde Kat Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130n\u015faat S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve d\u00fczeltme beyannamesi kapsam\u0131nda daval\u0131lara kalan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerde 01.09.1998 tarihli miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve Kat Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130n\u015faat S\u00f6zlemesi birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmek suretiyle, miras\u00e7\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131yla davac\u0131 …’e kalmas\u0131 gereken ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin ve paylar\u0131n belirlenerek davac\u0131 ad\u0131na tescile karar verilmesi gerekirken her iki s\u00f6zle\u015fme birlikte g\u00f6zetilmeden, yaln\u0131zca 01.09.1998 tarihli miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi de\u011ferlendirmek suretiyle h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftr.<\/p>\n
VI. KARAR
\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;
\nTemyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgiliye iadesine,<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay duru\u015fma vekalet \u00fccreti 17.100,00 TL’nin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak daval\u0131lara verilmesine,<\/p>\n
Dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 05.12.2023 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 05.12.2023 tarihli, 2022\/7187 E., 2023\/5982 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/7187 E., 2023\/5982 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 14. Hukuk Dairesi SAYISI : 2020\/1416 E., 2022\/1448 K. KARAR : Davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Salihli 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2018\/81 Esas, 2020\/19 Karar Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptal ve tescil davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n daval\u0131lar vekilince istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fma istemli temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 05.12.2023 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Belli edilen g\u00fcnde daval\u0131lar vekili avukat … ile davac\u0131 vekili avukat … geldiler. Ba\u015fka gelen olmad\u0131. A\u00e7\u0131k duru\u015fmaya ba\u015fland\u0131. Gelenlerin s\u00f6zl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenildikten sonra a\u00e7\u0131k duru\u015fman\u0131n bitti\u011fi bildirildi. \u0130\u015f karara b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131. Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlenerek dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; taraflar\u0131n karde\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131 mirasb\u0131rakanlar\u0131 …’den intikal eden 2019 ada 15 parsel zemin kat 1 numaral\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn miras\u00e7\u0131lar ad\u0131na intikal ettirildi\u011fini, ayn\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n