{"id":37119,"date":"2025-03-26T12:42:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-26T09:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-03-26T12:42:00","modified_gmt":"2025-03-26T09:42:00","slug":"yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

4. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130: Ticaret Mahkemesi<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tahkim davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

K A R A R<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131, daval\u0131ya trafik sigortal\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kusurlu hareketi ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen kazada davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a k\u0131smi \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n maluliyetinde art\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p bakiye zararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131 ile 15.000,00 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 vekili, ba\u015fvurunun reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakem Heyetince, iddia, savunma ve toplanan kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince davac\u0131 vekilinin itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 40.000,00 TL\u2019nin tahsiline karar verilmi\u015f, karar, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

1-Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re; daval\u0131 vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2-Dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan bedensel zarar nedeniyle tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili meydana gelen kazada davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha \u00f6nce yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvuruda davac\u0131n\u0131n %18 oran\u0131nda malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fini ancak daha sonra davac\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131k sorunlar\u0131n\u0131n artt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeni al\u0131nan maluliyet raporunda davac\u0131n\u0131n maluliyet oran\u0131n\u0131n %24\u2019e y\u00fckseldi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p bakiye zarar\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, Tahkim heyetince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde davac\u0131n\u0131n artan maluliyeti oran\u0131nda tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Eksik inceleme ile karar verilemez.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 kazaya ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak yeniden talepte bulunabilmesi i\u00e7in maluliyet oran\u0131ndaki art\u0131\u015fta geli\u015fen bir durumunun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Hakem heyetince bu y\u00f6nde bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosya kapsam\u0131 ile sabittir.<\/p>\n

Somut olayda; bu davadan \u00f6nce al\u0131nan maluliyet raporunda davac\u0131n\u0131n %18 oran\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli i\u015f g\u00f6remez oldu\u011fu belirlenmi\u015f, eldeki davada ise davac\u0131n\u0131n %24 oran\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli i\u015f g\u00f6remez oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu haliyle her iki rapor aras\u0131nda bariz farkl\u0131l\u0131klar bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Geli\u015fen durum; olay sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi halde, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta bilinen yaralanmalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, sonradan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan veya geli\u015fen, olaya ba\u011fl\u0131 v\u00fccut b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc bozan sonu\u00e7lar olarak tan\u0131mlanabilir. Geli\u015fen durumun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise her olaya \u00f6zg\u00fc olarak kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilir.<\/p>\n

Geli\u015fen durum kavram\u0131 ile artan maluliyet kavramlar\u0131 birbirinden farkl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle artan maluliyet oran\u0131nda ziyade davac\u0131da geli\u015fen durumun olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti gerekmektedir. Hakem Heyetince karara esas al\u0131nan maluliyet raporunda geli\u015fen durum olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle an\u0131lan rapor karar vermeye yeterli ve elveri\u015fli de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

Bu durumda Hakem Heyetince, davac\u0131ya ait t\u00fcm t\u0131bbi belgeler getirtilerek maluliyete ili\u015fkin al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n sebebinin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, yaralaman\u0131n hangi tarihte tedaviyle tamamen sona erdi\u011fi, maluliyetin artmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin geli\u015fen durumlar\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha \u00f6nce al\u0131nan maluliyet raporunda saptanan ve de\u011ferlendirmeye al\u0131nan t\u0131bbi bulgular ile eldeki davada al\u0131nan raporda dikkate al\u0131nan t\u0131bbi bulgular\u0131n ayn\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ilk rapordan sonra ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan arazlar\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, var ise dava konusu kazayla ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131nda kaza tarihinde ge\u00e7erli olan y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe uygun gerek\u00e7eli ve denetime elveri\u015fli bilirki\u015fi raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve has\u0131l olacak sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde eksik inceleme ile karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 define ili\u015fkin savunman\u0131n da maluliyette geli\u015fen durum olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorunu \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcld\u00fckten sonra de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir.
\nYukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan hususlar do\u011frultusunda ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve inceleme yap\u0131larak has\u0131l olacak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmek \u00fczere karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3-\u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince ba\u015fvuru sahibi lehine vekalet \u00fccretine karar verilirken Sigortac\u0131l\u0131k Kanununun 30. maddesinin 17. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 19\/01\/2016 tarihli, 29598 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Sigortac\u0131l\u0131kta Tahkime \u0130li\u015fkin Y\u00f6netmelik’in 16. maddesinin 13. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak AA\u00dcT’nin 13. maddesi gere\u011fince hesaplanan vekalet \u00fccretinin 1\/5’i oran\u0131nda vekalet \u00fccretine(maktu \u00fccretin alt\u0131nda kalmamak kayd\u0131 ile) karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde tam nisbi vekalet \u00fccretine karar verilmesi de do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da (1) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131 vekilinin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, (2) ve (3) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA; pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden daval\u0131ya geri verilmesine 31\/03\/2022 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 31\/03\/2022 tarihli, 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130: Ticaret Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tahkim davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Davac\u0131, daval\u0131ya trafik sigortal\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kusurlu hareketi ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen kazada davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a k\u0131smi \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n maluliyetinde art\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p bakiye zararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131 ile 15.000,00 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 vekili, ba\u015fvurunun reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakem Heyetince, iddia, savunma ve toplanan kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince davac\u0131 vekilinin itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 40.000,00 TL\u2019nin tahsiline karar verilmi\u015f, karar, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 1-Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re; daval\u0131 vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir. 2-Dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan bedensel zarar nedeniyle tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131 vekili meydana gelen kazada davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha \u00f6nce yapt\u0131klar\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130: Ticaret Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tahkim davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Davac\u0131, daval\u0131ya trafik sigortal\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kusurlu hareketi ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen kazada davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a k\u0131smi \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n maluliyetinde art\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p bakiye zararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131 ile 15.000,00 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 vekili, ba\u015fvurunun reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakem Heyetince, iddia, savunma ve toplanan kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince davac\u0131 vekilinin itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 40.000,00 TL\u2019nin tahsiline karar verilmi\u015f, karar, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 1-Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re; daval\u0131 vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir. 2-Dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan bedensel zarar nedeniyle tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131 vekili meydana gelen kazada davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha \u00f6nce yapt\u0131klar\u0131 …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-26T09:42:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-26T09:42:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":963,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-26T09:42:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130: Ticaret Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tahkim davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Davac\u0131, daval\u0131ya trafik sigortal\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kusurlu hareketi ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen kazada davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a k\u0131smi \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n maluliyetinde art\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p bakiye zararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131 ile 15.000,00 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 vekili, ba\u015fvurunun reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakem Heyetince, iddia, savunma ve toplanan kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince davac\u0131 vekilinin itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 40.000,00 TL\u2019nin tahsiline karar verilmi\u015f, karar, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 1-Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re; daval\u0131 vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir. 2-Dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan bedensel zarar nedeniyle tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131 vekili meydana gelen kazada davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha \u00f6nce yapt\u0131klar\u0131 …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-03-26T09:42:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-03-26T09:42:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":963,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-03-26T09:42:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-4-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-12814-e-2022-6622-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/12814 E., 2022\/6622 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37119"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37119\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}