Avukat Haklar\u0131 Grubu Ankara’dan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada; “Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019da 18 y\u0131ld\u0131r avukatlar\u0131n savunma hakk\u0131 hi\u00e7e say\u0131l\u0131yor. Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu Md.58\u2019e ra\u011fmen X-Ray dayatmas\u0131 s\u00fcr\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n
“AVUKATLARIN SAVUNMA HAKKI GASP ED\u0130LD\u0130!”<\/p>\n
29.11.2022 tarihinden bu yana i\u015flem yap\u0131lmayan dosyay\u0131 incelemek \u00fczere Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a giden meslekta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun 58. maddesine ra\u011fmen X-Ray kontrol\u00fcne zorlanarak engellenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bunun \u00fczerine meslekta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131zca tutanak tutulmu\u015f, akabinde uygulaman\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in taraf\u0131m\u0131zdan Dan\u0131\u015ftay’a ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Meslekta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 savunuyor, s\u00fcrecin sonuna kadar takip\u00e7isi olaca\u011f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 vurguluyoruz!” denildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yle;<\/p>\n
DANI\u015eTAY BA\u015eKANLI\u011eI’NA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuru Sahipleri : Av. Ebru D\u00f6nmez
\nAv. Sevde Ata Karata\u015f
\nAv. Mustafa Furkan Do\u011fan
\nAv. Emrah ALTUNO\u011eLU\u00a0<\/p>\n
Konu \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0: Avukat\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn hukuksuz bir \u015fekilde aranmas\u0131 hakk\u0131ndad\u0131r.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuru Tarihi \u00a0: 06.03.2025<\/p>\n
Olay Tarihi \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0: 26.02.2025<\/p>\n
Olay \u00d6zeti :<\/p>\n
Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 2022\/691 E. say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda 29.11.2022\u00a0 tarihinden beri tek bir i\u015flem bile yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131ndan kaynakl\u0131 Av. Ebru D\u00f6nmez, Av. Sevde Ata\u00a0Karata\u015f, Av. Mustafa Furkan Do\u011fan ve Av. Emrah Altuno\u011flu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a gelmi\u015f; g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlilerince\u00a0\u00e7antalar\u0131 X- RAY cihaz\u0131ndan ge\u00e7irilmek istenmi\u015f, kendileri de X-Ray cihaz\u0131ndan ge\u00e7meleri istenmi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Lakin avukatlar olarak biz; bu hususun Anayasaya, Avukatl\u0131k Kanununa, AYM kararlar\u0131na ve di\u011fer yarg\u0131\u00a0kararlar\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015f, mesleki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ra\u011fmen Dan\u0131\u015ftay’a giremeden olay\u00a0yerinden ayr\u0131lmak zorunda kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. \u00a0<\/p>\n
A\u00c7IKLAMALAR<\/p>\n
Avukatl\u0131k serbest bir meslek olup, ayn\u0131 zamanda kamu hizmetidir. Avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011fini\u00a0y\u00fcr\u00fcten hukuk\u00e7u, hakim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yerine getirmektedir. Avukat,\u00a0yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yerine getirirken yarg\u0131n\u0131n kurucu unsurlar\u0131ndan olan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z savunmay\u0131 serbest\u00e7e\u00a0temsil etmektedir. Gerek avukat\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131, gerekse avukat\u0131n s\u0131r saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve\u00a0dolay\u0131s\u0131yla savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, avukat ile ilgili ceza muhakemesi i\u015flemlerinin \u00f6zel\u00a0olarak d\u00fczenlenmesini zorunlu k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin, b\u00fcrosunun ve konutunun\u00a0aranmas\u0131 ile avukat\u0131n b\u00fcrosunda ve postas\u0131nda elkoyma \u00f6zel olarak d\u00fczenlenerek s\u0131k\u0131 ko\u015fullara\u00a0ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda, avukatlar hakk\u0131ndaki arama ve elkoymaya ili\u015fkin kurallar Ceza Muhakemesi\u00a0Kanunu ve Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nda \u00f6zel olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Ceza muhakemesi s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurulan\u00a0arama ve elkoyma koruma tedbirlerinde avukatlar i\u00e7in istisnai d\u00fczenlemeler getirilmesinin sebebi, serbest\u00a0bir mesle\u011fi icra eden ve kamu hizmeti g\u00f6ren avukat\u0131n, ayn\u0131 zamanda yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yerine getirmesidir.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu Madde 2: Avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Amac\u0131:\u00a0\u00a0\u201c\u2026hukuki m\u00fcnasabetlerin d\u00fczenlenmesini, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuki mesele ve anla\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n adalet ve\u00a0hakkaniyete uygun olarak \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesini ve hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 her\u00a0derecede yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131, hakemler, resmi ve \u00f6zel ki\u015fi, kurul ve kurumlar nezdinde sa\u011flamakt\u0131r\u201d<\/p>\n
Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu’ndan da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, yarg\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in savunman\u0131n,\u00a0savunman\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in de avukat\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden; avukat-savunma-yarg\u0131\u00a0birbirinden ayr\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclememektedir. S\u0131ras\u0131yla yarg\u0131 ve savunman\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in\u00a0avukat\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak gerekmekte ve bu sebeple arama gibi ceza muhakemesi i\u015flemleri\u00a0bak\u0131m\u0131ndan avukatlar hakk\u0131nda farkl\u0131, istisnai d\u00fczenlemeler getirilmektedir.<\/p>\n
Unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r ki yarg\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0\u00fc\u00e7 sacaya\u011f\u0131ndan biri olan Avukatlar da birer yarg\u0131 mensubudur ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma alanlar\u0131na giri\u015fte di\u011fer t\u00fcm\u00a0yarg\u0131 mensuplar\u0131yla e\u015fit \u015fartlara ve uygulamalara tabi tutulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Avukatlar\u0131n ifa ettikleri g\u00f6revler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra birtak\u0131m \u00f6zel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri\u00a0de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Avukatlar hakk\u0131ndaki arama ve elkoyman\u0131n \u00f6zel olarak d\u00fczenlenmesi hususu da\u00a0bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin en ba\u015f\u0131nda gelen avukat\u0131n s\u0131r saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile yak\u0131ndan ilgilidir.<\/p>\n
Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu Madde 36: S\u0131r Saklama\u00a0“Avukatlar\u0131n, kendilerine tevdi edilen veya gerek avukatl\u0131k g\u00f6revi, gerekse T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi ve\u00a0barolar organlar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6revleri dolay\u0131siyle \u00f6\u011frendikleri hususlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa vurmalar\u0131 yasakt\u0131r\u201d<\/p>\n
TBB Meslek Kurallar\u0131 Madde 37:\u00a0\u201cAvukat meslek s\u0131rr\u0131 ile ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d \u00a0S\u0131r saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedeniyle avukatlara \u00f6\u011frendikleri bu bilgilerle ilgili olarak tan\u0131kl\u0131ktan \u00e7ekinme\u00a0hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, avukatlar hakk\u0131ndaki arama ve elkoyma koruma tedbirleri de \u00f6zel olarak\u00a0d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Zira genel h\u00fck\u00fcmler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yap\u0131lacak arama ve elkoyma avukat\u0131n\u00a0m\u00fcvekkiliyle ilgili belgelerinin aranmas\u0131na ve el konulmas\u0131na engel te\u015fkil etmedi\u011finden, bu durum\u00a0avukat\u0131n s\u0131r saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. Bu nedenle avukat hakk\u0131ndaki arama ve\u00a0elkoyma \u00f6zel olarak d\u00fczenlenerek avukat\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili ile ilgili olan belgelerinin a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0\u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f, avukat\u0131n s\u0131r saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne uygun kurallar getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
AVUKATIN \u00dcZER\u0130N\u0130N ARANMASI\u00a0<\/p>\n
Avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranmas\u0131 ile ilgili bir d\u00fczenlemeye Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019na g\u00f6re \u00f6zel nitelikte\u00a0olan Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nda yer verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu Madde 58\u00a0\u00a0“…A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczeri\u00a0aranamaz.”<\/p>\n
Madde h\u00fckm\u00fcnden de \u00a0g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi \u00fczere a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan\u00a0dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczeri aranamayacakt\u0131r. Madde h\u00fckm\u00fcne bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 zaman\u00a0avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranabilmesi i\u00e7in iki unsurun birlikte bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Birlikte\u00a0bulunmas\u0131 gereken bu iki unsur su\u00e7un a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giriyor olmas\u0131 ve su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc\u00a0halidir. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun 58. maddesi gere\u011fince avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin\u00a0aranabilmesi i\u00e7in, avukat\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemesiyle birlikte\u00a0su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc halinin de varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerekecektir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n avukat\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na\u00a0giren bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemesine ra\u011fmen ortada su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali yoksa ya da ortada su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen\u00a0i\u015flenen su\u00e7 a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmiyorsa avukat\u0131n \u00fczeri aranamayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
DANI\u015eTAY 8. DA\u0130RE 2010\/5626 E. 2010\/6024 K. 12.11.2012 tarihli karar\u0131:<\/p>\n
“Avukat olan davac\u0131n\u0131n, avukatl\u0131k kimli\u011fini ibraz etmesine ra\u011fmen kolluk kuvvetleri taraf\u0131ndan \u00fczerinin\u00a0aranmas\u0131 nedeniyle manevi zarar\u0131n tazmini istemiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Avukatl\u0131k Yasas\u0131 uyar\u0131nca a\u011f\u0131r\u00a0ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukatlar\u0131n \u00fczeri\u00a0aranamaz. Su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali olmadan m\u00fcvekkili \u00f6n\u00fcnde kolluk kuvvetlerince \u00fczeri aranan davac\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0meslek onurunun zedelendi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Daval\u0131 \u0130darenin bu eylemde hizmet kusurunun bulundu\u011funa,\u00a0davac\u0131n\u0131n manevi zarar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131na, haks\u0131z zenginle\u015fmesine de yol a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak \u00fczere\u00a0takdiren manevi zarar\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faiziyle birlikte daval\u0131 \u0130dare taraf\u0131ndan\u00a0davac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine ve fazlaya ili\u015fkin istemin reddine karar verilmesi hukuka uygundur.”<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da yer alan kararda Dan\u0131\u015ftay 8. Dairesi, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu gere\u011fince a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin\u00a0g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 net bir \u015fekilde\u00a0ortaya koymu\u015ftur. Bu s\u0131n\u0131r, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu m.58, Anayasa m.2, 13 ve 124\u2019e ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak avukat\u00a0aleyhine geni\u015fletilemez.<\/p>\n
Normlar hiyerar\u015fisi prensibi ve hukukun genel ilkeleri uyar\u0131nca, kanun uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak\u00a0\u00fczere ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmamak \u015fart\u0131yla \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken y\u00f6netmelikle veya y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin alt\u00a0d\u00fczenlemeleri olan genelge, talimat gibi kurallarla ki\u015fi hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerine kanunda\u00a0\u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemeyen veya \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclenden fazla k\u0131s\u0131tlama getirilmesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yine;\u00a0<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesinin- \u00a0\u0130DR\u0130S TAN\u0130\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU (2) – (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2018\/21866)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 14\/12\/2022 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 28\/3\/2023-32146\u00a0\u00a0“Ba\u015fvuru, avukat olan ba\u015fvurucunun ikaz edilmesine ra\u011fmen \u00e7antas\u0131n\u0131 adliye giri\u015findeki X-Ray\u00a0 cihaz\u0131ndan ge\u00e7irmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in hakk\u0131nda idari para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131\u00a0 hakk\u0131 ile su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.”<\/p>\n
“Bu do\u011frultuda kamu otoritesini temsil eden yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme ve yarg\u0131 erklerinin bu ilkeye sayg\u0131l\u0131\u00a0hareket etmeleri, su\u00e7 ve cezalara ili\u015fkin kanuni d\u00fczenlemelerin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n yasama organ\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan\u00a0belirgin bir \u015fekilde \u00e7izilmesi, y\u00fcr\u00fctme organ\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 kanunla belirlenmi\u015f bir yetkiye\u00a0dayanmaks\u0131z\u0131n d\u00fczenleyici i\u015flemleri ile su\u00e7 ve ceza ihdas etmemesi, ceza hukukunu uygulamakla\u00a0g\u00f6revli yarg\u0131 organ\u0131n\u0131n da kanunlarda belirlenen su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131 yorum yoluyla\u00a0geni\u015fletmemesi gerekir (daha detayl\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. G\u00fclay Yurt, \u00a7\u00a7 25-32; Kadriye \u00c7a\u011flar\u00a0Y\u0131lmaz, \u00a7\u00a7 25- 32).”<\/p>\n
Uygulamada, Adli ve \u00d6nleme Aramalar\u0131 Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi\u2019nin \u201cHakimden \u00f6nleme aramas\u0131 karar\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131\u00a0gerekmeyen haller\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 25. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmek suretiyle adliye\u00a0giri\u015finde avukatlar\u0131n \u00fczerleri ile \u00e7antalar\u0131n\u0131n arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu uygulama ve gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilen\u00a0hukuki dayanak b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. 25. madde, gerek ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve gerekse bir y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fckm\u00fc\u00a0olmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda avukatlar\u0131 da kapsama g\u00fcc\u00fcne sahip olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle avukatlar\u0131n \u00fczerlerinin ve\u00a0\u00e7antalar\u0131n\u0131n aranmas\u0131na gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilemez. Yukar\u0131da detayl\u0131ca a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle ilgili\u00a0Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 25. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde say\u0131lan, “Devlet\u00e7e kamu hizmetine\u00a0\u00f6zg\u00fclenmi\u015f bina ve her t\u00fcrl\u00fc tesise girenlerin \u00fczerleri ile e\u015fya veya ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n aranmas\u0131na” dair\u00a0h\u00fck\u00fcm avukatlara uygulanamaz.<\/p>\n
Daha \u00f6nce at\u0131f yap\u0131lan Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu 58. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n son c\u00fcmlesi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a avukat\u0131n\u00a0\u00fczerinin a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda\u00a0aranamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 emretmektedir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc olup, genelge veya talimatla\u00a0de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez. Kanunun g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilmesine y\u00f6nelik her t\u00fcrl\u00fc genelge veya talimat \u201ckanunsuz\u00a0emir\u201d niteli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131r. Anayasa m.137\u2019ye g\u00f6re kanunsuz emrin verilmesi ve yerine getirilmesi su\u00e7 olup,\u00a0TCK m.24\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen \u201camirin emri\u201d adl\u0131 hukuka uygunluk sebebi de say\u0131lamaz. Nitekim \u201cHaks\u0131z\u00a0arama\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 TCK m.120\u2019de, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak bir kimsenin \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fc veya e\u015fyas\u0131n\u0131 arayan kamu\u00a0g\u00f6revlisine 3 aydan 1 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 verilece\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan t\u00fcm gerek\u00e7elerle Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n i\u00e7 i\u015fleyi\u015fi ile ilgili hukuksuz \u00fcst arama uygulamas\u0131na\u00a0kar\u015f\u0131 bu ba\u015fvuruyu yapma zaruriyeti do\u011fmu\u015ftur.\u00a0<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7 VE TALEP \u00a0:<\/p>\n
-ANAYASAYA, KANUNA ve YERLE\u015eM\u0130\u015e \u0130\u00c7T\u0130HATLARA AYKIRI AVUKATLARA\u00a0Y\u00d6NEL\u0130K \u00dcST ARAMASI UYGULAMASININ ( X- RAY ) SON BULMASINI VE\u00a0KALDIRILMASINI TALEP ED\u0130YORUZ.<\/p>\n
-BU UYGULAMANIN DEVAM ETMES\u0130 HAL\u0130NDE \u0130SE TARAFIMIZCA HUKUK\u0130 OLARAK\u00a0 T\u00dcM YOLLARA BA\u015eVURULACA\u011eINI SAYGILARIMIZLA B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130R\u0130Z.
\n\u00a0
\nTALEPTE BULUNAN\u00a0
\nAV. EMRAH ALTUNO\u011eLU\u00a0
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0
\nEKLER\u0130 : 1- Anayasa Mahkemesinin- \u00a0\u0130DR\u0130S TAN\u0130\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU (2) –\u00a0
\n(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2018\/21866) Karar Tarihi: 14\/12\/2022 R.G. Tarih\u00a0ve Say\u0131: 28\/3\/2023-32146
\n2- 26.02.2025 Tarihli tutanak\u00a0
\n3- \u00a0DANI\u015eTAY 8. DA\u0130RE 2010\/5626 E. 2010\/6024 K. 12.11.2012 tarihli\u00a0karar\u0131<\/p>\n
\u200bDosya incelemek \u00fczere Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a giden avukatlar\u0131n X-Ray kontrol\u00fcne zorlanmas\u0131 \u00fczerine; Avukat Haklar\u0131 Grubu Ankara, uygulaman\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Dan\u0131\u015ftay’a ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Avukat Haklar\u0131 Grubu Ankara’dan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada; “Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019da 18 y\u0131ld\u0131r avukatlar\u0131n savunma hakk\u0131 hi\u00e7e say\u0131l\u0131yor. Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu Md.58\u2019e ra\u011fmen X-Ray dayatmas\u0131 s\u00fcr\u00fcyor. “AVUKATLARIN SAVUNMA HAKKI GASP ED\u0130LD\u0130!” 29.11.2022 tarihinden bu yana i\u015flem yap\u0131lmayan dosyay\u0131 incelemek \u00fczere Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a giden meslekta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun 58. maddesine ra\u011fmen X-Ray kontrol\u00fcne zorlanarak engellenmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine meslekta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131zca tutanak tutulmu\u015f, akabinde uygulaman\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in taraf\u0131m\u0131zdan Dan\u0131\u015ftay’a ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Meslekta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 savunuyor, s\u00fcrecin sonuna kadar takip\u00e7isi olaca\u011f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 vurguluyoruz!” denildi. Ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yle; DANI\u015eTAY BA\u015eKANLI\u011eI’NA Ba\u015fvuru Sahipleri : Av. Ebru D\u00f6nmez Av. Sevde Ata Karata\u015f Av. Mustafa Furkan Do\u011fan Av. Emrah ALTUNO\u011eLU\u00a0 Konu \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0: Avukat\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn hukuksuz bir \u015fekilde aranmas\u0131 hakk\u0131ndad\u0131r.\u00a0 Ba\u015fvuru Tarihi \u00a0: 06.03.2025 Olay Tarihi \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0: 26.02.2025 Olay \u00d6zeti : Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 2022\/691 E. say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda 29.11.2022\u00a0 tarihinden beri tek bir i\u015flem bile yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131ndan kaynakl\u0131 Av. Ebru D\u00f6nmez, Av. Sevde Ata\u00a0Karata\u015f, Av. Mustafa Furkan Do\u011fan ve Av. Emrah Altuno\u011flu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a gelmi\u015f; g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlilerince\u00a0\u00e7antalar\u0131 X- RAY cihaz\u0131ndan ge\u00e7irilmek istenmi\u015f, kendileri de X-Ray cihaz\u0131ndan ge\u00e7meleri istenmi\u015ftir.\u00a0 Lakin avukatlar olarak biz; bu hususun Anayasaya, Avukatl\u0131k Kanununa, AYM kararlar\u0131na ve di\u011fer yarg\u0131\u00a0kararlar\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015f, mesleki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ra\u011fmen Dan\u0131\u015ftay’a giremeden olay\u00a0yerinden ayr\u0131lmak zorunda kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. \u00a0 A\u00c7IKLAMALAR Avukatl\u0131k …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n