T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
FER\u0130DUN OSMANA\u011eAO\u011eLU VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/53409)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 15\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u015eeyda Nur \u00dcN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Feridun OSMANA\u011eAO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Hasan Basri YILDIZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. Turan AKTA\u015e<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Seda \u015eARILDI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, haks\u0131z olarak konutu terk etmemek \u015feklinde adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130stanbul Valili\u011fi \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan 14\/9\/2021 tarihli \u0130hbar Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile “Devrimci Halk Kurtulu\u015f Partisi\/Cephesi (DHKP\/C) silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131 olan Tutuklu ve H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Aileleri Yard\u0131mla\u015fma Derne\u011fi (TAYAD) ve Direni\u015f\u00e7iler Meclisi isimli yap\u0131lanmalar ad\u0131na \u0130stanbul’da de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde d\u00fczenlenen eylem ve faaliyetlerine ili\u015fkin tespitler ve tanzim edilen rapor” \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ter\u00f6r Su\u00e7lar\u0131 Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosuna (Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Kolluk Kuvvetleri taraf\u0131ndan \u015fu tespitlerde bulunulmu\u015ftur:<\/p>\n
“-DHKP-C \u00fcyelerinin, \u00f6rg\u00fct ideolojisi ve amac\u0131 do\u011frultusunda, \u015fiddet i\u00e7eren veya \u00e7o\u011funlukla \u015fiddet i\u00e7ermeyen s\u00f6zde adalet aramak, hak talep etmek gibi demokratik kavramlar\u0131 kullanarak, devlet-toplum dengesini bozacak \u015fekilde sivil itaatsizlik eylemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi, yap\u0131lan bu eylemleri sosyal medya \u00fczerinden geni\u015f kitlelere yay\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla bas\u0131l\u0131 ve dijital olarak yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lacak eylemlere kat\u0131l\u0131m \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu eylemleri sahiplenerek, yasal g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc izlenimi de yaratarak s\u00f6z konusu eylemleri gerek \u00f6rg\u00fcte taban kazand\u0131rmak gerekse taban\u0131n\u0131 motive etmek amac\u0131 ile \u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131 yapmak i\u00e7in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
-Twitter sosyal medya hesab\u0131 \u00fczerinden payla\u015f\u0131m yapan ”D\u0130REN\u0130\u015eLER MECL\u0130S\u0130’ ‘@Direnis_Meclisi’ isimli\/rumuzlu kullan\u0131c\u0131 hesab\u0131ndan de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde yap\u0131lan payla\u015f\u0131mlar ile, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn g\u00fcncel olarak ‘Nuriye G\u00fclmen’ e \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck’, ‘Ali Osman K\u00f6se Serbest B\u0131rak\u0131ls\u0131n’, ‘Turan Akta\u015f \u0130\u015fe Geri Al\u0131ns\u0131n’, ‘Ankara Y\u00fcksel Direni\u015fi’, ‘Edibe Ana \u0130\u00e7in Adalet’, ‘\u00c7orlu \u0130\u00e7in Adalet’, ‘\u015eenya\u015far Ailesi \u0130\u00e7in Adalet’, ‘Burak \u0130\u00e7in Adalet’, ‘G\u00fclistan Doku Nerede’ ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 ve konulu eylemleri organize ederek, bu y\u00f6nde kitle olu\u015fturma \u00e7abas\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011fu, bu ama\u00e7la ‘Direni\u015fler Meclisi’ olarak il genelinde yap\u0131lan duvarlara gazete yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma, afi\u015fleme, pullama ve ku\u015flama, DHKP\/C Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00dcye Olmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Ali Osman K\u00f6se’ nin serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131, \u015ei\u015fli Belediyesinde i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan Turan Akta\u015f’a destek verme ile ilgili eylemlerin payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdikleri a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen eylemlerinin de sahiplenildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
-DHKP\/C’nin alan yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131ndan olan \u0130dil K\u00fclt\u00fcr Merkezi’nde 14.10.2021 tarihinde, \u00e7elik levha ve demirlerle \u00e7evrili ve g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmi\u015f k\u0131s\u0131mda yap\u0131lan aramada, \u00f6n k\u0131sm\u0131nda ‘Verbatim 32 GB’, arka k\u0131sm\u0131nda ise ‘E532G1626 TWLKA67038A47’ ibareleri bulunan SD Kart ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, yap\u0131lan incelemede; DHKP\/C’nin yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bulunan Merkez Komite ve yurt i\u00e7inde bulunan \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyelerinin aralar\u0131nda yapm\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131 yaz\u0131\u015fmalar bulundu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn alan yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 olan ‘Tutuklu Aileleri Yard\u0131mla\u015fma Derne\u011fi (TAYAD)’ isimli yap\u0131n\u0131n ‘TARAK\u00c7ILAR’ olarak kodland\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en derne\u011fin, 677 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK ile kapat\u0131lan derneklerden oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
-TAYAD rumuzlu ‘@TayadliAileler2’ kullan\u0131c\u0131 adl\u0131 Twitter hesab\u0131 incelendi\u011finde; hesap \u00fczerinden de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde yap\u0131lan payla\u015f\u0131mlarda, DHKP\/C Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00dcye Olmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Ali Osman K\u00f6se’nin serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ile ilgili payla\u015f\u0131mlar bulundu\u011fu, s\u00f6z konusu payla\u015f\u0131mlarda ku\u015flama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve pankart as\u0131lmas\u0131 ile ilgili eylemlerin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, gerek s\u00f6z konusu hesaptan gerekse benzer \u015fekilde faaliyet g\u00f6steren ‘Halk\u0131n Sesi TV’ rumuzlu ‘halkinsesitv’ kullan\u0131c\u0131 adl\u0131 ve ‘Buras\u0131 Okmeydan\u0131’ rumuzlu ‘OkmeydaniH’ kullan\u0131c\u0131 adl\u0131 hesaplardan yap\u0131lan payla\u015f\u0131mlardaki haber\/video\/foto i\u00e7eriklerinden \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tespit edildi\u011fi…<\/p>\n
-\u015e\u00fcphelilerden FER\u0130DUN OSMANA\u011eAO\u011eLU ile ilgili olarak; ‘Direni\u015fler Meclisi’ isimli \u00f6rg\u00fct yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde ve ayr\u0131ca ‘TAYAD’ isimli yap\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ‘Direni\u015fler Meclisi’ adl\u0131 yap\u0131lanma taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fi\u015fik zamanlarda yap\u0131lan bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na aktif olarak kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, TAYAD i\u00e7erisinde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu kapsamda \u00e7e\u015fitli tarihlerde eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan payla\u015f\u0131m \u00fczerine her \u00c7ar\u015famba DHKP\/C Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00dcye Olmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Ali Osman K\u00f6se ile ilgili eylem \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 \u00fczerine, \u0130stanbul Adalet Saray\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcndeki farkl\u0131 tarihlerdeki destek eylemlerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, farkl\u0131 tarihlerde TAYAD organizesindeki \u00f6len DHKP\/C Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyelerinin mezarlar\u0131n\u0131 ziyaret etti\u011fi, adresinde yap\u0131lan aramada; hakk\u0131nda toplatma karar\u0131 bulunan Tav\u0131r Dergisi 2020 Aral\u0131k \u00f6zel say\u0131s\u0131, hakk\u0131nda toplatma karar\u0131 bulunan Tav\u0131r Dergisi 2021 A\u011fustos say\u0131s\u0131, sayfalar halinde ve \u00f6n kapak k\u0131sm\u0131nda ‘Hasta Tutsaklara \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn Ad\u0131 G\u00fcler Zere’ ibareleri, G\u00fcler Zere i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fe ait resimler ve \u015fahs\u0131n resminin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 materyal bulundu\u011fu tespitlerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
-\u015e\u00fcphelilerden HASAN BASR\u0130 YILDIZ ile ilgili olarak; ‘Direni\u015fler Meclisi’ isimli \u00f6rg\u00fct yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde ve ayr\u0131ca ‘TAYAD’ isimli yap\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bu gruplar ad\u0131na yap\u0131lan bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na aktif olarak kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu kapsamda farkl\u0131 tarihlerdeki eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan payla\u015f\u0131m \u00fczerine her Per\u015fembe ‘Adalet \u0130stiyoruz’ eylemi i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 \u00fczerine, \u0130stanbul Adalet Saray\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcndeki destek eylemlerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Yunanistan Ba\u015fkonsoloslu\u011fu binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde, yan\u0131nda … oldu\u011fu halde birlikte ‘\u0130\u015fbirlik\u00e7i Fa\u015fist Yunanistan Mahkemeleri T\u00fcrkiyeli 11 Devrimciyi Yarg\u0131layamaz. Devrimcilik Yapmak Su\u00e7 De\u011fil, G\u00f6revdir. TAYAD’ LI A\u0130LELER’ imzal\u0131 pankart a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelinin TAYAD binas\u0131nda yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
-\u015e\u00fcphelilerden TURAN AKTA\u015e ile ilgili olarak; ‘Direni\u015fler Meclisi’ ve ‘Devrimci \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Hareketi’ isimli \u00f6rg\u00fct yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u015ei\u015fli Belediyesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 iken i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak, i\u015fe geri d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ‘\u0130\u015f\u00e7i Meclisi’ imzal\u0131 yelek ile \u015ei\u015fli Belediyesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde eylemler yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, fener u\u00e7urma, pullama, duvar gazetesi, yaz\u0131lama, pankart asma, afi\u015f asma, imza kampanyas\u0131, dilek\u00e7e verme gibi eylemlerin organize edildi\u011fi, 15 Eyl\u00fcl tarihinde yapaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fct yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131ndan olan Devrimci \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Hareketi ve Dev -Gen\u00e7 yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan destek \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131nda bulunuldu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ve ‘Direni\u015f Meclisi’ isimli \u00f6rg\u00fct yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n, \u015f\u00fcphelinin bu eylemlerini sahiplendi\u011finin \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait yay\u0131nlardan (Halk Okulu, Halk\u0131n Sesi gibi) a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, DHKP\/C’nin \u00f6l\u00fcm orucu eylemlerinde \u00f6len \u00fcyelerinin mezarlar\u0131n\u0131 ziyaret etti\u011fi, DHKP\/C \u00fcyelerinin tutuklu olarak yarg\u0131lanan \u00fcyelerinin duru\u015fmalar\u0131na ba\u015fka \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeleri ile birlikte kat\u0131l\u0131m yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, farkl\u0131 tarihlerdeki eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 esnadaki \u00fcst aramas\u0131nda ‘\u015ei\u015fli Chp’li Belediye, – KHK’ l\u0131lar, – \u015eenya\u015far Ailesi, Rabia Naz, – Edibe \u00d6z\u00e7elik, – M\u00fccahit Miro\u011flu, – \u0130kizdere Orman Katliam\u0131, – Orman Yang\u0131nlar\u0131, – HES’ lerin Faturas\u0131, – Bozkurt Sel Katliam\u0131’ yaz\u0131lar\u0131 bulunan el yaz\u0131l\u0131 dok\u00fcman ve ‘EK\u0130M POLAT 24 ya\u015f\u0131nda 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k tutsak, 24 y\u0131l h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc – kalp hastas\u0131 tansiyon, b\u00fcy\u00fcme Hormonu hastas\u0131, – 5 y\u0131ld\u0131r tek ba\u015f\u0131na h\u00fccrede – 90 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr a\u00e7l\u0131k grevinde – annesi 14 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr destek a\u00e7l\u0131k grevinde -annesi \u015ei\u015fli’ de cafe i\u015fletiyor – Teyyareci Cemal Sokak \u015ei\u015fli Camii kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Eski YKM Soka\u011f\u0131, ‘CAN CAFE’ annenin ismi SONG\u00dcL \u0130LKER’ \u015feklinde not ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi” <\/p>\n
4. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu \u015fah\u0131slar hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma devam ederken Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 24\/9\/2021 tarihinde aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu dokuz ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun314\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan tutuklama karar\u0131 verilmesini sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finden talep etmi\u015ftir. \u0130stanbul 3. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi (Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) 24\/9\/2021 tarihinde “…\u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flediklerine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren somut deliller bulundu\u011fu, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un CMK’n\u0131n 100\/3-a maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 kanunen tutuklama nedeni var say\u0131lan katalog su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu, fakat delillerin b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde toplanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, delil karartma ihtimalinin bulunmamas\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin sabit ikametgah sahibi olmalar\u0131, bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u015f\u00fcphelilerin sa\u011fl\u0131k sorunlar\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 hususlar\u0131 ile birlikte mevcut delil durumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak tutuklama tedbiri yerine adli kontrol tedbirinin yerinde ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olaca\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131ndaki tutuklama talebinin reddine, yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kmamak ve konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirine y\u00f6nelik itirazlar\u0131 \u0130stanbul 4. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan 28\/9\/2021 tarihinde “adli kontrol tedbirinin zorunlu, uygun ve orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu” gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 16\/10\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 20\/10\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan inceleme neticesinde ba\u015fvuruculardan Feridun Osmana\u011fao\u011flu hakk\u0131nda verilen konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin 22\/11\/2021 tarihinde, ba\u015fvuruculardan Turan Akta\u015f hakk\u0131nda verilen konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin ise 6\/12\/2021 tarihinde Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan resen kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
7. Akabinde Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 6\/12\/2021 tarihli iddianamesiyle, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu on alt\u0131 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130stanbul 32. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) 25\/12\/2021 tarihli tensip zapt\u0131nda, ba\u015fvuruculardan Hasan Basri Y\u0131ld\u0131z hakk\u0131nda verilen konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Dava, bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla \u0130stanbul 33. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde derdesttir.<\/p>\n
9. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmayan adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular; haklar\u0131ndaki su\u00e7laman\u0131n temelde \u0130stanbul’un de\u011fi\u015fik yerlerinde ve farkl\u0131 tarihlerde kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131n herhangi bir su\u00e7 unsuru i\u00e7ermedi\u011fini ve bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l nitelikte oldu\u011funu, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na kolluk kuvvetlerinin bir m\u00fcdahalesi dahi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, buna kar\u015f\u0131n haklar\u0131nda konutu terk etmemek \u015feklinde adli kontrol karar\u0131 verilmesinin toplant\u0131lara kat\u0131lma haklar\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesine y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucular; verilen adli kontrol tedbirinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, sa\u011fl\u0131k sorunlar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbiri nedeniyle ki\u015fisel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; mevcut ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 ile ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirine y\u00f6nelik iddialar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir (benzer de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Esra \u00d6zkan \u00d6zak\u00e7a [GK], B. No: 2017\/32052, 8\/10\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 68-76).<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesi konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin niteli\u011fi, uygulan\u0131\u015f \u015fekli ve \u00f6zellikleri itibar\u0131yla hareket serbest\u00eesi \u00fczerindeki s\u0131n\u0131rlay\u0131c\u0131 etkisinin derece ve yo\u011funluk olarak seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6re olduk\u00e7a ileri bir boyutta oldu\u011fu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil etti\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Esra \u00d6zkan \u00d6zak\u00e7a \u00a7\u00a7 68-76).<\/p>\n
16. Konutun terk edilmemesine y\u00f6nelik bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7eren adli kontrol tedbirinin hukukili\u011finin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde -t\u0131pk\u0131 tutuklaman\u0131n hukukili\u011finin incelenmesinde oldu\u011fu gibi- tedbirin kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi, isnat edilen su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen hakl\u0131 sebeplerden bir veya daha fazlas\u0131na dayan\u0131l\u0131p dayan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tedbirin ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc b\u00f6yle bir adli kontrol tedbiri tutuklamaya se\u00e7enek bir koruma tedbiridir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu tedbire ancak su\u00e7laman\u0131n kuvvetli say\u0131labilecek inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delillerle desteklenmesi \u015fart\u0131yla, su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hususunda kuvvetli belirti bulunan ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda, tedbir uygulanacak ki\u015finin ka\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131 ya da delilleri yok etmesini veya de\u011fi\u015ftirmesini \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla ve ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fczl\u00fck yoksa ba\u015fvurulabilir. Adli kontrol kapsam\u0131ndaki ba\u015fka y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen me\u015fru ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeterli olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ki\u015fi konutu terk etmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne tabi tutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Esra \u00d6zkan \u00d6zak\u00e7a, \u00a7\u00a7 78-83).<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu etti\u011fi husus 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 314. maddesi gere\u011fince ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 109. maddesi uyar\u0131nca verilen konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbiridir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda verilen ve adli kontrol y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olarak uygulanan konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki tedbirinin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunan s\u00f6z konusu tedbir a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n isnat edilen su\u00e7u i\u015flediklerine dair kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
19. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, adli kontrole h\u00fckmetti\u011fi karar\u0131nda su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphenin var oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 4). \u0130snada g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n DHKP\/C’nin alan yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131 olan Direni\u015f\u00e7iler Meclisi ve Tutuklu ve H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Aileleri ile Dayan\u0131\u015fma Derne\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan organize edilen\/\u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunulan\/sahiplenilen birden \u00e7ok bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu alan yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131 i\u00e7inde aktif bir \u015fekilde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri, afi\u015f, pankart vb. y\u00f6ntemlerle \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131, \u00f6len \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyelerinin mezarlar\u0131n\u0131 ziyaret ettikleri, tutuklu \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyelerinin duru\u015fmalar\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, \u00fcst ve ev\/i\u015fyeri aramalar\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fcte dair birden \u00e7ok dok\u00fcman ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi belirlenmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n eylemlerinin isnat edilen su\u00e7u olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan haklar\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n derdest oldu\u011fu da g\u00f6zetilerek somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe bulundu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki kabul\u00fcnden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirecek bir husus bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Bu a\u015famadan sonra ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirlerinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda, tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131n ka\u00e7ma ya da delillerin yok edilmesini veya de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin tutuklamaya alternatif olma niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi bu tedbir yaln\u0131zca Anayasa’da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ama\u00e7larla verilebilir. An\u0131lan tedbirin niteli\u011fi ve \u00f6zellikleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bunun bilhassa \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131klar\u0131n ka\u00e7malar\u0131n\u0131 engellemeye y\u00f6nelik adli bir \u00f6nlem olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (Esra \u00d6zkan \u00d6zak\u00e7a, \u00a7 80). 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 109. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda da tutuklama sebeplerinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde ki\u015finin tutuklanmas\u0131 yerine adli kontrol alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla adli kontrol tedbiri tutuklama sebeplerinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde ve ancak tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmayaca\u011f\u0131 durumlarda ba\u015fvurulabilen bir tedbirdir.<\/p>\n
22. Tutuklama sebepleri 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 100. maddesinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi \u00fczere \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ka\u00e7mas\u0131, saklanmas\u0131 ya da ka\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphesini uyand\u0131ran somut olgular\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n delilleri yok etme, gizleme veya de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi, tan\u0131k, ma\u011fdur veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131 \u00fczerinde bask\u0131 giri\u015fiminde bulunmas\u0131 hususlar\u0131nda kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fmas\u0131d\u0131r. Tutuklaman\u0131n an\u0131lan me\u015fru ama\u00e7lar\u0131 adli kontrol bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu kapsamda adli kontrol tedbiri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan somut olayda me\u015fru amac\u0131n Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince ortaya konulup konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
23. Somut olayda Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli kontrol alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verirken sabit bir ikametg\u00e2h sahibi olduklar\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphelerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, delillerin b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda toplanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu ve delil karartma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmi\u015f; tan\u0131k, ma\u011fdur veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131 \u00fczerinde bask\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleme ama\u00e7lar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin sebeplerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul\u00fcne ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. T\u00fcm bu veriler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan sunulan gerek\u00e7enin adli kontrol tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fini, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tedbirin me\u015fru amac\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyma bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetersiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden konutu terk etmemeye ili\u015fkin adli kontrol tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince de kabul edildi\u011fi bir h\u00e2lde Anayasa Mahkemesinin aksi bir sonuca varmas\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tedbirin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
26. Somut olayda bireysel ba\u015fvurunun adli kontrol tedbirine ili\u015fkin kanun yolu t\u00fcketildikten sonra yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve inceleme sonucunda, an\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucular; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve miktar belirtmeksizin manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
28. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruculara manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 net 83.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Muhterem \u0130NCE’nin kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA ,<\/p>\n
D. Toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130NCELEME YAPILMASINA YER OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvuruculara net 83.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n AYRI AYRI \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (2021\/384 D.\u0130\u015f) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
\u0130. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 15\/1\/2025 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucular, haklar\u0131nda uygulanan konutu terk etmeme adli kontrol tedbirinin haks\u0131z olarak uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mahkememiz \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu, Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan sunulan gerek\u00e7enin adli kontrol tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fini, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tedbirin me\u015fru amac\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyma bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetersiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130snada g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n DHKP\/C’nin alan yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131 olan Direni\u015f\u00e7iler Meclisi ve Tutuklu ve H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Aileleri ile Dayan\u0131\u015fma Derne\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan organize edilen\/\u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunulan\/sahiplenilen birden \u00e7ok bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu alan yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131 i\u00e7inde aktif bir \u015fekilde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri, afi\u015f, pankart vb. y\u00f6ntemlerle \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131, \u00f6len \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyelerinin mezarlar\u0131n\u0131 ziyaret ettikleri, tutuklu \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyelerinin duru\u015fmalar\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, \u00fcst ve ev\/i\u015fyeri aramalar\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fcte dair birden \u00e7ok dok\u00fcman ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu \u015fah\u0131slar hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma devam ederken Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 24\/9\/2021 tarihinde aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu dokuz ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 314\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan tutuklama karar\u0131 verilmesini sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finden talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130stanbul 3. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi (Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) 24\/9\/2021 tarihinde “…\u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flediklerine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren somut deliller bulundu\u011fu, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un CMK’n\u0131n 100\/3-a maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 kanunen tutuklama nedeni var say\u0131lan katalog su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu, fakat delillerin b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde toplanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, delil karartma ihtimalinin bulunmamas\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin sabit ikametgah sahibi olmalar\u0131, bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u015f\u00fcphelilerin sa\u011fl\u0131k sorunlar\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 hususlar\u0131 ile birlikte mevcut delil durumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak tutuklama tedbiri yerine adli kontrol tedbirinin yerinde ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olaca\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131ndaki tutuklama talebinin reddine, yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kmamak ve konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirine y\u00f6nelik itirazlar\u0131 \u0130stanbul 4. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan 28\/9\/2021 tarihinde “adli kontrol tedbirinin zorunlu, uygun ve orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu” gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Konutun terk edilmemesine y\u00f6nelik bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7eren adli kontrol tedbirinin hukukili\u011finin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde -t\u0131pk\u0131 tutuklaman\u0131n hukukili\u011finin incelenmesinde oldu\u011fu gibi- tedbirin kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi, isnat edilen su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen hakl\u0131 sebeplerden bir veya daha fazlas\u0131na dayan\u0131l\u0131p dayan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tedbirin ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc b\u00f6yle bir adli kontrol tedbiri tutuklamaya se\u00e7enek bir koruma tedbiridir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu tedbire ancak, su\u00e7laman\u0131n kuvvetli say\u0131labilecek inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delillerle desteklenmesi \u015fart\u0131yla, su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hususunda kuvvetli belirti bulunan ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda, tedbir uygulanacak ki\u015finin ka\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131 ya da delilleri yok etmesini veya de\u011fi\u015ftirmesini \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla ve ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fczl\u00fck yoksa ba\u015fvurulabilir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Esra \u00d6zkan \u00d6zak\u00e7a [GK], B. No: 2017\/32052, 8\/10\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 78-83).<\/p>\n
6. \u00c7o\u011funlu\u011fun karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere tedbirin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ve kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcpheye dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131nda bir teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu a\u015famadan sonra ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirlerinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
7. \u00c7o\u011funlu\u011fun karar\u0131nda, Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli kontrol alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verirken sabit bir ikametg\u00e2h sahibi olduklar\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphelerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, delillerin b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda toplanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu ve delil karartma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtti\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015f ve adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin sebeplerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul\u00fcne ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekilmi\u015ftir. Oysa belirtilen gerek\u00e7eler Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan tutuklama tedbirinin tercih edilmemesinin gerek\u00e7esini olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Nitekim bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceden hareketle belirtilen gerek\u00e7ede tan\u0131k, ma\u011fdur veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131 \u00fczerinde bask\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleme amac\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fi ve ba\u015fvuruculara isnad edilen eylemlerin niteli\u011fi g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda adli kontrol tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lan nedenlerin, yani me\u015fru amac\u0131n\u0131n da dosyadan anla\u015f\u0131labildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
8. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan tutuklama yerine daha hafif nitelikte olan konutu terk etmeme \u015feklinde adli kontrol tedbirinin tercih edildi\u011fi, UYAP \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan inceleme neticesinde ba\u015fvuruculardan Feridun Osmana\u011fao\u011flu hakk\u0131nda verilen tedbirinin 22\/11\/2021 tarihinde, Turan Akta\u015f hakk\u0131nda verilen tedbirinin 6\/12\/2021 tarihinde Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan resen kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvuruculardan Hasan Basri Y\u0131ld\u0131z hakk\u0131nda verilen tedbirin ise 25\/12\/2021 tarihli tensip zapt\u0131nda kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, tedbirin niteli\u011fi ve s\u00fcresi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasan\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi kanaatini ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131mdan \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun aksi y\u00f6ndeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00a0Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 15\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/53409 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 FER\u0130DUN OSMANA\u011eAO\u011eLU VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/53409) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 15\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : \u015eeyda Nur \u00dcN Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Feridun OSMANA\u011eAO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Hasan Basri YILDIZ \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Turan AKTA\u015e Vekili : Av. Seda \u015eARILDI \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, haks\u0131z olarak konutu terk etmemek \u015feklinde adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. \u0130stanbul Valili\u011fi \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan 14\/9\/2021 tarihli \u0130hbar Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile “Devrimci Halk Kurtulu\u015f Partisi\/Cephesi (DHKP\/C) silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131 olan Tutuklu ve H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Aileleri Yard\u0131mla\u015fma Derne\u011fi (TAYAD) ve Direni\u015f\u00e7iler Meclisi isimli yap\u0131lanmalar ad\u0131na \u0130stanbul’da de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde d\u00fczenlenen eylem ve faaliyetlerine ili\u015fkin tespitler ve tanzim edilen rapor” \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ter\u00f6r Su\u00e7lar\u0131 Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosuna (Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. 3. Kolluk Kuvvetleri taraf\u0131ndan \u015fu tespitlerde bulunulmu\u015ftur: “-DHKP-C \u00fcyelerinin, \u00f6rg\u00fct ideolojisi ve amac\u0131 do\u011frultusunda, \u015fiddet i\u00e7eren veya \u00e7o\u011funlukla \u015fiddet i\u00e7ermeyen s\u00f6zde adalet aramak, hak talep etmek gibi demokratik kavramlar\u0131 kullanarak, devlet-toplum dengesini bozacak \u015fekilde sivil itaatsizlik eylemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi, yap\u0131lan bu …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n