T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
A. A. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/19835)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 15\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ali Erdem \u015eAH\u0130N<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Cihad ALTUN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ki\u015fisel verilerin g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131na esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. 1992 do\u011fumlu olan ba\u015fvurucu,2017 y\u0131l\u0131 Kamu Personeli Se\u00e7me S\u0131nav\u0131 (KPSS) tercih sonucuna g\u00f6re Suru\u00e7 Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na veri haz\u0131rlama ve kontrol i\u015fletmeni(VHK\u0130) olarak yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 3\/10\/2016 tarihli ve 676 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 D\u00fczenlemeler Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 74. maddesiyle 14\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun 48. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (A) bendine eklenen ve 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7070 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 60. maddesiyle aynen kabul edilen (8) numaral\u0131 alt bent uyar\u0131nca g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu ara\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n olumsuz sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun yerle\u015fmeye hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kamu kurumuna atamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle idare mahkemesine ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ile ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131n neden olumsuz sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n idarece ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 idare s\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. B\u00f6lge idare mahkemesi, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara kararlar\u0131 neticesinde dosyaya sunulan bilgilere g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir eylem s\u0131ras\u0131nda sergiledi\u011fi davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un devlet memurlar\u0131 i\u00e7in arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kriterlere uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle iptal karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rarak davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu karar temyiz kanun yolunda kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 17\/6\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 30\/6\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
8. 7\/4\/2021 tarihli ve 7315 say\u0131l\u0131 G\u00fcvenlik Soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve Ar\u015fiv Ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 Kanunu 17\/4\/2021 tarihli ve 31457 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f ve 26\/10\/1994 tarihli ve 4045 say\u0131l\u0131 G\u00fcvenlik Soru\u015fturmas\u0131, Baz\u0131 Nedenlerle G\u00f6revlerine Son Verilen Kamu Personeli ile Kamu G\u00f6revine Al\u0131nmayanlar\u0131n Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Geri Verilmesine ve 1402 Numaral\u0131 S\u0131k\u0131y\u00f6netim Kanununda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kanun’u y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 7315 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihten itibaren ki\u015filerin g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 bu Kanun kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131 iptal etti\u011fini, somut olaya konu eyleme ili\u015fkin olarak adli yarg\u0131da kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini, Dan\u0131\u015ftay karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu belirterek \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n, su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne cevap vermemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucunun kendisi hakk\u0131nda g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131yla elde edilen verilerin ki\u015fisel veri oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (Fatih Saraman [GK], B. No: 2014\/7256, 27\/2\/2019, \u00a7 57; Turgut Duman, B. No: 2014\/15365, 29\/5\/2019, \u00a7 58). Ba\u015fvurunun temelinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda elde edilen ki\u015fisel verilerin kamu makamlar\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmalar\u0131nda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 hususu bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ki\u015fisel verilerin tutulmas\u0131, saklanmas\u0131 veya aktar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ise Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurular\u0131n \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 i\u00e7inde yer alan ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmektedir (benzer y\u00f6nde yap\u0131lan inceleme ve de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Fatih Saraman, \u00a7 57; Turgut Duman, \u00a7 58; Abdurrahim Kaya ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/12271, 3\/12\/2020, \u00a7 19).<\/p>\n
11. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi Fatih Saraman karar\u0131nda somut olay\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 kuralla benzer nitelikteki bir kurala dayanan g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 y\u00f6ntemini incelemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi ilgili kural\u0131n konuyla ilgili temel esaslar\u0131, ilkeleri ve \u00e7er\u00e7eveyi belirlemedi\u011fini belirttikten sonra kanunun ve ilgili y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin ki\u015fisel verilerin kay\u0131t, muhafaza ve kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren tedbirlerin kapsam\u0131n\u0131, uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen ve \u00f6zellikle s\u00fcre, stoklama, kullan\u0131m, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin eri\u015fimi, verilerin gizlili\u011fi, b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve imhas\u0131 konusundaki usullere ili\u015fkin, muhataplar\u0131n\u0131n yetki a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ve keyf\u00eeli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 yeteri kadar g\u00fcvenceye sahip olmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak a\u00e7\u0131k ve detayl\u0131 kurallar\u0131 i\u00e7ermemesi nedeniyle kanunilik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Fatih Saraman, \u00a7\u00a7 88-90; S\u00fcleyman Akif Nazl\u0131g\u00fcl, B. No: 2018\/31982, 15\/6\/2021, \u00a7 33).<\/p>\n
13. \u00d6te yandan 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7070 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 D\u00fczenlemeler Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin De\u011fi\u015ftirilerek Kabul Edilmesine Dair Kanun’un 60. maddesi ile 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 48. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (A) bendine eklenen (8) numaral\u0131 alt bendin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, Anayasa Mahkemesi 24\/7\/2019 tarihli ve E.2018\/73, K.2019\/65 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda uygulanan kural\u0131 Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13., 20. ve 128. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6rerek iptal etmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131yla elde edilen verilerin ki\u015fisel veri niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, bu alanda d\u00fczenleme getiren kurallar\u0131n kamu makamlar\u0131na hangi ko\u015fullarda ve hangi s\u0131n\u0131rlar i\u00e7inde tedbirler uygulama ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fine y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalelerde bulunma yetkisi verildi\u011fini yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k olarak g\u00f6stermesi ve olas\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmalara kar\u015f\u0131 yeterli g\u00fcvenceleri sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, kuralda ise g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve\/veya ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 memurlu\u011fa al\u0131mlarda genel \u015fartlar aras\u0131nda say\u0131lmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131na ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131na konu edilecek bilgi ve belgelerin neler oldu\u011funa, bu bilgilerin ne \u015fekilde kullan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na, hangi mercilerin soru\u015fturma ve ara\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 yapaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6ylece Anayasa Mahkemesi Fatih Saraman karar\u0131nda benimsedi\u011fi bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 norm denetiminde verdi\u011fi iptal karar\u0131yla da s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (S\u00fcleyman Akif Nazl\u0131g\u00fcl, \u00a7 34).<\/p>\n
14. Somut olayda da ba\u015fvurucunun yukar\u0131da belirtilen d\u00fczenlemeler esas al\u0131narak yap\u0131lan g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n olumsuz sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle yerle\u015ftirilmesinin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Fatih Saraman karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvuruya konu m\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan d\u00fczenlemenin kanunilik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da yer verilen tespitler uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvuruya konu m\u00fcdahalenin kanunilik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcdahale a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan di\u011fer g\u00fcvence \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerine riayet edilip edilmedi\u011finin ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmesine gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Orhan \u00d6zkan ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/19102, 4\/10\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 8-19; Hatip \u0130mir, B. No: 2019\/30759, 28\/2\/2024, \u00a7 15).<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile birlikte 250.000 TL maddi ve 200.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fiyarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
18. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Gaziantep B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 1. \u0130dari Dava Dairesine iletilmek \u00fczere (E.2019\/3, K.2019\/699) \u015eanl\u0131urfa 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2017\/1462, K.2018\/784) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 15\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 15\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/19835 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 A. A. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/19835) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 15\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Ali Erdem \u015eAH\u0130N Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Cihad ALTUN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ki\u015fisel verilerin g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131na esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. 1992 do\u011fumlu olan ba\u015fvurucu,2017 y\u0131l\u0131 Kamu Personeli Se\u00e7me S\u0131nav\u0131 (KPSS) tercih sonucuna g\u00f6re Suru\u00e7 Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na veri haz\u0131rlama ve kontrol i\u015fletmeni(VHK\u0130) olarak yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 3\/10\/2016 tarihli ve 676 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 D\u00fczenlemeler Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 74. maddesiyle 14\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun 48. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (A) bendine eklenen ve 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7070 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 60. maddesiyle aynen kabul edilen (8) numaral\u0131 alt bent uyar\u0131nca g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu ara\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n olumsuz sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun yerle\u015fmeye hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kamu kurumuna atamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle idare mahkemesine ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n