T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130. Y. VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/25295)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mehmet ALTUND\u0130\u015e<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekilleri<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Davut Emre D\u0130LEK<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular, Samsun B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi (Belediye) ile imzalad\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme uyar\u0131nca ald\u0131klar\u0131 toplu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k hizmetlerindeki hat kullan\u0131m hakk\u0131na istinaden il merkezinde \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcs\u00fc i\u015fletmektedir.<\/p>\n
3. Ayn\u0131 yerde faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir ta\u015f\u0131ma kooperatifi 2\/8\/2012 tarihinde Belediyeye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruyla \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcslerinin ihale s\u00fcresinin bitmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 8\/9\/1983 tarihli ve 2886 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet \u0130hale Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda ihale yoluyla kiralanan \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcslerinden s\u00fcresi bitenlerin faaliyetlerinin sona erdirilmesini talep etmi\u015f, talebinin cevap verilmemek suretiyle reddi \u00fczerine olu\u015fan z\u0131mni ret i\u015fleminin iptali istemiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Samsun 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi dava konusu i\u015flemi k\u0131smen iptal etmi\u015ftir. Kararda 2886 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 64. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, daval\u0131 idare ile y\u00fcklenici aras\u0131nda imzalanan s\u00f6zle\u015fme tarihinden itibaren on y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla sona erdi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bunun \u00fczerine Belediye Enc\u00fcmeni 4\/2\/2016 tarihinde an\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi feshetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucular, Enc\u00fcmenin on y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131 dolduran \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcslerinin s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin tek tarafl\u0131 feshedildi\u011finden bahisle olu\u015ftu\u011fu belirtilen zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi ve manevi tazminat\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshedildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren i\u015fletilecek yasal faiziyle birlikte \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Samsun 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015f; kararda idarece haz\u0131rlanan \u015fartnamenin ve imzalanan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcml\u00fc hat kullan\u0131m haklar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresiz \u015fekilde kiraya verilmesi sonucunu do\u011furacak nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fin s\u00fcresiz oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik hakl\u0131 beklenti yarat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin s\u00fcresiz oldu\u011funa g\u00fcvenilerek hatt\u0131n y\u00fcksek bir de\u011ferden sat\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n somut verilerle ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, on y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini dolduran \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcslerinin s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin hukuka uygun oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Davan\u0131n reddine y\u00f6nelik mahkeme karar\u0131 istinaf ve temyiz a\u015famalar\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurular s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. 2021\/31547, 2021\/17472, 2021\/17463 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n konu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuki irtibat nedeniyle 2021\/25295 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucular; Belediye ile aralar\u0131nda imzalanan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin hukuki nitelemesinin do\u011fru yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin bir kamu hizmetinin \u00f6zel hukuk ki\u015filerince y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kamu hizmeti imtiyaz s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi oldu\u011funu ve bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin k\u0131rk elli y\u0131l gibi uzun vadelerle yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hak sahibi olduklar\u0131 hatt\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131ndan ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ekonomik de\u011ferinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fclkiyet haklar\u0131na yap\u0131lan bu m\u00fcdahalenin yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ayn\u0131 zamanda \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; yarg\u0131 mercilerinin dava konusu maddi olay ve olgularla iddialar\u0131 ve delilleri de\u011ferlendirdikleri, hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131, uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili vard\u0131klar\u0131 sonucu ve kulland\u0131klar\u0131 takdir yetkisinin sebeplerini gerek\u00e7elendirdikleri, mevcut ba\u015fvurularla ayn\u0131 mahiyetteki bireysel ba\u015fvuruda Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi (A\u0130HM) taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurular, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. \u0130dare taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fme akdedilmek suretiyle verilen \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcs\u00fc hat kullan\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131n ilgililer y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ekonomik bir de\u011fer ifade etti\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 35. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda ekonomik de\u011fer te\u015fkil eden m\u00fclk\u00fcn\u00fcn var oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n toplu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k hizmetindeki hat kullan\u0131m haklar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshi yoluyla iptal edilmesinin -\u00fccret kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yapma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- ekonomik faaliyetleri \u00fczerinde olumsuz etkileri olaca\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil etti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda belli bir standart olu\u015fturabilmek ve bu sekt\u00f6rde faaliyette bulunmak isteyen ki\u015filer i\u00e7in bir rekabet ortam\u0131 yaratmak amac\u0131yla mevcut ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k hatt\u0131 tahsisinin iptaliyle sekt\u00f6rde yer almak isteyenler i\u00e7in ihaleye \u00e7\u0131kmak \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6zellikle amac\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurunun m\u00fclkten bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l yararlanma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc genel kural \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
12. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n hat kullan\u0131m haklar\u0131 2886 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine dayan\u0131larak iptal edildi\u011finden m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yolcu ta\u015f\u0131ma faaliyeti s\u0131ras\u0131nda yolcu, yaya ve di\u011fer ara\u00e7lar\u0131 meydana gelebilecek tehlikelerden korumak, trafi\u011fin g\u00fcven i\u00e7inde ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak, beldede ya\u015fayanlar\u0131n ula\u015f\u0131m ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenli, devaml\u0131 \u015fekilde kar\u015f\u0131lamak amac\u0131yla kural koymak, mevcut kurallar\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fcn gerekliliklerine ve de\u011fi\u015fen durumlara g\u00f6re yeniden belirlemek belediyelerin g\u00f6revinde ve sorumlulu\u011fundad\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan belediyelerin g\u00f6rev ve yetkileri kapsam\u0131nda olan ve kanunla \u00fcstlendikleri bu g\u00f6revleri yerine getirebilmek i\u00e7in ihtiya\u00e7 duyduklar\u0131 geliri elde etmek amac\u0131yla bedel kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 hat kullan\u0131m\u0131 haklar\u0131n\u0131 ki\u015filere devretmesi de m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Belediyelerin bu y\u00f6nde ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 tedbirler esas itibar\u0131yla belde halk\u0131na daha ya\u015fanabilir bir ortam sa\u011flamaya y\u00f6nelik olup tedbirlerin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131 oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinde m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n mutlak bir hak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesi temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetleri s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rmada genel ilkeleri tespit etmi\u015ftir. Bu maddede ifade edilen \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesi temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurularda \u00f6ncelikli olarak dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir g\u00fcvencedir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin kararlar\u0131na g\u00f6re \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin s\u0131n\u0131rlanma ama\u00e7lar\u0131 ile ara\u00e7 aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiyi yans\u0131t\u0131r. \u00d6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck denetimi, ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7tan yola \u00e7\u0131k\u0131larak bu amaca ula\u015f\u0131lmak i\u00e7in se\u00e7ilen arac\u0131n denetlenmesidir. Bu sebeple m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalelerde, hedeflenen amaca ula\u015fabilmek i\u00e7in se\u00e7ilen m\u00fcdahalenin elveri\u015fli, gerekli ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi Cafer Sezgin ve di\u011ferleri (B. No: 2018\/20720, 7\/4\/2021, \u00a7 51) yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin imtiyaz\u0131n iptalini ele alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi an\u0131lan kararda kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n 1987 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri hat ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yapan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n imtiyazlar\u0131n\u0131n iptaliyle ilgili takdir yetkisini \u00f6nceden belirlenmi\u015f ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir bir \u015fart veya \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct dikkate almadan kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuruculara \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez \u015fekilde \u015fahsi olarak a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 ve orant\u0131s\u0131z bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Somut olayda Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucular ile idare aras\u0131nda akdedilen s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve ihale \u015fartnamesine g\u00f6re s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a hat kullanma haklar\u0131n\u0131n kiraya verilmesine y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funu, \u015fartnamenin 4. maddesinde ruhsatlar\u0131n her y\u0131l yenilenece\u011fine dair h\u00fckm\u00fcn ihaleye giren ba\u015fvurucular taraf\u0131ndan bilindi\u011fi ve kabul edildi\u011fini, 2886 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 64. maddesinde kiraya verilecek ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallar\u0131n kira s\u00fcresinin on y\u0131ldan \u00e7ok olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ve onlar\u0131n k\u00fclli ve c\u00fczi haleflerinin on y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin \u00f6tesinde ruhsat yenileme hakk\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve on y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin sonunda s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona erme riskinin oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu husus ba\u015fvurucular ve onlar\u0131n k\u00fclli, c\u00fczi halefleri taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir bir durumdur. Bu sebeple somut ba\u015fvuruda Cafer Sezgin ve di\u011ferleri karar\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. Bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n on y\u0131l veya daha fazla s\u00fcredir hat kullan\u0131m hakk\u0131ndan faydaland\u0131klar\u0131 ve bu hakka istinaden \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcs\u00fc i\u015fletmecili\u011fi faaliyetini y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda on y\u0131l\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini doldurduklar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin feshedilmesinin kendilerine a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 ve ola\u011fan\u0131n \u00f6tesinde k\u00fclfet y\u00fcklemedi\u011fi ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Nitekim ba\u015fvuru konusu ayn\u0131 olayla ilgili olarak A\u0130HM, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a i\u015fletme hakk\u0131n\u0131n kiralanmas\u0131 niteli\u011finde olan bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin s\u00fcresi bitti\u011fi i\u00e7in idarece feshedilmesine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k kanunda ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r veya ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallara ili\u015fkin kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin on y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015famayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k ve eri\u015febilir olan unsurlar dikkate al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurucunun on y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin \u00f6tesinde ruhsat yenileme hakk\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Belediyenin niyeti ne olursa olsun s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin on y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin sonunda sona erme riskinin a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funun ink\u00e2r edilemeyece\u011fini belirterek bu s\u00fcreyi a\u015fan bir ruhsat\u0131n yenilenmemesinin ve tazminat \u00f6denmemesinin s\u00f6z konusu di\u011fer menfaatler aras\u0131nda kurulmas\u0131 gereken adil dengeyi bozmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir (Temizi\u015fler Madeni Ya\u011f Sanayi Ticaret Limitet \u015eirketi\/T\u00fcrkiye, B. No: 44159\/1818\/11\/2021, \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n B\u0130RLE\u015eT\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
B. M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 10\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/25295 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130. Y. VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/25295) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 10\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mehmet ALTUND\u0130\u015e Ba\u015fvurucular : Vekilleri : Av. Davut Emre D\u0130LEK \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular, Samsun B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi (Belediye) ile imzalad\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme uyar\u0131nca ald\u0131klar\u0131 toplu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k hizmetlerindeki hat kullan\u0131m hakk\u0131na istinaden il merkezinde \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcs\u00fc i\u015fletmektedir. 3. Ayn\u0131 yerde faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir ta\u015f\u0131ma kooperatifi 2\/8\/2012 tarihinde Belediyeye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruyla \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcslerinin ihale s\u00fcresinin bitmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 8\/9\/1983 tarihli ve 2886 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet \u0130hale Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda ihale yoluyla kiralanan \u00f6zel halk otob\u00fcslerinden s\u00fcresi bitenlerin faaliyetlerinin sona erdirilmesini talep etmi\u015f, talebinin cevap verilmemek suretiyle reddi \u00fczerine olu\u015fan z\u0131mni ret i\u015fleminin iptali istemiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Samsun 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi dava konusu i\u015flemi k\u0131smen iptal etmi\u015ftir. Kararda 2886 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 64. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, daval\u0131 idare ile y\u00fcklenici aras\u0131nda imzalanan s\u00f6zle\u015fme tarihinden itibaren on y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n