{"id":34003,"date":"2025-02-24T15:57:00","date_gmt":"2025-02-24T12:57:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-02-24T15:57:00","modified_gmt":"2025-02-24T12:57:00","slug":"yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi’nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

3. Hukuk Dairesi <\/p>\n

2024\/2704 E., 2024\/3706 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 15. Hukuk Dairesi(\u0130lk Derece)
\nSAYISI : 2024\/1 E., 2024\/1 K.<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, Mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekilince duru\u015fmal\u0131 istemli temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 19.11.2024 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Belli edilen g\u00fcnde gelen davac\u0131 vekili Avukat … ile daval\u0131 vekili Avukat ….’in s\u00f6zl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenildikten sonra i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen saat 14.00’de Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlenerek dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

I. DAVA<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili; davac\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131y\u0131 hem bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 hem de mal rejimi davas\u0131 nedeniyle vekil tayin etti\u011fini, avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde tahkim \u015fart\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle tahkime ba\u015fvuruldu\u011funu, atanan hakem taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya bilirki\u015fi tayin edildi\u011fini, ancak daval\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi \u00fccretini \u00f6dememesi nedeniyle hakem olarak atanan ki\u015finin yetkilerini a\u015farak dosyada herhangi bir hukuki ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmadan \u015fahsi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc ortaya koyarak karar verdi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan bo\u015f olarak imzalanan ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn daval\u0131 avukat taraf\u0131ndan doldurulmu\u015f oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 Hakemin dikkate almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, avukatl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fini istemesine ra\u011fmen daval\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6ndermedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n, bilgi vermedi\u011fi i\u00e7in daval\u0131 avukat\u0131 hakl\u0131 olarak azletti\u011fini, fahi\u015f bir avukatl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi bulundu\u011fundan ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa imzay\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanm\u0131\u015f olmakla yetinmeyerek fahi\u015f bir \u00fccret \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 yan\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkiline gabin uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihinde hen\u00fcz m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, avukat\u0131n \u00fczerine ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fi \u00f6zenle ve m\u00fcvekkili yarar\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcp sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, Avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011fine, hukuka, ahlaka, mesle\u011fin onuruna ve kurallar\u0131na uygun davranmayan daval\u0131n\u0131n gabin uygulamas\u0131, TCK’ n\u0131n 209 uncu maddesi gere\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa at\u0131lan imzan\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin olmas\u0131 sebebiyle Hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n iptaline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. CEVAP<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 vekili; davan\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti\u011fini, Tahkim Kurallar\u0131 16\/2 maddesine g\u00f6re bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapmadan da karar verilebilece\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 2 n\u00fcsha olarak haz\u0131rlanarak, bir suretinin davac\u0131ya verildi\u011fini, gabinin s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

III. MAHKEME KARARI<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; HMK’n\u0131n i\u00e7 tahkime ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 407 ve devam\u0131 maddeleri ile ayn\u0131 Kanun’un Hakem karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 iptal davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 439 maddesi gere\u011fince, somut olayda gerek davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen, gerekse resen dikkate al\u0131nacak iptaline ili\u015fkin nedenler mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n

A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuran
\nMahkemenin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri
\nDavac\u0131 vekili; daval\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi \u00fccretini \u00f6dememesi nedeniyle Hakem olarak atanan ki\u015finin yetkilerini a\u015farak dosyada herhangi bir hukuki ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmadan \u015fahsi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc ortaya koyarak karar verdi\u011fini, yaz\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan el yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile at\u0131lan imzalar\u0131n m\u00fcrekkebi ayn\u0131 e\u015f zamanl\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131p yaz\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti gerekti\u011fini, bu hususu Hakemin dikkate almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n avukatl\u0131k meslek kurallar\u0131na uygun davranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa imzay\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanm\u0131\u015f olmakla yetinmeyerek fahi\u015f bir \u00fccret \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 yan\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkiline gabin uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n %10 olarak kendince de\u011fer bi\u00e7ilen 5.000.000,00 TL olan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava ba\u015f\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, anla\u015fma protokol\u00fc gere\u011fi evi, e\u015finin m\u00fcvekkiline b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 30.03.2023 tarihinde hen\u00fcz m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, avukat\u0131n hileli i\u015flem yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, avukat\u0131n \u00fczerine ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fi \u00f6zenle ve m\u00fcvekkili yarar\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcp sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, azlin hakl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6rne\u011fini istemesine ra\u011fmen daval\u0131 avukat\u0131n g\u00f6ndermemi\u015f oldu\u011funu belirterek, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e
\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme
\nUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk
\n6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 439 uncu maddesi.<\/p>\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme
\n1. HMK\u2019n\u0131n 439 uncu maddesinde yer alan d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re, hakem kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yaln\u0131z iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilecektir. Ayn\u0131 maddenin devam\u0131nda da iptal sebepleri tek tek say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali davalar\u0131nda iptal sebepleri tahdidi olarak say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, karar\u0131n esas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka uygun ve yerinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile de hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n, yerinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, hakemlerin hukuku do\u011fru uygulay\u0131p uygulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi hususlar\u0131n hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali davalar\u0131nda inceleme konusu yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n

2. Hakem kurulunun, ba\u015fvuru sonucu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirerek, taraflar\u0131n t\u00fcm talepleri hakk\u0131nda bir karar vermesi gerekir. Maddi hukuka ili\u015fkin konularla ilgili uygulanacak hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve tahlili de hakeme aittir.<\/p>\n

3. Tahkim dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere taraflara tahkim yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcresince e\u015fit olarak iddia, savunma ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrme imkan\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, istemin tamam\u0131 hakk\u0131nda karar verilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen usul kurallar\u0131na uygun olarak y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, uygulanacak hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve yorumunun hakeme ait oldu\u011fu, iptal davas\u0131nda hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya hukukun do\u011fru uygulan\u0131p uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile usul ve kanuna uygun bulunan karar\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

V. KARAR<\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple;<\/p>\n

Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 370 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

28.000,00 TL Yarg\u0131tay duru\u015fmas\u0131 vekalet \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131n\u0131p daval\u0131ya verilmesine,<\/p>\n

19.11.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 19 Kas\u0131m 2024 Tarih ve E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2024\/2704 E., 2024\/3706 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 15. Hukuk Dairesi(\u0130lk Derece) SAYISI : 2024\/1 E., 2024\/1 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, Mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekilince duru\u015fmal\u0131 istemli temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 19.11.2024 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Belli edilen g\u00fcnde gelen davac\u0131 vekili Avukat … ile daval\u0131 vekili Avukat ….’in s\u00f6zl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenildikten sonra i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen saat 14.00’de Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlenerek dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 vekili; davac\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131y\u0131 hem bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 hem de mal rejimi davas\u0131 nedeniyle vekil tayin etti\u011fini, avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde tahkim \u015fart\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle tahkime ba\u015fvuruldu\u011funu, atanan hakem taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya bilirki\u015fi tayin edildi\u011fini, ancak daval\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi \u00fccretini \u00f6dememesi nedeniyle hakem olarak atanan ki\u015finin yetkilerini a\u015farak dosyada herhangi bir hukuki ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmadan \u015fahsi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc ortaya koyarak karar verdi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan bo\u015f olarak imzalanan ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn daval\u0131 avukat taraf\u0131ndan doldurulmu\u015f oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 Hakemin dikkate almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, avukatl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fini istemesine ra\u011fmen daval\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6ndermedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n, bilgi vermedi\u011fi i\u00e7in …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34003","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2024\/2704 E., 2024\/3706 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 15. Hukuk Dairesi(\u0130lk Derece) SAYISI : 2024\/1 E., 2024\/1 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, Mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekilince duru\u015fmal\u0131 istemli temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 19.11.2024 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Belli edilen g\u00fcnde gelen davac\u0131 vekili Avukat … ile daval\u0131 vekili Avukat ….’in s\u00f6zl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenildikten sonra i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen saat 14.00’de Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlenerek dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 vekili; davac\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131y\u0131 hem bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 hem de mal rejimi davas\u0131 nedeniyle vekil tayin etti\u011fini, avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde tahkim \u015fart\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle tahkime ba\u015fvuruldu\u011funu, atanan hakem taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya bilirki\u015fi tayin edildi\u011fini, ancak daval\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi \u00fccretini \u00f6dememesi nedeniyle hakem olarak atanan ki\u015finin yetkilerini a\u015farak dosyada herhangi bir hukuki ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmadan \u015fahsi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc ortaya koyarak karar verdi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan bo\u015f olarak imzalanan ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn daval\u0131 avukat taraf\u0131ndan doldurulmu\u015f oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 Hakemin dikkate almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, avukatl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fini istemesine ra\u011fmen daval\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6ndermedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n, bilgi vermedi\u011fi i\u00e7in …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-24T12:57:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi’nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-24T12:57:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1218,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-24T12:57:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi’nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2024\/2704 E., 2024\/3706 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 15. Hukuk Dairesi(\u0130lk Derece) SAYISI : 2024\/1 E., 2024\/1 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, Mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekilince duru\u015fmal\u0131 istemli temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 19.11.2024 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Belli edilen g\u00fcnde gelen davac\u0131 vekili Avukat … ile daval\u0131 vekili Avukat ….’in s\u00f6zl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenildikten sonra i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen saat 14.00’de Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlenerek dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 vekili; davac\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131y\u0131 hem bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 hem de mal rejimi davas\u0131 nedeniyle vekil tayin etti\u011fini, avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde tahkim \u015fart\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle tahkime ba\u015fvuruldu\u011funu, atanan hakem taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya bilirki\u015fi tayin edildi\u011fini, ancak daval\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi \u00fccretini \u00f6dememesi nedeniyle hakem olarak atanan ki\u015finin yetkilerini a\u015farak dosyada herhangi bir hukuki ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmadan \u015fahsi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc ortaya koyarak karar verdi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan bo\u015f olarak imzalanan ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn daval\u0131 avukat taraf\u0131ndan doldurulmu\u015f oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 Hakemin dikkate almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, avukatl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fini istemesine ra\u011fmen daval\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6ndermedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n, bilgi vermedi\u011fi i\u00e7in …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-02-24T12:57:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi’nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-02-24T12:57:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1218,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-02-24T12:57:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-e-2024-2704-k-2024-3706-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi’nin E.2024\/2704, K.2024\/3706 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34003"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34003\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}