T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
ERDEM YAVUZ BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/30146)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 11\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u015fenur TUNCER<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Erdem YAVUZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyeti ile \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yeni koronavir\u00fcs salg\u0131n\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Oltu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Kurum) bulunmaktayken kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin kaydedilmesi \u015feklindeki uygulaman\u0131n ve koronavir\u00fcs COVID-19 tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi iddias\u0131yla \u0130nfaz Kurumu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (\u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu 16\/7\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun taleplerinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un “H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve Tutuklular\u0131n Telefon G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme Hakk\u0131” alt ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 66. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin dinlenerek kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, yine kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerdeki uygulama bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 17\/6\/2005 tarihli ve 25848 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve Tutuklular\u0131n Ziyaret Edilmeleri Hakk\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik kapsam\u0131nda i\u015flem yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bunun yan\u0131nda Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza ve Tevkif Evleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle t\u00fcm yurtta al\u0131nan sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda hem infaz kurumlar\u0131nda bulunanlar\u0131n hem de toplumun sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla t\u00fcm infaz kurumlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin 1\/8\/2020 tarihine kadar ertelenmesi talimat\u0131 do\u011frultusunda uygulama yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek \u0130nfaz Kurumunun bu konuda herhangi bir yetkisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu verilen ret karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Oltu \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. H\u00e2kimlik 7\/8\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerde araya cam konularak telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmenin sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, an\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmenin asl\u0131nda telefonla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, telefon ile yap\u0131lan bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmenin d\u0131\u015f aramadan hi\u00e7bir fark\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerde ileti\u015fimin telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi belirtilerek kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerde kay\u0131t alma i\u015fleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi kabul edilse bile hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 66. maddesi oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bunun yan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun COVID-19 tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri H\u00e2kimlik karar\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 Oltu A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) itirazda bulunmu\u015ftur. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, an\u0131lan karar\u0131n usule ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle 2\/9\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 3\/9\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 21\/9\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011funu belirten ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. Kapal\u0131 G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin Dinlenmesi ve Kayda Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Nedeniyle \u00d6zel Hayata Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131 ile Haberle\u015fme H\u00fcrriyetinin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerdeki konu\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n kaydedilmesine ili\u015fkin infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ba\u015fvurucunun ihlal iddialar\u0131 konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan E\u015fref K\u00f6se (B. No: 2017\/38098, 3\/6\/2020) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerde yap\u0131lan konu\u015fmalar\u0131n sistematik bir \u015fekilde teknik ara\u00e7la dinlenmesi ve kaydedilmesinin \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n kanunla d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyeti ile \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut ba\u015fvuruda, an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu do\u011frultuda ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. ve 22. maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. COVID-19 Salg\u0131n\u0131na Y\u00f6nelik Tedbirler Kapsam\u0131nda Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumundaki G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin K\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 Nedeniyle Aile Hayat\u0131na Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131yla Ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 Olarak Etkili Ba\u015fvuru Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu; COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan itibaren devam eden g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tedbirlerin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinin Kurum taraf\u0131ndan reddedildi\u011fini, bu ret karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ise yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131nca de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini belirterek aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131ndaki birtak\u0131m uygulamalar\u0131n temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlere m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil etti\u011fi ve kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi konusunda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclecek iddialar\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayan ve gerekti\u011finde uygun bir telafi y\u00f6ntemi sunan etkili hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131n\u0131n ilgililere etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bir gereklilik oldu\u011funu Meral Dan\u0131\u015f Be\u015fta\u015f (3) karar\u0131nda kabul etmi\u015ftir (Meral Dan\u0131\u015f Be\u015fta\u015f (3), B. No: 2017\/34087, 13\/10\/2020, \u00a7 40). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6neminde uygulanan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tedbirler konusunda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n da bu kapsamda ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve bir yarg\u0131 merciince incelenmesi ba\u015fvurucuya etkili bir ba\u015fvuru yolunun sa\u011flanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemlidir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Meral Dan\u0131\u015f Be\u015fta\u015f (3), \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
13. Bu itibarla somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda yarg\u0131sal fonksiyonun esas\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u00e7inde yer alan maddi ve hukuki sorunlar\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u015flevinin ilgili mahkemelerce yerine getirilmedi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6neminde uygulanan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tedbirler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet konusu etti\u011fi hususlar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ya da reddine ili\u015fkin esasa y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir karar verilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. B\u00f6ylece ba\u015fvurucunun H\u00e2kimli\u011fe yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda verilen karar\u0131n bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine ve uygun bir telafi \u015fans\u0131 sunmaya elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130tiraz\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi de bu eksikli\u011fi gidermeye y\u00f6nelik bir gerek\u00e7eye yer vermemi\u015ftir. Neticede ba\u015fvurucuya, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc m\u00fcdahalenin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle ba\u015fvurabilece\u011fi ve asgari g\u00fcvenceleri i\u00e7eren, pratikte de i\u015fleyen etkili bir hukuk yolunun sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak 40. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, ihlalin t\u00fcm sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla giderilmesi ile 15.000 TL maddi ve 30.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu her ne kadar 16\/5\/2022 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015f olsa da ba\u015fvuru formunda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun mevcut ihlalin t\u00fcm sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla giderilmesi ve kay\u0131t alt\u0131ndaki verilerin silinmesine ili\u015fkin taleplerde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan; kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
17. \u00d6te yandan ihlallerin niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurucuya taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 1. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 22. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak 40. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tespit edilen \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 ve haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Oltu \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2020\/251, K.2020\/259) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Oltu A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (2020\/335 D. \u0130\u015f) ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 11\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 11\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/30146 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 ERDEM YAVUZ BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/30146) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 11\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Ay\u015fenur TUNCER Ba\u015fvurucu : Erdem YAVUZ \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyeti ile \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yeni koronavir\u00fcs salg\u0131n\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Oltu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Kurum) bulunmaktayken kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin kaydedilmesi \u015feklindeki uygulaman\u0131n ve koronavir\u00fcs COVID-19 tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi iddias\u0131yla \u0130nfaz Kurumu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (\u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu 16\/7\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun taleplerinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un “H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve Tutuklular\u0131n Telefon G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme Hakk\u0131” alt ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 66. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin dinlenerek kay\u0131t …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n