T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
ABDURRAHMAN ERG\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/2219)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Abdurrahman ERG\u0130N<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Hasan Ali APPAK<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetine maruz kal\u0131nmas\u0131 ve bu konuda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi sebebiyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan sunulan bireysel ba\u015fvuru formu ile infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tutulan tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re, 9\/3\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yapmak \u00fczere, annesi ve e\u015fiyle kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f odas\u0131nda bulunmaktad\u0131r. Kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f odas\u0131nda ki\u015filerin ileti\u015fimini sa\u011flayan ahizelerde bozukluk olmas\u0131 sebebiyle, ba\u015fvurucu durumu infaz koruma memuruna bildirmi\u015f, infaz koruma memurunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm bulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesi \u00fczerine sinirlenerek kap\u0131y\u0131 tekmelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Bunun \u00fczerine, infaz koruma memuru oradan ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, akabinde yakla\u015f\u0131k on infaz koruma memuru ile birlikte kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f odas\u0131na geri gelerek ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeyi sonland\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ko\u011fu\u015funa d\u00f6nmesini istemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu talebi reddetmesi \u00fczerine de m\u00fcdahaleye ba\u015flan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte olaya tan\u0131k olan ba\u015fvurucunun annesi ve e\u015fi ba\u015fvurucuyu darp eden kamu g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Yine ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucu, ceza infaz kurumu hekimli\u011fine ba\u015fvurarak genel adli muayene raporu alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan raporda, ba\u015fvurucunun y\u00fcz\u00fcnde ve boynunda darba ba\u011fl\u0131 hafif lezyonlar bulundu\u011fu, kafas\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 ayr\u0131 yerde 1×1 ebatlar\u0131nda hematom (kan toplanmas\u0131), s\u0131rtta travmaya ba\u011fl\u0131 yaralar, kol ve bacaklar\u0131nda da \u00e7e\u015fitli yerlerde kesi ve ekimozlar tespit edildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. 11\/3\/2020 tarihinde bu defa ba\u015fvurucu vekili taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6demi\u015f Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, olaya ili\u015fkin m\u00fc\u015fteki olarak ba\u015fvurucunun ve tan\u0131k olarak \u00fc\u00e7 infaz koruma memurunun ifadesini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olaya ili\u015fkin CD inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131 da dosyaya kazand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. CD inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun ziyaret g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc esnas\u0131nda infaz koruma memurunun yan\u0131na geldi\u011fi, agresif hareketlerde bulundu\u011fu, infaz koruma memuruna tekme att\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay\u0131n akabinde infaz koruma memurunun di\u011fer infaz koruma memurlar\u0131yla birlikte ziyaret g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f alan\u0131na gelerek ba\u015fvurucuya zor kulland\u0131klar\u0131, ko\u011fu\u015funa g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc esnada direnmeye devam eden ba\u015fvuruya y\u00f6nelik zor kullanman\u0131n devam etti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 23\/6\/2020 tarihinde soru\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu kararda olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ilgili kamu g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan tutulan tutanak ile ceza infaz kurumunda g\u00f6revli bir bilgisayar m\u00fchendisi ile bir infaz koruma memuru taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen CD inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131na dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, haklar\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulan kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00f6revlerini k\u00f6t\u00fcye kulland\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin kanunda aran\u0131lan \u015fartlar\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucuda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan yaralanmalar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun kendisinden kaynakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7elerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. An\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz sulh ceza hakimli\u011fince reddedilmi\u015f, ret karar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya 9\/12\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu 4\/1\/2021 tarihinde s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu yaralanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 doktor raporunun bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla soru\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 sundu\u011fu beyanda iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
14. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131 ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmektedir. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 81, 82).<\/p>\n
15. G\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutukluluk gibi bireyin devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada bir yaralanma olay\u0131 meydana gelmi\u015f ise bu olaya ili\u015fkin olarak tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yetkili makamlara aittir (S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 89, 90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 95). Bunun sebebi bu t\u00fcr olaylarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgilerin \u00e7o\u011funlukla yetkili makamlar\u0131n eri\u015fiminde olmas\u0131d\u0131r (Ferit Kurt ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/9957, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n kendi eylemlerinden kaynakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, iddian\u0131n soyut oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle soru\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131 olay\u0131yla ilgili olarak tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama getirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda yasaklanan muamelelerle ilgili de\u011ferlendirmelerine g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131na neden olan muamele, insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir muamele olarak kabul edilebilir (bahsi ge\u00e7en muamelelerle ilgili ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. S\u00fcleyman Deveci, \u00a7 84-88; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, \u00a7\u00a7 90-94). Bu durumda insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu ihlal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder bi\u00e7imde fiziksel ve ruhsal bir sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011fran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair savunulabilir bir iddia varsa bu iddia hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmelidir. Yaralama olay\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili bir kamu g\u00f6revlisinin kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir eylemi sonucu meydana geldi\u011finin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2llerde ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131, soru\u015fturma olaya kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olanlardan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ki\u015filerce y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmeli ve soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k tutulmal\u0131, soru\u015fturma sonunda \u00e7abuk ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayan\u0131lmamal\u0131 ve soru\u015fturma makam\u0131nca, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn ilgilinin davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle mutlak surette gerekli olan bir g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelip gelmedi\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir (s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ilkelerin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rnek kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S\u00fcleyman Deveci,\u00a7 \u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2), B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
18. Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada, ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen yaralanmalar\u0131n hangi \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucunun eylemlerinden dolay\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmedi\u011fi ve bu konuda bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ifadelerine ba\u015fvurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fabilecek bir infaz koruma memurunun da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu ki\u015filerce d\u00fczenlenen CD inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131na dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu ki\u015filerin tan\u0131k olarak da dinlenmedi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu ihlal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespit edilmesi, yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 150.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net 150.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutunun ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere \u00d6demi\u015f Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2020\/56) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 150.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 20\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 20\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/2219 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 ABDURRAHMAN ERG\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/2219) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : R\u0131dvan DEM\u0130R Ba\u015fvurucu : Abdurrahman ERG\u0130N Vekili : Av. Hasan Ali APPAK \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetine maruz kal\u0131nmas\u0131 ve bu konuda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi sebebiyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan sunulan bireysel ba\u015fvuru formu ile infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tutulan tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re, 9\/3\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yapmak \u00fczere, annesi ve e\u015fiyle kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f odas\u0131nda bulunmaktad\u0131r. Kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f odas\u0131nda ki\u015filerin ileti\u015fimini sa\u011flayan ahizelerde bozukluk olmas\u0131 sebebiyle, ba\u015fvurucu durumu infaz koruma memuruna bildirmi\u015f, infaz koruma memurunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm bulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesi \u00fczerine sinirlenerek kap\u0131y\u0131 tekmelemi\u015ftir. 3. Bunun \u00fczerine, infaz koruma memuru oradan ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, akabinde yakla\u015f\u0131k on infaz koruma memuru ile birlikte kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f odas\u0131na geri gelerek ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeyi sonland\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ko\u011fu\u015funa d\u00f6nmesini istemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu talebi reddetmesi \u00fczerine de m\u00fcdahaleye ba\u015flan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte olaya tan\u0131k olan ba\u015fvurucunun annesi ve e\u015fi ba\u015fvurucuyu darp eden …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n