T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130RFAN KARACA BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/4536)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 21\/1\/2025 – 32789<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
H\u00fcseyin Ozan ADIYAMAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan KARACA<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, tehdit vakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak etkili soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu ile A.S. ve onun o\u011flu U.S. aras\u0131nda 16\/7\/2018 tarihinde ya\u015fanan tart\u0131\u015fma nedeniyle Kepsut Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; adli kolluk biriminde verdi\u011fi ifadesinde olay tarihinde A.S. ve U.S.nin evinin bah\u00e7esine geldiklerini, A.S.nin elindeki orakla karn\u0131na vurdu\u011funu, ayr\u0131ca ikisinin birlikte kendisini yere yat\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve yumruklayarak yaralad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda yine adli kolluk biriminde tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen H.S. beyan\u0131nda U.S.nin ba\u015fvurucuya “Seni bu yoldan ge\u00e7irmeyece\u011fim, seni ya\u015fatmayaca\u011f\u0131m.” dedi\u011fini, tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen E.S. de A.S. ve U.S.nin ba\u015fvurucuya “Bu kad\u0131na bir \u015fey olursa seni bitiririz, yoldan ge\u00e7irmeyiz.” dediklerini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n sonunda taraflar\u0131n birbirlerine kar\u015f\u0131 eylemlerinden dolay\u0131 silahla basit yaralama su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 istemiyle iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131nda ge\u00e7en tehdit s\u00f6ylemleriyle ilgili bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kepsut Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclen davan\u0131n ikinci celsesinde tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen H.S. soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda verdi\u011fi ifadesini (bkz. \u00a7 2) aynen tekrar etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme; bu celsede ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia olunan konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali ile hakaret ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. An\u0131lan su\u00e7 duyurusuna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ba\u015flayan soru\u015fturmada Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k herhangi bir i\u015flem yapmadan \u015f\u00fcpheliler A.S. ve U.S. hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015f; kararda, Mahkemenin su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu\u011fu celseye ait duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelendi\u011fini, tutanakta ba\u015fvurucunun tehdit edildi\u011fine dair herhangi bir beyan\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda, Kepsut Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan, \u015f\u00fcpheliler belirtilmeksizin ma\u011fdur belirtilmek suretiyle su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu; \u0130ddianame d\u00fczenlenen 2018\/778 say\u0131l\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131n\u0131n ve 2019\/43 esas say\u0131l\u0131 Kepsut Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi duru\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde \u015f\u00fcphelilerin hakaret ve tehdit ettiklerine dair beyan tespit edilemedi\u011fi, yaln\u0131zca tan\u0131k [H.K.n\u0131n] (H.S. ismi sehven H.K. olarak yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.) beyan\u0131nda [U.nun] k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fini duydu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi ancak k\u00fcf\u00fcr c\u00fcmlesini a\u00e7\u0131klamad\u0131\u011f\u0131… [g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.]”<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, H.S.nin soru\u015fturma evresinde tespit edilen beyan\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphelilerin kendisini tehdit ettiklerini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade etti\u011fini vurgulayarak kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara itiraz etmi\u015ftir. Bal\u0131kesir 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince incelenen itiraz ayr\u0131ca bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 24\/12\/2019 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmesinin ard\u0131ndan 22\/1\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, tehdit s\u00f6ylemlerine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ve Mahkemenin su\u00e7 duyurusuyla sabit olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u015f\u00fcphelilerin savunmalar\u0131 ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 tespit edilmeden kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Devlet, Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda, bireyin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olan fiziksel ve zihinsel b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011fe keyf\u00ee olarak m\u00fcdahale etmemek ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr (Yusuf Burak \u00c7elik, B. No: 2013\/2538, 20\/11\/2014, \u00a7 31). Devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde devlet, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc fiziksel ve ruhsal sald\u0131r\u0131 olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili resm\u00ee bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmek durumundad\u0131r (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7 106).<\/p>\n
12. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi incelenirken soru\u015fturman\u0131n derh\u00e2l ba\u015flamas\u0131, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir bi\u00e7imde ve kamu denetimine tabi olarak \u00f6zenle ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi ile etkili olmas\u0131 unsurlar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (Mehmet Arif K\u0131l\u0131n\u00e7, B. No: 2013\/1656, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7 29). Etkili soru\u015fturma yapma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, iddialar do\u011frultusunda lehe ve aleyhe delillerin toplanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonucun temel haklar\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00fcvenceleri sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7elerle a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerekli k\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ancak soru\u015fturma sonunda \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda mutlaka ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez (Meral Talay, B. No: 2018\/8050, 7\/10\/2021, \u00a7 37; benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. G\u00f6zde Ba\u015far, B. No: 2016\/312, 228\/5\/2019, \u00a7 34).<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek soru\u015fturmalarda soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n, an\u0131lan hak kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilebilecek bir muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren ki\u015filerin olay\u0131n geli\u015fimine ve delillerin elde edilmesine ili\u015fkin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri her t\u00fcrl\u00fc iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve taleplerini kar\u015f\u0131lama zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerinin belirleyicisi yetkili soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131d\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131, her bir somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirerek makul olan bir y\u00f6ntem belirleyecektir (Yavuz Durmu\u015f ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/6574, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7 62).<\/p>\n
14. Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek ceza soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131 ki\u015finin dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruyan mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin etkili bir \u015fekilde tatbiki ile sorumlular\u0131n tespiti ve etkili m\u00fceyyidelerin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. Bu bir sonu\u00e7 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olmay\u0131p uygun ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr. Di\u011fer taraftan belirtilen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle yarg\u0131latma ya da cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131 talep hakk\u0131, kamusal makamlara ise t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyetle ya da belirli bir ceza h\u00fckm\u00fcyle sonu\u00e7land\u0131rma \u00f6devi y\u00fckledi\u011fi \u015feklinde yorumlanamaz (S\u00fcleyman Demirba\u015f, B. No: 2014\/1549, 13\/7\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 34, 35). Ancak her durumda s\u00f6z konusu yarg\u0131sal sistemlerin etkili \u015fekilde i\u015fletilmesi ve soru\u015fturmalar ya da yarg\u0131lamalar neticesinde yarg\u0131sal makamlarca ula\u015f\u0131lan t\u00fcm sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n temel haklar\u0131n i\u00e7erdi\u011fi g\u00fcvenceleri koruyacak \u015fekilde ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7elerle a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 gerekir (Erol Kumcu, B. No: 2015\/18988, 9\/5\/2019, \u00a7 35; Ali \u00c7\u0131\u011f\u0131r, B. No: 2015\/19298, 8\/5\/2019, \u00a7 35; Emine Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/16805, 25\/5\/2022, \u00a7 29).<\/p>\n
15. Somut olayda iddianamedeki belirlemelere g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu ile A.S. ve U.S. aras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan kavgada taraflar birbirlerini silahla yaralam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 3). Silahla yaralama su\u00e7undan g\u00f6r\u00fclen ceza davas\u0131nda tan\u0131k H.S. soru\u015fturma evresindeki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 aynen tekrar etti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 3). Mahkeme ayn\u0131 celse ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 di\u011fer su\u00e7lar\u0131n yan\u0131nda tehdit su\u00e7unun i\u015flendi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Bu su\u00e7 duyurusuna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ba\u015flayan soru\u015fturmada Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, Duru\u015fma Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda ba\u015fvurucunun tehdit edildi\u011fine dair herhangi bir beyan\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 4). Su\u00e7 duyurusunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Duru\u015fma Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda tan\u0131k H.S.nin soru\u015fturma evresindeki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etti\u011fine dair a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu hususta Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmam\u0131\u015f ve H.S.nin dinlenilmesine y\u00f6nelik bir karar vermemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ayr\u0131ca kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131nda; H.S.nin soru\u015fturma evresinde tespit edilen, U.S.nin ba\u015fvurucuya “Seni bu yoldan ge\u00e7irmeyece\u011fim, seni ya\u015fatmayaca\u011f\u0131m.” \u015feklindeki s\u00f6ylemini olay\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7inde (bkz. \u00a7 2) de\u011ferlendirmemi\u015ftir. Aksine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n Duru\u015fma Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda tehdit s\u00f6ylemine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair gerek\u00e7esi, H.S.nin soru\u015fturma evresindeki beyan\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fi izlenimine neden olmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n Mahkemenin su\u00e7 duyurusuna ra\u011fmen tehdit su\u00e7u bak\u0131m\u0131ndan delil niteli\u011finde olabilecek tan\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmedi\u011fi ve kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Somut ba\u015fvuruya konu olan s\u00fcre\u00e7te ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7erdi\u011fi g\u00fcvencelere uygun ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve \u00f6zenli bir soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00fcre\u00e7te al\u0131nan kararlar\u0131n ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak kamusal makamlarca \u00fcstlenilmesi gereken pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fartlar\u0131n somut olayda yerine getirilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi soru\u015fturma mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Kepsut Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2019\/626, K.2019\/674) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 446,90 TL har\u00e7tan olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/4536 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130RFAN KARACA BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/4536) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/9\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 21\/1\/2025 – 32789 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : H\u00fcseyin Ozan ADIYAMAN Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130rfan KARACA \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, tehdit vakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak etkili soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu ile A.S. ve onun o\u011flu U.S. aras\u0131nda 16\/7\/2018 tarihinde ya\u015fanan tart\u0131\u015fma nedeniyle Kepsut Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; adli kolluk biriminde verdi\u011fi ifadesinde olay tarihinde A.S. ve U.S.nin evinin bah\u00e7esine geldiklerini, A.S.nin elindeki orakla karn\u0131na vurdu\u011funu, ayr\u0131ca ikisinin birlikte kendisini yere yat\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve yumruklayarak yaralad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda yine adli kolluk biriminde tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen H.S. beyan\u0131nda U.S.nin ba\u015fvurucuya “Seni bu yoldan ge\u00e7irmeyece\u011fim, seni ya\u015fatmayaca\u011f\u0131m.” dedi\u011fini, tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen E.S. de A.S. ve U.S.nin ba\u015fvurucuya “Bu kad\u0131na bir \u015fey olursa seni bitiririz, yoldan ge\u00e7irmeyiz.” dediklerini ifade etmi\u015ftir. 3. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n sonunda taraflar\u0131n birbirlerine kar\u015f\u0131 eylemlerinden dolay\u0131 silahla basit yaralama su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 istemiyle iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26489","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n