T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
BURHAN KAYA BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/36153)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 31\/12\/2024-32769<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
H\u00fcseyin \u00d6zg\u00fcr SEV\u0130ML\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Burhan KAYA<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Abdurrahim KARSLI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza davas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haz\u0131r bulunma talebi reddedilerek ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc aktar\u0131m\u0131 suretiyle duru\u015fmaya uzaktan kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 nedeniyle duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, beyanlar\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde delil olarak kullan\u0131lan tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada sorgulanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle de tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
A. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru Konusu Olay ve Soru\u015fturma S\u00fcreci<\/p>\n
2. Batman’\u0131n Sason il\u00e7esindeki Cumhuriyet Caddesi’nde 24\/2\/2015 tarihinde meydana gelen silahl\u0131 kavga sonucunda maktul E.\u00c7.nin yaralanmas\u0131 ve kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hastanede \u00f6lmesiyle ilgili olarak Sason Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince olay yerinde yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda maktulle kavga eden ki\u015filerin ba\u015fvurucu ile karde\u015fi M.\u015e.K. oldu\u011fu ve bu ki\u015filerin olay yerinden ka\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Olay yerindeki MOBESE kameras\u0131na ait kay\u0131tlar\u0131n incelenmesi sonucu kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen CD \u00d6n \u0130nceleme Tutana\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6re olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.41.09 itibar\u0131yla maktul\u00fcn kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na girdi\u011fi, saat 09.41.10’da kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na giren ve elinde sopa bulunan M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n maktul\u00fcn ba\u015f\u0131na ve omzuna sopa ile vurdu\u011fu, sopan\u0131n elinden yere d\u00fc\u015fmesi \u00fczerine sopay\u0131 almaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada saat 09.41.11’de kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na giren ve elinde kesici alet oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen ba\u015fvurucunun saat 09.41.12 itibar\u0131yla maktul\u00fcn sol kar\u0131n ve g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs k\u0131sm\u0131na elindeki kesici aletle be\u015f kez, boyun ve omuz k\u0131sm\u0131na d\u00f6rt kez vurdu\u011fu, olaya kar\u0131\u015fan bu ki\u015filerin kuyumcu d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcne kadar gidip yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri, olay yerindeki vatanda\u015flar\u0131n kavgay\u0131 ay\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131, saat 09.41.49’da maktul\u00fcn boynuna bez bast\u0131rarak olay yerindeki bir ara\u00e7la hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fckleri anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan olay yerinde olduklar\u0131 tespit edilen ki\u015filerin kollukta al\u0131nan ifadeleri \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. Esnaf oldu\u011funu belirten S.G. olay an\u0131nda kavga sesi duyup d\u00fckk\u00e2ndan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kalabal\u0131\u011f\u0131n topland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ancak kavga edenleri fark edemedi\u011fini, sonra bir ki\u015finin hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, kalabal\u0131ktan bir ki\u015finin kendisine d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde te\u015fhir i\u00e7in bulundurdu\u011fu sopalardan birini getirip verdi\u011fini, bu sopay\u0131 d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnden kimin ne zaman ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini, \u00fczerinde kan olan sopay\u0131 olay yerine gelen kolluk g\u00f6revlilerine verdi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. S.G., Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda da bu ifadesini tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
ii. C.A. olay g\u00fcn\u00fc marketin \u00f6n\u00fcnde beklerken \u00f6nceden tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n balta sopas\u0131 ile maktule vurmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu esnada ba\u015fvurucunun da maktule vurdu\u011funu ancak onun ne ile vurdu\u011funu g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, ard\u0131ndan olaya m\u00fcdahale ettiklerini, bu ki\u015filerin neden kavga ettiklerini bilmedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. N.A. kavgaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015fileri tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fletti\u011fi bakkal\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde beklerken elinde sopa olan bir ki\u015finin ko\u015ftu\u011funu g\u00f6r\u00fcnce kendisinin de onun arkas\u0131ndan gitti\u011fini, olay yerinde bir ki\u015fiyi yerde yatarken g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve oradan ge\u00e7en bir arac\u0131n durmas\u0131 \u00fczerine bu ki\u015fiyi ara\u00e7la hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fcklerini, maktule b\u0131\u00e7akla kimin vurdu\u011funu g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. Zab\u0131ta g\u00f6revlisi oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyen A.D. olay g\u00fcn\u00fc kuyumcu d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde iki ya da \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015finin birbirine vurdu\u011funu g\u00f6r\u00fcnce hemen olaya m\u00fcdahale edip \u00e7evreden gelenlerle birlikte bu ki\u015fileri ay\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015fileri tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. A.D., Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda da bu ifadesini tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Sason Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine Sason Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince ba\u015fvurucu ve M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda yakalama emri d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Olaydan bir g\u00fcn sonra yakalanan M.\u015e.K. Sason Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca al\u0131nan ifadesinde; k\u00f6y korucusu oldu\u011funu, ayn\u0131 zamanda ba\u015fvurucuyla Batman-Sason aras\u0131nda yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6nceden tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 maktul\u00fcn de ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131kla u\u011fra\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin ve karde\u015finin maktulle aralar\u0131nda husumet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak maktul\u00fcn olaydan \u00f6nce ara s\u0131ra yanlar\u0131na gelip kendisini ve ba\u015fvurucuyu nedenini bilmemekle birlikte “Sizleri \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fim.” diyerek tehdit etti\u011fini, bu s\u0131rada kendilerinden ne istedi\u011fini de s\u00f6ylemedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. M.\u015e.K. ayr\u0131ca olay sabah\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuyla il\u00e7e merkezinde olduklar\u0131 s\u0131rada maktul\u00fcn yanlar\u0131na gelip yine kendilerini tehdit etmesi \u00fczerine bir i\u015fyeri \u00f6n\u00fcnde buldu\u011fu sopay\u0131 alarak maktule vurdu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucunun yan\u0131nda b\u0131\u00e7ak oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fini ve ba\u015fvurucunun maktule b\u0131\u00e7akla vurdu\u011funu da g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, sonras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuyla oradan ka\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin Malatya’da yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ile olay sonras\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fini, olay\u0131 \u00f6nceden planlamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, olay\u0131n aniden geli\u015fti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. M.\u015e.K. tutuklanma talebiyle sevk edildi\u011finde yap\u0131lan sorgusunda \u00f6nceki savunmas\u0131na ek olarak olaydan \u00fc\u00e7 sene kadar \u00f6nce maktul\u00fcn amcas\u0131n\u0131n o\u011flu olan M.\u00c7. ile tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 nedeniyle maktul\u00fcn kendisine ve ba\u015fvurucuya kin g\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bu nedenle ara s\u0131ra kendilerini tehdit etti\u011fini, olay an\u0131nda da maktul\u00fcn k\u00fcfrederek \u00fczerine do\u011fru gelmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay yerinden sopa al\u0131p maktule vurmas\u0131n\u0131n onun bu \u015fekilde \u00fczerine gelmesinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. M.\u015e.K. sorgusunun ard\u0131ndan kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince olay yerinde kay\u0131t yapan t\u00fcm kameralar ile olay an\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6ren ba\u015fka ki\u015filer de tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Kollu\u011fun 27\/2\/2015 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131 ekinde sundu\u011fu “Bilgi Alma Tutana\u011f\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadeler ve kameralar\u0131n incelenmesine dair tutanaklarda yer alan tespitler \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. A.Y. olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Vali Haluk \u0130mga Caddesi’ndeki sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131na do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcrken ba\u011fr\u0131\u015fmalar duydu\u011funu, seslerin geldi\u011fi yere y\u00f6neldi\u011finde \u00f6nceden tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 maktul ile ba\u015fvurucunun tart\u0131\u015fmakta oldu\u011funu, aralar\u0131nda kavga \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlay\u0131nca maktul\u00fc tutup uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, o esnada M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n geldi\u011fini ve ba\u015fvurucuyla maktule sald\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu sefer de ba\u015fvurucuyu tutup maktule yakla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 engelledi\u011fini, o s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun elinde kesici k\u0131sm\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131k 5-6 cm olan b\u0131\u00e7ak oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucunun bu b\u0131\u00e7akla maktule sald\u0131rmak istedi\u011fini ancak kendisinin engel olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ona yakla\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. A.Y. ayr\u0131ca orada bulunan di\u011fer ki\u015filerin M.\u015e.K.y\u0131 uzakla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fka birinin de maktul\u00fc oradaki eczanenin oldu\u011fu yere g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, sonra olay yerine polislerin gelip ba\u015fvurucu ve M.\u015e.K. ile konu\u015ftu\u011funu, o s\u0131rada maktul\u00fcn oradan uzakla\u015fm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucu ve M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n polislere olayda kavga olmay\u0131p sadece tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve sorun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyip oradan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015filerin neden kavga etti\u011fini bilmedi\u011fini, kendisinin sadece taraflar\u0131 ay\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. T.Y. olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.25 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Vali Haluk \u0130mga Caddesi’ndeki i\u015fletti\u011fi k\u0131rtasiyede oldu\u011fu s\u0131rada sesler duyup d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve isimlerini sonradan \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fiyi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131rlarken g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, e\u015fk\u00e2lini verdi\u011fi ba\u015fvurucunun elindeki b\u0131\u00e7akla maktul\u00fc kovalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucuyu kuzeni A.Y.nin tuttu\u011funu, M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n da ko\u015ftu\u011funu, maktul\u00fcn ise kendisini korumaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, orada bulunan ki\u015filerle taraflar\u0131 ay\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir ki\u015finin maktul\u00fc k\u0131rtasiyenin yan soka\u011f\u0131ndaki apartman\u0131n giri\u015fine g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, sonra polislerin gelip ba\u015fvurucu ve M.\u015e.K. ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ard\u0131ndan ikisinin oradan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015filerin maktulle ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 kavgan\u0131n nedenini bilmedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. K.\u00c7. maktul\u00fcn yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fc oldu\u011funu, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc 08.45 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda maktulle birlikte il\u00e7e merkezine geldi\u011fini, onu b\u0131rak\u0131p eve gitti\u011fini, bir saat sonra babas\u0131n\u0131n telefonla aray\u0131p maktul\u00fcn vuruldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, tekrar il\u00e7e merkezine geldi\u011finde maktul\u00fc yaral\u0131 \u015fekilde ve araca bindirilmekteyken g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, maktul ile ba\u015fvurucu ve M.\u015e.K. aras\u0131nda husumet olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini ancak nedenini bilmemekle birlikte birbirleriyle konu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. K.\u00c7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda da bu ifadesini tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. Sason \u00d6\u011fretmenevi ve Ak\u015fam Sanat Okuluna (Sason \u00d6\u011fretmenevi) ait kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.27.58’de maktul\u00fcn ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiyle kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na girdi\u011fi ve bu ki\u015finin maktul\u00fc tutarak sakinle\u015ftirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, 09.28.13’te ba\u015fvurucunun, 09.28.22’de de M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcye girip maktule sald\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 ancak oradaki kalabal\u0131\u011f\u0131n buna engel oldu\u011fu, 09.28.40’ta kalabal\u0131ktan baz\u0131 ki\u015filerin maktul\u00fc al\u0131p ara soka\u011fa g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve maktul\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcden \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, 09.30.09’da da maktul\u00fcn ara sokaktan gelip g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcye girdi\u011fi ve meydan taraf\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fcp g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcden \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
v. Bir markete ait g\u00fcvenlik kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.35.24’te ba\u015fvurucu ile M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcye girip marketin \u00f6n\u00fcnden Merkez Camisi istikametine do\u011fru, maktul \u00f6nde olacak \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, 09.36.02’de ba\u015fvurucu ile M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n Merkez Camisi \u00f6n\u00fcndeki meydanda 09.38.27’ye kadar bekledi\u011fi ve \u00e7evredeki ki\u015filerin onlar\u0131n oldu\u011fu istikamete do\u011fru bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131, 09.38.27’de M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n Cumhuriyet Caddesi’ndeki G. adl\u0131 i\u015fyerine y\u00f6nelik bu d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde tahta sopalar\u0131n oldu\u011fu merdiven aras\u0131nda 09.39.02’ye kadar bekledi\u011fi, bu s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun Merkez Camisi \u00f6n\u00fcndeki meydanda bulundu\u011fu, 09.39.02’de M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde bekledi\u011fi i\u015fyerinden arkas\u0131nda saklad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tahta sopa ile h\u0131zl\u0131ca meydan istikametine ko\u015ftu\u011fu, bu s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun da ayn\u0131 istikamete do\u011fru ko\u015ftu\u011fu, meydanda bulunan kalabal\u0131\u011f\u0131n da ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ne do\u011fru ilerledi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucu ile M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. A.Y., Sason Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde;<\/p>\n
i. Taraflar\u0131 \u00f6nceden tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak aralar\u0131nda akrabal\u0131k ba\u011f\u0131 ya da husumet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131na do\u011fru giderken ba\u015fvurucunun maktule y\u00fcksek sesle ba\u011f\u0131r\u0131p parmak sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, maktul\u00fcn ise ona g\u00fcl\u00fcmseyerek cevap verdi\u011fini ve hi\u00e7 sesini y\u00fckseltmedi\u011fini, bunun \u00fczerine kendisinin ba\u015fvurucuyu maktule bir \u015fey yapmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ki\u015finin de maktul\u00fc ba\u015fka yere g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc,<\/p>\n
ii. Ba\u015fvurucuyu uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun maktule “Baban\u0131n kafas\u0131n\u0131 sinkaf edece\u011fim.” diye K\u00fcrt\u00e7e k\u00fcfretti\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p kapanabilen tarzda ve 15 cm uzunlu\u011funda bir b\u0131\u00e7ak \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak ba\u015fvurucuyu tuttu\u011fu i\u00e7in maktule do\u011fru gidemeyip b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 tekrar cebine soktu\u011funu, bu ki\u015filerin kendi aralar\u0131nda konu\u015ftu\u011fu dili tam olarak anlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak Sason’da ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in K\u00fcrt\u00e7e s\u00f6ylenen k\u00fcf\u00fcrleri bildi\u011fini,<\/p>\n
iii. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki husumetin nedenini bilmedi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucuyu uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken ba\u015fvurucunun telefonla birisini aray\u0131p “Kula\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kesece\u011fim.” dedi\u011fini, o s\u0131rada M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n olay yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
iv. Bundan yakla\u015f\u0131k bir iki dakika sonra maktul\u00fcn arac\u0131na do\u011fru gitti\u011fi s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun bunu g\u00f6r\u00fcp tekrar maktule “Sinkaf ederim.” diye K\u00fcrt\u00e7e hakaret etti\u011fini, bunun \u00fczerine yeniden tart\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
v. Bu sefer de maktul\u00fc kolundan tutup \u00d6\u011fretmenevinin bulundu\u011fu soka\u011fa do\u011fru uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maktul\u00fcn de bu s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun oldu\u011fu y\u00f6ne do\u011fru bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sonras\u0131nda M.\u015e.K. ile ba\u015fvurucunun maktule do\u011fru ko\u015ftu\u011funu g\u00f6r\u00fcnce onun da bu ikisine do\u011fru hareket etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun elinde b\u0131\u00e7ak oldu\u011funu g\u00f6r\u00fcnce maktul\u00fc b\u0131rak\u0131p bu kez de ba\u015fvurucuyu engellemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00fcrekli olarak “B\u0131rak, vuraca\u011f\u0131m.” dedi\u011fini ancak ba\u015fvurucuyu tutup vurmas\u0131n\u0131 engelledi\u011fini,<\/p>\n
vi. Ba\u015fvurucuyu tutarken bu kez de M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n elinde bir cisim oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde h\u0131zla gelip maktule do\u011fru hamle yapmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u0131rada yere \u00e7arpan bir ta\u015f sesi duydu\u011funu, ta\u015f\u0131 kimin att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmemekle birlikte M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc,<\/p>\n
vii. Olay yat\u0131\u015ft\u0131ktan sonra bu ki\u015filerin yan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131l\u0131p sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131na do\u011fru gitti\u011fini, sonras\u0131nda geli\u015fen olaylar hakk\u0131nda bilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda maktule sorunun ne oldu\u011funu sordu\u011funda kendisine \u00f6nemli bir \u015fey olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, nitekim tart\u0131\u015fmalar ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilk olayda ba\u015fvurucu ba\u011f\u0131rarak konu\u015fmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen maktul\u00fcn g\u00fclerek cevap verdi\u011fini ancak ba\u015fvurucunun hareketleri sonras\u0131nda maktul\u00fcn sinirlendi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Sason Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, kollu\u011fun teslim etti\u011fi olay yeri kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015f ve bu hususta tutanak d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. G. Markete ait kamera ile MOBESE kameras\u0131ndan temin edilen kay\u0131tlara dair kolluk tespitlerine aynen yer verilen tutanakta, Sason \u00d6\u011fretmenevinin kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131ca taraflar\u0131n olay yerine gelen ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 yerlere g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun elindeki b\u0131\u00e7ak benzeri cisimle maktule vurmak \u00fczere hamle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n da elinde ta\u015f ile olay yerine gelip bu ta\u015f\u0131 maktule f\u0131rlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde isabet ettiremedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na da yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Olay an\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kolluk taraf\u0131ndan tespit edilen N.\u00c7.nin de Sason Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. N.\u00c7. ifadesinde; tart\u0131\u015fan ki\u015fileri Sasonlu olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda i\u015fyerine gelirken ba\u011f\u0131rma sesleri duydu\u011funu, bu s\u0131rada kendi i\u015fyerinin oldu\u011fu sokakta ba\u015fvurucu ve maktul\u00fcn bulundu\u011funu, o s\u0131rada M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n orada olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir anda kavga \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sonra olay yerine M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n da gelmesi \u00fczerine kendisinin onu tuttu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun elinde bir \u015fey olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini, taraflar\u0131 birbirlerinden ay\u0131r\u0131p maktul\u00fc kendi i\u015fyerine g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve ona bir yere gitmemesini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini ancak maktul\u00fcn arac\u0131ndan telefonunu alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyip oradan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yakla\u015f\u0131k be\u015f on dakika sonra da maktul\u00fcn b\u0131\u00e7akland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duydu\u011funu, i\u015fyerinde maktulle konu\u015ftuklar\u0131 s\u0131rada maktul\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine omuz att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak aralar\u0131nda herhangi bir problem olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, bunun haricinde ba\u015fka bir \u015fey anlatmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen otopsi raporunda, maktul\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesici delici alet yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak geli\u015fen i\u00e7 organ yaralanmas\u0131 ile \u00e7ok say\u0131da kesik vas\u0131fl\u0131 yaralanmaya ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f kanama ile geli\u015fen komplikasyonlar sonucu oldu\u011fu, ba\u015f k\u0131sm\u0131nda da pete\u015fiyal kanaman\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131 \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu ve M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda Batman Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) fezleke d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 27\/4\/2015 tarihli iddianame ile M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda olay yerinde bulunan i\u015fyeri \u00f6n\u00fcndeki sopay\u0131 izinsiz almas\u0131 nedeniyle h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucu ve M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca olay g\u00fcn\u00fc birlikte maktule sald\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 h\u00e2lde araya girenlerin engellemesi nedeniyle eylemlerini tamamlayamad\u0131klar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kasten yaralama su\u00e7una te\u015febb\u00fcsten ve sonras\u0131nda geli\u015fen kavga sonucunda maktul\u00fc sopa ve b\u0131\u00e7ak darbeleriyle \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fckleri gerek\u00e7esiyle de tasarlayarak kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B. Davan\u0131n Di\u011fer San\u0131\u011f\u0131 Olan M.\u015e.K. Hakk\u0131ndaki Kovu\u015fturma S\u00fcreci<\/p>\n
14. Batman 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin (Mahkeme) E.2015\/139 s\u0131ras\u0131na kaydedilen davadaki yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki yakalama emri infaz edilememi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 8\/7\/2015 tarihli celsesinde savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nan M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Ben olay g\u00fcn\u00fc [korucu olarak] Derince karakolunda n\u00f6bet tutmaktayd\u0131m, bir muhtar beni arayarak hastas\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi ve il\u00e7eye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcp g\u00f6t\u00fcremeyece\u011fimi sordu, gerekli izinleri alarak \u015fahs\u0131 hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fcm, daha sonra [C.\u00d6.] isimli arkada\u015f\u0131mla bir camide oturmaya ba\u015flad\u0131k, bu s\u0131rada karde\u015fim Burhan’\u0131 arayarak bana [maktul E.\u00c7.] ile kavga etti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi, hemen kavga ettiklerini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi yere do\u011fru gittim, araya giren \u015fah\u0131slar karde\u015fim ve [E.\u00c7.yi] ay\u0131rm\u0131\u015flard\u0131, ben gidince ni\u00e7in huzursuzluk \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek karde\u015fime k\u0131zmaya ba\u015flad\u0131m, bu olay \u00f6\u011fretmenevinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015fti, [E.\u00c7.] o s\u0131rada bana a\u011f\u0131r bir k\u00fcf\u00fcr edince yerden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131m bir ta\u015f\u0131 yan\u0131na do\u011fru att\u0131m, amac\u0131m vurmakta de\u011fildi, ta\u015f\u0131 vurmak isteseydim isabette ettirebilirdim, daha sonra araya giren \u015fah\u0131slar bizi aralay\u0131nca meydana do\u011fru gittik, ben karde\u015fime k\u0131z\u0131nca karde\u015fim ortadan kayboldu, meydanda bulundu\u011fumuz s\u0131rada zannediyorum aradan 5-6 dakika ge\u00e7mi\u015fti, [E.\u00c7.] a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dan k\u00fcfrederek bana do\u011fru geldi, orada buldu\u011fu bir sandalyeyi alarak bana sald\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131, ben de etraftaki d\u00fckkanlardan birinden elime ge\u00e7irdi\u011fim bir sopayla kendisine iki kere vurdum, ben vurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m s\u0131rada elinde zannedersem sandalye vard\u0131, e\u011filip almaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yordu, ben vurduktan sonra araya meydanda bulunan \u015fah\u0131slar girdi, ben olay yerinden ka\u00e7arak uzakla\u015ft\u0131m, daha sonra olay\u0131n heyecan\u0131yla Malatya’ya gittim ve orada yakaland\u0131m, [E.\u00c7.] ile benim olay \u00f6ncesinde hi\u00e7bir husumetim ve problemim yoktu, ikimiz de ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k yap\u0131yorduk, karde\u015fimin olay\u0131n sabah\u0131nda [E.\u00c7.] ile ni\u00e7in tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da \u00f6\u011frenemedim, olay \u00f6ncesi ve sonras\u0131nda karde\u015fime bunu sorma imkan\u0131m da olmad\u0131, [E.\u00c7.nin] \u015fof\u00f6r[\u00fc] olan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay\u0131n \u00f6ncesinde makt\u00fcl ile konu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddias\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmiyorum, karde\u015fimle de bildi\u011fim kadar\u0131yla herhangi bir problemi yoktu, bildi\u011fim kadar\u0131yla [E.\u00c7.nin] de bize kar\u015f\u0131 herhangi bir husumeti veyahut eylemi yoktu, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda ben tek ba\u015f\u0131mayd\u0131m, karde\u015fim \u00f6\u011fretmenevi \u00f6n\u00fcndeki olay sonras\u0131nda kendisine k\u0131zd\u0131\u011f\u0131m i\u00e7in olay mahallinden ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131, [E.\u00c7.nin] kim taraf\u0131ndan b\u0131\u00e7akland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilemiyorum, hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m kadar\u0131yla ben [E.\u00c7.ye] sopayla vurdu\u011fum s\u0131rada Burhan yan\u0131mda de\u011fildi [M.\u015e.K.ya a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki oldu\u011fu belirtilerek soruldu\u011funda] Ben soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda al\u0131nan ifademde [E.\u00c7.nin] olay \u00f6ncesinde bizi tehdit etti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemedim, olay an\u0131nda bana k\u00fcfrederek ‘sizi \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fim’ demekteydi, tehditle kast\u0131m buydu.”<\/p>\n
16. Bu celsede, soru\u015fturma evresinde ifadeleri al\u0131nan ki\u015filerden baz\u0131lar\u0131 duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r edilerek bu ki\u015filerin tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla yeniden beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130fadeler \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
i. [C.A.n\u0131n ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:] “Ben olay g\u00fcn\u00fc merkez camii kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda bulunan marketin \u00f6n\u00fcnde ayakta durmaktayd\u0131m, kendisini \u00f6nceden tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131m [M.\u015e.K.] isimli \u015fah\u0131s elindeki bir sopayla ismini sonradan \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fim ve kendisini tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131m [maktule] vurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yordu fakat ben isabet ettirdi\u011fini g\u00f6rmedim, o s\u0131rada Burhan da olay yerine geldi, o da \u015fahsa do\u011fru h\u00fccum etti fakat etinde bir\u015fey g\u00f6rmedim, \u015fah\u0131s yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc, yan\u0131na gitti\u011fimizde her yerinden kan gelmekteydi, etraftaki \u015fah\u0131slarla birlikte ona m\u00fcdahale ettik, ben yerdeki \u015fahs\u0131n nas\u0131l yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmedim, daha sonra da olay yerinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131m [a\u015famalardaki ifadeleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki oldu\u011fu belirtilerek soruldu\u011funda] Ben [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] elinde sopa g\u00f6rd\u00fcm ancak tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131m \u015fahs\u0131n kafas\u0131na vurdu\u011funu g\u00f6rmedim, vurmak i\u00e7in hamle yapt\u0131 ancak hamlelerinin isabet edip etmedi\u011fini bilemiyorum, zannediyorum hamleleri tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131m \u015fahs\u0131 s\u0131y\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.”<\/p>\n
ii. [A.Y.nin ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:] “Ben koruculuk yapar\u0131m, taraflar\u0131 \u00f6ncesinden simaen tan\u0131r\u0131m, \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n aralar\u0131nda \u00f6ncesine dayal\u0131 bir husumet bulundu\u011funa dair herhangi bir bilgim yoktur, sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131na gitmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m s\u0131rada Burhan Kaya ile [maktul\u00fcn] birbirlerine ba\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duydum, Burhan Kaya [maktule] k\u00fcfretmekteydi, parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da sall\u0131yordu, [maktul de] ona bir\u015feyler s\u00f6yleyerek kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k verdi fakat ben Arap oldu\u011fumdan K\u00fcrt\u00e7e s\u00f6ylenen \u015feyin tam olarak ne manaya geldi\u011fini anlayamad\u0131m, araya girerek Burhan’\u0131 uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131m, Burhan’\u0131n elinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir b\u0131\u00e7ak vard\u0131, b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 [maktule] kar\u015f\u0131 kullanmad\u0131, ben mani oldum, olay yerine daha sonra [M.\u015e.K.] geldi, [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] k\u00fcfretti\u011fini duymad\u0131m, ben Burhan’\u0131 uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m s\u0131rada [maktul] yerden bir\u015fey almaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yordu fakat ne ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmedim, bu s\u0131rada yere \u00e7arpan bir ta\u015f sesi duydum, bu ta\u015f\u0131n [M.\u015e.K.] taraf\u0131ndan at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahmin ettim fakat g\u00f6z\u00fcmle g\u00f6rmedim, \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 aralad\u0131ktan sonra sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131na gitmeye devam ettim, sonraki ya\u015fanan olayla ilgili benim bilgim yoktur, [maktule] ni\u00e7in kavga ettiklerini sordu\u011fumda \u00f6nemli bir\u015fey olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi, Burhan olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda telefonla konu\u015ftu\u011fu \u015fahsa ‘Kula\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kesece\u011fim’ \u015feklinde bir\u015feyler s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti ancak kimle konu\u015ftu\u011funu ve bu laf\u0131 kimin hakk\u0131nda s\u00f6yledi\u011fini de bilemiyorum.”<\/p>\n
iii. [Zab\u0131ta memuru olan A.A.n\u0131n ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:] “… kavga eden \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 \u00f6ncesinde tan\u0131m\u0131yorum, olay\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi yere 25-30 metre mesafedeydim, bir kavga olay\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, gidip \u015fah\u0131slardan birini uzakla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131m, daha do\u011frusu \u015fah\u0131slardan birini kalabal\u0131ktan biri bana do\u011fru itekledi, ben de olay yerinden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in bu \u015fahs\u0131 itekledim, kimin kime vurdu\u011funu g\u00f6rmedim, \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n elinde silah say\u0131labilecek bir alet g\u00f6rmedim.”<\/p>\n
iv. [N.A.n\u0131n ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:] “Ben Sason il\u00e7e merkezinde meydana yak\u0131n bir mahalde bakkal d\u00fckkan\u0131 i\u015fletmekteyim, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09:40 civar\u0131nda kendisini \u00f6nceden simaen tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131m [M.\u015e.K.] isimli \u015fahs\u0131n elinde sopayla meydana do\u011fru ko\u015ftu\u011funu g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, ben de pe\u015finden ko\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131m, meydana vard\u0131\u011f\u0131mda yerde bir \u015fahs\u0131n oldu\u011funu, kan i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, kafas\u0131n\u0131 tutarak kan\u0131 durdurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131m, daha sonra meydana gelen bir arac\u0131 durdurarak ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisindeki bezle \u015fahs\u0131n kafas\u0131na tampon yap\u0131p kanamas\u0131n\u0131 durdurmak istedim, ayn\u0131 ara\u00e7la \u015fahs\u0131 hastaneye g\u00f6nderdik, ben elinde [sopa] olan bir \u015fah\u0131s g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, elinde b\u0131\u00e7ak olan kimseyi g\u00f6rmedim, elinde sopa olan \u015fah\u0131s \u015fu an huzurdaki san\u0131kt\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
17. An\u0131lan celsede olay yerindeki kameralar\u0131n kay\u0131tlar\u0131 Mahkemece de izlenmi\u015f ve soru\u015fturma evresinde bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclere dair yap\u0131lan tespitlere benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler Duru\u015fma Tutana\u011f\u0131’na aktar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 15\/10\/2015 tarihli celsesinde de M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131nda adlar\u0131 ge\u00e7en ve yine soru\u015fturma evresinde beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurulan ki\u015filerden baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ifadeler \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
i. [\u00d6nceden beyan\u0131 al\u0131nmayan A.\u00d6.n\u00fcn ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:] “Ben [M.\u015e.K.y\u0131] tan\u0131r\u0131m, kendisi arkada\u015f\u0131md\u0131r, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc sabah saatlerinde merkezde bulunan caminin alt\u0131nda oturup \u00e7ay i\u00e7tik, yan\u0131nda tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131m arkada\u015flar\u0131 da vard\u0131, bir m\u00fcddet sonra [M.\u015e.K.ya] bir telefon geldi, d\u00fckkandan ayr\u0131ld\u0131, di\u011fer \u015fah\u0131slar da oradan ayr\u0131ld\u0131, sonras\u0131nda ne ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ben bilemiyorum, olaya \u015fahit olmad\u0131m, [maktul\u00fc] tan\u0131mam, aralar\u0131nda \u00f6nceye dayal\u0131 herhangi bir husumet bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilemiyorum.”<\/p>\n
ii. [N.\u00c7.nin ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:] “Ben Sason merkezde beyaz e\u015fya satan bir i\u015fletmenin sahibiyim, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc sabah saat 09:30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Burhan ile [maktul\u00fcn] tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 duydum, ba\u011fr\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n geldi\u011fi yere do\u011fru gitti\u011fimde \u00d6\u011fretmenevi \u00f6n\u00fcnde bu \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n at\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, her ikisini de Sason’lu olmalar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 tan\u0131yordum, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta [M.\u015e.K.] orada de\u011fildi, daha sonra o da olay mahalline geldi, tart\u0131\u015fma bir ara kavgaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc, ben [M.\u015e.K.y\u0131] tutup oradan uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131m, \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n ellerinde herhangi bir \u015fey g\u00f6rmedim, taraflar\u0131 oraya gelen di\u011fer \u015fah\u0131slarla birlikte ay\u0131rd\u0131ktan sonra ben [maktul\u00fc] zarar g\u00f6rmemesi i\u00e7in d\u00fckkan\u0131ma g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fcm, bir s\u00fcre d\u00fckkan\u0131mdan ayr\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131 istedim fakat [maktul] arac\u0131ndan telefonunu alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek benim d\u00fckkan\u0131mdan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131, d\u00fckkandan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131ktan sonra \u00f6\u011fretmenevinin \u00fcst taraf\u0131na do\u011fru uzakla\u015ft\u0131 fakat oradan ne tarafa do\u011fru gitti\u011fini g\u00f6rmedim, [maktul] benim d\u00fckkan\u0131mda 2-3 dakika kadar ancak kald\u0131, ben ni\u00e7in kavga ettiklerini sordu\u011fumda bana Burhan’\u0131n kendisine omuz att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, aralar\u0131nda \u00f6nemli bir \u015fey olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi, ben ikinci kavga olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir bilgiye sahip de\u011filim, ben o s\u0131rada d\u00fckkan\u0131mdayd\u0131m.”<\/p>\n
iii. [\u00d6nceden beyan\u0131 al\u0131nmayan H.A.n\u0131n ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:] “Ben [muhtar] olarak g\u00f6rev yapar\u0131m, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc \u00e7ocu\u011fumun a\u015f\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in il\u00e7eye gitmemiz gerekiyordu, [M.\u015e.K.] bizim k\u00f6ye ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k hizmeti sunard\u0131, ben veyahut k\u00f6y\u00fcnden birisi kendisini arad\u0131, gelip bizi ald\u0131, benim kendimin aray\u0131p aramad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131 hat\u0131rlam\u0131yorum, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc k\u00f6y\u00fcm\u00fczde her noktada telefon \u00e7ekmemektedir, birlikte [M.\u015e.K.ya] ait ara\u00e7la il\u00e7eye gittik, ben sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131na ge\u00e7tim, bir ara kavga sesleri duydum, sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131 ile \u00f6\u011fretmen evi birbirine yak\u0131n oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in o tarafa do\u011fru vard\u0131\u011f\u0131mda Burhan, [M.\u015e.K. ve maktul\u00fcn] tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, olay yerine benden ba\u015fka \u015fah\u0131slar da gelmi\u015fti, araya girerek \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 ay\u0131rd\u0131k, [maktul\u00fc] bir d\u00fckkana g\u00f6nderdik, ben bu ilk olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n ve makt\u00fcl\u00fcn elinde herhangi bir \u015fey g\u00f6rmedim, [M.\u015e.K.] makt\u00fcle bir ta\u015f f\u0131rlatt\u0131 fakat isteseydi bu ta\u015f\u0131 [maktul\u00fcn] ba\u015f\u0131na vurabilirdi fakat bilerek aya\u011f\u0131n\u0131n dibine do\u011fru f\u0131rlatt\u0131, ben o s\u0131rada [M.\u015e.K.y\u0131] engellemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m i\u00e7in bu olay\u0131 bizzat g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, biz \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 ay\u0131rd\u0131ktan sonra ben yeniden sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131na d\u00f6nd\u00fcm, ikinci olay\u0131 g\u00f6rmedim, o olaya ili\u015fkin herhangi bir bilgiye sahip de\u011filim, bildi\u011fim kadar\u0131yla \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n \u00f6nceye dayal\u0131 bir husumetleri yoktu, ilk olay sonras\u0131nda ben ni\u00e7in kap\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011fumda [maktul] ile Burhan bana kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n kendisine omuz att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti, olaya ili\u015fkin ba\u015fkaca bilgim yoktur.”<\/p>\n
iv. [\u00d6nceden beyan\u0131 al\u0131nmayan S.\u015e.nin ifadesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:] “Ben ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015fiyle u\u011fra\u015f\u0131yordum, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc Sason il\u00e7e meydan\u0131nda arac\u0131m i\u00e7in yolcu topluyordum, arac\u0131m\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ayakta beklemekteydim, meydana do\u011fru saat 09:30 civar\u0131nda [maktul\u00fcn] sinirli bir \u015fekilde geldi\u011fini g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, k\u00fcfrederek geliyordu, o arada [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] aya\u011f\u0131nda terlikle geldi\u011fini g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, aralar\u0131na girmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131m fakat o s\u0131rada [M.\u015e.K.] yandaki d\u00fckkanlardan birinde eline bir sopa ald\u0131, [maktule] do\u011fru vurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131nca ben araya girmedim, ortal\u0131k kalabal\u0131kla\u015ft\u0131, ben Burhan’\u0131 olay yerinde g\u00f6rmedim, sonras\u0131nda Burhan’\u0131n makt\u00fcle y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir eylemin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6remedim, olaya ili\u015fkin ba\u015fkaca bir bilgim yoktur, bildi\u011fim kadar\u0131yla \u00f6nceye dayal\u0131 bir husumetleri de yoktu […] benim beyanlar\u0131m aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki yoktur, ben g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcmde [M.\u015e.K.] meydana bir yerden girdi fakat o s\u0131rada ne yap\u0131yordu bilemiyorum.”<\/p>\n
19. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 17\/12\/2015 tarihli celsesinde olay yerinde i\u015fyeri oldu\u011fu tespit edilerek duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r edilen Y.U. da tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde; i\u015fletti\u011fi kuyumcu d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fterisiyle ilgilenirken bir ara d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kalabal\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ancak m\u00fc\u015fterisi oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in tekrar i\u015fyerine girdi\u011fini, kalabal\u0131ktan ayr\u0131lan ki\u015filere daha sonradan ne oldu\u011funu sordu\u011funda E.\u00c7.nin vuruldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylediklerini ancak kimin vurdu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemediklerini, kendisinin de eylemi kimlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini bilmedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Yarg\u0131lama sonucunda Mahkeme 17\/2\/2016 tarihinde, yakalanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n ayr\u0131lmas\u0131na, di\u011fer san\u0131k M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan beraatine, maktule y\u00f6nelik sonu\u00e7suz kalan ilk sald\u0131r\u0131 nedeniyle kasten yaralama su\u00e7una te\u015febb\u00fcsten cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na, maktul\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi olay\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise fiilin tasarlama olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve maktulden kaynaklanan haks\u0131z eylem sonucu i\u015flendi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirerek M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 81. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 29. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 17 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. Maktul\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden \u00f6nce ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen, M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda kasten yaralama su\u00e7una te\u015febb\u00fcsten verilen karara dayanak olan ve M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n maktule ta\u015f atmas\u0131ndan ibaret eyleme dair gerek\u00e7eli kararda yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmeler \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Olay tarihinde saat 09:20 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda, aralar\u0131ndaki bir anla\u015fmazl\u0131k nedeniyle hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 bulunan ve dosyas\u0131 i\u015f bu dosyam\u0131zdan tefrik edilen san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n maktul [E.\u00c7.ye] parmak sallayarak ve ba\u011f\u0131rarak konu\u015furken \u00e7evrede bulunanlar\u0131n araya girdi\u011fi, taraflar uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rken san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n maktule hitaben K\u00fcrt\u00e7e olarak ‘Baban\u0131n kafas\u0131n\u0131 sinkaf edece\u011fim’ dedi\u011fi ve cebinde bulunan a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r kapan\u0131r b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131, fakat \u00e7evredekilerin engellemesi akabinde tekrar cebine soktu\u011fu, san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 […] numaral\u0131 telefon ile di\u011fer san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.y\u0131] arayarak [maktul E.\u00c7.] ile kavga ettiklerini s\u00f6yleyerek karde\u015fi olan san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] olay yerine gelmesini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, maktul [E.\u00c7.nin] arac\u0131na do\u011fru gitti\u011fi s\u0131rada san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n maktule sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcrler etmesi \u00fczerine tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n tekrar ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, etraftan kimselerin araya girerek kavgaya m\u00fcdahale ettikleri ve saat 09:28 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda maktul [E.\u00c7.nin] Sason \u0130l\u00e7esi \u00d6\u011fretmenevinin bulundu\u011fu y\u00f6ne do\u011fru uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rken, san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n Sason Cumhuriyet Caddesi Meydan\u0131 istikametinden ko\u015farak elinde b\u0131\u00e7ak ile gelmek suretiyle maktul\u00fc yaralamaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etti\u011fi, bu esnada di\u011fer san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] da olay yerine gelerek elinde bulunan ta\u015f\u0131 [E.\u00c7.ye] do\u011fru att\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak isabet ettiremedi\u011fi, akabinde [E.\u00c7.nin] san\u0131klar\u0131n kendisine do\u011fru ko\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmesi \u00fczerine, yerden ta\u015f benzeri bir cisim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak kimseye y\u00f6neltmedi\u011fi, olay\u0131 \u00e7evrede bulunan ki\u015filerin ay\u0131rarak sonland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, ilk olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde sona erdi\u011fi, zira bu hususun iddia, san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] ayn\u0131 mahiyetteki bu olaya ili\u015fkin savunmas\u0131, tan\u0131klar [A.A., A.D., A.\u00d6., N.\u00c7., T.Y. ve H.A.n\u0131n] olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde vuku buldu\u011funu destekler mahiyetteki birbirleriyle uyumlu beyanlar\u0131, ileti\u015fim tespit tutanaklar\u0131, CD \u00f6n inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131, CD \u00f6n izleme tutana\u011f\u0131, Emniyet tutanak i\u00e7erikleri ve mahkememizce duru\u015fma salonunda \u00f6\u011fretmen evi \u00f6n\u00fcndeki bu olaya ili\u015fkin CD’ nin izlenerek tutana\u011fa aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fma zabt\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finden anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bu maddi ve somut deliller bu olaya ili\u015fkin mahkememizce kabule giden yolda dayanak te\u015fkil etmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
22. Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda maktul\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi olay\u0131na dairtespit ve de\u011ferlendirmeleri \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bu olay\u0131n akabinde san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.] ve hakk\u0131nda tefrik karar\u0131 verilen di\u011fer san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n saat 09:35 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Vali Haluk \u0130mga Caddesinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131ndan Cumhuriyet Caddesi Meydan \u00c7ar\u015f\u0131s\u0131na birlikte y\u00fcr\u00fcyerek, \u00f6ld\u00fcrme eyleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi yere 10 metre mesafede bekleyerek \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slarla konu\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, saat 09:39’da san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n, maktul E.\u00c7.nin] kendilerine do\u011fru k\u00fcfrederek geldi\u011fini g\u00f6rmesi \u00fczerine, (maktul\u00fcn k\u00fcfrederek geldi\u011fi san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] bu y\u00f6ndeki beyan\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen tan\u0131k [S.\u015e.nin] anlat\u0131m\u0131 ile sabit kabul edilmi\u015f, aksine destekler mahiyette ba\u015fkaca delile ula\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, bu suretle bu beyanlara itibar edilmi\u015ftir) bekledikleri yere 5 metre mesafede bulunan [G.] isimli i\u015fyerinin hemen \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunan sopay\u0131 i\u015fyeri [sahibinin] r\u0131zas\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n h\u0131zl\u0131ca alarak maktul\u00fcn arkas\u0131ndan ko\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu sopa ile ka\u00e7arak uzakla\u015fmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan maktule do\u011fru iki kez vurdu\u011fu, bu s\u0131rada san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] elinde bulunan sopan\u0131n yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu esnada san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n da maktul\u00fcn arkas\u0131ndan ko\u015farak gelmek suretiyle elinde bulunan b\u0131\u00e7akla maktul\u00fcn \u00fcst beden b\u00f6lgesine do\u011fru hamle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, maktul\u00fcn orada bulunan \u00e7ay oca\u011f\u0131na benzer i\u015fletmeye do\u011fru gitmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada yerden sopas\u0131n\u0131 alan san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] tekrar maktule do\u011fru h\u00fccum etti\u011fi, maktul\u00fcn kafas\u0131na iki kez daha sopayla vurdu\u011fu, bu s\u0131rada di\u011fer san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n elindeki b\u0131\u00e7akla maktule vurmaya devam etti\u011fi, maktul\u00fcn yere d\u00fc\u015fmesi \u00fczerine araya giren \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n \u00f6nce san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] elindeki sopay\u0131 ald\u0131klar\u0131, bu s\u0131rada san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n yere d\u00fc\u015fen maktul\u00fcn \u00fczerine e\u011filerek bir iki darbe daha vurdu\u011fu, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n araya girmesi akabinde her iki san\u0131\u011f\u0131 maktul\u00fcn yan\u0131ndan uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Maktul\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle sonu\u00e7lanan bu ikinci olay\u0131n, anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekilde vuku buldu\u011funun mahkememizce kabul edilmesine; san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] tevilli ikrar\u0131, tan\u0131klar [C.A., N.A., S.\u015e. ve Y.U.nun] olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde vuku buldu\u011funu destekler mahiyetteki birbirleriyle uyumlu beyanlar\u0131, CD \u00f6n inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131, Emniyet tutanak i\u00e7erikleri, mahkememizce duru\u015fma salonunda bu olaya ili\u015fkin CD’ nin izlenerek tutana\u011fa aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fma zabt\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fi, \u00d6l\u00fc muayene ve otopsi tutanaklar\u0131, adli muayene raporlar\u0131, ma\u011fdur anlat\u0131m\u0131, kat\u0131lan \u015fikayeti, Olay ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma tutana\u011f\u0131, Olay ve yakalama teslim ve tesell\u00fcm tutana\u011f\u0131 ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki maddi ve somut delillerle ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
23. Di\u011fer yandan M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan verilen cezadan haks\u0131z tahrik nedeniyle indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131na dair gerek\u00e7eli kararda yer alan de\u011ferlendirmeler \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Somut olayda, san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.] ve hakk\u0131nda tefrik karar\u0131 verilen di\u011fer san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n saat 09:35 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Vali Haluk \u0130mga Caddesinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131ndan Cumhuriyet Caddesi Meydan \u00c7ar\u015f\u0131s\u0131na birlikte y\u00fcr\u00fcyerek, \u00f6ld\u00fcrme eyleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi yere 10 metre mesafede bekleyerek \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slarla konu\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, saat 09:39’da san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n maktul E.\u00c7.nin] kendilerine do\u011fru k\u00fcfrederek geldi\u011fini g\u00f6rmesi \u00fczerine bekledikleri yere 5 metre mesafede bulunan [G.] isimli i\u015fyerinin hemen \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunan sopay\u0131 i\u015fyeri [sahibinin] r\u0131zas\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n h\u0131zl\u0131ca alarak maktul\u00fcn arkas\u0131ndan ko\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n; san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] bu y\u00f6ndeki beyan\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen tan\u0131k [S.\u015e.nin] anlat\u0131m\u0131 ile sabit oldu\u011fu ve aksine destekler mahiyette ba\u015fkaca delile ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n maktul\u00fcn k\u00fcfrederek gelmesi \u00fczerine sinirlendi\u011fi, zaten hemen \u00f6ncesinde de ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 di\u011fer tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n etkisi hen\u00fcz ge\u00e7memi\u015fken k\u0131zarak eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi dosya kapsam\u0131ndan sabit kabul edilmi\u015f, san\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanma \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015f[ti\u011fi] kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
24. M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan verilen karar Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesinin (Yarg\u0131tay) 12\/3\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131yla onanarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer yandan an\u0131lan kararda toplanan delillere g\u00f6re olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015fvurucu ile maktul\u00fcn tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun tart\u0131\u015fma esnas\u0131nda maktule sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcfrederek parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131, akabinde \u00fczerinde bulundurdu\u011fu b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kararak maktule sald\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak araya giren tan\u0131klar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyu engelledi\u011fi ve ilk olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde son buldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun san\u0131k M.\u015e.K.y\u0131 arayarak olay yerine gelmesini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n gelmesiyle maktul\u00fc tekrar g\u00f6ren ba\u015fvurucunun maktule yeniden sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcfretti\u011fi, san\u0131k M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n maktule do\u011fru ta\u015f f\u0131rlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak isabet ettiremedi\u011fi, araya tan\u0131klar\u0131n girmesiyle olay\u0131n tekrardan son buldu\u011fu, bir s\u00fcre sonra maktul\u00fcn tan\u0131k S.\u015e.nin ve san\u0131k M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re k\u00fcfrederek geldi\u011fi, M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n sopa ile ba\u015fvurucunun ise b\u0131\u00e7akla maktul\u00fc yaralayarak \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu \u015fekilde geli\u015fti\u011fi kabul edilen olayda ilk haks\u0131z hareketin M.\u015e.K. ve ba\u015fvurucudan geldi\u011fi, b\u00f6ylelikle M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda verilen cezadan hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmekte ise de karar\u0131n M.\u015e.K. aleyhine temyiz edilmemesi nedeniyle bu hususun bozma nedeni olarak de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurucu Hakk\u0131ndaki Kovu\u015fturma S\u00fcreci<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131lan dava, ayn\u0131 Mahkemenin E.2016\/93 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Yarg\u0131lama devam ederken ba\u015fvurucu 5\/4\/2019 tarihinde yakalanm\u0131\u015f, durumun Mahkemeye bildirilmesi \u00fczerine duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu haz\u0131r edildi\u011fi \u0130stanbul 8. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinden duru\u015fmaya Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Bili\u015fim Sistemi (SEGB\u0130S) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu celsede savunma yapmak i\u00e7in haz\u0131r olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve tarihi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan di\u011fer celsede beyanda bulunmak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6yleyen ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan celsede tutuklanarak \u00f6nce Beykoz\/Metris 1 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ard\u0131ndan da 8\/4\/2019 tarihinde Marmara 3 No.lu L Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) nakledilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 10\/4\/2019 tarihinde \u0130nfaz Kurumuna m\u00fczekkere yazarak ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6nceden kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan 11\/6\/2019 tarihli celseye kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sa\u011flanmas\u0131 talimat\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu, m\u00fcdafii celse \u00f6ncesinde Mahkemeye sundu\u011fu 15\/5\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile 11\/6\/2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lacak olan celseye kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sa\u011flanmas\u0131na r\u0131za g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan celsede bizzat haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte Mahkeme 11\/6\/2019 tarihli celsede ba\u015fvurucuyu tutuklu bulundu\u011fu infaz kurumundan SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun savunmas\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Duru\u015fma huzurunda ifade vermek istiyorum. Takdir sizindir. Burada da ifade verebilirim. K\u00f6yde iki yol ge\u00e7iyordu. O zaman ben muhtar\u0131n birinci azas\u0131yd\u0131m. Bir hafta sonra Sason’a e\u015fimle beraber geldim. [Maktul E.\u00c7.] ba\u015fka bir k\u00f6yde kal\u0131yor. K\u00f6ylerimiz yak\u0131nd\u0131r. Yolun geni\u015flemesi meselesi vard\u0131. Yolun kaymakaml\u0131\u011fa ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, muhtar\u0131n elinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledim. Ondan sonra beni tehdit etti. Ben e\u015fimle al\u0131\u015fveri\u015fteyken kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131k. Beni \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fini, e\u015fimi kendine alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Ben de kendisine hitaben ‘Seni Allah’a havale ediyorum’ dedim. Daha sonra Sason’a geldim. Jenerat\u00f6r i\u00e7in bir miktar benzin ald\u0131m. [E.\u00c7.] orada da kar\u015f\u0131ma geldi. E\u015fimle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131rken k\u00fcf\u00fcr etmi\u015fti. Elinde b\u0131\u00e7ak vard\u0131. Elinde de bir po\u015fet vard\u0131. \u00dczerime gelerek b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 bana do\u011fru vurdu. Ben de kendimi korumak amac\u0131yla b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fcnce yerden ald\u0131m. Elinde ta\u015f vard\u0131. Elindeki ta\u015fla bana vursayd\u0131 beni \u00f6ld\u00fcrecekti. Ben y\u00fcr\u00fcyerek abimi arad\u0131m ve elinden b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6yledim. Abime bu adam\u0131 karakola teslim edelim dedim. Aradan 10 dakika ge\u00e7meden ard\u0131mdan k\u00fcf\u00fcr ederek geliyordu. Abim bu s\u0131rada yan\u0131mda de\u011fildi. Abimi telefonla aram\u0131\u015ft\u0131m. Bana sinkafl\u0131 kelimeler kulland\u0131. Bu \u015fah\u0131s beni \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yordu. Ben kesinlikle \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in sald\u0131rmad\u0131m. Yaralama amac\u0131yla sald\u0131rd\u0131m. Bu \u015fahs\u0131 korkutmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131m. Ben kendimi koruma amac\u0131yla elimdeki b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 sallad\u0131m. B\u0131\u00e7ak \u015fahs\u0131n neresine ka\u00e7 defa de\u011fdi\u011fini hat\u0131rlam\u0131yorum. Defalarca bana k\u00fcf\u00fcr etmeye devam etti. Ben pi\u015fman\u0131m. 4 tane \u00e7ocu\u011fum var. Amac\u0131m \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek de\u011fildi. Bu \u015fah\u0131s beni \u00f6ld\u00fcrecekti. Beni tehdit etti. Ben giderken arkamdan k\u00fcf\u00fcr ederek gelmeye devam ediyordu. Ben uzakla\u015fmak istememe ra\u011fmen \u0131srarla beni \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in geliyordu. Ben kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmedim. Durdurmak i\u00e7in yaralamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131m. Kendimi korumaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131m.” <\/p>\n
27. Duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafileri, ba\u015fvurucunun kendisini ifade etmekte zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ya\u015fanan kavgan\u0131n olaydan \u00f6nceki tarihte maktul\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucuya s\u00f6yledi\u011fi s\u00f6zlerden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tan\u0131k A.Y.nin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015f; bu nedenlerle ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fmalarda bizzat haz\u0131r edilmesi ve M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada dinlenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n haz\u0131r edilerek yeniden ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Celse sonunda Mahkeme; tan\u0131klar\u0131n \u00f6nceden al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve dosya kapsam\u0131 itibar\u0131yla yarg\u0131lamaya yenilik katmayaca\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle tan\u0131klar\u0131n yeniden dinlenmeleri talebini, ba\u015fvurucunun Mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutuklu bulunmas\u0131 ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle de ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fmalarda haz\u0131r edilmesi talebini reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu celseden sonraki celselerin t\u00fcm\u00fcne kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 da SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 26\/11\/2019 tarihli son celsesinde haz\u0131r bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fi, Y.K.n\u0131n tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tan\u0131k Y.K. ifadesinde; olaydan yakla\u015f\u0131k bir hafta \u00f6nce saat 14.30 civar\u0131nda ara\u00e7la ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer yolcularla Sason’dan k\u00f6ye gittikleri s\u0131rada maktul\u00fcn yanlar\u0131na gelip “G\u00fczel bir kad\u0131ns\u0131n, e\u015fini \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcp seni kendime alaca\u011f\u0131m.” dedi\u011fini, bunu di\u011fer yolcular\u0131n duyup duymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun maktule “Seni Allah’a havale ediyorum.” dedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Y.K. ayr\u0131ca eve gidip ba\u015fvurucuya maktul\u00fcn neden b\u00f6yle s\u00f6yledi\u011fini sordu\u011funda ba\u015fvurucunun bunu kafas\u0131na takmamas\u0131n\u0131, sorunun yol mevzusundan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, k\u00f6ylerinde iki yol oldu\u011funu, evlerinin k\u00f6y\u00fcn yukar\u0131s\u0131nda oldu\u011funu ancak a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki k\u00f6y yolunun daha d\u00fczg\u00fcn oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucunun k\u00f6y yolunun a\u015fa\u011f\u0131s\u0131ndan ge\u00e7mesini istedi\u011fini ancak maktul\u00fcn bunu kabul etmemesi nedeniyle aralar\u0131nda husumet oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
29. Yarg\u0131lama sonunda Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun kasten yaralama su\u00e7una te\u015febb\u00fcsten 2 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 81. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 62. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 25 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, bu su\u00e7tan verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun cezas\u0131ndan haks\u0131z tahrik nedeniyle indirim yap\u0131lmamas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda davan\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131\u011f\u0131 M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131ndaki onama karar\u0131nda de\u011finilen a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verildikten sonra olay\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ve haks\u0131z tahrik nedeniyle cezadan indirim yap\u0131lmamas\u0131na dair yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmeler \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“24\/02\/2015 tarihinde saat 09:20 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda, aralar\u0131ndaki bir anla\u015fmazl\u0131k nedeniyle san\u0131k Burhan Kaya’n\u0131n maktul [E.\u00c7.]’ya parmak sallayarak ve ba\u011f\u0131rarak konu\u015furken \u00e7evrede bulunanlar\u0131n araya girdi\u011fi, taraflar uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rken san\u0131k Burhan’n\u0131n maktule hitaben K\u00fcrt\u00e7e olarak ‘Baban\u0131n kafas\u0131n\u0131 sinkaf edece\u011fim’ dedi\u011fi ve cebinde bulunan a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r kapan\u0131r b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131, fakat \u00e7evredekilerin engellemesi akabinde tekrar cebine soktu\u011fu, san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 […] numaral\u0131 telefon ile hakk\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilen san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.y\u0131] arayarak maktul ile kavga ettiklerini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi ve karde\u015fi olan san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] olay yerine gelmesini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, maktul\u00fcn arac\u0131na do\u011fru gitti\u011fi s\u0131rada san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n maktule sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcrler etmesi \u00fczerine tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n tekrar ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, etraftakilerin araya girerek kavgaya m\u00fcdahale ettikleri ve saat 09:28 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda maktul\u00fcn Sason \u0130l\u00e7esi \u00d6\u011fretmenevinin bulundu\u011fu y\u00f6ne do\u011fru uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rken, san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n Sason Cumhuriyet Caddesi Meydan\u0131 istikametinden ko\u015farak elinde b\u0131\u00e7ak ile gelmek suretiyle maktul\u00fc yaralamaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etti\u011fi, bu esnada di\u011fer san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n da] olay yerine gelerek elinde bulunan ta\u015f\u0131 maktule do\u011fru att\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak isabet ettiremedi\u011fi, akabinde maktul\u00fcn san\u0131klar\u0131n kendisine do\u011fru ko\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmesi \u00fczerine, yerden ta\u015f benzeri bir cisim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak kimseye y\u00f6neltmedi\u011fi, olay\u0131 \u00e7evrede bulunan ki\u015filerin ay\u0131rarak sonland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, ilk olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde sona erdi\u011fi, zira bu hususun san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] ayn\u0131 mahiyetteki bu olaya ili\u015fkin savunmas\u0131, tan\u0131klar [A.A., A.D., A.\u00d6., N.\u00c7., T.Y. ve H.A.n\u0131n] olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde vuku buldu\u011funu destekler mahiyetteki birbirleriyle uyumlu beyanlar\u0131, ileti\u015fim tespit tutanaklar\u0131, CD \u00f6n inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131, CD \u00f6n izleme tutana\u011f\u0131, Emniyet tutanak i\u00e7erikleri ve mahkememizce duru\u015fma salonunda \u00f6\u011fretmen evi \u00f6n\u00fcndeki bu olaya ili\u015fkin CD’nin izlenerek tutana\u011fa aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fma zabt\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finden anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 …<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Bu ilk olay sonras\u0131nda san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n karde\u015fi di\u011fer san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.] ile saat 09:35 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Vali Haluk \u0130mga Caddesinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131ndan Cumhuriyet Caddesi Meydan \u00c7ar\u015f\u0131s\u0131na birlikte y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fckleri, \u00f6ld\u00fcrme eyleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi yere 10 metre mesafede bekleyerek \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slarla konu\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, saat 09:39’da san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] maktul\u00fcn kendilerine do\u011fru k\u00fcfrederek geldi\u011fini g\u00f6rmesi \u00fczerine bekledikleri yere 5 metre mesafede bulunan [G.] isimli i\u015fyerinin hemen \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunan sopay\u0131 h\u0131zl\u0131ca alarak maktul\u00fcn arkas\u0131ndan ko\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu sopa ile ka\u00e7arak uzakla\u015fmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan maktule do\u011fru iki kez vurdu\u011fu ve sopay\u0131 yere d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu esnada san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n da maktul\u00fcn arkas\u0131ndan ko\u015farak gelmek suretiyle elinde bulunan b\u0131\u00e7akla maktul\u00fcn \u00fcst beden b\u00f6lgesine do\u011fru hamle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, maktul\u00fcn orada bulunan \u00e7ay oca\u011f\u0131na benzer i\u015fletmeye do\u011fru gitmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada yerden sopas\u0131n\u0131 alan san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] tekrar maktule do\u011fru h\u00fccum etti\u011fi, maktul\u00fcn kafas\u0131na iki kez daha sopayla vurdu\u011fu, bu s\u0131rada di\u011fer san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n elindeki b\u0131\u00e7akla maktule vurmaya devam etti\u011fi, maktul\u00fcn yere d\u00fc\u015fmesi \u00fczerine araya giren \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n \u00f6nce san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] elindeki sopay\u0131 ald\u0131klar\u0131, bu s\u0131rada san\u0131k Burhan’\u0131n yere d\u00fc\u015fen maktul\u00fcn \u00fczerine e\u011filerek bir iki darbe daha vurdu\u011fu, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n araya girmesi akabinde her iki san\u0131\u011f\u0131 maktul\u00fcn yan\u0131ndan uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde vuku buldu\u011funun san\u0131k [M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n] tevilli ikrar\u0131, tan\u0131klar [C.A., N.A., S.\u015e. ve Y.U.nun] olay\u0131n geli\u015fime ili\u015fkin birbirleriyle uyumlu beyanlar\u0131, CD \u00f6n inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131, emniyet tutanak i\u00e7erikleri, mahkememizce duru\u015fma salonunda bu olaya ili\u015fkin CD’nin izlenerek tutana\u011fa aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fma zabt\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fi, \u00f6l\u00fc muayene ve otopsi tutanaklar\u0131, adli muayene raporlar\u0131, olay ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma tutana\u011f\u0131, olay ve yakalama teslim ve tesell\u00fcm tutana\u011f\u0131 ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki maddi ve somut delillerle sabit oldu\u011fu …<\/p>\n
… ilk haks\u0131z hareketin san\u0131k Burhan’dan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan TCK’n\u0131n 29 maddesinde belirtilen haks\u0131z tahrik indiriminin uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 …”<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucu; di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra duru\u015fmalarda bizzat haz\u0131r bulundurulmay\u0131 talep etti\u011fi h\u00e2lde r\u0131zas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak duru\u015fmalara kat\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unun s\u00fcbutu ve bu su\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmamas\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131\u011f\u0131 M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131ndaki onama ilam\u0131ndaki a\u00e7\u0131klamalara ve tan\u0131k A.Y.nin bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalara dayanak olan anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak tan\u0131k A.Y.nin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n a\u015famalarda kendi i\u00e7inde ve di\u011fer tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle ba\u015fta A.Y. olmak \u00fczere M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131lamada ifadeleri al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r edilmedi\u011fini, bu nedenle tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama olana\u011f\u0131 verilmedi\u011fini beyan ederek an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
31. Diyarbak\u0131r B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi (Daire) 11\/3\/2020 tarihinde kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu esastan reddetmi\u015f; kasten yaralama su\u00e7una te\u015febb\u00fcsten kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ise her iki su\u00e7 aras\u0131nda hukuki kesintinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu eylemin ayr\u0131 bir su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kesin olmak \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucunun bu su\u00e7tan beraatine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucu, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan verilen Daire karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda dile getirdi\u011fi itirazlar\u0131 tekrar ederek temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay 17\/6\/2021 tarihinde Daire karar\u0131n\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvurucu nihai karar\u0131 26\/7\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 23\/8\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
34. Komisyon; adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma ve tan\u0131k sorgulama haklar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Duru\u015fmada Haz\u0131r Bulunma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
35. Ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci boyunca duru\u015fmalara kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sa\u011flanmas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
36. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fmalar s\u0131ras\u0131nda m\u00fcdafi yard\u0131m\u0131ndan da yararlanarak, herhangi bir s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya maruz kalmadan ve teknik bir ba\u011flant\u0131 sorunu ya\u015famadan etkili bir \u015fekilde savunma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda dile getirdi\u011fi itirazlar\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
37. Ba\u015fvuru, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
38. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
39. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u015eehrivan \u00c7oban ([GK], B. No: 2017\/22672, 6\/2\/2020) ve Emrah Yayla ([GK], B. No: 2017\/38732, 6\/2\/2020) kararlar\u0131nda duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131 ile ilgili ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi bu kararlarda \u00f6ncelikle ki\u015filerin talebine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak SEGB\u0130S yoluyla duru\u015fmaya kat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil etti\u011fini tespit etmi\u015ftir. Bu m\u00fcdahalenin kanunilik, me\u015fru ama\u00e7 ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararlarda 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 196. maddesinin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fcdahalenin usul ekonomisinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesine y\u00f6nelik me\u015fru bir amaca dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u015eehrivan \u00c7oban, \u00a7\u00a7 72-104; Emrah Yayla, \u00a7\u00a7 58-86).<\/p>\n
40. An\u0131lan kararlarda \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan incelemede ise ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma talebinin hangi zorlay\u0131c\u0131 nedene dayan\u0131larak kabul edilmedi\u011finin ortaya konulmamas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun SEGB\u0130S yoluyla kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 celselerde esasl\u0131 i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle m\u00fcdahalenin gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
41. \u00d6te yandan Anayasa Mahkemesi, daha \u00f6nce adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerinden a\u00e7\u0131k veya \u00f6rt\u00fcl\u00fc \u015fekilde feragat edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funu belirterek feragatin Anayasa’ya uygun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in feragat iradesinin a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131n\u0131n ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden makul olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Buna ek olarak asgari usul g\u00fcvencelerinin sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131ndan feragat edilmesini me\u015fru olmaktan \u00e7\u0131karan \u00fcst\u00fcn bir kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131n da bulunmamas\u0131 gerekmektedir (Nurettin Balta, B. No: 2016\/10023, 28\/12\/2021, \u00a7 45). \u00d6rt\u00fcl\u00fc feragatin hangi durumlarda Anayasa’ya uygun kabul edilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin ilkeler genel olarak Ansar Onat (B. No: 2019\/14515, 15\/6\/2022) karar\u0131nda belirtilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re \u00f6rt\u00fcl\u00fc feragatin ge\u00e7erli olabilmesi i\u00e7in feragat eden taraf\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu eylemlerinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 makul olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilece\u011finin ortaya konulmas\u0131 gerekir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yetkili yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131 bu konuda varsay\u0131ma dayal\u0131 bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmamal\u0131d\u0131r (duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Emrah Yayla, \u00a7 75). Bununla birlikte adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerinden feragat iradesi, bunu g\u00f6steren olgular\u0131n bulunmas\u0131ndan veya su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki ki\u015finin tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131labilir (Ansar Onat, \u00a7 21).<\/p>\n
42. Ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n t\u00fcm celselerine SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii Mahkemeye sundu\u011fu 15\/5\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile 11\/6\/2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lacak olan duru\u015fmada ba\u015fvurucunun bizzat haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 26). Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan celsede savunmas\u0131nda da bu talebini yinelemi\u015f ve her ne kadar fiil\u00ee durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda savunmas\u0131n\u0131 SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla da yapabilece\u011fini beyan etmi\u015fse de ayn\u0131 celsede s\u00f6z alan m\u00fcdafii, ba\u015fvurucunun bu \u015fekilde kendisini yeterince ifade edemedi\u011fini beyan ederek sonraki celselerde ba\u015fvurucunun haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131 talebini tekrar etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 27). Mahkeme ise ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutuklu bulunmas\u0131 ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle talebi reddetmi\u015f ve t\u00fcm celselere ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sa\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle Mahkeme esasl\u0131 i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm oturumlara ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131lma taleplerini reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
43. Her ne kadar ba\u015fvurucu, 11\/6\/2019 tarihli celsede duru\u015fmaya kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sa\u011flanmas\u0131 \u015feklinde geli\u015fen fiil\u00ee durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda bu \u015fekilde de savunma yapabilece\u011fini beyan etmi\u015fse de ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiinin ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fmada bizzat haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki talebini Mahkemeye iletti\u011fi ve bu husustaki itirazlar\u0131n kanun yolu ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7elerinde de ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131ndan feragat etti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir.<\/p>\n
44. \u00d6te yandan su\u00e7 tipi i\u00e7in kanunda belirlenen cezan\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 artt\u0131k\u00e7a duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunarak savunma yapman\u0131n da \u00f6neminin artaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda tart\u0131\u015fma bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen su\u00e7un cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun bu su\u00e7tan 25 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bizzat duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmak suretiyle savunma yapma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki talebinin \u00f6nem arz etti\u011fi vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki karar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Erg\u00fcn [GK], B. No: 2019\/34180, 25\/7\/2023, \u00a7 41).<\/p>\n
45. Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun talep etmesine ra\u011fmen yarg\u0131laman\u0131n t\u00fcm celselerine SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla kat\u0131lmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 somut olayda da yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan kararlarda yer alan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
46. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Tan\u0131k Sorgulama Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
47. Ba\u015fvurucu; mahk\u00fbm oldu\u011fu su\u00e7tan verilen cezadan haks\u0131z tahrik nedeniyle indirim yap\u0131lmamas\u0131, davan\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131\u011f\u0131 M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kendisinin haz\u0131r bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 oturumlarda dinlenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n -\u00f6zellikle tan\u0131k A.Y.nin- beyanlar\u0131na dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde bu tan\u0131klar\u0131n kendisinin yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada yeniden haz\u0131r edilerek sorgulanmalar\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
48. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; tan\u0131klar\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131k M.\u015e.K.n\u0131n yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada Mahkemece al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n duru\u015fmada okundu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun da bu beyanlara kar\u015f\u0131 iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 dile getirebildi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda, bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda dile getirdi\u011fi itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
49. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
50. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda tan\u0131k kavram\u0131n\u0131 san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen fiil hakk\u0131nda bilgi veren herhangi bir ki\u015fi \u015feklinde \u00f6zerk olarak yorumlam\u0131\u015f ve tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 ile ilgili ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir (Atila O\u011fuz Boyal\u0131, B. No: 2013\/99, 20\/3\/2014; Sel\u00e7uk Demir, B. No: 2014\/9783, 22\/1\/2015; AZ. M., B. No: 2013\/560, 16\/4\/2015; Baran Karada\u011f, B. No: 2014\/12906, 7\/5\/2015; Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, B. No: 2019\/30221, 28\/12\/2021). Buna g\u00f6re bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olan tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama ve sorgulatma hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131klara soru y\u00f6neltebilmesi, onlarla y\u00fczle\u015febilmesi ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu s\u0131nama imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gereklidir (AZ. M., \u00a7 55). Di\u011fer yandan bir mahk\u00fbmiyet -tek veya belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde- san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir kimse taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadelere dayand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haklar\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesindeki g\u00fcvencelerle ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f olur (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
51. Anayasa Mahkemesi, tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131yla ilgili olarak verdi\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda somut bir yarg\u0131lama \u00f6ncesinde veya haricinde elde edilen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n delil olarak kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adilli\u011fine zarar verip vermedi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmek i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 a\u015famal\u0131 bir test uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade etmektedir. Buna g\u00f6re ilk olarak tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemede haz\u0131r edilmemesi ge\u00e7erli bir nedenin mevcudiyetine dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130kinci olarak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan verilen beyan\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetin dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek veya belirleyici delil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. Sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n tek veya belirleyici delil oldu\u011funun tespit edilmesi durumunda ise \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc a\u015fama olarak savunma taraf\u0131n\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu olumsuzlu\u011fun telafi edilmesi amac\u0131yla yeterli d\u00fczeyde kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi ortaya konulmal\u0131d\u0131r (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Abdurrahim Balur, B. No: 2013\/5467, 7\/1\/2016, \u00a7 80; Onur Urbay, B. No: 2014\/6222, 6\/3\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 36, 40; Zekeriya Sevim, B. No: 2018\/18989, 16\/6\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 44, 51). Bu kapsamda h\u00fckme ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken sorgulanmam\u0131\u015f tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen ba\u015fka do\u011frulay\u0131c\u0131 delillere dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 telafi edici g\u00fcvencelerden biri olarak kabul edilebilir (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 39). Mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131klar\u0131n -san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da onlara soru sormas\u0131na imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayacak ve sorulan sorulara verdikleri cevaplar hakk\u0131nda ki\u015fisel izlenim edinme f\u0131rsat\u0131 elde edecek \u015fekilde- SEGB\u0130S gibi vas\u0131talarla dinlenmesi telafi edici bir g\u00fcvence olabilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. U\u011fur \u00d6zcan, B. No: 2021\/12137, 26\/7\/2022, \u00a7 40). Sorgulanmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin ve do\u011frulu\u011funun saptanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla savunma taraf\u0131na sa\u011flanabilecek bir di\u011fer telafi edici g\u00fcvence ise san\u0131\u011fa olay\u0131 kendi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 40).<\/p>\n
52. Ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda incelenmesi gereken ilk sorun, beyan\u0131 delil olarak kabul edilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenmemesinin ge\u00e7erli bir nedene dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Tan\u0131klar ba\u015fvurucunun firari oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafiinin yoklu\u011funda Mahkemece dinlenmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda \u00e7e\u015fitli a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun yakalanmas\u0131ndan sonra yeni esas numaras\u0131 alan dosyada tan\u0131klar\u0131 istinabe suretiyle ya da SEGB\u0130S arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla dinlememi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131klar\u0131n yeniden dinlenmeleri y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki talebini ise bunun dosyaya katk\u0131 sunmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek reddetmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re tan\u0131klar\u0131n savunman\u0131n da haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu bir celsede yeniden dinlenmemelerinin ge\u00e7erli bir nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir. Ancak buna ili\u015fkin ge\u00e7erli bir nedenin ortaya konulmamas\u0131, tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir. \u0130kinci olarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn tek ba\u015f\u0131na veya belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ba\u015fvurucunun sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadeye dayal\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan Anayasa Mahkemesi tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi bir kararda, bir delilin belirleyici olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sadece ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyeti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011fil temel cezan\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131larak tayin edilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir (Hasan Bati, B. No: 2019\/8419, 28\/6\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 33-35). Benzer \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ceza sorumlulu\u011funu kald\u0131ran veya azaltan nedenlere ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmamas\u0131 da sonu\u00e7 cezan\u0131n daha a\u011f\u0131r olarak belirlenmesine yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmamas\u0131na esas al\u0131nan delil a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da an\u0131lan kararda yer alan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
53. Mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturan eylemler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra olay yerinde bulunan kameralar\u0131n kay\u0131tlar\u0131, M.\u015e.K. ve ba\u015fvurucunun beyanlar\u0131 da delil olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 29). Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucuya verilen cezadan haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca indirim yap\u0131lmamas\u0131na dair gerek\u00e7ede ilk haks\u0131z hareketin ba\u015fvurucudan geldi\u011finin belirtilmesiyle yetinilmi\u015f, olay\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131na dair a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda ise ba\u015fvurucunun maktule parmak sallayarak hakaret etti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ve benzer y\u00f6nde de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7eren M.\u015e.K. hakk\u0131ndaki Yarg\u0131tay ilam\u0131na da kararda yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu y\u00f6ndeki kabule dayanak olan delil ise tan\u0131k A.Y.nin a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131 oldu\u011fundan (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 9, 16) bu tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verilen cezadan haks\u0131z tahrik nedeniyle indirim yap\u0131lmamas\u0131nda \u00f6nemli a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta bir delil olarak dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle sorgulama imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadelerinin ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmayarak cezan\u0131n daha a\u011f\u0131r olarak belirlenmesine g\u00f6t\u00fcren tek olmasa da belirleyici nitelikte delil oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
54. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucuya olaylar\u0131 bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak Mahkemenin tan\u0131klar\u0131n, \u00f6zellikle tan\u0131k A.Y.nin yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyanlar\u0131 duru\u015fmada okunmu\u015f ise de ba\u015fvurucu, tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc nakli yoluyla da olsa olay\u0131n tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 sorgulayamam\u0131\u015f; sorulan sorulara verdi\u011fi cevaplar hakk\u0131nda izlenim edinme f\u0131rsat\u0131 elde edememi\u015ftir. Bu y\u00fczden tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi tepkiler konusunda Mahkemenin dikkatini \u00e7ekememi\u015f, b\u00f6ylelikle tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi test edilememi\u015ftir. Olay\u0131n tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc aktarma yap\u0131larak dinlenmedi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucuya tan\u0131\u011fa soru sorma hakk\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. H\u00fckme ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken sorgulanmam\u0131\u015f tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka delillere de dayan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde mahk\u00fbmiyete temel al\u0131nan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulama imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle savunma makam\u0131n\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamay\u0131 telafi etti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi ve do\u011frulu\u011fu test edilmemi\u015f tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde savunman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorluklar\u0131 telafi edecek kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvencelerin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun da haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu duru\u015fmada ya da ses veya g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc nakli yoluyla dinlenmemesinin bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetini zedeledi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
55. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
56. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
57. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f; yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
58. Belirli bir davaya ili\u015fkin olarak delilleri de\u011ferlendirme ve g\u00f6sterilen delilin davayla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verme yetkisi kural olarak yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemelere aittir (Orhan K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 [GK], B. No: 2014\/4704, 1\/2\/2018, \u00a7 44). Bu ba\u011flamda somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar vermek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen ihlal karar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat etti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi gibi ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n gereklerinin yerine getirilmesi amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lacak yeniden yarg\u0131lama neticesinde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mutlaka beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na da gelmemektedir. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere gereken i\u015flemler yerine getirildikten sonra yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede mahkemenin delillerin takdir bi\u00e7imine g\u00f6re benzer veya farkl\u0131 bir sonuca varmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
59. Ba\u015fvurucunun maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun maddi tazminat talebinin, ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da manevi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma ve tan\u0131k sorgulama haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Batman 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2016\/93, K.2019\/462) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/36153 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 BURHAN KAYA BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/36153) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/7\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 31\/12\/2024-32769 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : H\u00fcseyin \u00d6zg\u00fcr SEV\u0130ML\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Burhan KAYA Vekili : Av. Abdurrahim KARSLI \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza davas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haz\u0131r bulunma talebi reddedilerek ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc aktar\u0131m\u0131 suretiyle duru\u015fmaya uzaktan kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 nedeniyle duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, beyanlar\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde delil olarak kullan\u0131lan tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada sorgulanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle de tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. A. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru Konusu Olay ve Soru\u015fturma S\u00fcreci 2. Batman’\u0131n Sason il\u00e7esindeki Cumhuriyet Caddesi’nde 24\/2\/2015 tarihinde meydana gelen silahl\u0131 kavga sonucunda maktul E.\u00c7.nin yaralanmas\u0131 ve kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hastanede \u00f6lmesiyle ilgili olarak Sason Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince olay yerinde yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda maktulle kavga eden ki\u015filerin ba\u015fvurucu ile karde\u015fi M.\u015e.K. oldu\u011fu ve bu ki\u015filerin olay yerinden ka\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. 3. Olay yerindeki MOBESE kameras\u0131na ait kay\u0131tlar\u0131n incelenmesi sonucu kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen CD \u00d6n \u0130nceleme Tutana\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6re olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.41.09 itibar\u0131yla maktul\u00fcn kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na girdi\u011fi, saat …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23155","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n