{"id":21022,"date":"2024-12-16T22:44:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-16T19:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2024-12-16T22:44:00","modified_gmt":"2024-12-16T19:44:00","slug":"aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM&#8217;nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   MET\u0130N ATSAK BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n<p>   (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/32033)<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n<p>   B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n<p>   \u00dcyeler<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n<p>   Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Metin ATSAK<\/p>\n<p>   Vekili<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Av. Cihan G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dcK<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>1. Ba\u015fvuru, haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6denen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda; izinsiz olarak ate\u015fli silah ve mermileri \u00fclkeye sokma, imal etme, nakletme, satma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>3. Ba\u015fvurucu bu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 11\/10\/2014 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015f, 13\/2\/2015 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>4. Tahliye karar\u0131na K\u0131z\u0131ltepe Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz \u00fczerine 25\/2\/2015 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu yeniden tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 9\/4\/2015 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu toplamda 5 ay 18 g\u00fcn tutuklu kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>5. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde Mardin 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lardan beraatine karar vermi\u015f, bu karar 1\/7\/2020 tarihinde istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmaks\u0131z\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>6. Beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 50.000 TL maddi, 50.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>7. Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 20. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi; 16\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya 5.063,28 TL maddi, 10.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>8. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi ve manevi tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz oldu\u011funu belirterek istinaf talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8\/2\/2022 tarihinde istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>9. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 8\/3\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 18\/3\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>10. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n<p>11. Ba\u015fvurucu, 5 ay 18 g\u00fcn tutuklu kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada yarg\u0131lama sonunda beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen manevi tazminat\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011funubelirterek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, Anayasa Mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi baz\u0131 kararlara ve derece mahkemelerinin gerek\u00e7elerine yer verilmi\u015f; inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n ve mevzuat\u0131n ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>12. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve dokuzuncu f\u0131kralar\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>13. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>14. Anayasa Mahkemesi G\u00fclseren \u00c7\u0131tak ([GK], B. No: 2020\/1554, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131yla haklar\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya beraat karar\u0131 verilenlerin 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat yolunu t\u00fckettikten sonra yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6denen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla yapt\u0131klar\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvurularda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmi\u015f kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in yaln\u0131zca 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (e) bendi kapsam\u0131nda bir tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli olaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Zira bu h\u00fck\u00fcmle yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklaman\u0131n daha sonra verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya beraat karar\u0131yla hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 h\u00e2le geldi\u011finin kabul edildi\u011fini, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (e) bendi uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davalar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede bu bent kapsam\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k kanun gere\u011fince kabul edildi\u011finden a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesince bu bende dayan\u0131larak tazminat \u00f6denmesi durumunda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak inceleme tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirlemekle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r (G\u00fclseren \u00c7\u0131tak, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38).<\/p>\n<p>15. Derece mahkemelerinin tazminat i\u00e7in somut olay\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re takdir yetkisi bulunmakla birlikte meydana gelen ihlalle orant\u0131l\u0131 olmayan \u00f6nemsiz miktarda bir tazminat Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan tazminat miktar\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer davalarda verdi\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re kayda de\u011fer \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck olmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bununla birlikte h\u00fckmedilen miktar\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer durumlarda verilmesine h\u00fckmetti\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131ndan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck olmas\u0131 tek ba\u015f\u0131na Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez. Tazminat\u0131n Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131yla uyumlu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilirken somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir (M.E., B. No: 2018\/696, 9\/5\/2019, \u00a7 48).<\/p>\n<p>16. Bunun yan\u0131nda manevi tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenirken tazminata karar veren derece mahkemesinin karar tarihinde Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer ba\u015fvurular \u00fczerine verdi\u011fi veya verebilece\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re bir kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilirken ki\u015finin sosyal ve ekonomik durumu, mesleki ve toplumsal konumu, \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un niteli\u011fi, koruma tedbirine neden olan olay\u0131n cereyan tarz\u0131, tedbirin ki\u015finin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 olumsuz etkiler ve tedbirin s\u00fcresi, tedbir nedeniyle meydana gelen ihlalin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Siyami H\u0131d\u0131ro\u011flu [GK] B. No: 2018\/11489, 11\/1\/2024,\u00a7 35).<\/p>\n<p>17. Bu ilkeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olaya bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun beraat ettikten sonra 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (e) bendi kapsam\u0131nda a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya 10.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6dendi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yap\u0131lacak inceleme bu miktar\u0131n yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesiyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. Bu miktar\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer durumlarda \u00f6denmesini kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011fu ortadad\u0131r (Anayasa Mahkemesinin tutuklama tedbirinin hukukili\u011fi ile ilgili iddialarda h\u00fckmetti\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131 derece mahkemesinin karar tarihi olan 2021 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in asgari 30.000, ortalama 80.000, azami 200.000 TL&#8217;dir) Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer durumlarda verilmesine h\u00fckmetti\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131yla ayn\u0131 olmas\u0131 gerekmemekle birlikte tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n somut olay\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131nda tazminat hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc zay\u0131flatacak kadar d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 19. maddesinin -\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak- dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n<p>19. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve 50.000 TL manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>20. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n<p>21. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n<p>A. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n<p>B. Haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fckmedilen tazminat\u0131n yetersizli\u011fi nedeniyle Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 19. maddesinin -\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak- dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 20. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2020\/313, K.2021\/58) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>E. 664,10 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.664,10 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MET\u0130N ATSAK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/32033) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Metin ATSAK Vekili : Av. Cihan G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dcK \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6denen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda; izinsiz olarak ate\u015fli silah ve mermileri \u00fclkeye sokma, imal etme, nakletme, satma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu bu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 11\/10\/2014 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015f, 13\/2\/2015 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. 4. Tahliye karar\u0131na K\u0131z\u0131ltepe Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz \u00fczerine 25\/2\/2015 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu yeniden tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 9\/4\/2015 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu toplamda 5 ay 18 g\u00fcn tutuklu kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 5. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde Mardin 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lardan beraatine karar vermi\u015f, bu karar 1\/7\/2020 tarihinde istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmaks\u0131z\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. 6. Beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 50.000 TL maddi, 50.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. 7. Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 20. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi; 16\/3\/2021 tarihinde &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AYM&#039;nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM&#039;nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MET\u0130N ATSAK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/32033) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Metin ATSAK Vekili : Av. Cihan G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dcK \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6denen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda; izinsiz olarak ate\u015fli silah ve mermileri \u00fclkeye sokma, imal etme, nakletme, satma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu bu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 11\/10\/2014 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015f, 13\/2\/2015 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. 4. Tahliye karar\u0131na K\u0131z\u0131ltepe Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz \u00fczerine 25\/2\/2015 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu yeniden tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 9\/4\/2015 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu toplamda 5 ay 18 g\u00fcn tutuklu kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 5. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde Mardin 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lardan beraatine karar vermi\u015f, bu karar 1\/7\/2020 tarihinde istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmaks\u0131z\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. 6. Beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 50.000 TL maddi, 50.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. 7. Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 20. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi; 16\/3\/2021 tarihinde &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-16T19:44:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-16T19:44:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1564,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\",\"Uncategorized\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-16T19:44:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MET\u0130N ATSAK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/32033) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Metin ATSAK Vekili : Av. Cihan G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dcK \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6denen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda; izinsiz olarak ate\u015fli silah ve mermileri \u00fclkeye sokma, imal etme, nakletme, satma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu bu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 11\/10\/2014 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015f, 13\/2\/2015 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. 4. Tahliye karar\u0131na K\u0131z\u0131ltepe Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz \u00fczerine 25\/2\/2015 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu yeniden tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 9\/4\/2015 tarihinde tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu toplamda 5 ay 18 g\u00fcn tutuklu kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 5. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde Mardin 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lardan beraatine karar vermi\u015f, bu karar 1\/7\/2020 tarihinde istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmaks\u0131z\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. 6. Beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, haks\u0131z tutuklama tedbiri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 50.000 TL maddi, 50.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. 7. Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 20. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi; 16\/3\/2021 tarihinde &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2024-12-16T19:44:00+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"AYM&#8217;nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2024-12-16T19:44:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":1564,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler","Uncategorized"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-16T19:44:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-32033-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM&#8217;nin 2022\/32033 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}