T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
YUSUF OK BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/37021)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf OK<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. \u00d6mer SANSARKAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kanunda kabahat olarak say\u0131lmayan bir fiilden dolay\u0131 idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin; lehe vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesi nedeniyle de m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Covid-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile Diyarbak\u0131r Yeni\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce 30\/12\/2020 tarihinde, 24\/4\/1930 tarihli ve 1593 say\u0131l\u0131 Umumi H\u0131fz\u0131ss\u0131hha Kanunu’nun 282. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 3.150 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, idari para cezas\u0131 yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Diyarbak\u0131r 5. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu dilek\u00e7esinde temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilece\u011fini, genelge ile verilen soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gerek\u00e7e belirtmeden \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rdan para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. H\u00e2kimlik itiraz\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne vepara cezas\u0131n\u0131n 900 TL’yeindirilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu k\u0131smen kabul karar\u0131 verilmesine ve i\u015fin vekil vas\u0131tas\u0131yla takip edilmesine ra\u011fmen vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmedi\u011fi ve karar\u0131n yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. S\u00f6z konusu itiraz, Diyarbak\u0131r 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bu karar 30\/6\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 26\/7\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Komisyonca; ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Su\u00e7ta ve Cezada Kanunilik \u0130lkesinin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; 1593 say\u0131l\u0131 Umumi H\u0131fz\u0131ss\u0131hha Kanunu dayanak g\u00f6sterilerek hakk\u0131nda soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde alt\u0131 \u00e7izilen temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilece\u011fi ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
9. 1593 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 282. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cBu Kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 olan yasaklara ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket edenler veya zorunluluklara uymayanlara, fiilleri ayr\u0131ca su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, ikiy\u00fczelli T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131ndan bin T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131na kadar idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 verilir.\u201d<\/p>\n
10. 3\/11\/2022 tarihli ve 7420 say\u0131l\u0131 Gelir Vergisi Kanunu ile Baz\u0131 Kanun ve Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamelerde De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 4. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) 24\/4\/1930 tarihli ve 1593 say\u0131l\u0131 Umumi H\u0131fz\u0131ss\u0131hha Kanunu ile 30\/3\/2005 tarihli ve 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda COVID-19 salg\u0131n hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00fclkemizde yay\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla 11\/3\/2020 tarihinden itibaren bu maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihe kadar verilen ve bu Kanunun yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla ilgilisine tebli\u011f edilmemi\u015f olan idari para cezalar\u0131 tebli\u011f edilmez, tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olanlar\u0131n tahsilinden vazge\u00e7ilir. Bu maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck tarihinden \u00f6nce i\u015flenen s\u00f6z konusu kabahatler i\u00e7in idari para cezas\u0131 verilmez. (\u0130ptal ibare: Anayasa Mahkemesinin 5\/4\/2023 Tarihli ve E: 2023\/44, K: 2023\/71 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 ile.)<\/p>\n
\u00a0(2) (Ek: 14\/7\/2023-7456\/24 md.) Bu maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6nce tahsil edilen idari para cezalar\u0131, 31\/12\/2024 tarihine kadar tahsilat\u0131 yapan idari birime yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca belirlenecek usul ve esaslara g\u00f6re iade edilir.”<\/p>\n
11. COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 ile m\u00fccadele amac\u0131yla al\u0131nan baz\u0131 tedbirlere ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 30\/3\/2005 tarihli ve 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu’nun ilgili maddelerine dayan\u0131larak uygulanan idari para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmemesinin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 7420 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un ge\u00e7ici 4. maddesinin ikinci c\u00fcmlesindeki “…tahsil edilmi\u015f olan idari para cezalar\u0131 iade edilmez.” kural\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesi Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iptal edilmi\u015ftir (AYM, E. 2023\/44, K.2023\/71, 5\/4\/2023).<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan verilen s\u00f6z konusu iptal karar\u0131 \u00fczerine bu defa 7420 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 4. maddesinin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 9\/11\/2022 tarihinden \u00f6nce yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin iade edilmesini temin etmek amac\u0131yla 7420 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 4. maddesine \u201c(2) Bu maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6nce tahsil edilen idari para cezalar\u0131, 31\/12\/2024 tarihine kadar tahsilat\u0131 yapan idari birime yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca belirlenecek usul ve esaslara g\u00f6re iade edilir.\u201d f\u0131kras\u0131 eklenmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 10). Bu d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re 7420 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 4. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda olan ve an\u0131lan maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 9\/11\/2022 tarihinden \u00f6nce tahsil edilen idari para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n, tahsilat\u0131 yapan idari birime 31\/12\/2024 tarihine kadar ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde iade edilmesi imk\u00e2n\u0131 getirilmi\u015ftir. Buna ek olarak Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ve Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan iptal karar\u0131na da at\u0131f yap\u0131larak s\u00f6z konusu idari para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmesine y\u00f6nelik usul ve esaslar\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi Tahsilat Genel Tebli\u011fi 5\/8\/2023 tarihli ve 32270 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. An\u0131lan kurallarla kanun koyucu ve kamu makamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde -\u00f6denmi\u015f ya da \u00f6denmemi\u015f olsun- ba\u015fvuruya konu idari para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 giderici mevzuat de\u011fi\u015fiklikleri yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) \u201cD\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 80. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) B\u00f6l\u00fcmler ya da Komisyonlarca yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki h\u00e2llerde d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilebilir:<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
c) \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kalkm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u00e7) B\u00f6l\u00fcmler ya da Komisyonlarca saptanan herhangi bir ba\u015fka gerek\u00e7eden \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc, ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan bir neden g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesi. <\/p>\n
\u00a0(2) B\u00f6l\u00fcmler ya da Komisyonlar; yukar\u0131daki f\u0131krada belirtilen nitelikteki bir ba\u015fvuruyu, Anayasan\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 ve yorumlanmas\u0131 veya temel haklar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ya da insan haklar\u0131na sayg\u0131n\u0131n gerekli k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2llerde incelemeye devam edebilir.”<\/p>\n
15. \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn 80. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendi gere\u011fi Anayasa Mahkemesi, ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kalkm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvurunun d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verebilir (S.\u00d6., B. No: 2013\/7087, 18\/9\/2014, \u00a7 23; Mehmet Emin B\u00fclb\u00fcl, B. No: 2014\/4463, 16\/6\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 46-48).<\/p>\n
16. Yukar\u0131da yer verilen kanuni d\u00fczenlemelerden de anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere ilgili kamu birimine 31\/12\/2024 tarihine kadar ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 durumunda COVID-19 salg\u0131n hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00fclkemizde yay\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in 1593 ve\/veya 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunlar uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan idari para cezas\u0131na konu tutar\u0131n iade edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn h\u00e2le gelmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik gerekli mevzuat de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. \u00d6te yandan Anayasa Mahkemesi, somut ba\u015fvuruda dile getirilen \u015fik\u00e2yeti daha \u00f6nce Mustafa Karaku\u015f ([GK], B. No: 2020\/34781, 17\/1\/2023) karar\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. Kararda ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etme fiilinin 1593 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 282. maddesinde yer alan “bu Kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 olan yasaklara ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etme veya zorunluluklara uymayanlara, … idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 verilir.\u201d \u015feklindeki h\u00fckm\u00fcn kapsam\u0131na girmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131larak Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir (ayr\u0131ca benzer y\u00f6nde de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7eren kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Selma Atabey [GK], B. No: 2021\/38893, 27\/9\/2023; \u00c7a\u011fla Yola\u015fan Kurul [GK], B. No: 2021\/29184, 27\/9\/2023). An\u0131lan kararda yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmeler ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde -\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn 80. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen- ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin devam\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 veya temel haklar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ya da insan haklar\u0131na sayg\u0131n\u0131n gerekli k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 herhangi bir durumun da s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kalkm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. M\u00fclkiyet Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, itiraz\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fi halde lehine vekalet \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini belirterek m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucunun dile getirdi\u011fi \u015fik\u00e2yetlere benzer \u015fik\u00e2yetler Anayasa Mahkemesince daha \u00f6nce incelenmi\u015f ve ilgili Anayasa kurallar\u0131n\u0131n yorumlanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131yan husus, kesin nitelikteki kararla yararlar\u0131na bir miktar vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti takdir edilmemesidir. Takdir edilmeyen vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin; ba\u015fvurucunun i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu ki\u015fisel ko\u015fullara g\u00f6re kendisine ciddi anlamda zarar verdi\u011fi ve kendisi i\u00e7in ne denli \u00f6nemli oldu\u011fu hususunda herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucu i\u00e7in \u00f6nemli bir zarar olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Dayg\u0131nat Magomedzham\u0131lova ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2015\/516, 20\/3\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 33-42).<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131 ve uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ba\u015fvurucunun da \u00f6nemli bir zarara u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kalkm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle D\u00dc\u015eMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemden yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/37021 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 YUSUF OK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/37021) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Yusuf OK Vekili : Av. \u00d6mer SANSARKAN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kanunda kabahat olarak say\u0131lmayan bir fiilden dolay\u0131 idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin; lehe vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesi nedeniyle de m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Covid-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile Diyarbak\u0131r Yeni\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce 30\/12\/2020 tarihinde, 24\/4\/1930 tarihli ve 1593 say\u0131l\u0131 Umumi H\u0131fz\u0131ss\u0131hha Kanunu’nun 282. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 3.150 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, idari para cezas\u0131 yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Diyarbak\u0131r 5. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu dilek\u00e7esinde temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilece\u011fini, genelge ile verilen soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gerek\u00e7e belirtmeden \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rdan para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 4. H\u00e2kimlik itiraz\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne vepara cezas\u0131n\u0131n 900 TL’yeindirilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. 5. Ba\u015fvurucu k\u0131smen kabul karar\u0131 verilmesine ve i\u015fin vekil vas\u0131tas\u0131yla takip edilmesine ra\u011fmen …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n