T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
S\u00dcLEYMAN U\u00c7AR BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/43757)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa \u015eENOCAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
S\u00fcleyman U\u00c7AR<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ahmet YUM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, davan\u0131n sonucunu etkileyecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun in\u015faat sekt\u00f6r\u00fcnde faaliyet g\u00f6steren i\u015fyerinde 15\/10\/2014 tarihinde \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u015f Tefti\u015f Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Kurum) taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan tefti\u015fte, i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u00e7in yak\u0131n hayati tehlike olu\u015fturacak hususlar\u0131n tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine i\u015f kazalar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlenmesi amac\u0131yla i\u015fyerinin tamam\u0131nda i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Kurum taraf\u0131ndan 29\/5\/2015 tarihinde i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131 karar\u0131 verilen i\u015fyerinde yap\u0131lan denetimlerde 15\/10\/2014 tarihinde %55’i tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olan in\u015faat\u0131n 29\/5\/2015 tarihinde tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re s\u00f6z konusu in\u015faata 15\/4\/2015 tarihinde gidilerek m\u00fch\u00fcrleme tutana\u011f\u0131 tanzim edilmi\u015ftir. Bu tespit \u00fczerine \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan su\u00e7tan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 25\/5\/2018 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130ddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucunun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 in\u015faatta 15\/10\/2014 tarihinde i\u015fin %55’i tamamlanm\u0131\u015f iken 29\/5\/2015 tarihinde yap\u0131lan denetimlerde in\u015faat\u0131n tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi ve bu \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, \u0130stanbul 52. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Duru\u015fma d\u00f6rt celsede bitirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130kinci celsede ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafii duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu; al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda sahibi ve yetkilisi oldu\u011fu in\u015faata i\u015f m\u00fcfetti\u015flerinin geldi\u011fi s\u00f6ylenince in\u015faata gitti\u011fini, ilgililerle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, tespit ettikleri eksiklikleri bir iki g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde giderdi\u011fini, tefti\u015fe gelen g\u00f6revlilerin \u015fifahi olarak problem kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ettiklerini, bunun \u00fczerine in\u015faata devam etti\u011fini, su\u00e7 i\u015fleme kast\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayn\u0131 celse ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii, durdurma karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc celsede ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un m\u00fctemadi oldu\u011funu, su\u00e7 tarihinin iddianame tarihi olan 29\/5\/2015 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, M\u00fch\u00fcrleme Tutana\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n tanzim edildi\u011fi tarihin 15\/4\/2015 oldu\u011funu, yasal d\u00fczenlemenin ise 23\/4\/2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fini, bu nedenle m\u00fcvekkilinin beraatine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan ba\u015fvurucunun 2 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda, i\u015f yerinde \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u015f Tefti\u015f Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan tefti\u015fte, i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u00e7in yak\u0131n hayati tehlike olu\u015fturacak hususlar\u0131n tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine i\u015f kazalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi amac\u0131yla i\u015fyerinin tamam\u0131nda i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, s\u00f6z konusu in\u015faatta 15\/4\/2015 tarihinde m\u00fch\u00fcrleme tutana\u011f\u0131 tanzim edildi\u011fi, i\u015fyerinde yap\u0131lan denetimlerde 15\/10\/2014 tarihinde %55’i tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olan in\u015faat\u0131n 29\/5\/2015 tarihinde tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun b\u00f6ylece 20\/6\/2012 tarihli ve 6331 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u0130\u015f G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Kanun’un 25. maddesindeki su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 25. maddesinin (8) numaral\u0131 bendi uyar\u0131nca alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir hususun da dosyada bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle san\u0131\u011fa taktiren alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan hapis cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130stinaf dilek\u00e7esinde di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra iddia edilen su\u00e7 tarihinin yasal d\u00fczenlemenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6nce oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesinin kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 16. Ceza Dairesinin (Daire) 24\/12\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla, Mahkemenin dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar temel al\u0131narak esastan reddedilmi\u015f ve kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 26\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 26\/4\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un m\u00fctemadi su\u00e7 oldu\u011funu, su\u00e7 tarihinin 15\/4\/2015 oldu\u011funu, yasal d\u00fczenlemenin 23\/4\/2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fini, buna ra\u011fmen hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini belirterek su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu yerde y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc in\u015fai faaliyetin %55’i tamamlanm\u0131\u015fken 15\/10\/2014 tarihinde yap\u0131lan denetimler sonucu in\u015faat\u0131n durduruldu\u011fu, 15\/4\/2015 tarihinde yeniden yap\u0131lan tefti\u015fte in\u015faat\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlendi\u011fi, 29\/5\/2015 tarihinde in\u015faatta yap\u0131lan son denetimde ise daha \u00f6nce m\u00fch\u00fcrlenen ve yap\u0131m\u0131 durdurulan in\u015faat\u0131n m\u00fchre ve idari yapt\u0131r\u0131ma ra\u011fmen tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin beyan\u0131nda genel olarak bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen bir\u00e7ok ba\u015fvuruda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam ve i\u00e7eri\u011fini belirlemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6zellikle a\u00e7\u0131k ve somut bir bi\u00e7imde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde davayla do\u011frudan ilgili olan bu hususlara mahkemelerce makul bir gerek\u00e7e ile yan\u0131t verilmesi gerekti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir (Muhittin Kaya ve Muhittin Kaya \u0130n\u015faat Taahh\u00fct Madencilik G\u0131da Turizm Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. \u015eti., B. No: 2013\/1213, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 25, 26; Vesim Parlak, B. No: 2012\/1034, 20\/3\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 33, 34; Yasemin Ek\u015fi, B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 56, 57; Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 31-39; M\u00fcn\u00fcr Ata, B. No: 2014\/4958, 22\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 37-43; Hikmet \u00c7elik ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/4894, 15\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 54-59; \u015eah Tar\u0131m \u0130n\u015f. Tur. Ltd. \u015eti., B. No: 2013\/7847, 9\/3\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 36-48).<\/p>\n
15. 6331 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25. maddesine 4\/4\/2015 tarihli ve 6645 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 2. maddesiyle eklenen (8) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kra “\u0130\u015f yerinde durdurulan i\u015flerde izinsiz \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131ran i\u015fveren veya i\u015fveren vekillerine \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ldan be\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 verilir.” h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir. An\u0131lan f\u0131kra, 6645 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 88. maddesinin (e) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince Kanun’un yay\u0131m\u0131 tarihi olan 23\/4\/2015’te y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Somut olayda B\u00f6lge Adiye Mahkemesinin denetiminden ge\u00e7erek onanan gerek\u00e7eli karara g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbm olmas\u0131nda dayan\u0131lan deliller Kurum taraf\u0131ndan 15\/10\/2014 ve 29\/5\/2015 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen tutanaklard\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; yarg\u0131laman\u0131n t\u00fcm a\u015famalar\u0131nda \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un m\u00fctemadi su\u00e7 oldu\u011funu, su\u00e7 tarihinin 15\/4\/2015 tarihli M\u00fch\u00fcrleme Tutana\u011f\u0131 tarihi oldu\u011funu ancak yasal d\u00fczenlemenin 23\/4\/2015’te y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur. Gerek\u00e7eli karar i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve Daire karar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n ayr\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 6-8). Derece mahkemeleri kararlar\u0131nda yer verilen gerek\u00e7enin yeterli olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Belirli bir davaya ili\u015fkin olarak delilleri de\u011ferlendirme ve g\u00f6sterilen delilin davayla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verme yetkisi kural olarak yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten derece mahkemelerine aittir (Orhan K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 [GK], B. No: 2014\/4704, 1\/2\/2018, \u00a7 44). Bu ba\u011flamda somut olayda ba\u015fvurucununi\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar vermek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen ihlal karar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat etti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi gibi ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n gereklerinin yerine getirilmesi amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lacak yeniden yarg\u0131lama neticesinde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mutlaka beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na da gelmemektedir. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere gereken i\u015flemler yerine getirildikten sonra yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede mahkemenin delillerin takdir bi\u00e7imine g\u00f6re benzer veya farkl\u0131 bir sonuca varmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere \u0130stanbul 52. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2018\/378, K.2019\/790) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.287,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 17\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/43757 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 S\u00dcLEYMAN U\u00c7AR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/43757) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa \u015eENOCAK Ba\u015fvurucu : S\u00fcleyman U\u00c7AR Vekili : Av. Ahmet YUM \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, davan\u0131n sonucunu etkileyecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucunun in\u015faat sekt\u00f6r\u00fcnde faaliyet g\u00f6steren i\u015fyerinde 15\/10\/2014 tarihinde \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u015f Tefti\u015f Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Kurum) taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan tefti\u015fte, i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u00e7in yak\u0131n hayati tehlike olu\u015fturacak hususlar\u0131n tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine i\u015f kazalar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlenmesi amac\u0131yla i\u015fyerinin tamam\u0131nda i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Kurum taraf\u0131ndan 29\/5\/2015 tarihinde i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131 karar\u0131 verilen i\u015fyerinde yap\u0131lan denetimlerde 15\/10\/2014 tarihinde %55’i tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olan in\u015faat\u0131n 29\/5\/2015 tarihinde tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re s\u00f6z konusu in\u015faata 15\/4\/2015 tarihinde gidilerek m\u00fch\u00fcrleme tutana\u011f\u0131 tanzim edilmi\u015ftir. Bu tespit \u00fczerine \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda i\u015fin durdurulmas\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan su\u00e7tan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 25\/5\/2018 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n