ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/141<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/132<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 23\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara Bat\u0131 Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 334. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10. ve 36. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: Kat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan tapu iptal ve tescil davas\u0131nda itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu kural\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 334. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir: <\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cAdli yard\u0131mdan yararlanacak ki\u015filer<\/p>\n
MADDE 334 \u2013 (1) Kendisi ve ailesinin ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zor duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeksizin, gereken yarg\u0131lama veya takip giderlerini k\u0131smen veya tamamen \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun olan kimseler, iddia ve savunmalar\u0131nda, ge\u00e7ici hukuki korunma taleplerinde ve icra takibinde, taleplerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmamas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanabilirler.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(2) Kamuya yararl\u0131 dernek ve vak\u0131flar, iddia ve savunmalar\u0131nda hakl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fckleri ve mali a\u00e7\u0131dan zor duruma d\u00fc\u015fmeden gerekli giderleri k\u0131smen veya tamamen \u00f6deyemeyecek durumda olduklar\u0131 takdirde adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanabilirler.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(3) Yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanabilmeleri ayr\u0131ca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k \u015fart\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME <\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r S\u00fcmeyye KOCAMAN taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
2. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un \u201cAnayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemelerce ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesinde Anayasa Mahkemesine itiraz yoluyla yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda izlenecek y\u00f6ntem belirtilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu maddenin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda bir davaya bakmakta olan mahkemenin bu davada uygulanacak bir kanun veya Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6rmesi h\u00e2linde veya taraflardan birinin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131n\u0131n ciddi oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varmas\u0131 durumunda an\u0131lan f\u0131krada say\u0131lan belgeleri dizi listesine ba\u011flayarak Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderece\u011fi kurala ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f; s\u00f6z konusu f\u0131kran\u0131n (a) bendinde \u201c\u0130ptali istenen kurallar\u0131n Anayasan\u0131n hangi maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131\u201d, (b) bendinde \u201cBa\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi\u201d Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilecek belgeler aras\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Maddenin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmayan itiraz ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin gerek\u00e7eleriyle reddedilece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. An\u0131lan \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 46. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda, Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin her birinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n hangi maddelerine, hangi nedenlerle ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funun ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eleriyle birlikte a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekti\u011fi, (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda da itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesine sunulaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan f\u0131kran\u0131n (a) bendinde ise \u201cBa\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi\u201d Anayasa Mahkemesine sunulacak belgeler aras\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Yine \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 49. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendinde Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan ilk incelemede ba\u015fvuruda eksikliklerin bulundu\u011funun tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde itiraz yoluna ili\u015fkin i\u015flerde esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin ba\u015fvurunun reddine karar verilece\u011fi, (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise an\u0131lan (b) bendi uyar\u0131nca verilen karar\u0131n itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran mahkemenin eksiklikleri tamamlayarak yeniden ba\u015fvurmas\u0131na engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. \u0130tiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran Mahkemenin ayn\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden itiraz konusu kurala ili\u015fkin olarak daha \u00f6nce Anayasa Mahkemesine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru Anayasa Mahkemesinin 4\/4\/2024 tarihli ve E.2024\/76, K.2024\/84 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla g\u00f6nderilen belgeler aras\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011finin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Yap\u0131lan incelemede itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran Mahkeme, ayn\u0131 kurala ili\u015fkin olarak yeniden Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Bak\u0131lmakta olan davan\u0131n heyet h\u00e2linde g\u00f6r\u00fclecek i\u015flerden olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda g\u00f6nderilen 24\/6\/2024 tarihli tutanakta yaln\u0131zca mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, bu h\u00e2liyle s\u00f6z konusu tutana\u011f\u0131n an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendinde belirtilen nitelikte bir ba\u015fvuru tutana\u011f\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6te yandan \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 49. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca Mahkemenin eksiklikleri tamamlayarak yeniden itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmakla birlikte yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvuru \u00f6nceki ba\u015fvurunun devam\u0131 mahiyetinde olmay\u0131p yeni bir ba\u015fvuru niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple ayn\u0131 kurala ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lacak yeni ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa, 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019te belirtilen y\u00f6nteme uygun olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
9. \u0130tiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran Mahkemenin daha \u00f6nceki ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin olarak d\u00fczenlenen 15\/3\/2024 tarihli gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesine yeniden itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda bulundu\u011fu, bu ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin yeni bir gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu itibarla itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda daha \u00f6nceki ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlenen gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n bu ba\u015fvuru a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendine uygun bir gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) ve (b) bentleri ile \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 46. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendine ve (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 334. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n iptaline karar verilmesi talebiyle yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunun 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan REDD\u0130NE 23\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/7\/2024 tarihli, 2024\/141 esas – 2024\/132 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI \u00a0 Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/141 Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/132 Karar Tarihi : 23\/7\/2024 R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi. \u00a0 \u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara Bat\u0131 Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi \u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 334. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10. ve 36. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir. OLAY: Kat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan tapu iptal ve tescil davas\u0131nda itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu kural\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 334. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir: \u00a0\u201cAdli yard\u0131mdan yararlanacak ki\u015filer MADDE 334 \u2013 (1) Kendisi ve ailesinin ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zor duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeksizin, gereken yarg\u0131lama veya takip giderlerini k\u0131smen veya tamamen \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun olan kimseler, iddia ve savunmalar\u0131nda, ge\u00e7ici hukuki korunma taleplerinde ve icra takibinde, taleplerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmamas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanabilirler. \u00a0(2) Kamuya yararl\u0131 dernek ve vak\u0131flar, iddia ve savunmalar\u0131nda hakl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fckleri ve mali a\u00e7\u0131dan zor duruma d\u00fc\u015fmeden gerekli giderleri k\u0131smen veya tamamen \u00f6deyemeyecek durumda olduklar\u0131 takdirde adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanabilirler. \u00a0(3) Yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanabilmeleri ayr\u0131ca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k \u015fart\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME 1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n