T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
SELAM\u0130 TUN\u00c7 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/22152)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa \u015eENOCAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Selami TUN\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza davas\u0131nda adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuru, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma evrelerinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen i\u015flemler nedeniyle ba\u015fka temel haklar\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri de i\u00e7ermektedir.<\/p>\n
2. Yalova Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 9\/12\/2016 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015f; iddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki ByLock tespiti, Bank Asyada hesab\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 ve baz\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelilerle irtibat h\u00e2linde bulunmas\u0131 neticesinde at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, Yalova A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lamada 22\/2\/2017 tarihinde duru\u015fma haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Yalova \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve Organize Su\u00e7larla M\u00fccadele Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (KOM) \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak ByLock kayd\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ByLock kayd\u0131 varsa ki\u015finin bu sistemi kullanarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc haberle\u015fme, yaz\u0131\u015fma ve i\u015flemin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmi\u015f d\u00f6k\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6steren analiz raporunun istenmesine, vadeli, vadesiz ve yat\u0131r\u0131m hesaplar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak 2013, 2014, 2015 ve 2016 y\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131 kapsayacak \u015fekilde m\u00fc\u015fteri numaras\u0131, hesap a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f ve kapan\u0131\u015f tarihi, hesap t\u00fcr\u00fc, bakiye miktar\u0131, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hesap hareketi, hesap hareketlerinin niteli\u011fi, i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 gibi bilgileri i\u00e7eren d\u00f6k\u00fcm\u00fcn g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in Bank Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Duru\u015fma \u00fc\u00e7 celsede bitirilmi\u015ftir. Birinci celsede Yalova \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc KOM \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ve Bank Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkere cevaplar\u0131 ve talep edilen hesap d\u00f6k\u00fcmleri Mahkemeye sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Mahkeme; ayn\u0131 celsede Bilgi Teknolojileri ve \u0130leti\u015fim Kurumuna (BTK) m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131 ile ByLock sunucusunun IP adreslerine hangi tarihlerde, hangi cihaz seri numaralar\u0131 ve IMSI numaralar\u0131yla hangi baz istasyonlar\u0131 kullan\u0131larak ba\u011flant\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgilerin istenmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. \u0130kinci celsede, BTK’ya yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkereye BTK’n\u0131n verdi\u011fi cevaba g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun 1\/1\/2015-16\/5\/2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam 1.108 kez ByLock’a ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda kendisine sorulan dijital materyal analiz raporunda ge\u00e7en kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefonun 8\/3\/2016 tarihinde fabrika ayarlar\u0131na geri d\u00f6nd\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tespitini, veri inceleme raporundaki A4 notlamas\u0131n\u0131 ve aleyhine olan hususlar\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan celsede iddia makam\u0131, esas hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaa sunmu\u015f; Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcre talebinin kabul\u00fcne, duru\u015fman\u0131n yeni celsesinin 9\/3\/2018 tarihinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc celsede ba\u015fvurucu; m\u00fcdafii huzurunda esas hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaaya kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlayarak isnat edilen su\u00e7u ink\u00e2r etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii ise \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fini, \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda m\u00fcvekkilinin beraatine, olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde lehine olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015farak ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 7 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“[EGM KOM Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n raporu ve BTK kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile CGNAT sorgu kay\u0131tlar\u0131na g\u00f6re]<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011fa ait 0553 [..] 70 numaral\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131nda kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon cihaz\u0131 ile 01\/01\/2015 il\u00e2 16\/05\/2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam 1.108 kez ByLockta oturum a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
\u00a0[Dijital materyal analiz raporu sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na g\u00f6re]<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda el konulmu\u015f olan ve ByLock tespiti yap\u0131lan telefonunu 08\/03\/2016 tarihinde fabrika ayarlar\u0131na geri d\u00f6nd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tespit edildi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
\u00a0[Veri inceleme raporuna g\u00f6re]<\/p>\n
Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Anayasal D\u00fczene Kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130\u015flenen Su\u00e7lar Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosunun 18\/04\/2017 tarih 2017\/68532 say\u0131l\u0131 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ele ge\u00e7irilen micro CD kart \u00fczerinde Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc KOM Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda; \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131k Selami TUN\u00c7’a A4 notu verildi\u011fi ve bu notun Fet\u00f6 mensubiyeti olan teslimiyeti, sadakati ve ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fcst seviyede olan ki\u015fiyi ifade etti\u011fi,<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunma i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re; 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131nav\u0131nda 86 puan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu s\u0131navlar\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan devlet erklerine s\u0131zma stratejisi do\u011frultusundaki \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131navlardan oldu\u011fu hususlar\u0131 dosya kapsam\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n
\u0130nkara y\u00f6nelen savunma i\u00e7eriklerinin cezadan ve sorumluluktan kurtulmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan itibar edilmemi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n
Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6revler, sahip oldu\u011fu bilgi ve tecr\u00fcbe, tahsil durumu ve \u00f6rg\u00fctteki konumu itibariyle bu olu\u015fumun bir silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funu bilebilecek durumda olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, <\/p>\n
FET\u00d6\/PDY Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn kurulu\u015f ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131, faaliyet ve eylemlerini benimsedi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir \u015fekilde ve \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda yo\u011funluk, s\u00fcreklilik ve \u00e7e\u015fitlilik arzeden eylem ve faaliyetlerde bulundu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fctle hiyera\u015fik ve organik a\u00e7\u0131dan tam bir disiplin i\u00e7inde ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, <\/p>\n
Bu haliyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n; 15 Temmuz darbe giri\u015fimine kadar olan s\u00fcre\u00e7te s\u00f6zde me\u015fruiyetini toplum nezdinde inan\u00e7 de\u011ferlerini, kamu otoritesi nezdinde ise hukuksal zemini istismar ederek sa\u011flaya gelmi\u015f olan FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f \u015fekli, su\u00e7 konusunun \u00f6nem ve de\u011feri, meydana gelen zarar veya tehlikenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ama\u00e7 ve saik, kasta dayal\u0131 kusurun a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n (Komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131) r\u00fctbeli ve silahl\u0131 kamu g\u00f6revlisi olmas\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerinin niteli\u011fi ve etkinlik dereceleri, veri inceleme raporuna g\u00f6re \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan kendisine verilmi\u015f olan notun niteli\u011fi, eylemlerine uyan TCK 314\/2 maddesi gere\u011fince; su\u00e7 i\u00e7in yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezan\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131larak ceza tayin edilmek suretiyle mahkumiyetine dair h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis etmek gerekmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesi istinaf talebinin esastan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi, ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu kabul etmeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ByLock Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutana\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n temin edilememesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda “1-Yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda dosyada mevcut olan ancak san\u0131\u011fa okunmadan, bu hususta savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nmadan h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan veri inceleme raporunun, veri inceleme raporuna dayanak delilin elde edili\u015fine dair gizli tan\u0131k Garson’un daha \u00f6nce hakim huzurunda al\u0131nan ifade tutana\u011f\u0131 ve CMK\u2019n\u0131n 134. maddesine g\u00f6re al\u0131nan mahkeme karar\u0131 ve varsa ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 analiz raporunun soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p getirtilmesi, 2-\u0130stinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda dosya i\u00e7erisine geldi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fka dosya \u015f\u00fcphelisi [H.C.nin] a\u015fama beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131 veya onayl\u0131 suretleri getirtilerek, gerekti\u011finde mahkemede tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmesi, 3-UYAP\u2019ta olu\u015fturulan \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc su\u00e7lar bilgi bankas\u0131nda san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bilgi ve beyan olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131” gerek\u00e7eleriyle bozma karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Bozma \u00fczerine yarg\u0131lama, Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesince g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lamada 16\/4\/2019 tarihinde duru\u015fma haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Yalova\u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc KOM \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak 0553…70 numaral\u0131 hatta ili\u015fkin Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutanaklar\u0131 ile ID numaralar\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131\u015fma ve i\u00e7eriklerinin istenmesine, S.H.nin ByLock Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutanaklar\u0131 ile ID numaralar\u0131 ile yaz\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7eriklerinin istenmesine, M.S., H.C., \u0130.K. ve K.K.n\u0131n emniyet, soru\u015fturma ve varsa kovu\u015fturma a\u015famalar\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm \u0130fade Tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n birer suretinin Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesinin istenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Bozma karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma iki celsede bitirilmi\u015ftir. Birinci celsede di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra S.H., M.S., H.C., \u0130.K. ve K.K. ile ilgili yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkerelere ikmalen cevap verilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu bilgi ve belgeler duru\u015fmada okunmu\u015ftur. Tan\u0131k H.C. duru\u015fmada okunan beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2007 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2008 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar \u00c7evik Kuvvette g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde ba\u015fvurucunun sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu toplant\u0131larda burs ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda yard\u0131m topland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Tan\u0131k M.S. duru\u015fmada okunan beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u0130stanbul’da kursiyer oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde cemaat evinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun da bu evde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu eve G. isimli birinin sohbet vermeye geldi\u011fini, sohbetlerde Fettullah G\u00fclen’in kitaplar\u0131n\u0131 okudu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Tan\u0131k K.K. duru\u015fmada okunan beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda Rize’de komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131nav\u0131na haz\u0131rlan\u0131rken ba\u015fvurucu ile s\u0131navdan iki g\u00fcn \u00f6nce ders \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait eve gittiklerini, A. isimli ki\u015finin kendilerine yemin ettirip sonra sorular\u0131n oldu\u011fu bilgisayar\u0131 b\u0131rakarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, daha sonra s\u0131nava girdiklerini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Tan\u0131k \u0130.K. duru\u015fmada okunan beyan\u0131n\u0131n da ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu ayn\u0131 celsede al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015f; okunan bilgi ve belgelerdeki aleyhe hususlar\u0131 ve hakk\u0131nda haz\u0131rlanan veri inceleme raporunda A4 kodu ile kodlanmas\u0131 hususunu kabul etmedi\u011fini, \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flemedi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Ayn\u0131 celsede Mahkeme, dosyan\u0131n geldi\u011fi a\u015fama itibar\u0131yla ByLock Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutana\u011f\u0131’na ili\u015fkin olarak yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkere cevab\u0131n\u0131n beklenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu celsede ayr\u0131ca iddia makam\u0131 esas hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaa sunmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme; ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcre talebinin kabul\u00fcne, duru\u015fman\u0131n 30\/5\/2019 tarihine ertelenmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. \u0130kinci celsede ba\u015fvurucu; m\u00fcdafiinin de haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131yla esas hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaaya kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlayarak isnat edilen su\u00e7u ink\u00e2r etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii ise \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fini, \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda m\u00fcvekkilinin beraatine, olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde lehine olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015farak ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan7 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“San\u0131k Selami TUN\u00c7’un FET\u00d6\/PDY Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131nca kullan\u0131lan haberle\u015fme program\u0131n\u0131 kendisine ait 0553[…]70 numaral\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131nda kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon cihaz\u0131 ile 01\/01\/2015 ile 16\/05\/2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam 1.108 kez ByLockta oturum a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda el konulmu\u015f olan ve ByLock tespiti yap\u0131lan telefonunu 08\/03\/2016 tarihinde fabrika ayarlar\u0131na geri d\u00f6nd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tespit edildi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
Dairemizce, Yalova \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kom \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’ne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak 0553 […]70 numaral\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131na ili\u015fkin tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n, ID numaralar\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131\u015fma ve i\u00e7eriklerinin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak Dairemize g\u00f6nderilmesinin istenildi\u011fi, Yalova \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kom \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 10\/05\/2019 tarih 5971492 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile san\u0131k Selami TUN\u00c7 isimli \u015fahs\u0131n ByLock kayd\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu ancak U[ser-]ID kayd\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Dairemize bildirildi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
\u0130lk istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda dosya i\u00e7erisine g\u00f6nderilen ve Rize \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde 08\/11\/2016 tarihinde ifade veren \u015f\u00fcpheli [H.C.nin] ifadesinde ‘..Daha sonra \u00c7evik kuvvet ile beraber sohbet ortamlar\u0131 olmaya ba\u015flad\u0131m. Bu sohbetleri de yukar\u0131da e\u015fk\u00e2l bilgilerini verdi\u011fim [A.] isimli ve di\u011fer \u00f6\u011fretmen \u015fah\u0131s veriyordu. Bu arada [A.n\u0131n] kod isim mi ger\u00e7ek isim mi oldu\u011funu bilmiyorum. \u00c7evik kuvvetteyken bu sohbetlere d\u00fczenli olarak gidip gelmeye ba\u015flad\u0131m. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te annem ile birlikte bir evde kal\u0131yorduk. Zaman zaman kendi kalm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fum evde de sohbetler d\u00fczenlenirdi. \u00c7evik kuvvette 2007 y\u0131l\u0131nda 2008 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131m. Daha sonra 2008 senesinde Lojistik \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131m. Lojistikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda \u00c7evik kuvvetin sohbetlerine devam ettim. Kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fum sohbetlerde Lojistikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan polis memuru [S.Z.] (sonradan komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu) isimli ki\u015fi sohbetleri organize eder ve burs ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda para toplard\u0131. Bu paralar\u0131n nereye verildi\u011fini bilmiyorum. Benimle beraber bu sohbetlere o d\u00f6nem \u00c7evik kuvvet \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan [E.T.] (sonradan komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu), [\u0130.K.] (sonradan komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu), Selami TUN\u00c7 [ba\u015fvurucu] (sonradan komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu), [M.H.] (sonradan komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu), [K.K.] (sonradan komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu), [Y.K.] isimli \u015fah\u0131slar ile soy isimlerini hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131m [\u015e.] (soyad\u0131 [\u00c7.] olabilir), [M.] ve [C.] isimli bir ki\u015fi daha kat\u0131l\u0131rd\u0131. 2010 ya da 2011 senesinde [\u015e.], [M.] ve [C.] Rize \u0130stihbarat \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne tayin oldular. Bu d\u00f6nemde \u0130stihbarat \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc yanl\u0131\u015f hat\u0131rlam\u0131yorsam [M.\u015e.M.] idi. Ben grubun emniyet i\u00e7erisindeki kadrola\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ek manada bu d\u00f6nem fark ettim. Benim fark edebilece\u011fim bu kadrola\u015fmay\u0131 idarecilerinde i\u00e7erisinde bulundu\u011fu herkesin g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bunun o d\u00f6nem devletin bir politikas\u0131 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyordum…’ \u015feklinde beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funun belirlendi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
\u0130stem \u00fczerine, Ankara 18. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 25\/04\/2019 tarih 2018\/384 esas say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fczekkeresi ile Dairemize g\u00f6nderilen tan\u0131k [M.S.nin] ifadesinde ‘…\u0130stanbul’da kurs boyunca kalm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fum bu ev cemaat eviydi. \u0130sminin [G.] oldu\u011funu bildi\u011fim Zaman Gazetesinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ama pozisyonunu bilmedi\u011fim bir \u015fah\u0131s ise bu eve sohbet vermeye gelirdi. Fettullah G\u00dcLEN’e ait kitaplar\u0131 okurdu. Kalm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fumuz bu evde evin ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u00e7in kendi aram\u0131zda para toplard\u0131k ama bu para d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmazd\u0131 evde kal\u0131rd\u0131 evin giderleri i\u00e7in kullan\u0131l\u0131rd\u0131. Biz bu evde 5 ki\u015fi kal\u0131rd\u0131k. [S.T.], [T.K.], [A.T.], Selami TUN\u00c7 [ba\u015fvurucu] ve ben kal\u0131rd\u0131m. Hepimiz kursiyerdik….’ \u015feklinde beyanda bulundu\u011funun belirlendi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
\u0130stem \u00fczerine, Ankara 25. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 10\/05\/2019 tarih 2017\/371 esas say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fczekkeresi ile Dairemize g\u00f6nderilen tan\u0131k [K.K.nin] ifadesinde ‘…26\/03\/2011 tarihinde yap\u0131lan Komiser Yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kursu S\u0131nav\u0131na yukar\u0131daki soruya cevap verdi\u011fim gibi Rize’de adresini \u015fu anda hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131m \u00f6\u011frenci evinde [\u0130.K.], Selami TUN\u00c7 [ba\u015fvurucu] ve soy ismini hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131m [F.] isimli arkada\u015flar ile hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m kadar\u0131 ile s\u0131navdan 2 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce ders \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya gitti\u011fimizde orada daha \u00f6nce hi\u00e7 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fim sivil giyimli ve ismini o esnada duydu\u011fum kadar\u0131 ile [A.] oldu\u011funu bildi\u011fim \u015fah\u0131s bize \u00f6nce yemin ettirdi sonra size soru b\u0131rak\u0131yorum dedi ve yan\u0131nda getirmi\u015f oldu\u011fu bilgisayar\u0131 b\u0131rakarak bu sorulara \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131n eve gitmeyin burada kal\u0131n d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmay\u0131n burada derslerinize \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131n dedi. Biz a\u00e7t\u0131k bilgisayar\u0131 ve sorulara \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131k o gece orada kald\u0131k ertesi g\u00fcn\u00fcn ak\u015fama do\u011fru evlerimize gittik ve sabah herkes ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 \u015fekilde Trabzon ilinde s\u0131navlara girdik. Bu s\u0131nav ile ilgili olarak \u00e7\u0131kacak sorular ile ilgili olarak temin yoluna gitmedim….’ \u015feklinde beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131 foto\u011fraf te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131 ile te\u015fhis etti\u011finin belirlendi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Bu kapsamda dosya aras\u0131na al\u0131nan bilgi ve belgeler do\u011frultusunda, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Anayasal D\u00fczene Kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130\u015flenen Su\u00e7lar Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosunun 18\/04\/2017 tarih 2017\/68532 say\u0131l\u0131 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ele ge\u00e7irilen micro CD kart \u00fczerinde Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc KOM Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda; \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131k Selami TUN\u00c7’a A4 notunun verildi\u011fi ve bu notun ‘Fet\u00f6 mensubiyeti olan teslimiyeti, sadakati ve ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fcst seviyede olan ki\u015fiyi’ ifade etti\u011finin belirlendi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
T\u00fcm bu delil ve tespitler bir arada de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde,<\/p>\n
San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda [M. S.] ile [K. K.] ve [H. C.nin] beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n somut olmas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca [K. K.] ve [H. C.nin] beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n birbirini destekler mahiyette bulunmas\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, [H. C.nin] tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmesine gerek duyulmam\u0131\u015f, yine veri inceleme raporundaki Mahrem Kart bilgileri de delil niteli\u011finde kabul edilerek, ayr\u0131ca ByLock tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 sonuca etkili g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f olup,<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu eylem ve faaliyetlerinin zamansal olarak s\u00fcreklilik, \u00e7e\u015fitlilik ve belirgin bir yo\u011funlu\u011fa ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011fu hususu yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile kesinle\u015fen FET\u00d6\/PDY Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn hiyerar\u015fisi i\u00e7erisinde d\u0131\u015f d\u00fcnyaya kapal\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn gizlilik, disiplin ve mutlak sadakat gibi kurallara uygun davran\u0131\u015flar sergiledi\u011fi, ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemlerin \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmesine nedensel ba\u011f ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct ile aras\u0131nda organik ba\u011f kurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi sabit g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp, ceza mahkumiyetine karar vermek gerekti\u011fi sonu\u00e7 ve vicdani kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda temel ceza belirlenirken su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f bi\u00e7imi , su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesindeki \u00f6zellikler, su\u00e7 konusunun \u00f6nem ve de\u011feri, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kast\u0131n\u0131n yo\u011funlu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde bulundu\u011fu s\u00fcre ve eylemleri nazara al\u0131narak alt ceza s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lma yoluna gidilmi\u015f; 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu 3. maddesi atf\u0131 ile 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu 5\/1 maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7un ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u olarak d\u00fczenlenmesi nedeniyle san\u0131\u011fa verilen cezada yar\u0131 oran\u0131nda artt\u0131r\u0131m yoluna gidilmi\u015f, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 62.maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemden sonraki ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 cezan\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n gelece\u011fi \u00fczerindeki olas\u0131 etkileri, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihteki durumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sab\u0131kas\u0131z ge\u00e7mi\u015fi de dikkate al\u0131narak takdiren ceza indirimi yap\u0131larak sonu\u00e7 ceza belirlenmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra tan\u0131klar M.S., H.C. ve K.K.n\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenilmedi\u011fini, Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Bili\u015fim Sistemi (SEGB\u0130S) ile ba\u011flant\u0131 kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, soru sorma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcm, kanun yolu denetiminden ge\u00e7erek 21\/1\/2020 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc evrak i\u015flem k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile 5\/6\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 1\/7\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
20. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki bir k\u0131s\u0131m g\u00fcvenceler ile su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan haklara ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Tan\u0131k Sorgulama Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu; gerek\u00e7eli kararda beyan\u0131na yer verilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenilmesi i\u00e7in Mahkemenin herhangi bir giri\u015fimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine tan\u0131klara soru sorma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu suretle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
22. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; tan\u0131klar\u0131n istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131n duru\u015fmada okundu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun bunlara kar\u015f\u0131 iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 dile getirdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvuru formuna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun Mahkemenin tan\u0131k ifadelerinin kendisine okumad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir \u015fik\u00e2yeti bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun istismar edici, yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 vb. nitelikteki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131yla ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fcye kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir tespit yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
25. Somut olayda Mahkeme; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine ait 0553…70 numaral\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131yla kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon cihaz\u0131yla 1\/1\/2015 ile 16\/5\/2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam 1.108 kez ByLock’ta oturum a\u00e7mas\u0131na, dijital materyal analiz raporuna g\u00f6re kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefonun 8\/3\/2016 tarihinde fabrika ayarlar\u0131na geri d\u00f6nd\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tespitine, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ele ge\u00e7irilen mikro CD kart \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucuya A4 notunun verilmesine ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na istinaden mahk\u00fbmiyet sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm, Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. Mahkeme; ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock’ta oturum a\u00e7mas\u0131na, kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefonu fabrika ayarlar\u0131na geri d\u00f6nd\u00fcrmesine ve A4 notu ile kodlanmas\u0131na BTK kay\u0131tlar\u0131na, dijital materyal analiz ve veri inceleme raporlar\u0131na istinaden ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. Tan\u0131k H.C.nin “ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 2007 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2008 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar \u00c7evik Kuvvette g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde ba\u015fvurucunun sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na, bu toplant\u0131larda burs ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda yard\u0131m topland\u0131\u011f\u0131na, daha sonra komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funa, Tan\u0131k M.S.nin ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131na, \u0130stanbul’da kursiyer oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde cemaat evinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na, ba\u015fvurucunun da bu evde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na, s\u00f6z konusu eve G. isimli ki\u015finin sohbet vermeye geldi\u011fine, sohbetlerde Fettullah G\u00fclenin kitaplar\u0131n\u0131 okudu\u011funa, Tan\u0131k K.K.nin ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda Rize’de komiser yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131nav\u0131na haz\u0131rlan\u0131rken ba\u015fvurucu ile s\u0131navdan iki g\u00fcn \u00f6nce ders \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait eve gittiklerine, A. isimli ki\u015finin kendilerine yemin ettirip sonra sorular\u0131n oldu\u011fu bilgisayar\u0131 b\u0131rakarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fine, daha sonra s\u0131nava girdiklerine” \u015feklindeki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki kanaatin olu\u015fmas\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
28. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, m\u00fcdafiinin de haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu celsede s\u00f6z konusu tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na itiraz etme imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulmu\u015ftur. Ayr\u0131ca gerek\u00e7eli kararda mahk\u00fbmiyete esas al\u0131nan di\u011fer deliller g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131klar H.C., M.S. ve K.K.y\u0131 sorgulama imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamamas\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak adil olmaktan \u00e7\u0131karmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
29. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucunun yetersiz gerek\u00e7e ile karar verilmesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Abdullah Top\u00e7u (B. No: 2014\/8868, 19\/4\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 74-79) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmamas\u0131, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan delillerin yanl\u0131\u015f nitelendirilmesi, haks\u0131z yere ceza verilmesi nedeniyle hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Ahmet Sa\u011flam (B. No: 2013\/3351, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 43-46) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, delillerin toplanmamas\u0131, bir k\u0131s\u0131m talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00fcksel Han\u00e7er (B. No: 2013\/2116, 23\/1\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 14-21) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan itibaren su\u00e7lu kabul edilmesi nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Cemal G\u00fcnsel [GK], B. No: 2016\/12900, 21\/1\/2021 karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Ay\u015fe Z\u0131raman ve Cennet Ye\u015filyurt (B. No: 2012\/403, 26\/3\/2013, \u00a7 17) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
2. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik kriterlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Kenan YA\u015eAR’\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 12\/6\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada sorgulanmas\u0131na veya sorgulat\u0131lmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada ilk derece mahkemesi \u201csan\u0131k hakk\u0131nda M.S., H.C. ve K.K.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n somut olmas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca K.K.ve H.C.nin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n birbirini destekler mahiyette bulunmas\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, H. C.nin tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmesine gerek duyulmam\u0131\u015f, yine veri inceleme raporundaki Mahrem Kart bilgileri de delil niteli\u011finde kabul edilerek, ayr\u0131ca ByLock tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 sonuca etkili g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi sabit g\u00f6r\u00fcp\u201d ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130stinaf ve temyiz a\u015famalar\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erek karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu; gerek\u00e7eli kararda beyan\u0131na yer verilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenilmesi i\u00e7in Mahkemenin herhangi bir giri\u015fimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine tan\u0131klara soru sorma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu suretle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Mahkememiz ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirli\u011fine oybirli\u011fi ile, ihlal edilmedi\u011fine oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar vermi\u015ftir. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen sebeplerle ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine dair Mahkeme \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun karar\u0131na i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda ceza yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olan tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama veya sorgulatma hakk\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131klara soru y\u00f6neltebilmesi, onlarla y\u00fczle\u015febilmesi ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu s\u0131nama imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gereklidir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma evresinde sorgulama ya da sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k ifadelerinin tek veya belirleyici oldu\u011fu bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda \u015fayet dengeleyici g\u00fcvencelerden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haklar\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesindeki g\u00fcvencelerle ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f olur.<\/p>\n
6. Mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131klar\u0131n -san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da onlara soru sormas\u0131na imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayacak ve sorulan sorulara verdikleri cevaplar hakk\u0131nda izlenim edinme f\u0131rsat\u0131 elde edecek \u015fekilde- SEGB\u0130S gibi vas\u0131talarla dinlenmesi telafi edici bir g\u00fcvence olabilir (Metin Akdemir (2), B. No: 2020\/3964, 21\/9\/2022 \u00a7 36). Sorgulanmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin ve do\u011frulu\u011funun saptanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla savunma taraf\u0131na sa\u011flanabilecek bir di\u011fer telafi edici g\u00fcvence ise san\u0131\u011fa olay\u0131 kendi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun aleyhinde beyanda bulunan tan\u0131klar\u0131n istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nan ifadeleri duru\u015fmada okunmu\u015f ancak tan\u0131klar\u0131n huzurda dinlenilmesine ili\u015fkin olarak Mahkemece herhangi bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir. \u0130lgili duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli kararda tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r edilememesinin veya ayn\u0131 anda g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc ve sesli ileti\u015fim tekni\u011finin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle dinlenilmemesinin hangi ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Somut olayda Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan tan\u0131klar M.S., H.C. ve K.K.n\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenilmesine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir. \u0130lgili duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli kararda da tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n Mahkemede haz\u0131r edilememesinin veya ayn\u0131 anda g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc ve sesli ileti\u015fim tekni\u011finin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle dinlenilmemesinin hangi ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmemi\u015ftir. Ancak buna ili\u015fkin ge\u00e7erli bir nedenin ortaya konulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir. \u0130kinci olarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn tek ba\u015f\u0131na veya belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ba\u015fvurucunun sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadeye dayal\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Mahkeme, gerek\u00e7eli kararda di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine ait 0 553 … 70 numaral\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131nda kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon cihaz\u0131 ile 1\/1\/2015 ile 16\/5\/2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam 1.108 kez ByLock’ta oturum a\u00e7mas\u0131na, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ele ge\u00e7irilen mikro CD kart \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucuya A4 notunun verilmesine ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na istinaden mahk\u00fbmiyet sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihad\u0131 uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unun s\u00fcbutu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan belirleyici olmas\u0131 durumunda ByLock Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutana\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n dosyaya getirtilmesi, an\u0131lan tutana\u011f\u0131n temin edilememesi h\u00e2linde operat\u00f6r kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile e\u015fle\u015ftirme yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere BTK’dan getirtilen CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile HTS sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p belirtilen hat \u00fczerinden ByLock kullanan ki\u015finin san\u0131k olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 do\u011frultusunda bilirki\u015fiden teknik rapor al\u0131narak h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir [(kapat\u0131lan) bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 30\/6\/2021 tarihli ve E.2020\/2018, K.2021\/4527; Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesinin 4\/10\/2022 tarihli ve E.2021\/18943, K.2022\/5428 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131]. Somut olayda ByLock Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutana\u011f\u0131 dosyaya getirtilmedi\u011fi gibi Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihad\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan teknik bilirki\u015fi raporu da temin edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Yine Yarg\u0131tay uygulamas\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Garson kod adl\u0131 gizli tan\u0131ktan ele ge\u00e7irilen SD kart i\u00e7inde A4 olarak kodlanmas\u0131n\u0131n mahk\u0217miyet i\u00e7in yeterli olmay\u0131p bunun i\u00e7in destekleyici bir ifade, beyan yahut ba\u015fka bir bilgi ve belge bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir [(kapat\u0131lan) Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 25\/1\/2021 tarihli ve E.2020\/1608, K.2021\/75 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131].<\/p>\n
12. Gerek\u00e7eli karar i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan delillere ili\u015fkin Yarg\u0131tay uygulamas\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda M.S.,H.C. ve K.K.n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne m\u00fczahir evlerde sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131na kat\u0131lmas\u0131, s\u0131nav sorular\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nceden temin edilmesine ili\u015fkin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki kanaatin olu\u015fmas\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle sorgulama imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmayan tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcren tek olmasa da belirleyici nitelikte delil oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
13. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucuya olaylar\u0131 kendi bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dosyada tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen ba\u015fka deliller de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ancak Mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun da onlara soru sormas\u0131na imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde SEGB\u0130S gibi vas\u0131talarla neden dinlemedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir bilgi ve belgeye ula\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Tan\u0131klar\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyanlar\u0131 duru\u015fmada okunmu\u015f ise de ba\u015fvurucu, tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc nakli yoluyla da olsa onlar\u0131 sorgulayamam\u0131\u015f; sorulan sorulara verdikleri cevaplar hakk\u0131nda izlenim edinme f\u0131rsat\u0131 elde edememi\u015ftir. Bu y\u00fczden tan\u0131klar\u0131n g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi tepkiler konusunda Mahkemenin dikkati \u00e7ekilememi\u015f, tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi test edilememi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Mahkeme de tan\u0131klar beyanda bulunurken g\u00f6sterdikleri tepkilerle ilgili olarak izlenim edinememi\u015ftir. \u00d6te yandan h\u00fckme ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken sorgulanmam\u0131\u015f tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka delillere de dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde mahk\u00fbmiyete temel al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle savunma makam\u0131n\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamay\u0131 telafi etti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir.<\/p>\n
16. Sonu\u00e7 olarak g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi ve do\u011frulu\u011fu test edilmemi\u015f tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde savunman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorluklar\u0131 telafi edecek kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvencelerin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada veya SEGB\u0130S yoluyla dinlenmemesi bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetini zedelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi kanaatine vard\u0131\u011f\u0131mdan, \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun aksi y\u00f6ndeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00a0Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 12\/6\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/22152 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 SELAM\u0130 TUN\u00c7 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/22152) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa \u015eENOCAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Selami TUN\u00c7 \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza davas\u0131nda adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuru, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma evrelerinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen i\u015flemler nedeniyle ba\u015fka temel haklar\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri de i\u00e7ermektedir. 2. Yalova Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 9\/12\/2016 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015f; iddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki ByLock tespiti, Bank Asyada hesab\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 ve baz\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelilerle irtibat h\u00e2linde bulunmas\u0131 neticesinde at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. 4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, Yalova A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lamada 22\/2\/2017 tarihinde duru\u015fma haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Yalova \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve Organize Su\u00e7larla M\u00fccadele Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (KOM) \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak ByLock kayd\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ByLock kayd\u0131 varsa ki\u015finin bu …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n