T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
ABDULHAK\u0130M EK\u0130NC\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/24391)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Abdulhakim EK\u0130NC\u0130<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. \u015eakir DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine yap\u0131lan bir g\u00f6steriye i\u015ftirak edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lma nedeniyle toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 15\/2\/2015 tarihinde, PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lideri Abdullah \u00d6calan’\u0131n yakalanmas\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131l d\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fc nedeniyle yap\u0131lan bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc i\u00e7in bir siyasi partinin il binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde 2.500 ki\u015filik grup toplanm\u0131\u015f, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lideri lehine ifadelerin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 pankartlar ile ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc simgeleyen “bez par\u00e7alar\u0131” a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Toplulu\u011fun bildirimde bulunmadan g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapmas\u0131 nedeniyle kolluk g\u00f6revlileri toplulu\u011fu durdurmu\u015f, kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumuna gitmeme ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fe son verme hususunda uyarm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Parti y\u00f6neticileri ile yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakereler sonras\u0131nda farkl\u0131 bir istikamete do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fe ge\u00e7en grup, yukar\u0131da s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen pankartlar\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ve \u00f6rg\u00fct lideri lehine sloganlar atm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bir parkta bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapt\u0131ktan sonra grup kendili\u011finden da\u011f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7u ile kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir toplant\u0131nda ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ihtara ra\u011fmen da\u011f\u0131lmama su\u00e7undan iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015f ve an\u0131lan toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lan bir\u00e7ok ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda da ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisini vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucuyu ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fen eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle bir y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kararda “eylem yapan grubun genelinde ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc PKK’y\u0131 simgeleyen flama ve bez par\u00e7alar\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 ve s\u00fcrekli ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine slogan at\u0131lmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eyleme kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n PKK\/KCK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 su\u00e7una i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi” sonucuna vard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Bununla birlikte Mahkeme, an\u0131lan eyleme ili\u015fkin “tespit, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ya da tan\u0131k anlat\u0131m\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131”n\u0131 belirterek su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 toplant\u0131da veya g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ihtara ra\u011fmen da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar etme su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden beraat karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Yarg\u0131tay 3.Ceza Dairesi13\/12\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131na sunulan belgelere g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar hakk\u0131nda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet kararlar\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay, an\u0131lan toplant\u0131da ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine s\u00f6ylenen sloganlara veya ta\u015f\u0131nan pankartlara i\u015ftirak ettiklerine dair \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak delil bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle biri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi, bir di\u011feri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bozulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir (Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, E.2021\/4804, K.2021\/10410, 8\/12\/2021; Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi E.2021\/4795, K.2021\/11028, 22\/12\/2021).<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 7\/2\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 22\/2\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; sadece bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, su\u00e7 te\u015fkil edecek slogan atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, pankart ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, etkili soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmadan ve somut olgular ortaya konulmadan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131 merciinin ayn\u0131 olayla ilgili farkl\u0131 ki\u015filere farkl\u0131 kararlar vermesi nedeniyle e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011finden yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti kapsam\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ve \u00f6rg\u00fct lideri lehine sloganlar atmas\u0131 nedeniyle verilen bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninde gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilirken ter\u00f6r\u00fc ve \u015fiddeti me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131ran, \u00f6ven ya da bunlara te\u015fvik eden s\u00f6zlerin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fine y\u00f6nelik Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu i\u00e7in de\u011fil bir toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir (benzer de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Sercan Av\u015far, B. No: 2016\/63088, 9\/6\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 22, 38). A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 12\/4\/1991 tarihli ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu’nun 7. maddesinin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 34. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131n\u0131rlama sebeplerinden kamu d\u00fczeni ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011finin korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu belirlemenin ard\u0131ndan demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi daha \u00f6nce pek \u00e7ok karar\u0131nda propaganda su\u00e7unun soyut tehlike su\u00e7u olarak kabul edilmesinin ba\u015fta ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olmak \u00fczere anayasal hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler \u00fczerinde bir bask\u0131 olu\u015fturma potansiyeli oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple bir propaganda faaliyetinin cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in olay\u0131n somut ko\u015fullar\u0131nda belirli oranda tehlikeye neden oldu\u011funun g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir (di\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndan bkz. Ay\u015fe \u00c7elik, B. No: 2017\/36722, 9\/5\/2019, \u00a7 47; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2018\/17635, 26\/7\/2019, \u00a7 84; S\u0131rr\u0131 S\u00fcreyya \u00d6nder [GK], B. No: 2018\/38143, 3\/10\/2019, \u00a7 64; Meki Katar, [GK], B. No: 2015\/4916, 3\/10\/2019, \u00a7 53; \u00d6mer Faruk Gergerlio\u011flu [GK], B. No: 2019\/10634, 1\/7\/2021, \u00a7 175; ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7unun T\u00fcrk hukukundaki g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcne ili\u015fkin tespitler i\u00e7in bkz. Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 115-118; ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 su\u00e7unun tan\u0131m\u0131na ve su\u00e7un tespitine y\u00f6nelik de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 86; ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n benzer y\u00f6nde de\u011ferlendirmeleri i\u00e7in bkz. Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 54-57; \u00d6mer Faruk Gergerlio\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 155-163, 175; Figen Y\u00fcksekda\u011f \u015eeno\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2016\/39759, 30\/3\/2022, \u00a7 73; Ahmet Aslan, B. No: 2021\/23949, 6\/10\/2022, \u00a7 54).<\/p>\n
13. Bunun yan\u0131nda bir usul g\u00fcvencesi olan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n maddi haklara etkisi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00e7ok say\u0131da karar\u0131nda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc veya toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 gibi temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere gerek\u00e7esiz olarak veya Anayasa Mahkemesince ortaya konulan kriterleri kar\u015f\u0131lamayan bir gerek\u00e7e ile yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalelerin Anayasa’n\u0131n ilgili maddelerini ihlal edece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir (di\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndan bkz. Tansel \u00c7\u00f6la\u015fan, B. No: 2014\/6128, 7\/7\/2015, \u00a7 56; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, B. No: 2014\/1577, 25\/10\/2017, \u00a7 58; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 120; S\u0131rr\u0131 S\u00fcreyya \u00d6nder, \u00a7 60; Candar \u015eafak D\u00f6nmez [GK], B. No: 2015\/15672, 5\/11\/2020, \u00a7 53; Ayhan \u00d6lmez ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2015\/15090, 11\/2\/2021, \u00a7 46; Atilla Yazar ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/1635, 5\/7\/2022, \u00a7 127).O h\u00e2lde Anayasa Mahkemesince \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken mesele, ba\u015fvurucunun eylemleriyle ki\u015fileri ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flenmesine te\u015fvik etti\u011fi ya da bunlar\u0131 me\u015fru g\u00f6stermek niyetinde oldu\u011funu yarg\u0131 merciinin mahk\u00fbmiyete ili\u015fkin karar\u0131nda ikna edici bir bi\u00e7imde ortaya koyupkoymad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Somut olayda ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131nda “PKK\/KCK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine sloganlar\u0131n at\u0131l[mas\u0131] ve pankart ve flamalar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131l[mas\u0131], … \u015fiddeti \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131\u015ft\u0131ran ve \u015fiddeti te\u015fvik eden sloganlar at\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle” ba\u015fvuru konusu toplant\u0131n\u0131n bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l olmaktan \u00e7\u0131karak “d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce ve fikir a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7en ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f[t\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc]” de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 5). Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n belirledi\u011fi ilkelere g\u00f6re, yarg\u0131 merciinin toplant\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015ftan itibaren bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir de\u011ferlendirmesinin ve kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer yandan Mahkeme toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ihtara ra\u011fmen da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar etme su\u00e7undan beraat karar\u0131nda an\u0131lan su\u00e7ui\u015fledi\u011fine dair herhangi bir delil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 6).<\/p>\n
15. Her ne kadar ba\u015fvurucunun kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda pankart ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmesi kayda ge\u00e7se de Mahkemenin kurdu\u011fu h\u00fck\u00fcm gerek\u00e7esinde bu delile dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu delil d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u015fiddet ve tehdit y\u00f6ntemlerini me\u015fru g\u00f6sterecek veya \u00f6vecek ya da bu y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik edecek nitelikte bir eylemi ortaya konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturacak a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulundu\u011fu veya bu nitelikte bir pankart ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da bir \u015fiddet olay\u0131na kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 da iddia edilmemi\u015ftir (ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7unun tan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 115-118; Candar \u015eafak D\u00f6nmez, \u00a7 91; Ter\u00f6rizmin \u00d6nlenmesi S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 eylemine ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u00d6mer Faruk Gergerlio\u011flu [GK], B. No: 2019\/10634, 1\/7\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 34-40, 160).<\/p>\n
16. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lmas\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyet i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu -kendisine isnat edilmeyen- ba\u015fka ki\u015filerin davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131yla sonradan bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kan bir toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan kararda ba\u015fvurucunun toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n koruma alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda herhangi bir eylem ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fine dair somut bir olgu ortaya konulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla m\u00fcdahaleye konu eylemin ne surette ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u015fiddet ve tehdit y\u00f6ntemlerinin me\u015fru g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, \u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ya da bu y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik etti\u011fi mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinden anla\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Belirli bir davaya ili\u015fkin olarak delilleri de\u011ferlendirme ve g\u00f6sterilen delilin davayla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verme yetkisi kural olarak yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemeye aittir. Ayr\u0131ca yine hem bu a\u015famada hem de bu ba\u011flamda su\u00e7lu-su\u00e7suz karar\u0131 vermek ya da daha hafif veya a\u011f\u0131r ceza belirlemek de Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi Anayasa Mahkemesince burada var\u0131lacak olan sonu\u00e7 ba\u015fvurucunun mutlaka beraat ettirilmesi veya mahk\u00fbm edilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na da gelmemektedir. Burada belirtilen eksikliklerin mahkemesince giderilmesi suretiyle yap\u0131lacak inceleme ve de\u011ferlendirme sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilece\u011fi tabiidir (Ruh\u015fen Mahmuto\u011flu, B. No: 2015\/22, 15\/1\/2020, \u00a7 67; Sabri Y\u0131lmaz, B. No: 2018\/11960, 30\/3\/2022, \u00a7 49). Bununla birlikte Anayasa Mahkemesinin belirtilen ilkeleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucuya 1 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 verilmesi \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalenin zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ikna edici bir bi\u00e7imde g\u00f6steremeyen ve kendi i\u00e7erisinde \u00e7eli\u015fkiler i\u00e7eren ilk derece mahkemesi gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili ve yeterli olarak kabul edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU ve \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131, 100.000 TL manevi tazminat ile miktar belirtmeksizin maddi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
21. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi ve belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 34. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU ve \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR’\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Siirt 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2015\/556, K.2016\/112) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 664,10 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.464,10 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 10\/7\/2024 tarihindekarar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
15 \u015eubat 2015 tarihinde PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lideri A.O\u2019nun yakalanmas\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131l d\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fcnde yakla\u015f\u0131k 2.500 ki\u015filik bir grup baz\u0131 siyasi partilerin il binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde toplanarak, \u201c15 \u015eubat Komplosunu \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6nderlikle Ayd\u0131nlataca\u011f\u0131z\u201d, \u201cGen\u00e7lik Aponun Fedaisidir\u201d, \u201cBiji Serok Apo, Siirt Ovas\u0131 Apocular Ovas\u0131\u201d, \u201cBask\u0131lar Bizi Y\u0131ld\u0131ramaz\u201d \u015feklinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 pankartlar ile PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc sergileyen bez par\u00e7alar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ihtara ra\u011fmen da\u011f\u0131lmama su\u00e7undan dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, Ba\u015fvurucu yarg\u0131lamadaki ifadesinde toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6nde oldu\u011funu ve pankart\u0131 tuttu\u011funu belirtmi\u015f, Mahkemece ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan Ba\u015fvurucunun bir y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ve Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan bu karar\u0131 onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede \u00e7o\u011funluk taraf\u0131ndan ilk derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda Ba\u015fvurucunun hangi eyleminin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu,Ba\u015fvurucunun hangi ifadesinin ne surette ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u015fiddet ve tehdit y\u00f6ntemlerini me\u015fru g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi veya \u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvuruya konu eylemlerde herhangi bir \u015fiddet olay\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonu\u00e7 olarak Ba\u015fvurucunun sadece ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131 yap\u0131lan bir toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ceza i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu durumun \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirlik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamayan yarg\u0131sal bir yorum olu\u015fturdu\u011fu belirtilerek, Ba\u015fvurucunun toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00c7o\u011funluk taraf\u0131ndan ula\u015f\u0131lan sonuca a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gerek\u00e7elerle kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz. \u015e\u00f6yle ki;<\/p>\n
Somut olayda g\u00f6sterinin devletin ter\u00f6r faaliyetine kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir operasyonun y\u0131ld\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fcnde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc simgeleyen bez par\u00e7alar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve onun s\u00f6zde liderinin a\u00e7\u0131lan pankartlarla \u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, yine PKK ter\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcn halen devam etti\u011fi olgusu da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, g\u00f6steride a\u00e7\u0131lan pankartlar\u0131n ter\u00f6re ve \u015fiddete te\u015fvik eden, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc manevi olarak g\u00fc\u00e7lendiren bir mesaj\u0131n kamuoyu ile payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 niteli\u011fini haiz oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekir. PKK\u2019n\u0131n insanl\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi, devletin PKK ve di\u011fer ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ile m\u00fccadele etmesinin bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck oldu\u011fu nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmesinde devletin di\u011fer su\u00e7lara nazaran daha geni\u015f takdir hakk\u0131 mevcuttur. Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcnde, Ba\u015fvurucunun ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n \u201cKatil Devlet Hesap Verecek\u201d, \u201cPKK Halkt\u0131r, Halk Burada\u201d gibi \u015fiddeti te\u015fvik eden sloganlaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131, pankart ve flama a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki fillerine ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde yer verilmi\u015f olup, s\u00f6z konusu fiiller ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan, Kadri Pervane Ba\u015fvurusuna (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2015\/12115, Karar Tarihi: 8\/6\/2021 ve R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 30\/9\/2021 – 31614) ili\u015fkin verilen kararda \u00f6zetle; \u201c…48. Ter\u00f6rizmin propagandas\u0131, \u015fiddetin ge\u00e7erli ve etkili bir y\u00f6ntem oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn toplum i\u00e7inde yay\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ter\u00f6r eylemlerine neden olan fikir ve kanaatlerin k\u00f6kle\u015fmesini sa\u011flamak amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131r ve bu amaca ula\u015fmak ancak belirli bir \u00e7aba ve zaman harcanmas\u0131 ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilir. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine a\u015fama a\u015fama \u00f6nce sempatizan, daha sonra destek\u00e7i ve \u00fcye olunmas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde propagandan\u0131n \u00f6nemli bir i\u015flevi vard\u0131r. \u00dcstelik ba\u015fvuruya konu PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc art\u0131k tehlikelili\u011fi bulunmayan veya tehlikelili\u011fi varsay\u0131msal bir \u00f6rg\u00fct de\u011fildir. PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olaylar\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fi tarihlerde ve h\u00e2len vahim \u015fiddet hareketlerinin planlay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 ve uygulay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131d\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla PKK toplum y\u00f6n\u00fcnden olduk\u00e7a yo\u011fun, ciddi ve somut bir tehlike arz etmektedir (Metin Birdal [GK], B. No: 2014\/15440, 22\/5\/2019, \u00a7 74). A.\u00d6. ise bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kurucusu ve uzun s\u00fcre y\u00f6neticisi olarak \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn benimsedi\u011fi \u015fiddet y\u00f6ntemleri ile ismi \u00f6zde\u015fle\u015fmi\u015f bir ki\u015fidir\u202650. Bu kapsamda somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetinde Mahkemece de\u011ferlendirmeye al\u0131nan “Biji PKK, bu yola ba\u015fkoymu\u015fuz, liderimiz Apo bizim” \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zler, \u00f6zellikle polis raporlar\u0131nda \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yap\u0131lan par\u00e7adaki t\u00fcm s\u00f6zlerle birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.\u2026 51. \u2026Anayasa Mahkemesi, isimleri birer sembol h\u00e2line getirilmi\u015f olan PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc veya A.\u00d6.y\u00fc bu ba\u011flamda \u00f6vmek, desteklemek veya y\u00fcceltmek ile cebir, \u015fiddet veya tehdit i\u00e7eren y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik etmek aras\u0131nda bir mesafe olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatindedir\u202657.Yukar\u0131daki bilgiler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda -derece mahkemelerinin farkl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 dengelerken sahip olduklar\u0131 takdir pay\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde- ilk derece mahkemesinin ba\u015fvurucunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7elendirmek i\u00e7in sundu\u011fu nedenler bu t\u00fcr bir mahk\u00fbmiyeti hakl\u0131 g\u00f6stermek i\u00e7in ilgili ve yeterlidir\u2026.\u201d gerek\u00e7elerine yer verilerek, Ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan 2 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalenin zorunlu toplumsal bir ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fi gibi orant\u0131l\u0131 da oldu\u011fu, m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Somut olay\u0131m\u0131zda da Ba\u015fvurucu\u2019nun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 toplant\u0131da ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ve s\u00f6zde lideri lehine slogan at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ba\u015fvurucunun mahkeme huzurunda al\u0131nan ifadesinde ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc ve s\u00f6zde liderini \u00f6ven pankart\u0131 tuttu\u011funu kabul ve ikrar etti\u011fi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, Say\u0131n Mahkemenin Kadri Pervane Ba\u015fvurusuna i\u00e7tihad\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, isimleri birer sembol h\u00e2line getirilmi\u015f olan PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc veya A.\u00d6.y\u00fc \u00f6vmek, desteklemek veya y\u00fcceltmek ile cebir, \u015fiddet veya tehdit i\u00e7eren y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik etmek aras\u0131nda bir mesafe olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Say\u0131n Mahkemenin s\u00f6z konusu i\u00e7tihad\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatindeyiz.<\/p>\n
Kald\u0131 ki, ilk derece mahkemesince kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ihtara ra\u011fmen da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar etme su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7una i\u015ftirakten ise Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda bir y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015f olup, s\u00f6z konusu hapis cezas\u0131 Ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015fledi\u011fi fiil ile orant\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu toplumsal bir ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fi gibi orant\u0131l\u0131 da olup, m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatindeyiz. Bu nedenlerle Ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasan\u0131n 26. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve Anayasan\u0131n 34. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc haklar\u0131 ihlal edilmedi\u011finden \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/24391 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 ABDULHAK\u0130M EK\u0130NC\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/24391) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 10\/7\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Abdulhakim EK\u0130NC\u0130 Vekili : Av. \u015eakir DEM\u0130R \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine yap\u0131lan bir g\u00f6steriye i\u015ftirak edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lma nedeniyle toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 15\/2\/2015 tarihinde, PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lideri Abdullah \u00d6calan’\u0131n yakalanmas\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131l d\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fc nedeniyle yap\u0131lan bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc i\u00e7in bir siyasi partinin il binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde 2.500 ki\u015filik grup toplanm\u0131\u015f, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lideri lehine ifadelerin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 pankartlar ile ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc simgeleyen “bez par\u00e7alar\u0131” a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Toplulu\u011fun bildirimde bulunmadan g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapmas\u0131 nedeniyle kolluk g\u00f6revlileri toplulu\u011fu durdurmu\u015f, kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumuna gitmeme ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fe son verme hususunda uyarm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Parti y\u00f6neticileri ile yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakereler sonras\u0131nda farkl\u0131 bir istikamete do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fe ge\u00e7en grup, yukar\u0131da s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen pankartlar\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ve \u00f6rg\u00fct lideri lehine sloganlar atm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bir parkta …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17802","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n