T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MUHARREM \u00d6ZDEN BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/7290)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muharrem \u00d6ZDEN<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. B\u00fclent D\u0130KEN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamudaki g\u00f6revine iade edilirken daha \u00f6nceki g\u00f6revine atama yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u00c7orum’da bulunan Hitit \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi \u0130\u00e7 Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Anabilim Dal\u0131nda ara\u015ft\u0131rma g\u00f6revlisi olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken 17\/4\/2017 tarihli ve 689 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname (689 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) kapsam\u0131nda kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma i\u015flemine kar\u015f\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna (Komisyon) ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; Komisyon ba\u015fvurucunun talebini kabul ederek kamu g\u00f6revine iadesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Y\u00d6K) Y\u00fcr\u00fctme Kurulu 13\/12\/2019 tarihinde, ba\u015fvurucunun Yozgat Bozok \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi \u0130\u00e7 Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Anabilim Dal\u0131na atanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, Yozgat Bozok \u00dcniversitesine atanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle Yozgat \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme 4\/9\/2020 tarihinde davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda, idarenin 23\/1\/2017 tarihli ve 29957 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 685 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonu Kurulmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (685 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) “Kararlar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 10. maddesine dayanarak atama i\u015flemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi, an\u0131lan maddede kamu g\u00f6revine iade karar\u0131 al\u0131nan \u00f6\u011fretim elemanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nceki g\u00f6rev yerleri ile Ankara, \u0130stanbul ve \u0130zmir’de bulunan y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131na atamalar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131na dair a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcm bulundu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucunun kendi tercihi do\u011frultusunda ve birinci tercihine atamas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla dava konusu atama i\u015fleminde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130stinaf incelemesini yapan B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi, mahkeme karar\u0131nda usul ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 21\/12\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 20\/1\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu; g\u00f6revine iade edildi\u011fi h\u00e2lde eski \u00dcniversitesine atanmamas\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131zl\u0131k oldu\u011fundan, eski \u00dcniversitesinin daha kapsaml\u0131 bir e\u011fitim verdi\u011finden ayr\u0131ca e\u015finin \u00c7orum’da \u00e7ak\u0131l\u0131 kadroda g\u00f6rev yapmas\u0131 nedeniyle ailesinin de ma\u011fdur edildi\u011finden yak\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 71. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurunun i\u00e7tihad\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu alana ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilerek Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc beklenmeden ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Anayasa Mahkemesi benzer bir \u015fik\u00e2yeti Mertihan Kurdo\u011flu (B. No: 2020\/5774, 15\/11\/2023) karar\u0131nda ele alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bahsi ge\u00e7en kararda, ba\u015fvurucunun kamudaki g\u00f6revine iade edilirken kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmadan \u00f6nceki \u00fcniversitedeki g\u00f6revine atanmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi \u015feklindeki mesleki hayat\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak al\u0131nan tedbirin, \u00f6zel hayata ili\u015fkin herhangi bir nedene dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak bu tedbirin ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n\u0131 ciddi \u015fekilde etkiledi\u011fi ve bu etkinin belirli bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k d\u00fczeyine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek sonuca dayal\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131m kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurunun \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenebilir nitelikte oldu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Mertihan Kurdo\u011flu, \u00a7 25; benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Abdulkadir Tuncay, B. No: 2019\/35343, 30\/3\/2022, \u00a7 39). Bu ba\u011flamda eldeki ba\u015fvurunun da \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
10. Anayasa Mahkemesi Mertihan Kurdo\u011flu karar\u0131nda, daha \u00f6nce g\u00f6rev yap\u0131lan \u00fcniversiteye atanman\u0131n engellenmesi \u015feklindeki tedbirin ba\u015fvurucunun meslek hayat\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerle ili\u015fki kurabilme ve geli\u015ftirebilme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zay\u0131flatabilece\u011fini, sosyal ve mesleki itibar\u0131n\u0131 koruyabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ciddi sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furabilece\u011fini belirterek \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Mertihan Kurdo\u011flu, \u00a7 27). Somut olayda da bu sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu belirlemeden sonra ilk olarak ba\u015fvuru konusu m\u00fcdahalenin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lay\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucunun daha \u00f6nceki \u00fcniversitedeki g\u00f6revine atanmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesine dayanak olarak olarak g\u00f6sterilen 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 10. maddesinin 25\/7\/2018 tarihli ve 7145 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 22. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlesinin \u201c\u2026Ankara, \u0130stanbul, \u0130zmir illeri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ve 2006 y\u0131l\u0131ndan sonra kurulan y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131na \u00f6ncelik verilmek kayd\u0131yla, Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumu haricinde tespit edilecek y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131ndan birine\u2026\u201d b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan iptal ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine norm denetimi yoluyla incelemi\u015f ve bahsi ge\u00e7en b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2018\/137, K.2022\/86, \u00a7\u00a7 420-423).<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi bahsi ge\u00e7en iptal karar\u0131nda, kuralda kamu g\u00f6revine iade edilen her bir \u00f6\u011fretim eleman\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kamu hizmetinin gerekleri de g\u00f6zetilerek bu ki\u015filerin daha \u00f6nce g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131klar\u0131 y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00e7al\u0131\u015famayacaklar\u0131 hususunda idareye herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yetkisi tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca bu ki\u015filerin kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131klar\u0131 yerlere atanmalar\u0131n\u0131n kategorik olarak yasaklanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek hukuki ve fiil\u00ee zorunluluklar\u0131n neler oldu\u011funun g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fini, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kural\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda ayr\u0131ca bu ki\u015filerin atamalar\u0131n\u0131n Ankara, \u0130stanbul ve \u0130zmir d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00f6ncelikli olarak 2006 y\u0131l\u0131ndan sonra kurulan y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131na yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015fse de s\u00f6z konusu ihtiyac\u0131n genel, objektif ve kabul edilebilir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler belirlenerek t\u00fcm \u00f6\u011fretim elemanlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsayacak bir sistem olu\u015fturulmadan yaln\u0131zca g\u00f6revlerine iade edilen \u00f6\u011fretim elemanlar\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 tutularak kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n, kamu hizmetinin etkin ve sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi amac\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmek bak\u0131m\u0131ndan zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelmedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla g\u00f6revlerine iade edilen \u00f6\u011fretim elemanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nceki g\u00f6rev yerleri ile Ankara, \u0130stanbul ve \u0130zmir’de bulunan y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131na atanmalar\u0131na kategorik yasak getiren ve bu ki\u015filerin \u00f6ncelikli olarak 2006 y\u0131l\u0131ndan sonra kurulan y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131nda istihdam edilmelerini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kuralla ki\u015filerin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesini isteme hakk\u0131na getirilen s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (AYM, E.2018\/137, K.2022\/86, \u00a7\u00a7 420-423).<\/p>\n
13. Nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesi benzer bir \u015fik\u00e2yeti ele ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Mertihan Kurdo\u011flu karar\u0131nda, an\u0131lan iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esini de g\u00f6zeterek \u00f6zel hayata m\u00fcdahale i\u00e7eren 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 10. maddesinin muhataplar\u0131n\u0131, yetki a\u015f\u0131m\u0131na ve keyf\u00eeli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 koruyabilecek niteli\u011fe ve a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle m\u00fcdahalenin kanunilik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayarak \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir (Mertihan Kurdo\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38). Eldeki ba\u015fvuru y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de Mertihan Kurdo\u011flu karar\u0131nda yer alan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma, m\u00fclkiyet ve etkili ba\u015fvuru haklar\u0131 ile e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 100.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan, B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) , B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
18. Ayr\u0131ca ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Yozgat \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2020\/424, K.2020\/419) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.287,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/7290 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MUHARREM \u00d6ZDEN BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/7290) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/9\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Muharrem \u00d6ZDEN Vekili : Av. B\u00fclent D\u0130KEN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamudaki g\u00f6revine iade edilirken daha \u00f6nceki g\u00f6revine atama yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u00c7orum’da bulunan Hitit \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi \u0130\u00e7 Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Anabilim Dal\u0131nda ara\u015ft\u0131rma g\u00f6revlisi olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken 17\/4\/2017 tarihli ve 689 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname (689 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) kapsam\u0131nda kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma i\u015flemine kar\u015f\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna (Komisyon) ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; Komisyon ba\u015fvurucunun talebini kabul ederek kamu g\u00f6revine iadesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Y\u00d6K) Y\u00fcr\u00fctme Kurulu 13\/12\/2019 tarihinde, ba\u015fvurucunun Yozgat Bozok \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi \u0130\u00e7 Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Anabilim Dal\u0131na atanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, Yozgat Bozok \u00dcniversitesine atanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle Yozgat \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme 4\/9\/2020 tarihinde davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda, idarenin 23\/1\/2017 tarihli ve 29957 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17121","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n