T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
BURAK AKBAY VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/61371)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ekin \u00c7ANKAL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Burak AKBAY<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Veli TOPRAK<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. Estetik Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k A.\u015e.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Fahri EMEKS\u0130Z<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, yay\u0131mlad\u0131klar\u0131 bir haber sebebiyle aleyhlerine manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesinin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu Burak Akbay, S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin kurucusu olup di\u011fer ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucu Veli Toprak ise ihtilafa konu haberin yazar\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu t\u00fczel ki\u015fi, S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin yay\u0131n sahibidir. 11\/7\/2013 tarihinde S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinde “Bakan\u0131n o\u011flu fakirlik bursuyla okuyor” ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla bir haber yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mezk\u00fbr haber \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
“M\u00fcbarek ramazanda gariban \u00e7ocu\u011funun hakk\u0131n\u0131 yediler. <\/p>\n
D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 [A.D.nin] T\u00fcrkiye E\u011fitim Derne\u011fi (TED) Koleji son s\u0131n\u0131f \u00f6\u011frencisi olan o\u011flu [M.D\u2019ye] fakirlik bursu \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n
ANAP\u2019l\u0131 eski y\u00f6netici [S.P.nin] ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 TED Koleji, \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki e\u011fitim d\u00f6neminde tam burs kazanan isimleri belirledi. 28 Haziran tarihli yaz\u0131da, ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 ve fakir olan 5 ki\u015finin ismi yer ald\u0131. Tam E\u011fitim Bursu kazanan isimler \u00d6.D., M.K., E.G., O.Y. ve M.D. olarak a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131.<\/p>\n
5 kriterden 2\u2019si tutmuyor<\/p>\n
Bursu kazanan \u00f6\u011frencinin e\u011fitim \u00fccreti, servis \u00fccreti, yemek gideri, giyim gideri, kitap-k\u0131rtasiye harcama ve har\u00e7l\u0131klar\u0131 kolej y\u00f6netimi taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lan\u0131yor. TED\u2019in 2003-2004 y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tam e\u011fitim bursunu alabilmek i\u00e7in 5 ana kriter var: ‘1- T.C vatanda\u015f\u0131 olmak, 2- 5,6,7,8, 9. s\u0131n\u0131flara devam ediyor olmak 3- \u00f6\u011frencinin en son ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karne not ortalamas\u0131n\u0131n 85-100 aras\u0131nda olmas\u0131 4- Gelir durumu itibariyle maddi deste\u011fe kesinlikle ihtiya\u00e7 duymas\u0131 5- Ba\u015fka kurum ve kurulu\u015flardan burs, \u00fccret, kredi vb yard\u0131m alm\u0131yor olmas\u0131.’<\/p>\n
Babas\u0131n\u0131n maa\u015f\u0131 20 bin lira<\/p>\n
Bu kritere g\u00f6re 12. s\u0131n\u0131f \u00f6\u011frencisi burs alamaz. Ayr\u0131ca 4. kriter olan \u2018kesinlikle ihtiya\u00e7 sahibi olmas\u0131\u2019 \u015fart\u0131 da bakan o\u011flu i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olmasa gerekir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, [M.D.]\u2019nun babas\u0131 [A.D.], bakan, vekil ve emekli maa\u015f\u0131 olarak ayda yakla\u015f\u0131k 20 bin lira kazan\u0131yor. Ayr\u0131ca yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015f kitaplar\u0131 olan [D.]\u2019nun bu kitaplardan kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00fckl\u00fc bir telif geliri de mevcut.<\/p>\n
Oturdu\u011fu konutun kiras\u0131 49 bin lira<\/p>\n
D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 [A.D.], 2013 bakanl\u0131k b\u00fct\u00e7esi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcrken oturdu\u011fu konut nedeniyle muhalefetin sert ele\u015ftirisini ald\u0131. Oturdu\u011fu konuta ayl\u0131k 49 bin liradan 3 y\u0131lda 1 milyon 769 bin 450 TL kira \u00f6dendi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatan CHP\u2019li [M.T.nin] ele\u015ftirisine [D.] \u015fu cevab\u0131 vermi\u015fti: \u201cBu konut benim \u015fahsi konutum de\u011fil. Bir damla suyun paras\u0131 devlet kasas\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kmaz. Bu bo\u011fazdan haram ge\u00e7ece\u011fine, Allah bu bo\u011faz\u0131, bu can\u0131 als\u0131n.\u201d<\/p>\n
Bakan o\u011fluna burs inceleniyor<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK E\u011fitim Derne\u011fi Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 [S.P.], Bakan [D.nin] o\u011fluna \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki y\u0131l tam e\u011fitim bursu verilmesiyle ilgili \u201cGenel M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcm \u015fu anda ABD\u2019de, okulla da konu\u015ftum, evraklar\u0131 inceletiyorum\u201d dedi. S\u00d6ZC\u00dc\u2019ye a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunan [P.], \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yledi: \u201cBelgeleri inceletiyorum. Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcm \u015fu anda ABD\u2019de bulunuyor. Hem bizdeki hem de okuldaki evraklar\u0131 inceletiyorum. Bir yerde tahribat filan var m\u0131, bakt\u0131r\u0131yorum. Eklendi diye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum. Burs verecek olsam Y\u00d6K Ba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fu da bizde ona veririm.\u201d<\/p>\n
3. D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 resm\u00ee a\u00e7\u0131klamaya, haberde \u015fu \u015fekilde yer verilmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
[D. ]: B\u0130ZE FAK\u0130RL\u0130K \u015eARTINDAN BAHSED\u0130LMED\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130ddialarla ilgili D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n resmi internet sitesinde bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klamada ‘Bug\u00fcn baz\u0131 bas\u0131n yay\u0131n organlar\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanan \u2018Bakan o\u011flu fakirlik bursuyla okuyor\u2019 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 haberler hi\u00e7 bir \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekleri yans\u0131tmamaktad\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu haberlerde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekilde Say\u0131n Bakan\u2019\u0131n o\u011fluna bir burs verilmesi, ‘Bakan\u0131n o\u011flunun fakirlik bursu ile okumas\u0131’ kesinlikle s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Haberlerde ge\u00e7en ‘[M.D.ye] y\u00fczde 100 burs verdi’, ‘torpilin belgesi’, ‘[M.nin] servis, yemek, e\u011fitim, kitap, k\u0131rtasiye t\u00fcm ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 okuldan’ ibarelerinin t\u00fcm\u00fc as\u0131ls\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n
[M.D.] 4 y\u0131ld\u0131r ayn\u0131 okula devam etmektedir ve okulca belirlenen \u00fccreti d\u00fczenli olarak Say\u0131n Bakan taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denmi\u015ftir. Bug\u00fcne kadar hi\u00e7 bir \u015fekilde bir burs talebi olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ya da burs almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum gelecek e\u011fitim-\u00f6\u011fretim y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in de aynen ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p>\n
Okul y\u00f6netimi, her hangi bir burs talebi olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, [M.D.nin] g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi ba\u015far\u0131 sebebiyle burs almaya hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmi\u015f, ancak bunun i\u00e7in gelir seviyesi ile ilgili bir \u015farttan bahsetmemi\u015ftir. Bu konuda okul taraf\u0131ndan nihai bir bildirimde ya da aile taraf\u0131ndan kabulde de bulunulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Haberde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en bursun kullan\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir.[M.D.nin] 2013-2014 e\u011fitim-\u00f6\u011fretim y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in de okul kayd\u0131 hen\u00fcz yenilenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Say\u0131n Bakan’\u0131n ikisi y\u00fcksek lisansta olmak \u00fczere d\u00f6rt \u00e7ocu\u011fu e\u011fitim g\u00f6rmektedir. Say\u0131n Davuto\u011flu, bug\u00fcne kadar hi\u00e7 bir \u00e7ocu\u011fu i\u00e7in hi\u00e7 bir d\u00f6nemde hi\u00e7 bir \u015fekilde e\u011fitim yard\u0131m\u0131 ya da burs talep etmemi\u015f, b\u00f6yle bir ba\u015fvuruda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu t\u00fcr etik konularda son derece hassas olan Say\u0131n Bakan’\u0131 y\u0131pratmaya y\u00f6nelik bu t\u00fcr \u00e7arp\u0131tma ve yalan haberler her \u015feyden \u00f6nce bas\u0131n ahlak\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Bu yay\u0131nlarla ilgili hukuki haklar sonuna kadar kullan\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Kamuoyuna sayg\u0131yla duyurulur.’ denildi.”<\/p>\n
4. S\u00f6z konusu iddian\u0131n ayn\u0131 tarihte farkl\u0131 bas\u0131n organlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da haberle\u015ftirildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bununla birlikte meselenin T\u00fcrkiye E\u011fitim Derne\u011fi (TED) camias\u0131nda da ses getirdi\u011fi ve dernek taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa da ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda buna ili\u015fkin bilgi bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. 18\/7\/2013 tarihinde, “Bakan\u0131n o\u011fluna bursun orijinal belgesi \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular ikinci bir haber yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lgili haberde \u015fu ifadeler kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n
“T\u00fcrk E\u011fitim Derne\u011fi, \u201cBursla ilgili bir karar yok\u201d dedi ama…<\/p>\n
S\u00f6zc\u00fc D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 [A.D.nin] o\u011fluna verilen y\u00fczde 100 e\u011fitim bursunu g\u00f6steren belgenin orijinaline ula\u015ft\u0131. \u0130\u015fte gizlenmek istenen ger\u00e7ekler… D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 [A.D.nin] o\u011flu [M.D.ye] T\u00fcrk E\u011fitim Derne\u011fi (TED) taraf\u0131ndan verilen tam e\u011fitim bursunun yank\u0131lar\u0131 s\u00fcr\u00fcyor. TED Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 [S.P.], S\u00d6ZC\u00dc\u2019ye noter kanal\u0131yla \u2018cevap ve d\u00fczeltme\u2019 metni g\u00f6nderdi. [P.], bakan\u0131n o\u011fluna burs sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir karar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulad\u0131. Ancak S\u00d6ZC\u00dc\u2019n\u00fcn ge\u00e7en hafta yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 haberde bursu g\u00f6steren belgenin fotokopisi yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Burs verilen \u00f6\u011frenci listesini g\u00f6steren orijinal belge de ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. TED Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 [P.nin] haberimize verdi\u011fi yan\u0131t ile S\u00d6ZC\u00dc\u2019n\u00fcn man\u015feti aras\u0131nda bak\u0131n hangi farklar var…<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015eTE TED\u2019\u0130N A\u00c7IKLAMASI<\/p>\n
1- \u00d6\u011frencimiz [M.D.’ye] burs sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde bir habere konu olacak herhangi bir karar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclecektir.<\/p>\n
2- Ayr\u0131ca \u00f6\u011frencimizin okul \u00fccretlerinin TED Ankara Koleji\u2019ne girdi\u011fi 2009-2010 e\u011fitim y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren d\u00fczenli olarak banka hesab\u0131na yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ekteki banka dekontlar\u0131 ile ortad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3- Dahas\u0131, ne TED\u2019in ne de TED Ankara Koleji\u2019nin \u2018fakirlik bursu\u00ad\u2019 ad\u0131yla bir uygulamas\u0131 yoktur.<\/p>\n
4- Ayr\u0131ca yine TED Ankara Koleji\u2019nin tam e\u011fitim bursu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, \u00f6\u011frencilerine b\u00f6yle bir burs teklifinde bulunamaz. Bu burs TED Genel Merkezi taraf\u0131ndan yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan ko\u015fullarda verilmektedir.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015eTE S\u00d6ZC\u00dc\u2019N\u00dcN CEVABI<\/p>\n
1- Haberimizde yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z belge, TED\u2019in Ankara Koleji\u2019ne g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi \u2018Tam E\u011fitim Bursu \u00d6\u011frencileri Listesi\u2019ni g\u00f6stermektedir. Peki karar yoksa [M.D.] listeye nas\u0131l \u2018eklendi\u00ad\u2019.<\/p>\n
2- Biz ge\u00e7mi\u015fe d\u00f6n\u00fck \u2018\u00fccretsiz, burslu okudu\u00ad\u2019 iddias\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131k. 2013-2014 \u00f6\u011fretim y\u0131l\u0131nda \u2018ilk kez\u2019 verilecek bursu haber yapt\u0131k.<\/p>\n
3- Tam E\u011fitim Bursu alabilmenin 5 \u015fart\u0131ndan 4\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc \u2018gelir durumu itibariyle maddi deste\u011fe kesinlikle ihtiya\u00e7 duymas\u0131\u2019 diye yaz\u0131yor. Bu ifade fakirlik tan\u0131m\u0131 de\u011fil de nedir?<\/p>\n
4- Bursu TED Ankara Koleji de\u011fil Genel Merkez olarak siz veriyorsunuz. Listeyi belirleyen, Ankara Koleji\u2019ne g\u00f6nderen de TED Genel Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015eTE BELGEN\u0130N OR\u0130J\u0130NAL\u0130<\/p>\n
[…]”<\/p>\n
6. Mezk\u00fbr belgenin antetli oldu\u011fu, sa\u011f \u00fcst k\u00f6\u015fede derne\u011fin ambleminin bulundu\u011fu, “EK-1: TED Ankara Koleji Tam E\u011fitim Bursu \u00d6\u011frencileri Listesi” ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131nda, “2013-2014 y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren tam e\u011fitim bursu kapsam\u0131nda TED Ankara Koleji’nde e\u011fitim almaya hak kazanan \u00f6\u011frenciler” denilerek be\u015f ki\u015finin isminin s\u0131raland\u0131\u011f\u0131, be\u015finci s\u0131rada ise davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011flunun isminin yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. 11\/7\/2013 tarihli haberle ilgili, o d\u00f6nem d\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri bakan\u0131 olan A.D. (davac\u0131), haberin ger\u00e7ek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilinmesine ra\u011fmen yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 20.000 TL manevi tazminat isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucular ise s\u00f6z konusu haberin TED’e ait 28\/6\/2013 tarihli belgeye dayanarak haz\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, haberin ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca haberde bakan\u0131n o\u011flunun gelecek d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in burs ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisinin verildi\u011fini, ge\u00e7mi\u015f y\u0131llara dair herhangi bir iddian\u0131n mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucular habere dayanak te\u015fkil eden belgenin sahte olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in mahkemeye ba\u015fvurulabilece\u011fini TED’e iletmelerine ra\u011fmen bu hususta bir ad\u0131m at\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, taraflar\u0131na bilgi verilmedi\u011fini de belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi manevi tazminat talebinin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, 8.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n ba\u015fvuruculardan tahsiline karar vermi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde, T\u00fcrk E\u011fitim Derne\u011finin bas\u0131n duyurusu ve ekindeki 28\/6\/2013-36 say\u0131l\u0131 burslu \u00f6\u011frenci tespit komisyon karar\u0131 ve y\u00f6netim kurulu karar\u0131 ile davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demelere ili\u015fkin faturalar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, haberin ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme ayn\u0131 zamanda, haberin yazar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu Veli Toprak’\u0131n yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza davas\u0131na at\u0131f yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Bahsi ge\u00e7en davada Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde TED Ankara Koleji Vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netimine m\u00fczekkere yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131, S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin haberine konu belgenin ger\u00e7ek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2013\/2014 e\u011fitim \u00f6\u011fretim y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu bursun kim taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2013\/2014 e\u011fitim \u00f6\u011fretim y\u0131l\u0131nda M.D.nin burslu \u00f6\u011frenciler aras\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, S.P.nin TED Ba\u015fkan\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u015fayet \u00f6yleyse hangi y\u0131llar g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yetkisinin ne oldu\u011funu sordu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. M\u00fczekkere cevaplar\u0131nda, davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011flunun 10\/9\/2013 tarihinde kayd\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015fka bir okula ald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve TED Ankara Kolejinde \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u00fcre\u00e7te burs almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme ihtilafa konu haberle hakaret su\u00e7unun s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f ve 1.740 TL adli para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Gazeteci ba\u015fvurucunun iddia konusu haberde belirtilen belgenin ger\u00e7ekli\u011fini ilgili kurumdan sorarak ara\u015ft\u0131rmak zorunda oldu\u011funun alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izen mahkeme, soyut su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n yaz\u0131y\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 h\u00e2le getirdi\u011fini, haberin ger\u00e7eklik unsuru ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin manevi tazminat isteminin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair karar\u0131n\u0131n istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi istinaf isteminin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Sulh Ceza Mahkemesinin tekzip metninin S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinde yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131na karar verdi\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015f; haberi haz\u0131rlayan Veli Toprak hakk\u0131nda adli para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Konuyla ilgili olarak TED’in bas\u0131n duyurusunda davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011flu hakk\u0131nda burs sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir karar\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011flunun 12. s\u0131n\u0131fa ge\u00e7me hakk\u0131n\u0131 elde etti\u011fi TED Kolejindeki \u00f6\u011fretim hayat\u0131 boyunca t\u00fcm giderlerinin banka hesab\u0131na yat\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun ve 12. s\u0131n\u0131f kayd\u0131n\u0131n hen\u00fcz yenilenmedi\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izen mahkeme ihtilafl\u0131 haberin ger\u00e7ek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kamu yarar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr ger\u00e7ekli\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 as\u0131ls\u0131z haber yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar kesin niteliktedir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular 8\/6\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucular, s\u00f6z konusu haberin belgeye dayal\u0131 haz\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca haberde TED Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 S.P.nin ifadelerine de yer verildi\u011fini, bu kapsamda haberin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve uydurma oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur. Bir \u00fclkenin bakan\u0131n\u0131n siyasi bir ki\u015fili\u011fi olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bas\u0131n\u0131n yak\u0131n merce\u011finde olmas\u0131n\u0131n son derece do\u011fal oldu\u011funu vurgulayan ba\u015fvurucular, ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 te\u015fkil edecek herhangi bir ifadeye haberde yer verilmedi\u011finin de alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmi\u015ftir. Kendilerinin belgede tahrif yapmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve bu iddian\u0131n ispata muhta\u00e7 oldu\u011funu belirten ba\u015fvurucular, resm\u00ee bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda “Okul y\u00f6netimi, herhangi bir burs talebi olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, [M.D.]nun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi ba\u015far\u0131 sebebiyle burs almaya hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmi\u015f, ancak bunun i\u00e7in gelir seviyesi ile ilgili bir \u015farttan bahsetmemi\u015ftir. Bu konuda okul taraf\u0131ndan nihai bir bildirimde ya da aile taraf\u0131ndan kabulde de bulunulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Haberde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en bursun kullan\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. [M.D.]nun 2013-2014 e\u011fitim-\u00f6\u011fretim y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in de okul kayd\u0131 hen\u00fcz yenilenmemi\u015ftir.” \u015feklindeki ifadelerin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011fluna burs verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir irade oldu\u011funun ikrar\u0131 te\u015fkil etti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015flerdir. Ba\u015fvurucular haberin kayna\u011f\u0131nda 28\/6\/2013 tarihli belge olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131nda bu belge hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015fler; dernek ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n dahi konuyu do\u011frudan reddetmeyip, ara\u015ft\u0131raca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesinin haberin as\u0131ls\u0131z olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyar nitelikte oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015flerdir. Bu kapsamda ba\u015fvurucular, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131ndad\u0131rlar.<\/p>\n
13. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir denge kurulup kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya a\u00e7\u0131k keyf\u00eelik i\u00e7erip i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvuru, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 11\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 58. maddesinin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcdahalenin ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n \u015f\u00f6hret veya haklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u00f6nlemlerin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve me\u015fru bir ama\u00e7 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu noktada m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesinde korunan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in zorunlu bir ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layan orant\u0131l\u0131 bir m\u00fcdahale olmas\u0131 gerekir (Bekir Co\u015fkun [GK], B. No: 2014\/12151, 4\/6\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 53-55; Mehmet Ali Ayd\u0131n [GK], B. No: 2013\/9343, 4\/6\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 70-72). Somut olaya benzer uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda bir gazetecinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 haberin ger\u00e7ek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6ncelikle haberin konusu s\u00f6ylemlerin maddi vak\u0131alar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 veya de\u011fer yarg\u0131s\u0131 olarak nitelendirilip nitelendirilemeyece\u011fi (Deniz Karadeniz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/18001, 6\/2\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 48, 49; Durmu\u015f Fikri Sa\u011flar (2) [GK], B. No: 2017\/29735, 17\/3\/2021, \u00a7 50) ele al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eayet somut olayda oldu\u011fu gibi haberde olgusal bir iddia mevcutsa, s\u00f6z konusu iddian\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde gazetecinin hukuki bir yapt\u0131r\u0131ma maruz kalmas\u0131 toplumsal bir ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan me\u015fru g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir. Zira habercilik salt bilgiye eri\u015fimi de\u011fil ayn\u0131 zamanda g\u00fcvenilir kaynaklardan elde edilmi\u015f do\u011fru bilgiye eri\u015fimi kapsamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Demokratik bir toplumda bas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flevlerini tam anlam\u0131yla yerine getirebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6zg\u00fcr olmas\u0131 kadar sorumluluk bilinci ile hareket etmesi \u015fartt\u0131r. Bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde belli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde abart\u0131ya ve hatta tahrik yoluna ba\u015fvurmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olsa da bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ayn\u0131 zamanda ilgililerin meslek ahlak\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6stererek do\u011fru ve g\u00fcvenilir bilgi verecek \u015fekilde ve iyi niyetli olarak hareket etmelerini de zorunlu k\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (\u0130lhan Cihaner (2), B. No: 2013\/5574, 30\/6\/2014, \u00a7 60; Orhan Pala, B. No: 2014\/2983, 15\/2\/2017, \u00a7 48; Medya G\u00fcndem Dijital Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k Ticaret A.\u015e. [GK], B. No: 2013\/2623, 11\/11\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 42; Kadir Sa\u011fd\u0131\u00e7 [GK], B. No: 2013\/6617, 8\/4\/2015, \u00a7 53).<\/p>\n
18. Olgusal isnat i\u00e7eren ifadeler kapsam\u0131nda bas\u0131n\u0131n gazetecilik etik ve ilkelerine uygun olarak ve iyi niyetle topluma do\u011fru ve g\u00fcvenilir bilgi sa\u011flama \u00f6dev ve sorumlulu\u011funu yerine getirip getirmedi\u011fi belirlenirken, ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olgusal iddialar\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011fu konusunda yeterli ara\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 denetlenmelidir (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u00c7etin Do\u011fan (2) [GK], B. No: 2014\/3494, 27\/2\/2019, \u00a763; Mehmet Do\u011fan U\u011furlu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2015\/954, 12\/9\/2018, \u00a7 54). Bu denetleme gazetecinin olgusal isnatlar konusunda yeterli bir kaynak g\u00f6sterip g\u00f6stermedi\u011fine, g\u00f6sterilen kayna\u011fa yay\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 zamanda ne dereceye kadar g\u00fcvenebilece\u011fine ve bu g\u00fcvenle orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak kayna\u011f\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu teyit etmek a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan imk\u00e2nlar\u0131 d\u00e2hilinde harekete ge\u00e7ip ge\u00e7medi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermelidir. \u015eu h\u00e2lde somut olayda incelenmesi gereken esas mesele ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n haberde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri olgusal iddian\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011fu konusunda gerekli ara\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131klar\u0131, gazetecilik etik ve ilkelerine uygun hareket edip etmedikleridir.<\/p>\n
19. \u0130htilaf\u0131n merkezindeki haberde TED’in, davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011fluna bir sonraki y\u0131l burs verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisi mevcuttur. Olgusal isnat niteli\u011findeki bu bilgiye dayanak olarak okul taraf\u0131ndan yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen 28\/6\/2013 tarihli belge g\u00f6sterilmektedir. Haberin devam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere haberin haz\u0131rl\u0131k s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucu gazeteci, TED Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 S.P. ile mezk\u00fbr iddiay\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Haberde bu kapsamda S.P.nin ifadelerine de yer verilmi\u015ftir. Son olarak haberin g\u00fcncellenmi\u015f h\u00e2linde ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n habere cevaben yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 resm\u00ee duyuru da yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere haberin temel iddias\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011flunun isminin bir sonraki y\u0131l burs verilecek \u00f6\u011frenciler listesinde bulundu\u011fudur. \u00d6te yandan, davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011flunun ge\u00e7mi\u015f y\u0131llarda burslu okudu\u011fu iddia edilmedi\u011fi gibi, verilece\u011fi iddia edilen bursun davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kabul edildi\u011fine dair bir bilgi de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. \u015eu h\u00e2lde ihtilaf\u0131n oda\u011f\u0131nda TED’in davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011fluna bir sonraki e\u011fitim d\u00f6nemi i\u00e7in burs verece\u011fi isnad\u0131 ve bu isnad\u0131n kayna\u011f\u0131nda ise TED taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ve yay\u0131mlanan bir belge bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu iddiaya cevaben D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 resm\u00ee a\u00e7\u0131klamada (bkz. \u00a7 3) ise davac\u0131n\u0131n, o\u011flunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi ba\u015far\u0131 sebebiyle burs almaya hak kazanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu ikrar etti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Buna ra\u011fmen yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcresince davac\u0131 bu meseleye ili\u015fkin ba\u015fka bir beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015f, habere dayanak te\u015fkil eden 28\/6\/2013 tarihli belgenin ba\u015fvurucularca de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. \u00d6te yandan, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n sahte bir belgeye dayanarak haberi yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekten de ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda mezk\u00fbr evrak\u0131n ger\u00e7ek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair TED’e yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkere cevab\u0131nda belgenin ger\u00e7ek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir netlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Ne var ki, habere dayanak belgenin sahteli\u011fi hen\u00fcz ayd\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmadan gazeteci hem ceza hem de tazminat yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na maruz kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. \u00dcstelik haber metninden anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere gazeteci bizzat S.P. ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ferek belgenin do\u011fru olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sormu\u015ftur. S.P. ise davac\u0131n\u0131n o\u011fluna burs verildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131 reddetmedi\u011fi gibi kabul de etmemi\u015ftir. S.P.nin cevab\u0131 oldu\u011fu h\u00e2liyle habere i\u015flenmi\u015f, buna herhangi bir yorum eklenmemi\u015ftir. TED Ankara Kolejinden 1981 y\u0131l\u0131nda mezun olan S.P.nin, 2003 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana TED Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana ise TED \u00dcniversitesi M\u00fctevelli Heyet Ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak hizmet etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, konuya ili\u015fkin gazetecinin yetkili bir kimse ile ileti\u015fime ge\u00e7erek meseleyi ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirdi\u011fini kabul etmek gerekir.<\/p>\n
23. Burada as\u0131l cevaplanmaya muhta\u00e7 mesele ise bir gazetecinin haberin do\u011frulu\u011funu ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi daha \u00f6nce gazetecinin ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirirken kendisinden bir beyan\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu kan\u0131tlayan savc\u0131 gibi hareket etmesinin beklenemeyece\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmi\u015ftir. Burada s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc somut ger\u00e7eklik anlam\u0131nda de\u011fil yay\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 andaki olay\u0131n beliri\u015f bi\u00e7imine uygunluk olarak anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun haber kaynaklar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu iddialar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan makul olarak g\u00fcvenilir olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile do\u011fru ve g\u00fcvenilir bilgiler sunmak i\u00e7in iyi niyet \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00e7aba g\u00f6sterip g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini ortaya koymas\u0131 yeterlidir (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Orhan Pala, \u00a7 51; U\u011furlu Gazetecilik Bas\u0131n Yay\u0131n Matbaac\u0131l\u0131k Reklamc\u0131l\u0131k Ltd. \u015eti. (2) [GK], B. No: 2016\/12313, 26\/12\/2019, \u00a7 52). Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede somut olayda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n s\u00f6ylentiye dayanarak ve olgular\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funa dair hi\u00e7bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n haberi yay\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenemez. Nitekim, belgeye dayal\u0131 yap\u0131lan bir haber y\u00f6n\u00fcnden habere dayanak belgenin ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu objektif bir \u015fekilde ortaya konmadan s\u0131rf haberden haklar\u0131 haleldar olanlar aksini iddia etti\u011fi i\u00e7in gazetecilerin yapt\u0131r\u0131ma maruz kalmalar\u0131n\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczerinde cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 etki yarataca\u011f\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphesizdir.<\/p>\n
24. Yukar\u0131daki tespitlere ra\u011fmen yarg\u0131 mercilerinin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fc olan habere dayanak belgenin ger\u00e7ek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusunu \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturmadan ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine manevi tazminata h\u00fckmetmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gerek\u00e7eler, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale i\u00e7in ilgili ve yeterli kabul edilemez. Sonu\u00e7 olarak yarg\u0131 mercilerinin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile davac\u0131n\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir denge kurdu\u011fundan bahsedilemeyece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucular ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi mahkemece yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
28. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruculara manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck\u00e7ekmece 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine (E.2013\/357, K.2019\/609) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvuruculara ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 664,10 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.464,10 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/61371 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 BURAK AKBAY VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/61371) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR Raport\u00f6r : Ekin \u00c7ANKAL Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Burak AKBAY \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Veli TOPRAK \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Estetik Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k A.\u015e. Vekili : Av. Fahri EMEKS\u0130Z \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, yay\u0131mlad\u0131klar\u0131 bir haber sebebiyle aleyhlerine manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesinin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu Burak Akbay, S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin kurucusu olup di\u011fer ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucu Veli Toprak ise ihtilafa konu haberin yazar\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu t\u00fczel ki\u015fi, S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin yay\u0131n sahibidir. 11\/7\/2013 tarihinde S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinde “Bakan\u0131n o\u011flu fakirlik bursuyla okuyor” ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla bir haber yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mezk\u00fbr haber \u015fu \u015fekildedir: “M\u00fcbarek ramazanda gariban \u00e7ocu\u011funun hakk\u0131n\u0131 yediler. D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 [A.D.nin] T\u00fcrkiye E\u011fitim Derne\u011fi (TED) Koleji son s\u0131n\u0131f \u00f6\u011frencisi olan o\u011flu [M.D\u2019ye] fakirlik bursu \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. ANAP\u2019l\u0131 eski y\u00f6netici [S.P.nin] ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 TED Koleji, \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki e\u011fitim d\u00f6neminde tam burs kazanan isimleri belirledi. 28 Haziran tarihli yaz\u0131da, ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 ve fakir olan 5 ki\u015finin ismi yer ald\u0131. Tam E\u011fitim Bursu kazanan isimler \u00d6.D., M.K., E.G., O.Y. ve M.D. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n