{"id":15604,"date":"2024-11-12T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-11-12T03:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/"},"modified":"2024-11-12T06:00:00","modified_gmt":"2024-11-12T03:00:00","slug":"avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/","title":{"rendered":"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

3. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2023\/2369 E., 2024\/728 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 46. Hukuk Dairesi
\nSAYISI : 2021\/1187 E., 2023\/71 K.
\n\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul 18. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nSAYISI : 2017\/142 E., 2020\/364 K.<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

I. DAVA<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili; daval\u0131 \u015firket ile aralar\u0131nda s\u00f6zl\u00fc vekalet ili\u015fkisi kuruldu\u011funu, Be\u015fikta\u015f 23. Noterli\u011finin 02.09.2016 tarihli ve 16777 yevmiye say\u0131l\u0131 vekaletnamesine istinaden bir k\u0131s\u0131m davalar\u0131n daval\u0131lar ad\u0131na takip edildi\u011fini, takip edilen davalar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6zel ihtisas, uzun ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve inceleme gerektiren kendine has davalar oldu\u011funu, s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak de\u011feri para ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclen davalarda dava de\u011feri \u00fczerinden %10+KDV+STF, de\u011feri para ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclemeyen davalar i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Barosu en az \u00fccret \u00e7izelgesine g\u00f6re avukatl\u0131k vekalet \u00fccreti \u00f6denece\u011fi konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, vekalet g\u00f6revinin \u00f6zen ve do\u011fruluk i\u00e7inde yerine getirmesine ra\u011fmen Beyo\u011flu 23. Noterli\u011finin 05.11.2016 tarihli ve 20839 yevmiye say\u0131l\u0131 azilnamesi ile haks\u0131z olarak azledildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek; fazlaya ili\u015fkin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc dava ve talep haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla haks\u0131z azle dayal\u0131 olarak \u015fimdilik 25.000,00 TL vekalet \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n dava tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep etmi\u015f, 03.04.2019 tarihli \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talebini 1.882.680,59 TL akdi vekalet \u00fccretinin tahsili y\u00f6n\u00fcnde \u0131slah etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. CEVAP<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n sadece ceza dosyalar\u0131 i\u00e7in g\u00f6revlendirilmesine ra\u011fmen hukuk dosyas\u0131na da kendilerine haber vermeden vekalet koyup dilek\u00e7e verdi\u011fini, bu sebeple hakl\u0131 nedenle azledildi\u011fini, ceza dosyas\u0131ndaki \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6dendi\u011fini, hukuk davas\u0131ndan \u00fccrete hak kazanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; davac\u0131n\u0131n davaya dayanak hukuk dosyas\u0131na yaln\u0131zca 02.11.2016 tarihinde Kutman Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. ad\u0131na ihtiyati tedbire itiraz ederek vekaletname ibraz etti\u011fi, ba\u015fka her hangi bir i\u015flemde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ok k\u0131sa s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde vekillik g\u00f6revine son verildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 avukat\u0131n dava dosyas\u0131na kendilerinden habersiz olarak vekalet koymu\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n bu kadar k\u0131sa s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde daval\u0131 \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan bilinememesinin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygun oldu\u011fu, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir vekalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 35.000,00 TL bedelli “avukatl\u0131k hizmeti” a\u00e7\u0131klamal\u0131 avukatl\u0131k serbest meslek makbuzu dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda vekalet \u00fccretleri hususunda bir sorun var olsa idi, makbuzda hangi hizmet i\u00e7in kesildi\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilece\u011fi s\u00f6z konusu vekaletnamenin hangi davalara girmesi hususunda yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, vekaletname ile hangi davalarda veya i\u015flerde kendisini temsil etmesi gerekti\u011finin taraflarca yaz\u0131l\u0131 talimatla yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, yaz\u0131l\u0131 belge yoksa da s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak verilen talimatlar\u0131n hukuka uygun olarak ispat\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi, davac\u0131 avukat\u0131n, ceza davalar\u0131 yan\u0131nda hukuk davas\u0131na da vekaletname sunarak daval\u0131 \u015firketin kendisini temsil etmesini istedi\u011fini ispat edemedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/p>\n

A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri
\nDavac\u0131 vekili; azlin hakl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir tespitte bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fini, sadece ceza davalar\u0131n\u0131n takibi i\u00e7in vekaletname verildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn davac\u0131ya y\u00fcklendi\u011fini, olmayan bir \u015feyin ispat\u0131n\u0131n taraflar\u0131ndan istendi\u011fini, teminat\u0131n iadesine ili\u015fkin fi\u015fin makbuz \u00f6rne\u011finin daval\u0131 \u015firket yetkililerin i\u015fbu dosyalar\u0131n takibinin davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bilindi\u011finin kan\u0131t\u0131 oldu\u011funu, dosya i\u00e7inde bulunan belge ve hususlar dikkate al\u0131nmadan daval\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda karar verildi\u011fini, azilnamenin “g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm\u00fcz l\u00fczum \u00fczerine” \u015feklinde gerek\u00e7eye dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fka kayd\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmedi\u011fin ileri s\u00fcrerek; \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; davac\u0131ya verilen vekaletnamenin genel nitelikte olmas\u0131 nedeni ile daval\u0131ya ait dosyalar\u0131 takip etmesinde herhangi bir hukuki engel bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, vekalet \u00fccreti talebine konu dosyada teminat\u0131n 27.10.2016 tarihli ve 4773 numaral\u0131 reddiyat fi\u015fi ile davac\u0131ya iade edildi\u011fi, elden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu paray\u0131 ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn \u015firketin yetkilisi Ne\u015fe Do\u011fan’\u0131n imzas\u0131na teslim etti\u011fi, bu kapsamda davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firketin bilgisi dahilinde \u0130stanbul 11. ATM 2016\/917 ve \u0130stanbul 12. ATM’nin 918 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyalar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n taraflar aras\u0131ndaki anla\u015fmaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak bir k\u0131s\u0131m dava ve i\u015fleri takip etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcren daval\u0131n\u0131n bu iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispat etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc alt\u0131nda oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n hangi i\u015fleri takip edece\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f herhangi bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme veya ba\u015fkaca bir belge bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan azlin hakl\u0131 oldu\u011funun daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a ispatlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, avukat\u0131n dosyaya vekaletname sunarak dilek\u00e7e vermesinin \u00fccretin do\u011fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli oldu\u011funu, \u0131slah edilirken dava de\u011feri 1.882.680,59 TL’ye tamamlanmakla bu miktar\u0131n akdi vekalet \u00fccretine tekab\u00fcl etmesi sebebiyle davac\u0131n\u0131n netice-i talebini akdi \u00fccrete \u00f6zg\u00fcledi\u011fi ve talebinin de a\u015f\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n 34.300,00 TL \u00fccreti vekalet \u00f6demesi ceza davalar\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6denen \u00fccret oldu\u011fundan eldeki davada mahsup edilmeyece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davac\u0131n\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 1.882.680,59 TL akti vekalet \u00fccretinin 25.000,00 TL’sine 04.04.2017 dava tarihinden itibaren, bakiye k\u0131s\u0131m\u0131na ise 03.04.2019 \u0131slah tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faiziyle birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n

A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri
\nDaval\u0131 vekili; davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel olarak g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fini ispat edemedi\u011fini, vekilin i\u015f sahibinin \u00f6zel olarak yetkilendirdi\u011fini ispatlamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, teminat yat\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p iade edildi\u011fi belirtilen dosyan\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firketin taraf oldu\u011fu dosya olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, vekalet sunulmas\u0131n\u0131n vekalet \u00fccretine hak kazan\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, karar\u0131n usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek; karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e
\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme
\nUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, haks\u0131z azle dayal\u0131 vekalet \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk
\n1. 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 505 vd maddeleri.<\/p>\n

2. Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu’nun 34 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi.<\/p>\n

3. Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu’nun 174 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131.<\/p>\n

4. Dairece verilen 21.12.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/6554 E., 2022\/9754 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131<\/p>\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme
\nTemyizen incelenen karar, taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131na, dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131 ile hukuki ili\u015fkinin nitelendirilmesine, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lama ve ispat kurallar\u0131 ile kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere ve \u00f6zellikle davac\u0131 avukat\u0131n daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a verilen vekaletname kapsam\u0131nda yetkilendirildi\u011finin, \u00fccrete hak kazanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu hukuk dava dosyas\u0131na vekaletname sunarak dilek\u00e7e vermesinin yeterli oldu\u011funun ve daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a avukat\u0131n hakl\u0131 bir nedenle azledildi\u011fini ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile usul ve kanuna uygun olan karar\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

VI. KARAR<\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n

Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 370 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 bakiye temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edene y\u00fckletilmesine,<\/p>\n

Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n

21.02.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bUyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131 ile hukuki ili\u015fkinin nitelendirilmesine, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lama ve ispat kurallar\u0131 ile kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere ve \u00f6zellikle davac\u0131 avukat\u0131n daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a verilen vekaletname kapsam\u0131nda yetkilendirildi\u011finin, \u00fccrete hak kazanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu hukuk dava dosyas\u0131na vekaletname sunarak dilek\u00e7e vermesinin yeterli oldu\u011funun ve daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a avukat\u0131n hakl\u0131 bir nedenle azledildi\u011fini ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re…\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2023\/2369 E., 2024\/728 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 46. Hukuk Dairesi SAYISI : 2021\/1187 E., 2023\/71 K. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul 18. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2017\/142 E., 2020\/364 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 vekili; daval\u0131 \u015firket ile aralar\u0131nda s\u00f6zl\u00fc vekalet ili\u015fkisi kuruldu\u011funu, Be\u015fikta\u015f 23. Noterli\u011finin 02.09.2016 tarihli ve 16777 yevmiye say\u0131l\u0131 vekaletnamesine istinaden bir k\u0131s\u0131m davalar\u0131n daval\u0131lar ad\u0131na takip edildi\u011fini, takip edilen davalar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6zel ihtisas, uzun ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve inceleme gerektiren kendine has davalar oldu\u011funu, s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak de\u011feri para ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclen davalarda dava de\u011feri \u00fczerinden %10+KDV+STF, de\u011feri para ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclemeyen davalar i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Barosu en az \u00fccret \u00e7izelgesine g\u00f6re avukatl\u0131k vekalet \u00fccreti \u00f6denece\u011fi konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, vekalet …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2023\/2369 E., 2024\/728 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 46. Hukuk Dairesi SAYISI : 2021\/1187 E., 2023\/71 K. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul 18. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2017\/142 E., 2020\/364 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 vekili; daval\u0131 \u015firket ile aralar\u0131nda s\u00f6zl\u00fc vekalet ili\u015fkisi kuruldu\u011funu, Be\u015fikta\u015f 23. Noterli\u011finin 02.09.2016 tarihli ve 16777 yevmiye say\u0131l\u0131 vekaletnamesine istinaden bir k\u0131s\u0131m davalar\u0131n daval\u0131lar ad\u0131na takip edildi\u011fini, takip edilen davalar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6zel ihtisas, uzun ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve inceleme gerektiren kendine has davalar oldu\u011funu, s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak de\u011feri para ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclen davalarda dava de\u011feri \u00fczerinden %10+KDV+STF, de\u011feri para ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclemeyen davalar i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Barosu en az \u00fccret \u00e7izelgesine g\u00f6re avukatl\u0131k vekalet \u00fccreti \u00f6denece\u011fi konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, vekalet …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-12T03:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-12T03:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/\"},\"wordCount\":1557,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\",\"Uncategorized\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/\",\"name\":\"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-12T03:00:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2023\/2369 E., 2024\/728 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 46. Hukuk Dairesi SAYISI : 2021\/1187 E., 2023\/71 K. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul 18. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2017\/142 E., 2020\/364 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 vekili; daval\u0131 \u015firket ile aralar\u0131nda s\u00f6zl\u00fc vekalet ili\u015fkisi kuruldu\u011funu, Be\u015fikta\u015f 23. Noterli\u011finin 02.09.2016 tarihli ve 16777 yevmiye say\u0131l\u0131 vekaletnamesine istinaden bir k\u0131s\u0131m davalar\u0131n daval\u0131lar ad\u0131na takip edildi\u011fini, takip edilen davalar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6zel ihtisas, uzun ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve inceleme gerektiren kendine has davalar oldu\u011funu, s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak de\u011feri para ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclen davalarda dava de\u011feri \u00fczerinden %10+KDV+STF, de\u011feri para ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclemeyen davalar i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Barosu en az \u00fccret \u00e7izelgesine g\u00f6re avukatl\u0131k vekalet \u00fccreti \u00f6denece\u011fi konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, vekalet …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2024-11-12T03:00:00+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU","datePublished":"2024-11-12T03:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/"},"wordCount":1557,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler","Uncategorized"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/","name":"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-11-12T03:00:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/avukatin-dosyaya-vekaletname-sunarak-dilekce-vermesinin-ucretin-dogmasi-icin-yeterli-oldugu\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AVUKATIN DOSYAYA VEKALETNAME SUNARAK D\u0130LEK\u00c7E VERMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00dcCRET\u0130N DO\u011eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YETERL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15604"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15604\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}