{"id":135833,"date":"2025-07-04T16:29:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-04T13:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-07-04T16:29:00","modified_gmt":"2025-07-04T13:29:00","slug":"aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM’nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n

ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n

B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

AL\u0130 KO\u00c7 VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n

(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/11771)<\/p>\n

Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025<\/p>\n

B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n

\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n

Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n

\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n

Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n

Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

C. Ece YALIM<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

1. Ali KO\u00c7<\/p>\n

2. Umahan KO\u00c7<\/p>\n

3. Mehmet KO\u00c7<\/p>\n

Vekili<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Av. Figen ELALDI<\/p>\n

I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n

1. Ba\u015fvuru, ihtiyati tedbirinin uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. Ba\u015fvurucular taraf\u0131ndan azledilen avukat M.S.\u00d6. vekalet \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine icra takibi ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n icra takibine itiraz etmeleri \u00fczerine M.S.\u00d6. taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine K\u00fctahya 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinde Mahkeme) 17\/7\/2012 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 M.S.\u00d6. dava dilek\u00e7esinde K\u00fctahya 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin (1.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi) 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular ad\u0131na vekil olarak dosyay\u0131 takip etti\u011fini, hi\u00e7 bir hakl\u0131 sebep bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve \u00fccret \u00f6denmeksizin karar celsesinden \u00f6nce vekillikten azledildi\u011fini, davan\u0131n kazan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, son celsede vekil olarak bulunan avukat i\u00e7in 10.050,00 TL avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdir edildi\u011fini, vekalet \u00fccretini alabilmek amac\u0131yla ilams\u0131z icra yoluyla takip ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n takibi durdurdu\u011funu, bor\u00e7lular\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 ayr\u0131ca 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bulunan alaca\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k tedbir konulmas\u0131na karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. Mahkemece 18\/7\/2012 tarihinde ihtiyati tedbir talebinin kabul\u00fcne, daval\u0131 ba\u015fvuruculara \u00f6denmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi i\u00e7in K\u00fctahya 1 Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bulunan alaca\u011f\u0131n 10.000,00 TL’lik k\u0131sm\u0131na ihtiyati tedbir konulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

4. Davac\u0131 7\/3\/2014 tarihinde 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bulunan 10.000,00 TL alaca\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k konulan tedbirin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015f, talep \u00fczerine Mahkemece 11\/3\/2014 tarihinde ihtiyati tedbirin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilerek 12\/3\/2014 tarihinde 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine tedbirin kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

5. Mahkemece 13\/2\/2014 tarihinde davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, an\u0131lan karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca 17\/6\/2015 tarihinde davac\u0131 avukat yarar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yan vekalet \u00fccretinin de tahsiline karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilerek bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 12\/5\/2016 tarihinde direnme karar\u0131 vermi\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 9\/2\/2021 tarihinde direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulunca verilen bozma karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamalar sonucunda Mahkemece 19\/10\/2021 tarihinde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, an\u0131lan karar temyiz edilmeden 27\/1\/2022 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

6. Ba\u015fvuru 9\/2\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n

7. Ba\u015fvurucular 17\/7\/2012 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131n\u0131n 9 y\u0131l 3 ay s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, uzun s\u00fcren yarg\u0131lama boyunca mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerine ihtiyati tedbir konulmas\u0131 nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

8. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un “Bireysel ba\u015fvuru usul\u00fc” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 47. maddesinin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“Bireysel ba\u015fvurunun, ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi tarihten; ba\u015fvuru yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015fse ihlalin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Hakl\u0131 bir mazereti nedeniyle s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde ba\u015fvuramayanlar, mazeretin kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde ve mazeretlerini belgeleyen delillerle birlikte ba\u015fvurabilirler … “<\/p>\n

9. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) “Ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ve mazeret” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 64. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“Bireysel ba\u015fvurunun, ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi tarihten, ba\u015fvuru yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015fse ihlalin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.”<\/p>\n

10. 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 47. maddesinin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn 64. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi tarihten, ba\u015fvuru yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise ihlalin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir (Yasin Yaman, B. No: 2012\/1075, 12\/2\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 18, 19). Bireysel ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan olan ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresine riayet edilmesi \u015fart\u0131, bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemesinin her a\u015famas\u0131nda resen nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir ba\u015fvuru ko\u015fuludur (Taner Kurban, B. No: 2013\/1582, 7\/11\/2013, \u00a7 19). Ayr\u0131ca otuz g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131nda kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi \u00f6\u011frenme tarihi esas al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r (Mehmet \u00d6zcan, B. No: 2019\/6266, 15\/1\/2020, \u00a7 20).<\/p>\n

11. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden nihai karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin tebli\u011fi, \u00f6\u011frenme \u015fekillerinden biridir (Mehmet Ali Kurtuldu, B. No: 2013\/5504, 28\/5\/2014, \u00a7 27). Ancak \u00f6\u011frenme, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmez; ba\u015fka \u015fekillerde de \u00f6\u011frenme s\u00f6z konusu olabilir. Ba\u015fvurucunun nihai karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esini dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131 incelemek suretiyle \u00f6\u011frenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu do\u011frultuda dosyadan suret al\u0131nmas\u0131 gibi h\u00e2llerde ba\u015fvurucunun gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi kabul edilebilir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n nihai karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esini \u00f6\u011frendiklerini beyan ettikleri tarih de bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 olarak ele al\u0131nabilir (\u0130lyas T\u00fcredi, B. No: 2013\/1267, 13\/6\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 21, 22).<\/p>\n

12. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucular uygulanan ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesinden yak\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n taraf\u0131 oldu\u011fu davadaki alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n 10.000,00 TL’lik k\u0131sm\u0131na ihtiyati tedbir uygulanarak ba\u015fvuruculara \u00f6denmemesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. 11\/3\/2014 tarihinde ise ihtiyati tedbir talebinde bulunan davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2010\/338 E say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bulunan 10.000,00 TL’nin ba\u015fvuruculara \u00f6denmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi i\u00e7in konulan ihtiyati tedbirin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na kesin olarak karar verilmi\u015f bu karar 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine bildirilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla 11\/3\/2014 tarihinde kesin olarak verilen tedbirin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131ndan yakla\u015f\u0131k 8 y\u0131l sonra 10\/2\/2022 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen bireysel ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n

A. Ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 25\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 25\/3\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR AL\u0130 KO\u00c7 VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/11771) Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : C. Ece YALIM Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Ali KO\u00c7 2. Umahan KO\u00c7 3. Mehmet KO\u00c7 Vekili : Av. Figen ELALDI I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ihtiyati tedbirinin uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular taraf\u0131ndan azledilen avukat M.S.\u00d6. vekalet \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine icra takibi ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n icra takibine itiraz etmeleri \u00fczerine M.S.\u00d6. taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine K\u00fctahya 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinde Mahkeme) 17\/7\/2012 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 M.S.\u00d6. dava dilek\u00e7esinde K\u00fctahya 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin (1.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi) 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular ad\u0131na vekil olarak dosyay\u0131 takip etti\u011fini, hi\u00e7 bir hakl\u0131 sebep bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve \u00fccret \u00f6denmeksizin karar celsesinden \u00f6nce vekillikten azledildi\u011fini, davan\u0131n kazan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, son celsede vekil olarak bulunan avukat i\u00e7in 10.050,00 TL avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdir edildi\u011fini, vekalet \u00fccretini alabilmek amac\u0131yla ilams\u0131z icra yoluyla takip ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n takibi durdurdu\u011funu, bor\u00e7lular\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 ayr\u0131ca 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bulunan alaca\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k tedbir konulmas\u0131na karar …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-135833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAYM'nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM'nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR AL\u0130 KO\u00c7 VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/11771) Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : C. Ece YALIM Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Ali KO\u00c7 2. Umahan KO\u00c7 3. Mehmet KO\u00c7 Vekili : Av. Figen ELALDI I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ihtiyati tedbirinin uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular taraf\u0131ndan azledilen avukat M.S.\u00d6. vekalet \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine icra takibi ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n icra takibine itiraz etmeleri \u00fczerine M.S.\u00d6. taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine K\u00fctahya 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinde Mahkeme) 17\/7\/2012 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 M.S.\u00d6. dava dilek\u00e7esinde K\u00fctahya 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin (1.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi) 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular ad\u0131na vekil olarak dosyay\u0131 takip etti\u011fini, hi\u00e7 bir hakl\u0131 sebep bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve \u00fccret \u00f6denmeksizin karar celsesinden \u00f6nce vekillikten azledildi\u011fini, davan\u0131n kazan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, son celsede vekil olarak bulunan avukat i\u00e7in 10.050,00 TL avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdir edildi\u011fini, vekalet \u00fccretini alabilmek amac\u0131yla ilams\u0131z icra yoluyla takip ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n takibi durdurdu\u011funu, bor\u00e7lular\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 ayr\u0131ca 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bulunan alaca\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k tedbir konulmas\u0131na karar …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-04T13:29:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"AYM’nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-04T13:29:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1105,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-04T13:29:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM’nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR AL\u0130 KO\u00c7 VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/11771) Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : C. Ece YALIM Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Ali KO\u00c7 2. Umahan KO\u00c7 3. Mehmet KO\u00c7 Vekili : Av. Figen ELALDI I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ihtiyati tedbirinin uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular taraf\u0131ndan azledilen avukat M.S.\u00d6. vekalet \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine icra takibi ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n icra takibine itiraz etmeleri \u00fczerine M.S.\u00d6. taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular aleyhine K\u00fctahya 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinde Mahkeme) 17\/7\/2012 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 M.S.\u00d6. dava dilek\u00e7esinde K\u00fctahya 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin (1.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi) 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular ad\u0131na vekil olarak dosyay\u0131 takip etti\u011fini, hi\u00e7 bir hakl\u0131 sebep bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve \u00fccret \u00f6denmeksizin karar celsesinden \u00f6nce vekillikten azledildi\u011fini, davan\u0131n kazan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, son celsede vekil olarak bulunan avukat i\u00e7in 10.050,00 TL avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdir edildi\u011fini, vekalet \u00fccretini alabilmek amac\u0131yla ilams\u0131z icra yoluyla takip ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n takibi durdurdu\u011funu, bor\u00e7lular\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 ayr\u0131ca 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2010\/338 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bulunan alaca\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k tedbir konulmas\u0131na karar …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-07-04T13:29:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"AYM’nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-07-04T13:29:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":1105,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-07-04T13:29:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-11771-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM’nin 2022\/11771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135833"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135833\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}