Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
6. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2023\/2360 E., 2025\/699 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi
\nSAYISI : 2022\/970 E., 2022\/1444 K.
\nSU\u00c7 : Nitelikli ya\u011fma
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi
\nTEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Onama<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun (5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 286 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, 260 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz edenin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 291 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, 294 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde temyiz sebeplerine yer verildi\u011fi, 298 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmekle, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 288. maddesinin ”Temyiz, ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedenine dayan\u0131r. Bir hukuk kural\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131 veya yanl\u0131\u015f uygulanmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r.”, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 294. maddesinin ”Temyiz eden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn neden dolay\u0131 bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131r. Temyiz sebebi ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuki y\u00f6n\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olabilir.” ve ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 301. maddesinin ”Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131z temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda belirtilen hususlar ile temyiz istemi usule ili\u015fkin noksanlardan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015fsa, temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bunu belirten olaylar hakk\u0131nda incelemeler yapar.” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi de g\u00f6zetilerek,san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin temyiz sebebinin “cezaland\u0131rmaya yeterli somut delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, su\u00e7un sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na” ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu belirlenerek, an\u0131lan sebeplere y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n
Olu\u015f ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda nitelikli ya\u011fma su\u00e7undan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcnde herhangi bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ayr\u0131ca dosyada 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 289. maddesinde say\u0131lan hukuka kesin ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k h\u00e2llerinin herhangi birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da tespit edilememi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda nitelikli ya\u011fma su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen temyiz sebebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 302\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafiinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen TEMY\u0130Z \u0130STEM\u0130N\u0130N ESASTAN REDD\u0130 ile Tebli\u011fname’ye uygun olarak H\u00dcKM\u00dcN ONANMASINA, dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine,<\/p>\n
16.01.2025 tarihinde oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n
(Muhalif)<\/p>\n
M U H A L E F E T \u015e E R H \u0130<\/p>\n
Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan ma\u011fdurenin karde\u015fi … ve iki k\u0131z\u0131 ile evde bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada ye\u011feni olan uyu\u015fturucu ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131s\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdurenin evine geldi\u011fi, ma\u011fdureyi para veya ziynet alt\u0131n vermesi i\u00e7in b\u0131\u00e7ak \u00e7ekerek \u00f6l\u00fcmle tehdit etti\u011fi, ma\u011fdureye ait iki adet banka kart\u0131n\u0131 farkettirmeden bulundu\u011fu yerden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fdurenin olay esnas\u0131nda mesaj \u00e7ekerek yak\u0131n\u0131 …\u2019\u0131 eve \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 kendi bo\u011faz\u0131na dayay\u0131p kendisini \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, eve gelen tan\u0131k … ile evde bulunan tan\u0131k …\u2019\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131 evin d\u0131\u015f\u0131na merdivenlere \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n burada d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcp bay\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, elindeki b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n ve ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 banka kartlar\u0131n\u0131n yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, tan\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n kartlar\u0131 ma\u011fdureye, b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 ise olay yerine gelen polislere teslim etti\u011fi, olay tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re g\u00f6revli polisin bina i\u00e7ine girip olay\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi dairenin \u00f6n\u00fcndeki merdivenlerde san\u0131\u011f\u0131 bayg\u0131n \u015fekilde g\u00f6r\u00fcp yakalad\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin te\u015febb\u00fcs a\u015famas\u0131nda kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ya\u011fma su\u00e7u TCK\u2019da h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7u ile beraber Malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131 Su\u00e7lar b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda m\u00fclkiyet ve zilyetlik hakk\u0131 korunmakla beraber ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda ayr\u0131ca ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve v\u00fccut b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc korunmaktad\u0131r. Ya\u011fma \u00f6\u011fretide bile\u015fik su\u00e7 olarak nitelendirilmekte olup bile\u015fik su\u00e7larda her bir su\u00e7un ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 tamamlanmas\u0131 ile su\u00e7 tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Tehdit veya etkili eylem su\u00e7unun tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ya\u011fma su\u00e7unun tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli olmay\u0131p bile\u015fen h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unun tamamlanmas\u0131 yani ki\u015finin mal\u0131n\u0131n da al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131 ile ya\u011fma su\u00e7u tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olacakt\u0131r. \u00d6\u011fretide ya\u011fma ve h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unun hareket ve netice su\u00e7u oldu\u011fu hususunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Hareket su\u00e7lar\u0131nda hareketin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi su\u00e7un tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olup netice su\u00e7lar\u0131nda hareketin ve akabinde neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi ile su\u00e7 tamamlanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu hareket su\u00e7u kabul eden \u00f6\u011freticiler ve uygulamac\u0131lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unun tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 maddi unsur olan alma hareketinin gerek\u00e7ede tarif edildi\u011fi \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekmektedir. Netice su\u00e7u olarak kabul edenler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ise su\u00e7un tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in zilyedin zilyetli\u011finin sona ermesi yani tasarruf olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kalkmas\u0131 neticesinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekmektedir. Maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde alma hareketi veya neticesi \u015fu \u015fekilde belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u201cAlmak fiilinden maksat, su\u00e7un konusunu olu\u015fturan mal \u00fczerinde ma\u011fdurun zilyetli\u011fine son verilmesi, ma\u011fdurun su\u00e7 konusu e\u015fya \u00fczerinde zilyetlikten do\u011fan tasarruf haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n olanaks\u0131z h\u00e2le gelmesidir. Bu tasarruf olana\u011f\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131nca su\u00e7 da tamamlan\u0131r. \u201d uygulamada mal\u0131 alan h\u0131rs\u0131z kesintisiz takip ile yakalan\u0131p mal geri al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eye uygun bir \u015fekilde su\u00e7un te\u015febb\u00fcs a\u015famas\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Yine uygulamada kesintisiz takibin bizzat mal\u0131n sahibi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131 aranmamakta mal\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 yere veya mal\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na gelen kom\u015fular veya kolluk taraf\u0131ndan kesintisiz takip ile h\u0131rs\u0131z\u0131n yakalan\u0131p mal\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 halinde de su\u00e7un te\u015febb\u00fcs a\u015famas\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n
Ayn\u0131 neviden ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda da kanunda tarif edilen alma hareketi, netice su\u00e7u kabul edersek zilyetli\u011fin sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 neticesi gerek\u00e7ede \u015fu \u015fekilde tarif edilmi\u015ftir. \u201cMal\u0131n teslim edilmesi veya al\u0131nmas\u0131, su\u00e7un konusunu olu\u015fturan mal \u00fczerinde ma\u011fdurun zilyetli\u011fine son verilmesini, ma\u011fdurun bu e\u015fya \u00fczerinde zilyetlikten do\u011fan tasarruf haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n olanaks\u0131z h\u00e2le gelmesini ifade eder.\u201d G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere alma fiili maddelerin gerek\u00e7esinde gerek h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k gerekse ya\u011fma su\u00e7u a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde tarif edilmi\u015ftir. Bunun sebebi h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unun ya\u011fma su\u00e7unun bile\u015fen su\u00e7u olmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndand\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7u gibi ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda da su\u00e7un tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in zilyedin zilyetli\u011finin sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve zilyetlikten do\u011fan tasarruf haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n olanaks\u0131z hale gelmesi, bu haklar\u0131n gayri me\u015fru zilyet olan san\u0131\u011fa ge\u00e7mesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
Alma fiili bak\u0131m\u0131ndan her iki su\u00e7un gerek\u00e7esinde ayn\u0131 tarif yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u00f6\u011freti ve uygulamada h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7u bak\u0131m\u0131ndan te\u015febb\u00fcs a\u015famas\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilen fiil ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f kabul edilmektedir. Cebir veya tehdit ile mal\u0131 al\u0131nan ma\u011fdur veya ma\u011fdurun bulundu\u011fu mahalde bulunan veya gelen tan\u0131k veya kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin san\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal ile beraber kesintisiz takip ile yakalam\u0131\u015f olmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen su\u00e7un tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek uygulama yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ceza Genel Kurulumuzun uygulamas\u0131 da bu y\u00f6ndedir.<\/p>\n
Her iki su\u00e7un gerek\u00e7esinde tarif edilen alma s\u00f6zl\u00fck anlam\u0131nda de\u011fil bilimsel anlamda (\u0131st\u0131lah anlam\u0131nda) bir tariftir. Burada alma s\u00f6zl\u00fck anlam\u0131nda alma ile ba\u015flayan ve zilyedin tasarruf olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kalkmas\u0131na kadar devam eden bir s\u00fcre\u00e7te devam eden bir alma fiilidir. Maddenin yorumlamas\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esine uygun olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi temel yorum kural\u0131d\u0131r. Ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda almak fiili bak\u0131m\u0131ndan h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan farkl\u0131 ilave bir gerek\u00e7e bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Ki\u015finin cebirle bedenen kendini savunamaz hale gelmesi veya ki\u015finin tehdidin etkisi ile korkuya kap\u0131larak kendini savunamaz hale gelmesine g\u00f6re almak fiili tarif edilmemi\u015f aksine zilyedin bu durumundan tamamen ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z, bu durumunu dikkate almadan objektif bir tarif yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle ki\u015fi kendini savunacak durumda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan mal \u00fczerinde tasarruf olana\u011f\u0131 kalmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r \u015feklindeki bir yorum gerek\u00e7eye uygun olmayan gerek\u00e7eyi geni\u015fleten hukuken san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kanunda tarif edilen fiilini aleyhine geni\u015fleten bir yorum olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Elbetteki h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unda alma fiili ilgili tarif etmi\u015f oldu\u011fumuz s\u00fcre\u00e7 tamamlanmadan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n cebir veya tehdit kullanmas\u0131 halinde su\u00e7 ya\u011fmaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fecektir. TCK\u2019n\u0131n 148. maddesinin gerek\u00e7esinde ilk \u00f6nce ya\u011fma su\u00e7unun niteli\u011fi ve alma fiilinin hukuki\/bilimsel tarifi yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ya\u011fma su\u00e7una d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi hususu \u201cMal, zilyedin tasarruf olana\u011f\u0131 ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 anda al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, bu ana kadar yap\u0131lan cebir veya tehdit, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya\u011fmaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcr .\u00d6rne\u011fin evin i\u00e7indeki e\u015fyay\u0131 al\u0131p kap\u0131dan \u00e7\u0131karken mal sahibi ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fan h\u0131rs\u0131z , ona cebir veya tehdit kullanacak olursa, ya\u011fma su\u00e7u olu\u015fur\u201d \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dikkat edilmesi gerekirse alma s\u00fcreci tamamlanmadan cebir veya \u015fiddet g\u00f6sterenin eylemi ya\u011fma su\u00e7una d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fecek, ya\u011fma su\u00e7u alma s\u00fcreci bittikten sonra gerek\u00e7edeki tabir ile \u201czilyedin tasarruf olana\u011f\u0131 ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 anda\u201d tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olacakt\u0131r. Yine dikkat edilmesi gerekirse kanun koyucu gerek\u00e7ede ya\u011fma su\u00e7u tamamlan\u0131r ibaresini kullanmam\u0131\u015f su\u00e7 ya\u011fmaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr ibaresini kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Zaten \u00f6\u011fretide var olan hareketi neticeye biti\u015fik su\u00e7 kavram\u0131 yeni TCK ile terk edilmi\u015f, hareket su\u00e7u, netice su\u00e7u kavram\u0131 kabul edilerek d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle mal s\u00f6zl\u00fck anlam\u0131 ile al\u0131n\u0131r al\u0131nmaz netice do\u011fmu\u015ftur, zilyetlik sona ermi\u015ftir yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 isabetli olmayacakt\u0131r. Kanunun tarif etti\u011fi alma s\u00fcreci yani bilimsel hukuki tarifteki alma fiili tamamlan\u0131nca zilyetlik sona ermi\u015f olacakt\u0131r. Zaten su\u00e7u netice su\u00e7u olarak kabul etti\u011fimiz takdirde zilyetli\u011fin sonland\u0131r\u0131lma neticesi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fince su\u00e7 tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda almak fiii zilyetlik kavram\u0131 \u00fczerinden tarif edildi\u011finden MK\u2019n\u0131n zilyetlik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fen bir \u015fekilde yorumlanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Zilyet MK\u2019n\u0131n 981.maddesinin verdi\u011fi hak ve yetki uyar\u0131nca zilyetli\u011fini savunabilir, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc gasp veya sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 kuvvet kullanarak defedebilir, eylem s\u0131ras\u0131nda ve ka\u00e7arken mal\u0131n\u0131 yakalanan\u0131n elinden alarak zilyetli\u011fini koruyabilir. Ki\u015finin ka\u00e7arken ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal\u0131 atmas\u0131 veya ka\u00e7arken yakalan\u0131p mal\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 halinde zilyetlik korunmu\u015f ve TCK\u2019n\u0131n 148.maddesinin gerek\u00e7esinde yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekilde zilyedlikten do\u011fan tasarruf imkan\u0131 ortadan kalkmam\u0131\u015f olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
MK\u2019nun tabiri ile \u201ceylem s\u0131ras\u0131nda veya ka\u00e7arken\u201d olay\u0131 g\u00f6ren kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan veya olaya tan\u0131k olan ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakalanarak elinden mal\u0131n al\u0131narak zilyede verilmesi halinde de zilyedin zilyetli\u011fi korunmu\u015f, mal\u0131 \u00fczerindeki tasarruf haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 imkans\u0131z hale gelmeyecektir. Zira CMK\u2019n\u0131n bu husustaki a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re i\u015flenmekte olan bir su\u00e7ta herkesin su\u00e7luyu yakalama hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Bu husus zaten kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00f6rev ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eler do\u011frultusunda sonu\u00e7 olarak h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unda uygulamada genel kabul g\u00f6ren \u201ckesintisiz takip\u201d kriterinin ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda da uygulanmas\u0131 yani ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal ile yakalanan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin de te\u015febb\u00fcs a\u015famas\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, kanun koyucunun amac\u0131na, maddelerin gerek\u00e7elerine ve maddelerin gerek\u00e7elerine paralel yorumlanmas\u0131 \u00f6\u011fretisine daha uygun olacakt\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 neviden olan s\u00f6z konusu iki su\u00e7un tamamen ayn\u0131 olan alma hukuki tan\u0131m\u0131na dair gerek\u00e7elerine ra\u011fmen ya\u011fma su\u00e7unun tehdit ve cebirle i\u015flenmesinden ve ihlal edilen haklar\u0131n vehametinden dolay\u0131 ya\u011fmada almak hukuki tan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131ktan farkl\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuken isabetli olmayacakt\u0131r. Zira ya\u011fma su\u00e7unun gerek\u00e7esinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen geni\u015fletici bir yorum yap\u0131lmas\u0131 aleyhe yorum yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 prensibine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Kanun koyucu zaten h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7una nazaran ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda ihlal edilen haklar\u0131n fazlal\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tehlikenin b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda cezan\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 ve yukar\u0131 haddini daha y\u00fcksek belirlemi\u015ftir. Zaten \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezan\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 haddinden su\u00e7un ve su\u00e7lunun somut olaydaki durumu dikkate al\u0131narak TCK\u2019n\u0131n 61.maddesine g\u00f6re uzakla\u015fmak her zaman m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131m\u0131zda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi dairede etkisiz hale getirilerek dairenin d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kap\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda binan\u0131n merdivenlerinde bay\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 banka kartlar\u0131n\u0131 burada d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, kartlar\u0131n m\u00fcdahale eden tan\u0131k\u00e7a al\u0131n\u0131p ma\u011fdureye geri verildi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ka\u00e7amadan bay\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde kolluk\u00e7a yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi yerde daha ka\u00e7amadan ya\u011fmalanan banka kartlar\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fdureye iade edildi\u011fi, ma\u011fdurun mallar\u0131 \u00fczerinde zilyetli\u011finin hen\u00fcz sona ermedi\u011fi ve zilyetli\u011fini kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n olanaks\u0131z hale gelmedi\u011fi,bu nedenle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin te\u015febb\u00fc\u015f a\u015famas\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatinde oldu\u011fumdan heyetimizin \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 16.01.2025 tarihli, 2023\/2360 E. ve 2025\/699 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Yarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesi 2023\/2360 E., 2025\/699 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi SAYISI : 2022\/970 E., 2022\/1444 K. SU\u00c7 : Nitelikli ya\u011fma H\u00dcK\u00dcM : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi TEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Onama \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun (5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 286 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, 260 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz edenin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 291 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, 294 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde temyiz sebeplerine yer verildi\u011fi, 298 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmekle, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 288. maddesinin ”Temyiz, ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedenine dayan\u0131r. Bir hukuk kural\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131 veya yanl\u0131\u015f uygulanmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r.”, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 294. maddesinin ”Temyiz eden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn neden dolay\u0131 bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131r. Temyiz sebebi ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuki y\u00f6n\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olabilir.” ve ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 301. maddesinin ”Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131z temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda belirtilen hususlar ile temyiz istemi usule ili\u015fkin noksanlardan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015fsa, temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bunu belirten olaylar hakk\u0131nda incelemeler yapar.” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi de g\u00f6zetilerek,san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin temyiz sebebinin …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-127307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n