T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
13. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2017\/825 E., 2019\/11133 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi (T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi S\u0131fat\u0131yla)<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda ilamda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne k\u0131smen reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 avukat\u0131nca temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131, daval\u0131 ile 105.000,00 TL bedel kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 105 m2 y\u00fcz \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm\u00fcnde bir adet daire sat\u0131m\u0131 konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ancak tapuda ad\u0131na tescil edilen daireyi teslim ald\u0131ktan sonra vadedildi\u011fi gibi 105 m2 de\u011fil 90 m2 lik bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri s\u00fcrerek aradaki 15m2 lik fark i\u00e7in 12.500,00 TL’nin yasal faiziyle birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Dava, sat\u0131m konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ay\u0131pl\u0131 olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bedelin indirilmesi talebine ili\u015fkindir. Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan daval\u0131 ile davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 hususunda 30\/01\/2014 tarihli adi yaz\u0131l\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fince ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu devrinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, b\u00f6ylece taraflar\u0131n resmi \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ge\u00e7ersiz olan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye tapuda i\u015flem yapmak suretiyle ge\u00e7erlilik kazand\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 sabittir. 30\/01\/2014 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n net veya br\u00fct oldu\u011fu belirtilmeksizin 105 m2 oldu\u011fu belirtilmesine ra\u011fmen, bilirki\u015fi raporuyla ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ger\u00e7ek net alan\u0131n\u0131n 69,58 m2, br\u00fct alan\u0131n\u0131n 92,75m2 oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015f, mahkemece s\u00f6zle\u015fmede belirtilen alan br\u00fct alan olarak kabul edilip, bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan nispi metoda g\u00f6re belirlenen rakam \u00fczerinden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ay\u0131pl\u0131 mallarda indirilecek miktar\u0131n tespitinde; doktrinde, \u201cmutlak metod\u201d, \u201cnisbi metod\u201d ve \u201ctazminat metodu\u201d ad\u0131yla bilinen de\u011fi\u015fik g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler mevcutsa da, Dairemizce, Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6teden beri uygulanan \u201cnispi metod\u201d olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan hesaplama y\u00f6ntemi benimsenmektedir. Bu metoda g\u00f6re; sat\u0131\u015f tarihi itibariyle sat\u0131lan\u0131n, ay\u0131ps\u0131z ve ay\u0131pl\u0131 de\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndaki oran\u0131n, sat\u0131\u015f bedeline yans\u0131ma miktar\u0131 belirlenmektedir. Ba\u015fka bir ifade ile sat\u0131lan\u0131n, taraflar\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f bedeli g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, sat\u0131\u015f tarihi itibariyle ger\u00e7ek ay\u0131ps\u0131z rayi\u00e7 de\u011feri ile, mevcut ay\u0131pl\u0131 haldeki rayi\u00e7 de\u011feri ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenerek, bu iki de\u011ferin birbirine b\u00f6l\u00fcnmesi suretiyle elde edilecek oran, sat\u0131\u015f bedeline uygulanmaktad\u0131r. Somut olayda ise mahkemece h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 2015 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki ay\u0131pl\u0131 yani mevcut halinin rayi\u00e7 de\u011feri 110.921,00 TL olarak belirlenmesine ra\u011fmen bu de\u011fer, hesapta ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ay\u0131ps\u0131z objektif de\u011feri olarak g\u00f6sterilerek hesapta hataya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Buna g\u00f6re mahkemece ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f tarihindeki ay\u0131ps\u0131z yani 105 m2 br\u00fct alana sahip halinin objektif de\u011ferinin gerek\u00e7eli ve denetime a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde belirlendikten sonra nispi metodun uygulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden bilirki\u015fi raporu al\u0131narak sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, bu husus g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilip yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle karar\u0131n daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde iadesine, HUMK\u2019nun 440\/III-1 maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar d\u00fczeltme yolu kapal\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, 11\/11\/2019 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 13. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 11.11.2019 tarihli 2017\/825 Esas\u00a0 2019\/11133 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 13. Hukuk Dairesi 2017\/825 E., 2019\/11133 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi (T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi S\u0131fat\u0131yla) Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda ilamda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne k\u0131smen reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 avukat\u0131nca temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. KARAR Davac\u0131, daval\u0131 ile 105.000,00 TL bedel kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 105 m2 y\u00fcz \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm\u00fcnde bir adet daire sat\u0131m\u0131 konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ancak tapuda ad\u0131na tescil edilen daireyi teslim ald\u0131ktan sonra vadedildi\u011fi gibi 105 m2 de\u011fil 90 m2 lik bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri s\u00fcrerek aradaki 15m2 lik fark i\u00e7in 12.500,00 TL’nin yasal faiziyle birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. Dava, sat\u0131m konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ay\u0131pl\u0131 olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bedelin indirilmesi talebine ili\u015fkindir. Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan daval\u0131 ile davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 hususunda 30\/01\/2014 tarihli adi yaz\u0131l\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fince ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu devrinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, b\u00f6ylece taraflar\u0131n resmi \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ge\u00e7ersiz olan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye tapuda i\u015flem yapmak suretiyle ge\u00e7erlilik kazand\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 sabittir. 30\/01\/2014 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n net veya br\u00fct oldu\u011fu belirtilmeksizin 105 m2 oldu\u011fu belirtilmesine ra\u011fmen, bilirki\u015fi raporuyla ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ger\u00e7ek net alan\u0131n\u0131n 69,58 m2, br\u00fct alan\u0131n\u0131n 92,75m2 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n