{"id":101479,"date":"2025-05-29T12:50:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-29T09:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/"},"modified":"2025-05-29T12:50:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-29T09:50:00","slug":"yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>10. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2021\/7471 E., 2022\/9793 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme : ED\u0130RNE 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<br \/>\nSu\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ihra\u00e7 etme<br \/>\nH\u00fck\u00fcmler : Mahk\u00fbmiyet<\/p>\n<p>Dosya incelendi.<\/p>\n<p>GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc :<\/p>\n<p>A.San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde;<br \/>\nH\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesinden sonra, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin dosyaya sundu\u011fu 22\/08\/2022 tarihli dilek\u00e7esindeki \u201cSan\u0131k kapal\u0131 cezaevinde kalma s\u00fcrecini tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, temyiz hakk\u0131ndan feragat\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile yeniden ma\u011fduriyet ya\u015famamas\u0131 i\u00e7in ivedilikle kesinle\u015ftirmenin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 arz ve talep ederiz.\u201d \u015feklindeki beyan\u0131 temyiz iste\u011finden vazge\u00e7me niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan, temyizden vazge\u00e7mesi nedeniyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE YER OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n<p>B.San\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz incelemesi; san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcresindeki iste\u011fi nedeniyle san\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak, san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin isteminin s\u00fcresinden sonra olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 8\/1, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun 318. ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun 299. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilerek ve san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden duru\u015fma talebi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz incelemesi san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak, yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Anayasan\u0131n 141. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 34 ve 230. maddeleri gere\u011fince, h\u00fckm\u00fcn dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar\u0131n, bu kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n, iddia, savunma, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ve dosyadaki di\u011fer belgelere ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmeler ile san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin ve y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funun, hangi nedenle hangi delillere \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k olarak gerek\u00e7eye yans\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin delillerle ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ili\u015fkilendirilip ve bu \u015fekilde cezalar\u0131n \u015fahsile\u015ftirilmesi ve sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131klar\u0131n hukuk\u00ee durumlar\u0131n\u0131n saptanmas\u0131 gerekirken, a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu ilkelere uyulmadan yetersiz gerek\u00e7e ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 ile san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin duru\u015fmadaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunmas\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde oldu\u011fundan, di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri incelenmeksizin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin BOZULMASINA, bozman\u0131n niteli\u011fi ile adli kontrol s\u00fcresi ve adli kontrol ko\u015fullar\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fiklik bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131klar &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131nda verilen adli kontrol tedbirlerinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 taleplerinin reddine,<\/p>\n<p>C.San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p>H\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra UYAP sistemi \u00fczerinden MERN\u0130S&#8217;ten al\u0131narak dosyas\u0131na konulan n\u00fcfus kay\u0131t \u00f6rne\u011finde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 02\/01\/2019 tarihinde \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn belirtilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; bu hususun ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak, \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011funun tespiti halinde hakk\u0131ndaki kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 64\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri incelenmeksizin h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA,<br \/>\n03\/10\/2022 tarihinde oy birli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>TEFH\u0130M TUTANA\u011eI<\/p>\n<p>03.10.2022 tarihinde verilen bu karar Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;in kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131yla ve duru\u015fmada savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015f bulunan san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafii Avukat &#8230; &#8216;nun yoklu\u011funda, 13.10.2022 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131k olarak okundu.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>10. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2016\/697 E., 2016\/1368 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme : A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<br \/>\nSu\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma<br \/>\nH\u00fck\u00fcmler : 1-Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet (San\u0131klar &#8230; , &#8230; , &#8230; , &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131nda)<br \/>\n2- De\u011fi\u015fen su\u00e7 vasf\u0131na g\u00f6re uyu\u015fturucu madde ithal etme su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet (San\u0131klar Burhan, Kutbettin, &#8230; &#8230; , &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131nda)<\/p>\n<p>GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc :<\/p>\n<p>A) San\u0131klar &#8230; , &#8230; ve&#8230; hakk\u0131nda \u201cuyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma\u201d su\u00e7undan; san\u0131klar Burhan, Kutbettin, &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131nda ise .\/..<br \/>\n\u201cuyu\u015fturucu madde ithal etme\u201d su\u00e7undan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin incelenmesi:<\/p>\n<p>Dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re; h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;ye ait telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerine ili\u015fkin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Mahkemenin 10.12.2012 tarihli oturumunda okundu\u011fu ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da, okunan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n kendisine ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, Mahkemenin 05.02.2013, 21.05.2013 ve 03.10.2013 tarihli oturumlar\u0131nda; \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm tutanaklar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerini kabul ederek kendisine ait oldu\u011funu, ancak bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin i\u00e7eri\u011finin uyu\u015fturucu madde ticaretine ili\u015fkin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, tebli\u011fnamedeki bu y\u00f6ndeki bozma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Su\u00e7 konusu eroinin naklinde kullan\u0131lan san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;a ait &#8230; plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n m\u00fcsaderesi konusunda mahkemesince karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemlerin san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemlere uyan su\u00e7 tipi ile a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilenin d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan; yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p>H\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08.10.2015 tarihli 2014\/140 esas ve 2015\/85 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle, bu maddenin uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, san\u0131klar\u0131n durumunun yeniden belirlenmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131klar &#8230; , &#8230; , &#8230; , &#8230; , &#8230; &#8230;ve &#8230;&#8217;in m\u00fcdafileri ile san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve&#8230;&#8217;in temyiz itirazlar\u0131 ile san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;in m\u00fcdafilerinin duru\u015fmadaki savunmalar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230;y\u00f6n\u00fcnden resen de temyize tabi olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin BOZULMASINA; ancak bu durumun yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 ile ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve yerlerine \u201cAnayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08.10.2015 tarihli iptal karar\u0131ndan sonra olu\u015fan durumuna g\u00f6re, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin 1 ve 2. f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinin uygulanmas\u0131na\u201d ibaresinin yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, h\u00fckmolunan hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi ile tutuklama tarihlerine g\u00f6re san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki sal\u0131verilme ve h\u00fckmolunan hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re san\u0131klar &#8230;ve &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki yakalama karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin isteklerin reddine,<\/p>\n<p>B) San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda \u201cuyu\u015fturucu madde ithal etme\u201d su\u00e7undan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn incelenmesi:<\/p>\n<p>Telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerine ili\u015fkin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi ile dosyadaki di\u011fer bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, su\u00e7 konusu eroini ithal etti\u011fine ya da ithal su\u00e7una i\u015ftirak etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; sabit olan fiilinin, \u201cuyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma\u201d su\u00e7una yard\u0131m etmekten ibaret oldu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131narak, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 188. maddesinin 3 ve 4. f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 39. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken &#8220;uyu\u015fturucu madde ithal etme&#8221; su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 ile m\u00fcdafiinin duru\u015fmadaki savunmas\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde oldu\u011fundan, resen de temyize tabi olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, tutuklama \u015fartlar\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fiklik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki sal\u0131verilme iste\u011finin reddine,<\/p>\n<p>C) San\u0131klar &#8230; ve&#8230; hakk\u0131nda \u201cuyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma\u201d su\u00e7undan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin incelenmesi:<\/p>\n<p>Dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re; san\u0131klar\u0131n savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n aksine, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7una i\u015ftirak ettiklerine veya ele ge\u00e7irilen uyu\u015fturucu maddeler ile ilgileri oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin, ku\u015fkuyu a\u015fan kesin ve yeterli delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden, san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda beraat yerine mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda (Kapat\u0131lan) &#8230; A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2012\/36 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda 13.11.2012 tarihli karar\u0131 ile CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 109\/3-a maddesi gere\u011fince verilen yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kmamak adli kontrol tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, gere\u011fi i\u00e7in ilgili Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na,<br \/>\n28.04.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>TEFH\u0130M TUTANA\u011eI<\/p>\n<p>28.04.2016 tarihinde saat: 15.00&#8217;de verilen bu karar Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131yla ve duru\u015fmada savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015f bulunan san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafii Avukat &#8230; ve san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafii Avukat &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n y\u00fczlerine kar\u015f\u0131, san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafii Avukat &#8230; ve san\u0131klar &#8230; ve &#8230; m\u00fcdafii Avukat &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n yokluklar\u0131nda 28.04.2016 tarihinde y\u00f6ntemine uygun bi\u00e7imde, a\u00e7\u0131k olarak okunup anlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>10. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2016\/132 E., 2016\/778 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme : A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<br \/>\nSu\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma (t\u00fcm san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda)<br \/>\nH\u00fck\u00fcm : Mahk\u00fbmiyet (t\u00fcm san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda)<\/p>\n<p>Dosya incelendi.<\/p>\n<p>GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc :<\/p>\n<p>San\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin iste\u011finin, h\u00fckmedilen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re, 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n 8\/1, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n 318 ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 299. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilerek, duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak inceleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>A)San\u0131klar &#8230;, H\u00fcseyin, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin incelenmesi:<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, a\u015famalarda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n toplanan t\u00fcm delillerle birlikte gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleme uyan su\u00e7 tipi ile a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilenin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan; yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p>H\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra 24\/11\/2015 tarih ve 29542 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08\/10\/2015 tarihli 2014\/140 esas ve 2015\/85 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle, bu maddenin uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, san\u0131klar\u0131n durumunun yeniden belirlenmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131<\/p>\n<p>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; m\u00fcdafileri ve san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin BOZULMASINA; ancak bu durumlar\u0131n yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 ile ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kralar\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve yerlerine \u201cAnayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08\/10\/2015 tarihli iptal karar\u0131ndan sonra olu\u015fan durumuna g\u00f6re, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin 1 ve 2. f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinin uygulanmas\u0131na\u201d ibaresinin yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, h\u00fckmolunan hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi ve tutuklama tarihine g\u00f6re, san\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki sal\u0131verilme talebinin reddine,<\/p>\n<p>B)San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn incelenmesi:<br \/>\nSavunmas\u0131n\u0131n aksine, su\u00e7 konusu uyu\u015fturucu maddeyle ilgisi bulundu\u011funa veya di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7lar\u0131na i\u015ftirak etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin, somut olay ve olgularla \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmeyen ve maddi bulgularla desteklenmeyen telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, ku\u015fkuyu a\u015fan yeterli ve kesin delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda beraat yerine mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 08.01.2014 tarihli ara karar\u0131 ile verilen &#8220;yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 konulmas\u0131na&#8221; \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, gere\u011fi i\u00e7in ilgili Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p>14\/03\/2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200b&#8217;Bozman\u0131n niteli\u011fi ile adli kontrol s\u00fcresi ve adli kontrol ko\u015fullar\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fiklik bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131klar &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131nda verilen adli kontrol tedbirlerinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 taleplerinin reddine&#8230;&#8217; karar verilmi\u015ftir.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 10. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/7471 E., 2022\/9793 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkeme : ED\u0130RNE 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Su\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ihra\u00e7 etme H\u00fck\u00fcmler : Mahk\u00fbmiyet Dosya incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc : A.San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde; H\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesinden sonra, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin dosyaya sundu\u011fu 22\/08\/2022 tarihli dilek\u00e7esindeki \u201cSan\u0131k kapal\u0131 cezaevinde kalma s\u00fcrecini tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, temyiz hakk\u0131ndan feragat\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile yeniden ma\u011fduriyet ya\u015famamas\u0131 i\u00e7in ivedilikle kesinle\u015ftirmenin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 arz ve talep ederiz.\u201d \u015feklindeki beyan\u0131 temyiz iste\u011finden vazge\u00e7me niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan, temyizden vazge\u00e7mesi nedeniyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE YER OLMADI\u011eINA, B.San\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde; Temyiz incelemesi; san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcresindeki iste\u011fi nedeniyle san\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak, san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin isteminin s\u00fcresinden sonra olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 8\/1, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun 318. ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun 299. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilerek ve san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden duru\u015fma talebi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz incelemesi san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak, yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasan\u0131n 141. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 34 ve 230. maddeleri gere\u011fince, h\u00fckm\u00fcn dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar\u0131n, bu kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 10. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/7471 E., 2022\/9793 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkeme : ED\u0130RNE 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Su\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ihra\u00e7 etme H\u00fck\u00fcmler : Mahk\u00fbmiyet Dosya incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc : A.San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde; H\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesinden sonra, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin dosyaya sundu\u011fu 22\/08\/2022 tarihli dilek\u00e7esindeki \u201cSan\u0131k kapal\u0131 cezaevinde kalma s\u00fcrecini tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, temyiz hakk\u0131ndan feragat\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile yeniden ma\u011fduriyet ya\u015famamas\u0131 i\u00e7in ivedilikle kesinle\u015ftirmenin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 arz ve talep ederiz.\u201d \u015feklindeki beyan\u0131 temyiz iste\u011finden vazge\u00e7me niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan, temyizden vazge\u00e7mesi nedeniyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE YER OLMADI\u011eINA, B.San\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde; Temyiz incelemesi; san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcresindeki iste\u011fi nedeniyle san\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak, san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin isteminin s\u00fcresinden sonra olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 8\/1, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun 318. ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun 299. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilerek ve san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden duru\u015fma talebi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz incelemesi san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak, yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasan\u0131n 141. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 34 ve 230. maddeleri gere\u011fince, h\u00fckm\u00fcn dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar\u0131n, bu kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-29T09:50:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-29T09:50:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/\"},\"wordCount\":2165,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-29T09:50:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 10. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/7471 E., 2022\/9793 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkeme : ED\u0130RNE 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Su\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ihra\u00e7 etme H\u00fck\u00fcmler : Mahk\u00fbmiyet Dosya incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc : A.San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde; H\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesinden sonra, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin dosyaya sundu\u011fu 22\/08\/2022 tarihli dilek\u00e7esindeki \u201cSan\u0131k kapal\u0131 cezaevinde kalma s\u00fcrecini tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, temyiz hakk\u0131ndan feragat\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile yeniden ma\u011fduriyet ya\u015famamas\u0131 i\u00e7in ivedilikle kesinle\u015ftirmenin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 arz ve talep ederiz.\u201d \u015feklindeki beyan\u0131 temyiz iste\u011finden vazge\u00e7me niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan, temyizden vazge\u00e7mesi nedeniyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE YER OLMADI\u011eINA, B.San\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde; Temyiz incelemesi; san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcresindeki iste\u011fi nedeniyle san\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak, san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin isteminin s\u00fcresinden sonra olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 8\/1, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun 318. ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun 299. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilerek ve san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden duru\u015fma talebi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz incelemesi san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak, yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasan\u0131n 141. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 34 ve 230. maddeleri gere\u011fince, h\u00fckm\u00fcn dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar\u0131n, bu kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-29T09:50:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi","datePublished":"2025-05-29T09:50:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/"},"wordCount":2165,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-29T09:50:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitayin-esasa-iliskin-verdigi-kararlarda-sanik-hakkinda-uygulanan-adli-kontrol-tedbirinin-devam-edip-etmeyecegi-hakkinda-karar-verdigi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararlarda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanan adli kontrol tedbirinin devam edip etmeyece\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verdi\u011fi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101479"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101479\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}