T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
9. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/5826 E., 2019\/22774 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi taraflar vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
YARGITAY KARARI<\/p>\n
A) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:
\nDavac\u0131 vekili; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 05\/06\/2008-01\/09\/2010 ve 04\/10\/2010-05\/07\/2013 tarihleri aras\u0131nda iki d\u00f6nem uluslar aras\u0131 t\u0131r \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fc olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, birinci \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00f6neminin emeklilik nedeniyle sona erdi\u011fini ancak bu d\u00f6neme ait k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, ikinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 ise \u00fccretleri \u00f6denmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in hakl\u0131 nedenle m\u00fcvekkilinin feshetti\u011fini, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fe girerken davac\u0131dan teminat senedi al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederek; k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsili ile daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan teminat senedinin iadesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B) Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
\nDaval\u0131 vekili, davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C) Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
\nMahkemece, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
D) Temyiz:
\nKarar\u0131, taraflar temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
E) Gerek\u00e7e:<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re taraflar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
2-Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esi ile i\u015fyerine giri\u015fte i\u015fverene verdi\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi teminat senedinin kendisine iadesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f ise de daval\u0131, b\u00f6yle bir teminat senedi alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmemi\u015f, teminat senedinin var oldu\u011fu bu a\u015famada ortaya konulamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n teminat senedinin kendisine iadesine ili\u015fkin talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, bu hususta olumlu ya da olumsuz bir karar verilememesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3-Davac\u0131ya daval\u0131 i\u015fyerindeki ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 sonland\u0131ran emeklili\u011fi sonras\u0131nda, kay\u0131tlardaki \u00fccret \u00fczerinden 14 g\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 izin \u00fccreti \u00f6demesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup bu \u00f6demenin eksik oldu\u011fu, \u00f6demeye esas \u00fccrete ilave edilmesi gereken sefer primi \u00fccretinin ilave edilmedi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n ikinci d\u00f6nemin sonunda ise kullan\u0131lmayan 3 g\u00fcn daha \u00fccretli izin hakk\u0131 bulundu\u011fu sabittir.<\/p>\n
Buna g\u00f6re, emeklilik tarihindeki \u00fccret seviyesi \u00fczerinden 14 g\u00fcn \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131 hesaplan\u0131p \u00f6denen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fckten sonra bakiyesiyle ikinci d\u00f6nem sonu i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lmayan 3 g\u00fcn izin hakk\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in hesaplanan tutar toplan\u0131p, bunun \u00fczerinden \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131 talebinin kabul\u00fc gerekirken eksik \u00f6demeye ra\u011fmen ilk d\u00f6nemin tamam\u0131n\u0131n tasfiyesinin kabul\u00fc hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4-Davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fyerindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 iki d\u00f6nem halinde olup ilk d\u00f6nem emeklilik nedeniyle, ikinci d\u00f6nem ise davac\u0131n\u0131n hakl\u0131 nedenle feshiyle sona ermi\u015ftir. \u0130kinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 da 1 y\u0131l\u0131n \u00fczerinde oldu\u011fundan, davac\u0131 her iki d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Emeklilikle sona eren ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda daval\u0131 i\u015fveren kay\u0131tlardaki \u00fccreti esas alarak k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6demesi yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ancak k\u0131deme esas \u00fccretin tespitinde ilavesi gereken sefer primi kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in davac\u0131n\u0131n ilk d\u00f6nem sonundaki k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 eksik \u00f6denmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f, emeklilikle sona eren ilk d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in o tarihteki son \u00fccret \u00fczerinden k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131 hesaplat\u0131p \u00f6denen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fckten sonra varsa bakiyesi i\u00e7in ilk fesih tarihinden itibaren faiziyle tahsiline karar vermek, ayr\u0131ca ikinci d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z hesap yapt\u0131r\u0131p bu d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in \u00f6deme s\u00f6z konusu olmadan da belirlenecek k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131 ikinci fesih tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek faiziyle birlikte ayr\u0131ca h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na almakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
F) Sonu\u00e7:<\/p>\n
Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgililere iadesine 19.12.2019 tarihinde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n
K A R \u015e I O Y<\/p>\n
K\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken s\u00fcre ve ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n tasfiye edilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131p say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6nlerinden taraflar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015fverene ait bir ya da birka\u00e7 i\u015fyerinde belli bir s\u00fcre \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f bir i\u015f\u00e7inin, i\u015fini kaybetmesi halinde, i\u015finde y\u0131pranmas\u0131, yeni bir i\u015f edinmede kar\u015f\u0131la\u015faca\u011f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckler ve i\u015fyerine sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 katk\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak, ge\u00e7mi\u015f hizmetlerine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f\u00e7iye kanuni esaslar dahilinde verilen toplu paraya \u201ck\u0131dem tazminat\u0131\u201d denilmektedir. K\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131, hesab\u0131 ve \u00f6deme \u015fekli do\u011frudan \u0130\u015f Kanunlar\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
K\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, feshe ba\u011fl\u0131 haklardan olsa da, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sona erdi\u011fi her durumda talep hakk\u0131 do\u011fmamaktad\u0131r. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanununun 120 nci maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte b\u0131rak\u0131lan 1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 14 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinde, k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanabilmek i\u00e7in i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015fverene ait i\u015fyerinde en az bir y\u0131l \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 14 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7inin ayn\u0131 i\u015fverene ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak bir ya da de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrelerin k\u0131dem hesab\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden birle\u015ftirilece\u011fini h\u00fckme ba\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. O halde k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanmaya dair bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin hesab\u0131nda, i\u015f\u00e7inin daha \u00f6nceki fas\u0131lal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. Bununla birlikte, her bir fesih \u015feklinin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanacak \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi, hizmet birle\u015ftirmesi i\u00e7in \u015fartt\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin \u00f6nceki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 sebebiyle k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmi\u015fse, ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in iki defa k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denemeyece\u011finden, tasfiye edilen d\u00f6nemin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmaz. Yine, istifa etmek suretiyle i\u015fyerinden ayr\u0131lan i\u015f\u00e7i k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, istifa yoluyla sona eren \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmaz. Ancak ayn\u0131 i\u015fverene ait bir ya da de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan s\u00fcre i\u00e7in k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmemi\u015fse, bu s\u00fcre ayn\u0131 i\u015fverende ge\u00e7en sonraki hizmet s\u00fcresine eklenerek son \u00fccret \u00fczerinden k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesaplanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde t\u0131r \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fc olarak iki d\u00f6nem halinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 05.06.2008- 01.09.2010 aras\u0131nda olup, emeklilik suretiyle sona ermi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren nezdinde 04.10.2010 tarihinde yeniden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f, \u00f6denmeyen i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 sebebiyle 05.07.2013 tarihinde i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini hakl\u0131 olarak feshetti\u011fini bildirmek suretiyle i\u015fyerinden ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7iye ilk d\u00f6nem sonunda 2 y\u0131l 2 ay 26 g\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 1.722,56TL k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmi\u015ftir. Tazminata esas \u00fccretin sabit \u00fccret ve sefer primleri toplam\u0131 \u00fczerinden hesab\u0131 gerekti\u011finden dosya i\u00e7inde yer alan ve ilk derece mahkemesi ile Dairemiz taraf\u0131ndan benimsenen hesap raporuna g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in \u00f6denmesi gereken k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 toplam\u0131 5.590,06 TL’dir. Bu durumda i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin, emeklilik \u00f6ncesi d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamaktan uzak oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. K\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 tam olarak \u00f6denmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nemin tasfiye edildi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemez. Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin, fesihten itibaren yakla\u015f\u0131k bir ay sonra yeniden ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren nezdinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flamas\u0131 sebebiyle 1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 14\/2 nci maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirilece\u011fi varsay\u0131m\u0131 ile ilk d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in eksik \u00f6demeye dayal\u0131 fark k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131 talep etmedi\u011fi kabul edilmelidir. Zira ilgili Kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc ve Yarg\u0131tay uygulamas\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015f\u00e7inin aral\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131nda ara verilen s\u00fcre zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresini a\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 taktirde veya zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmezse \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcreleri birle\u015ftirilerek hesaplamaya gidilir. Eksik \u00f6deme halinde dahi ilk d\u00f6nemin tasfiye edildi\u011finin ve ancak aradaki fark\u0131n istenebilece\u011finin kabul\u00fc halinde, ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n sonraki d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken dahi zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011framas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r. \u015eu hale g\u00f6re i\u015f\u00e7inin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 tam olarak \u00f6denmedi\u011fi taktirde sonraki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 ile ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n birle\u015ftirilmesi ve yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin yasal faizi ile mahsubu cihetine gidilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131, k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denen d\u00f6nemin tasfiyesi i\u00e7in tam olarak \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6nde a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Yarg\u0131tay 9.HD. 25.12.2013 g\u00fcn, 2012\/ 32986 E, 2013\/ 34947 K.). \u0130lk d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in ihbar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n eksik \u00f6dendi\u011fi bir durumda dahi, eksik \u00f6deme sebebiyle ilk d\u00f6nemin tasfiye edilmedi\u011fi kabul edilerek her iki d\u00f6nem birle\u015ftirilerek k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir (Yarg\u0131tay 9.HD. 30.09.2019 g\u00fcn, 2016\/ 7225 E, 2019\/ 16914 K).
\nBa\u015fka bir kararda, k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 tam olarak \u00f6denmi\u015f olsa dahi, ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n tasfiye edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r(Yarg\u0131tay 22. HD. 16.04.2019 g\u00fcn, 2017\/ 21554 E, 2019\/ 8735 K.). Yine Yarg\u0131tay, muvazaal\u0131 bir as\u0131l i\u015fveren\/ alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinde tazminata esas al\u0131nan \u00fccretin eksik olmas\u0131 sebebiyle, ilk d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in \u00f6denen k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n tasfiye yerine ge\u00e7meyece\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir (Yarg\u0131tay 22. HD. 26.09.2018 g\u00fcn, 2017\/ 14362 E, 2018\/ 20206 K.).<\/p>\n
Dairemizin ba\u015fka bir karar\u0131nda, “…davac\u0131n\u0131n birinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak \u00f6denip \u00f6denmedi\u011fi tespit edilerek tam olarak \u00f6denmi\u015f ise birinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n tasfiye edildi\u011finin kabul\u00fc ile sonuca gidilmesi, birinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tam olarak \u00f6denmemi\u015f ise yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeler avans kabul edilerek \u015fimdiki gibi mahsup edilerek karar verilmesi” gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir (Yarg\u0131tay 9.HD. 25.05.2015 g\u00fcn, 2014\/ 6960 E, 2015\/ 18990 K.). Yine Dairemiz karar\u0131nda, muvazzaf askerlik sebebiyle ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 sona eren bir i\u015f\u00e7i bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin; o tarihteki \u00fccrete g\u00f6re k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 halinde ilk d\u00f6nemin tasfiye edilmi\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, aksi halde her iki d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in yap\u0131lacak hesaptan mahsup cihetine gidilmesi gerekti\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir (Yarg\u0131tay 9.HD. 11.02.2015 g\u00fcn, 2015\/ 1288 E, 2015\/ 5772 K.).<\/p>\n
1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 14\/2 inci maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015f\u00e7inin ayn\u0131 i\u015fverende ge\u00e7en aral\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem hesab\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k olup, aksine uygulama i\u00e7in \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in fesih \u015fekline g\u00f6re k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 veya kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak \u00f6denmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla ilk d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in hesaplanan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak \u00f6denmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece tasfiyeden s\u00f6z edilemez ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131nda hizmet birle\u015ftirmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren ana kural uygulama alan\u0131 bulur.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7iye \u00f6denen k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, \u00fccretin as\u0131l b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc olu\u015fturan sefer primi eklenmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in hak kazan\u0131lan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok alt\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n tasfiye edildi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011finden, her iki d\u00f6nemim birle\u015ftirilmesi suretiyle ve son \u00fccretten hesaplanan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nce \u00f6denen 1.722,56 TL’nin yasal faizi ile mahsubu ile sonuca gidilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle, Dairemiz \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan verilen bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n (4) no’lu bendine kat\u0131lam\u0131yorum.19.12.2019<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 19.12.2019 tarihli, 2016\/5826 E., 2019\/22774 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/5826 E., 2019\/22774 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi taraflar vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: YARGITAY KARARI A) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti: Davac\u0131 vekili; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 05\/06\/2008-01\/09\/2010 ve 04\/10\/2010-05\/07\/2013 tarihleri aras\u0131nda iki d\u00f6nem uluslar aras\u0131 t\u0131r \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fc olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, birinci \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00f6neminin emeklilik nedeniyle sona erdi\u011fini ancak bu d\u00f6neme ait k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, ikinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 ise \u00fccretleri \u00f6denmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in hakl\u0131 nedenle m\u00fcvekkilinin feshetti\u011fini, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fe girerken davac\u0131dan teminat senedi al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederek; k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsili ile daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan teminat senedinin iadesini talep etmi\u015ftir. B) Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti: Daval\u0131 vekili, davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir. C) Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti: Mahkemece, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. D) Temyiz: Karar\u0131, taraflar temyiz etmi\u015ftir. E) Gerek\u00e7e: 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re taraflar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir. 2-Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esi ile i\u015fyerine giri\u015fte i\u015fverene verdi\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi teminat senedinin kendisine iadesine karar verilmesini …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n