T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
7. Hukuk Dairesi <\/p>\n
2013\/16120 E., 2013\/11938 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131 ve di\u011fer arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ektikleri ihtardan sonra i\u015fyerinde as\u0131l i\u015fveren ile alt i\u015fveren g\u00f6z\u00fcken \u015firket y\u00f6neticilerinin aralar\u0131nda toplant\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, … \u015firketi \u0130nsan kaynaklar\u0131 y\u00f6neticisi …’n\u0131n 8-16 ve 16-24 vardiyas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7ileri toplayarak avukat olarak \u015fahs\u0131na ve i\u015f\u00e7ilere ile ihtar \u00e7eken b\u00fct\u00fcn m\u00fcvekkillerine a\u011f\u0131r hakaretlerde bulundu\u011funu, bu nedenle hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu, bu hakaret ve tehditlerin CD’si oldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frenmeleri \u00fczerine i\u015flenin bu su\u00e7lar nedeniyle \u00f6\u00e7 almak amac\u0131yla sanki … davac\u0131ya de\u011fil, davac\u0131 …ya ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015firkete 19.03.2011 tarihinde 00-08 vardiyas\u0131nda hakaretlerde bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131 ile 23.03.2011 tarihinde i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 ve arkada\u015flar\u0131na \u00f6ncelikle t\u00fcm haklar\u0131 \u00f6denerek i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 beyan edilerek \u00f6nlerine bir tak\u0131m belgeler imzalamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f, \u00f6nlerine konulan bu yaz\u0131lar\u0131 imzalanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylenmesi \u00fczerine ortaya i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fesih bildirimi adl\u0131 bir belge getirilerek ( bu matbu belge davac\u0131lardan …, …, … hakk\u0131nda) d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, bu d\u00fczenleme esnas\u0131nda evrak matbu ve yukar\u0131da anlat\u0131lan nedenlerle …’n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkillere yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tehdit ve hakareti \u00f6rtmek amac\u0131yla yerine getirildi\u011finden bir k\u0131s\u0131m maddi yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131klar yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilin ta\u015feron gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnen \u015firketin m\u00fcvekkile verdi\u011fi maa\u015f bordrosunda say\u0131m eleman\u0131 unvan\u0131 ile g\u00f6sterilmekte ise de i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilirken ilgili matbu evrakta forklift operat\u00f6r\u00fc olarak g\u00f6sterildi\u011fini, as\u0131ls\u0131z acele bir \u015fekilde kendi \u00fcst\u00fc konumunda olan …’y\u0131 kurtarmak amac\u0131yla operasyon m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f iftira niteli\u011findeki belgenin i\u00e7eri\u011finden davac\u0131n\u0131n haberdar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi savunma hakk\u0131 da verilmeden i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 hakaret ve tehdide maruz kalm\u0131\u015fken hakk\u0131nda at\u0131lan iftira nedeniyle bir kat daha elem ve ac\u0131 duydu\u011funu, \u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erli neden olmadan feshedildi\u011fini belirterek feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011finin tespitine, i\u015fe iadesine, i\u015fe ba\u015flatmama tazminat\u0131 ile bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 … vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin \u015firketin \u0130nsan Kaynaklar\u0131 Direkt\u00f6r\u00fc hakk\u0131nda hakaret etmesi ve k\u00fcf\u00fcrl\u00fc s\u00f6ylemlerde bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle hakl\u0131 olarak feshedildi\u011fini, di\u011fer daval\u0131n\u0131n as\u0131l i\u015fveren oldu\u011funu savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 …. \u015eirketi vekili, davac\u0131 asil i\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f ise de bunun do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, belirtilen i\u015flerin depolama faaliyetleri olup bunlar\u0131n as\u0131l i\u015f olan sigara \u00fcretimi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki lojistik i\u015fler oldu\u011funu, \u015firketin di\u011fer \u015firket …’den lojistik hizmetleri sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer daval\u0131n\u0131n bu hizmeti kendi nam ve hesab\u0131na istihdam etti\u011fi kendi personeli ile \u015firkete sundu\u011funu, aralar\u0131nda as\u0131l-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle \u015firkete husumet y\u00f6neltilemeyece\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n 19.03.2011 tarihinde “o” vardiyas\u0131nda \u0130K Direkt\u00f6r\u00fc … taraf\u0131ndan 17.03.2011 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen toplant\u0131 ile ilgili olarak toplant\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ekinildi\u011fi i\u00e7in gece vardiyas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan personellerle yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsayd\u0131 kavga \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek hakaret ve k\u00fcf\u00fcrl\u00fc konu\u015ftu\u011fu tespit edildi\u011fi, i\u015fvereni taraf\u0131ndan savunmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015fse de davac\u0131n\u0131n savunma vermekten imtina etti\u011fini ve tutanak tutuldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n hakarete varan k\u00fcf\u00fcrl\u00fc konu\u015fmalar\u0131 i\u015fverenine i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini hakl\u0131 nedenle fesih hakk\u0131 verdi\u011fini, i\u015fvereni … firmas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 25\/2-b gere\u011fi fesih yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, “daval\u0131 … A.\u015e.nin i\u015fyerinde \u00fcretim yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, … A.\u015e.nin ise \u00fcretime yard\u0131mc\u0131 haz\u0131rl\u0131k i\u015fleri yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu i\u015fin i\u015fletmenin gere\u011fi ve teknolojik nedenlerle uzmanl\u0131k gerektiren bir i\u015f olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, her iki i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7ilerinin ve i\u015fverenlerinin ayn\u0131 oldu\u011fu, kendi i\u015f\u00e7ileri \u00fczerinde di\u011ferinin emir ve talimat\u0131, i\u015fe alma ve \u00e7\u0131karma yetkilerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olayda muvazaa olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Esasen muvazaa olay\u0131n\u0131n bu davan\u0131n sonucuna etkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r.Daval\u0131 taraf davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fine \u0130\u015f Kanunu,m.25\/II- b gere\u011fince i\u015fverenin direkt\u00f6r\u00fc …\u2019ya hakaret edildi\u011fi nedeniyle son verildi\u011fini belirtmektedirler. Dinlenen tan\u0131klardan \u00f6nemli b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc hakaret olay\u0131na tan\u0131k de\u011fildirler. duyduklar\u0131n\u0131 belirtmektedirler., daval\u0131 … tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 … ise i\u015fverenin di\u011fer bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131na hakareti do\u011frulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131 taraf davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fine \u0130\u015f Kanunu,m.25\/II- b gere\u011fince i\u015fverenin direkt\u00f6r\u00fc …\u2019ya hakaret edildi\u011fi nedeniyle son verildi\u011fini belirtmektedirler. Dinlenen tan\u0131klardan \u00f6nemli b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc hakaret olay\u0131na tan\u0131k de\u011fildirler. Duyduklar\u0131n\u0131 belirtmektedirler. Ke\u015fifte dinlenen davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 …, hakaret olay\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f, daval\u0131 … tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 … ise davac\u0131n\u0131n, insan kaynaklar\u0131 direkt\u00f6r\u00fc …’ya hakaret etti\u011fi i\u00e7in i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 10\/12\/2012 tarihli bilirki\u015fi heyeti raporu do\u011frultusunda davac\u0131n\u0131n hakaret eylemi do\u011fruland\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akti \u015firketin \u0130nsan Kaynaklar\u0131 Direkt\u00f6r\u00fcne k\u00fcf\u00fcr ve hakaret etti\u011finden bahisle feshedilmi\u015f ise de dosyaya sunulan olaya ili\u015fkin tutanakta k\u00fcf\u00fcr ve hakaret i\u00e7erikli s\u00f6z\u00fcn belirtilmedi\u011fi ve soyut bir \u015fekilde sadece isimleri belirlenen 4 i\u015f\u00e7inin hakaret ve k\u00fcf\u00fcr i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zler s\u00f6yledikleri belirtilmi\u015f olup tutanak alt\u0131nda imzas\u0131 bulunan 2 i\u015f\u00e7i, duru\u015fmadaki beyanlar\u0131nda olay\u0131 g\u00f6rmedikleri di\u011fer tutanak m\u00fcmziinin anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re tanzim ettiklerini beyan ettileri g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, olay\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc beyan eden daval\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 … ise duru\u015fmada “… g\u00f6sterdikleri tepki nedeniyle bizimle toplant\u0131 yapsayd\u0131 biliyordu ba\u015f\u0131na gelecekleri dediler ve ayr\u0131ca \u015ferefsiz diyerek …’ya hakaret ettiler” \u015feklinde beyanda bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla daval\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n isimleri tespit edilen i\u015f\u00e7ilerden hangisi ya da hangilerinin somut olarak sarfetti\u011fi s\u00f6zleri dile getirmeyip genelle\u015ftirmesi ve olaya ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu belirtilen tutanakta ise somut olarak k\u00fcf\u00fcr ve hakaret i\u00e7erikli olan s\u00f6zlerin ne oldu\u011fu belirtilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda i\u015fverence yap\u0131lan feshin hakl\u0131 nedene dayanmayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi olay\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda daval\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sonradan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f soyut beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda delil de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erli neden olarak da kabul edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olup mahkemece yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile yap\u0131lan feshin hakl\u0131 nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki temel uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, daval\u0131lar aras\u0131nda muvazaa bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Alt i\u015fveren; bir i\u015f yerinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen mal ve hizmet \u00fcretimine ili\u015fkin as\u0131l i\u015fin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde veya yard\u0131mc\u0131 i\u015flerde, i\u015fletmenin ve i\u015fin gere\u011fi ile teknolojik nedenlerle uzmanl\u0131k gerektiren alanlarda i\u015f alan ve bu i\u015f i\u00e7in g\u00f6revlendirdi\u011fi i\u015f\u00e7ilerini, sadece bu i\u015fyerinde ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131ran di\u011fer i\u015fveren olarak tan\u0131mlanabilir. Alt i\u015fverenin i\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fveren ise as\u0131l i\u015fveren olarak adland\u0131r\u0131labilir. Bu tan\u0131mlamalara g\u00f6re as\u0131l i\u015fveren – alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edebilmek i\u00e7in iki ayr\u0131 i\u015fverenin olmas\u0131, mal veya hizmet \u00fcretimine dair bir i\u015fin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7ilerin sadece as\u0131l i\u015fverenden al\u0131nan i\u015f kapsam\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve taraflar\u0131n muvazaal\u0131 bir ili\u015fki i\u00e7ine girmemeleri gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
Alt i\u015fverene yard\u0131mc\u0131 i\u015fin verilmesinde bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama olmasa da, as\u0131l i\u015fin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn teknolojik uzmanl\u0131k gerektirmesi zorunludur. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanununun 2 nci maddesinde, as\u0131l i\u015fveren alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde yasa koyucunun amac\u0131ndan da yola \u00e7\u0131k\u0131larak, as\u0131l i\u015fin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn alt i\u015fverene verilmesinde \u201ci\u015fletmenin ve i\u015fin gere\u011fi\u201d ile \u201cteknolojik nedenlerle uzmanl\u0131k gerektiren i\u015fler\u201d \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn bir arada bulunmas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r. Yasan\u0131n 2 nci maddesinin alt\u0131nc\u0131 ve yedinci f\u0131kralar\u0131nda \u201ci\u015fletmenin ve i\u015fin gere\u011fi ile teknolojik nedenlerle uzmanl\u0131k gerektiren i\u015fler\u201d s\u00f6zc\u00fcklerine yer verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 bu gereklili\u011fi ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Alt \u0130\u015fverenlik Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 11 inci maddesinde de yukar\u0131daki anlat\u0131mlara paralel bi\u00e7imde, as\u0131l i\u015fin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn alt i\u015fverene verilebilmesi i\u00e7in \u201ci\u015fletmenin ve i\u015fin gere\u011fi ile teknolojik sebeplerle uzmanl\u0131k gerektirmesi\u201d \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n birlikte ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015fverenler aras\u0131nda muvazaal\u0131 bi\u00e7imde as\u0131l i\u015fveren alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi kurulmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmek amac\u0131yla \u0130\u015f Kanununun 2\u2019nci maddesinde baz\u0131 muvazaa kriterlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Muvazaa Bor\u00e7lar Kanununda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup, taraflar\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri aldatmak amac\u0131yla, kendi ger\u00e7ek iradelerine uymayan, aralar\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7 meydana getirmesini arzu etmedikleri, g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fte bir anla\u015fma olarak tan\u0131mlanabilir. Muvazaada, taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri aldatma kast\u0131 bulunmakta ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmedeki ger\u00e7ek ama\u00e7 gizlenmektedir. Muvazaa genel ispat kurallar\u0131 ile ispat edilebilir. Bundan ba\u015fka \u0130\u015f Kanununun 2\u2019nci maddesinin yedinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen hususlar\u0131n, aksi kan\u0131tlanabilen adi kanun\u00ee karineler oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
5538 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile \u0130\u015f Kanununun 2\u2019nci maddesine baz\u0131 f\u0131kralar eklenmi\u015f ve kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131yla sermayesinin yar\u0131s\u0131ndan fazlas\u0131n\u0131n kamuya ait olan ortakl\u0131klara dair ayr\u0131k durumlar d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Ancak, maddenin di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe tabi tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, as\u0131l i\u015fveren alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinin unsurlar\u0131 ve muvazaa \u00f6\u011feleri de\u011fi\u015fmemi\u015ftir. Yasal olarak verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan bir i\u015fin alt i\u015fverene b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 veya muvazaal\u0131 bir ili\u015fki i\u00e7ine girilmesi halinde, i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ba\u015ftan itibaren as\u0131l i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7ileri olarak i\u015flem g\u00f6recekleri 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 2\u2019nci maddesinin yedinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k bi\u00e7imde ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Kamu i\u015fverenleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 bir uygulamaya gidilmesi hukuken korunamaz. Muvazaaya dayanan bir ili\u015fkide i\u015f\u00e7i, ger\u00e7ek i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7isi olmakla k\u0131dem ve unvan\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir kadro kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ve di\u011fer i\u015f\u00e7ilerle ayn\u0131 \u00fccreti talep edememesi, \u0130\u015f Kanununun 5 inci maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen e\u015fitlik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturur. Yine ko\u015fullar\u0131n olu\u015fmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen i\u015f\u00e7inin toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden yararlanamamas\u0131, Anayasal temeli olan sendikal haklar\u0131 engelleyen bir durumdur. Dairemizin kararlar\u0131 da bu do\u011frultudad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015f Kanununun 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 15.5.2008 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5763 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 1 inci maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f ve alt i\u015fverenin i\u015fyerini bildirim y\u00fck\u00fcm\u00fc getirilmi\u015ftir. Alt i\u015fveren bu bildirimi as\u0131l i\u015fverenle aralar\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olan yaz\u0131l\u0131 alt i\u015fverenlik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve gerekli belgelerle birlikte yapmak durumundad\u0131r. Alt i\u015fverenlik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ilgili b\u00f6lge m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile gerekti\u011finde i\u015f m\u00fcfetti\u015fleri taraf\u0131ndan incelenecek ve kurumca re\u2019sen muvazaa ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131labilecektir.<\/p>\n
Muvazaan\u0131n tespiti halinde bu y\u00f6nde haz\u0131rlanan m\u00fcfetti\u015f raporu ilgililere bildirilir ve ilgililer alt\u0131 i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7inde yetkili i\u015f mahkemesine itiraz edebilirler. \u0130tiraz \u00fczerine verilen kararlar kesindir. \u0130\u015f M\u00fcfetti\u015fli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan muvazaal\u0131 alt i\u015fverenlik ili\u015fkisinin tespit edildi\u011fi rapora ilgililerin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde itiraz etmemesi ya da mahkemece muvazaal\u0131 i\u015flemin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 halinde, alt i\u015fverenli\u011fe dair tescil i\u015flemi iptal edilir. Bu halde alt i\u015fveren i\u015f\u00e7ileri ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7tan itibaren as\u0131l i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7ileri say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
As\u0131l i\u015fveren alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi ve muvazaa konular\u0131, 5763 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasayla i\u015f kanununda yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikler ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan Alt \u0130\u015fveren Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin ard\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 bir anlam kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u00f6netmelikte \u201cyaz\u0131l\u0131 alt i\u015fverenlik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u201dnden s\u00f6z edilmi\u015f ve \u00e7e\u015fitli tan\u0131mlara yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Alt \u0130\u015fveren Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finde;<\/p>\n
1) \u0130\u015fyerinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen mal veya hizmet \u00fcretimine ili\u015fkin as\u0131l i\u015fin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde uzmanl\u0131k gerektirmeyen i\u015flerin alt i\u015fverene verilmesini,<\/p>\n
2) Daha \u00f6nce o i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan kimse ile kurulan alt i\u015fverenlik ili\u015fkisini,<\/p>\n
3) As\u0131l i\u015fveren i\u015f\u00e7ilerinin alt i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fe al\u0131narak haklar\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanmak suretiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaya devam ettirilmesini,<\/p>\n
4) Kamusal y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerden ka\u00e7\u0131nmak veya i\u015f\u00e7ilerin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yahut \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma mevzuat\u0131ndan kaynaklanan haklar\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlamak ya da ortadan kald\u0131rmak gibi taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ek iradelerini gizlemeye y\u00f6nelik i\u015flemleri, ihtiva eden s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler muvazaal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
\nSomut olayda davac\u0131 forklift operat\u00f6r\u00fc olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve k\u0131deminin yakla\u015f\u0131k 3 y\u0131l oldu\u011funu belirterek daval\u0131 \u015firketler aras\u0131nda muvazaa oldu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015f, daval\u0131 \u015firket vekilleri ise muvazaa iddias\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 as\u0131l-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinin bulundu\u011funu savunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece her ne kadar mahallinde ke\u015fif yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve teknik bilirki\u015fi heyet raporu al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ise de s\u00f6z konusu ke\u015fif ve al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firketler aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkinin tespiti y\u00f6n\u00fcnde yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Zira ayn\u0131 mahkemece istenilen bir k\u0131s\u0131m raporlarda daval\u0131lar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkinin as\u0131l-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi oldu\u011fu, bir k\u0131sm\u0131nda ise muvazaa bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015f olup mahkemede bu nedenle baz\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda muvazaay\u0131 kabul etmi\u015f iken baz\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda as\u0131l-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. verilen baz\u0131 kararlarda daval\u0131lar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fki as\u0131l-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi kabul edilirken baz\u0131 kararda ise muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.
\nBu nedenle mahkemece \u00f6ncelikle; daval\u0131 \u015firketlerin faaliyet alanlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi amac\u0131yla ticari kay\u0131tlar ile daval\u0131 … \u015firketinin \u00fcretim a\u015famalar\u0131n\u0131 tek tek g\u00f6sterir i\u015f organizasyon yap\u0131s\u0131na ili\u015fkin kay\u0131tlar daval\u0131 \u015firketten celp edilmesi gerekmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda daval\u0131lardan … \u015firketinden ara\u00e7 kabul \u00e7ektisi formu, mamul transfer formu \u00f6rnekleri, malzeme transfer formalar\u0131, t\u00fct\u00fcn mamulleri picking listesi, ay sonu ve y\u0131l sonu say\u0131m \u00f6rnek ve tutanaklar\u0131 istenmi\u015f ise de s\u00f6z konusu \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan bu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n di\u011fer daval\u0131dan talep edilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ancak mahkemece bu y\u00f6n \u00fczerinde durulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f ile yak\u0131ndan ilgisi bulunma ihtimali bulunan bu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n da getirtilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
S\u00f6z konusu belgeler temin edildikten sonra mahkemece \u00fcniversitelerden daval\u0131 \u015firketlerin faaliyet konular\u0131nda uzman bilirki\u015filer arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ke\u015fif yap\u0131larak ve hakimin davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc uyar\u0131nca dinlenen tan\u0131klar ke\u015fif s\u0131ras\u0131nda yeniden dinlenerek davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin ne oldu\u011funun yerinde tespiti ile yap\u0131lan bu i\u015fin tutanaklara eksiksiz ge\u00e7irilerek bilirki\u015filerden bu i\u015fin daval\u0131lar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda bir i\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yoksa daval\u0131 … \u015firketinin asli faaliyeti olan sigara \u00fcretiminin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 niteli\u011finde de oldu\u011funun belirlenmesi, as\u0131l i\u015f oldu\u011funun tespiti halinde ise alt i\u015fverene devrinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti gerekmektedir. Yine tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re daval\u0131 … \u015firketinin … fabrikas\u0131n\u0131n kapanmas\u0131ndan sonra fabrikaya getirilen bu i\u015f\u00e7ilere i\u015flerin daval\u0131 … i\u015f\u00e7ileri taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6\u011fretildi\u011fi bir k\u0131s\u0131m tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan beyan edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda mahkemece bu hususlar ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak davac\u0131n\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir eyleminin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 teredd\u00fcts\u00fcz belirlenerek t\u00fcm dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finin yeniden de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak, daval\u0131 … ile daval\u0131 … \u015firketi aras\u0131ndaki niyet mektubu ve ekleri ile i\u015fyerinde fiili durum kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak davac\u0131 ve arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin daval\u0131lar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, as\u0131l i\u015f niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dinlenilecek tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131, i\u015fyerinin \u00fcretim mekanizmas\u0131n\u0131n eksiksiz tespiti ile davac\u0131 ve arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin as\u0131l i\u015f olan \u00fcretim kapsam\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 her iki \u015firket kay\u0131tlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lacak inceleme ile eksiksiz bir \u015fekilde belirlenerek sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile daval\u0131 \u015firketler aras\u0131nda as\u0131l i\u015fveren-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi oldu\u011funun belirtilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece bu y\u00f6n \u00fczerinde durulmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucu davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde davac\u0131ya iadesine, 26.06.2013 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle KES\u0130N olarak karar verildi.<\/p>\n
——–<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
1. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2010\/587 E. \u00a0, \u00a02010\/2008 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : S\u0130VAS 1. ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 01\/10\/2009
\nNUMARASI : 2008\/107-2009\/267<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada; Davac\u0131, ortak miras b\u0131rakan e\u015fi S.’in 2107 ada 1 say\u0131l\u0131 parselde \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na birer daireye tekab\u00fcl eden paylar verdi\u011fini, i\u015flemin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, di\u011fer \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n miras pay\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kendisine para verdiklerini, ancak daval\u0131 o\u011flunun buna yana\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda iptal-tescil istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bedelini \u00f6dedi\u011fini, davac\u0131 annesinin e\u015fiyle ge\u00e7inememesi ve onu istememesi nedeniyle bu davay\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtip, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.
\nMahkemece, miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 payla\u015ft\u0131rmaya davac\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131za g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, resmi aktin aksinin tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131yla da kan\u0131tlanamayaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Karar, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla; Tetkik Hakimi …. raporu okundu, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi al\u0131nd\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Dava, muris muvazaas\u0131 hukuksal nedenine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali-tescil iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve toplanan delillerden, taraflar\u0131n ortak miras b\u0131rakan\u0131 S.in, \u00fczerinde kat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 in\u015faat yapt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 2107 ada 1 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki 960\/2400 pay\u0131n\u0131n 240’\u0131n\u0131 o\u011flu A.’a, 240’\u0131n\u0131 o\u011flu V.’e, 240’\u0131n\u0131 o\u011flu B.’ye, 240’\u0131n\u0131 da \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye \u00a007.12.1998 tarihli resmi akitte sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla devretti\u011fi, sonradan ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kat irtifak\u0131 kuruldu\u011fu ve \u00e7eki\u015fmeli 2 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn A.’a isabet etti\u011fi; miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n 14.12.2005’te \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, geride miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 olarak e\u015fi ve 4 o\u011flunun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, eldeki davan\u0131n e\u015f taraf\u0131ndan o\u011flu A. aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n, sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 o\u011fluna birer daire, bir o\u011fluna da \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye sat\u0131lan dairenin paras\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fi, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda payla\u015ft\u0131rma amac\u0131yla hareket etti\u011fi, davac\u0131 e\u015fin de buna r\u0131za g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Ger\u00e7ekten de miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n, sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda hak dengesini g\u00f6zeten, kabul edilebilir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ve t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 kapsar bi\u00e7imde bir payla\u015ft\u0131rma yapmas\u0131 halinde mal ka\u00e7\u0131rmak kast\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilmeyece\u011finden, olayda 1.4.1974 tarih 1\/2 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130nan\u00e7lar\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 ku\u015fkusuzdur.\u00a0
\nNe var ki, miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 lehine bir tak\u0131m kazand\u0131rmalarda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakta ise de, miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndan olan e\u015fi lehine b\u00f6yle bir tasarrufu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a feragati olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece e\u015finin \u00e7ocuklar lehine ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen tasarruflara ses \u00e7\u0131karmamas\u0131n\u0131n, hakk\u0131ndan feragat etti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyebilme ve b\u00f6ylece t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 kapsayan bir payla\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etme olana\u011f\u0131 yoktur. Esasen muvazaal\u0131 i\u015fleme r\u0131za g\u00f6sterilmesi veya icazet verilmesine hukuken sonu\u00e7 ba\u011flanamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu durumda, mahkemece i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, uygulamada ve \u00f6\u011fretide “muris muvazaas\u0131” olarak tan\u0131mlanan muvazaa, niteli\u011fi itibariyle nisbi (mevsuf-vas\u0131fl\u0131) muvazaa t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bu t\u00fcr muvazaada miras b\u0131rakan ger\u00e7ekten s\u00f6zle\u015fme yapmak ve tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 devretmek istemekte, ancak miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 miras hakk\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rakmak i\u00e7in esas amac\u0131n\u0131 gizleyerek, ger\u00e7ekte ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamak istedi\u011fi tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131, tapuda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 resmi s\u00f6zle\u015fmede iradesini sat\u0131\u015f veya \u00f6l\u00fcnceye kadar bakma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131klamak suretiyle devretmektedir.<\/p>\n
Yerle\u015fmi\u015f Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda ve l-4-1974 tarih 1\/2 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130nan\u00e7lar\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrdeki s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ek iradelerine uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, gizli ba\u011f\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi de Medeni Kanunun 706, Bor\u00e7lar Kanunun 213 ve Tapu Kanunun 26. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekil ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan yoksun bulundu\u011fundan, sakl\u0131 pay \u00a0sahibi olsun veya olmas\u0131n miras hakk\u0131 \u00e7i\u011fnenen t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar dava a\u00e7arak resmi s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin muvazaa nedeni ile ge\u00e7ersizli\u011finin tespitini ve buna dayan\u0131larak olu\u015fturulan tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptalini isteyebilirler.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Hemen belirtmek gerekir ki, bu t\u00fcr uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131, adil ve do\u011fru bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilmesi, daval\u0131ya yap\u0131lan temlikin ger\u00e7ek y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn di\u011fer bir s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n as\u0131l irade ve amac\u0131n\u0131n duraksamaya yer b\u0131rakmayacak bi\u00e7imde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Bir i\u00e7 sorun olan ve gizlenen ger\u00e7ek irade ve amac\u0131n tespiti ve ayd\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 genellikle zor oldu\u011fundan bu y\u00f6ndeki delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131lmas\u0131 yan\u0131nda birlikte ve do\u011fru \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirilmesi de b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Bunun i\u00e7in de \u00fclke ve y\u00f6renin gelenek ve g\u00f6renekleri, toplumsal e\u011filimleri, olaylar\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131, miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi yapmakta hakl\u0131 ve makul bir nedeninin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 yan\u0131n al\u0131\u015f g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sat\u0131\u015f bedeli ile s\u00f6zle\u015fme tarihindeki ger\u00e7ek de\u011fer aras\u0131ndaki fark, taraflar ile miras b\u0131rakan aras\u0131ndaki be\u015feri ili\u015fki gibi olgulardan yararlan\u0131lmas\u0131nda zorunluluk vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, t\u00fcm delillerin yukar\u0131da de\u011finilen ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru de\u011fildir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itiraz\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenden \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc yerindedir. Kabul\u00fcyle, h\u00fckm\u00fcn HUMK.’nun 428.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, al\u0131nan pe\u015fin harc\u0131n temyiz edene geri verilmesine, 24.02.2010 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 26.06.2013 tarihli, 2013\/16120 E., 2013\/11938 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ve<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 24.02.2010 tarihli, 2010\/587 E., 2010\/2008 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2013\/16120 E., 2013\/11938 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131 ve di\u011fer arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ektikleri ihtardan sonra i\u015fyerinde as\u0131l i\u015fveren ile alt i\u015fveren g\u00f6z\u00fcken \u015firket y\u00f6neticilerinin aralar\u0131nda toplant\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, … \u015firketi \u0130nsan kaynaklar\u0131 y\u00f6neticisi …’n\u0131n 8-16 ve 16-24 vardiyas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7ileri toplayarak avukat olarak \u015fahs\u0131na ve i\u015f\u00e7ilere ile ihtar \u00e7eken b\u00fct\u00fcn m\u00fcvekkillerine a\u011f\u0131r hakaretlerde bulundu\u011funu, bu nedenle hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu, bu hakaret ve tehditlerin CD’si oldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frenmeleri \u00fczerine i\u015flenin bu su\u00e7lar nedeniyle \u00f6\u00e7 almak amac\u0131yla sanki … davac\u0131ya de\u011fil, davac\u0131 …ya ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015firkete 19.03.2011 tarihinde 00-08 vardiyas\u0131nda hakaretlerde bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131 ile 23.03.2011 tarihinde i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 ve arkada\u015flar\u0131na \u00f6ncelikle t\u00fcm haklar\u0131 \u00f6denerek i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 beyan edilerek \u00f6nlerine bir tak\u0131m belgeler imzalamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f, \u00f6nlerine konulan bu yaz\u0131lar\u0131 imzalanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylenmesi \u00fczerine ortaya i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fesih bildirimi adl\u0131 bir belge getirilerek ( bu matbu belge davac\u0131lardan …, …, … hakk\u0131nda) d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, bu d\u00fczenleme esnas\u0131nda evrak matbu ve yukar\u0131da anlat\u0131lan nedenlerle …’n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkillere yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tehdit ve hakareti \u00f6rtmek amac\u0131yla yerine getirildi\u011finden bir k\u0131s\u0131m maddi yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131klar yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilin ta\u015feron gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnen \u015firketin …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76918","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n