{"id":7430,"date":"2024-10-24T11:33:00","date_gmt":"2024-10-24T08:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/"},"modified":"2024-10-24T11:33:00","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T08:33:00","slug":"on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/","title":{"rendered":"AUF DER GRUNDLAGE DER AUFFORDERUNG DER REGISTRIERUNG DER URKUNDE, DER K\u00dcNDIGUNG UND DAS RECHT VOR, DIE DISCOVERY \u2013 AKTIE AKTION"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.
\nYARGITAY
\n7. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130
\nE. 2023\/2455
\nK. 2024\/1999
\nT. 4.4.2024<\/p>\n

\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi )<\/p>\n

KE\u015e\u0130F ( \u00d6n Al\u0131m Hakk\u0131na Dayal\u0131 Tapu \u0130ptali ve Tescil \u0130stemi – Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA ( HMK 259\/2. Maddesi Gere\u011fince Mahalli Bilirki\u015filer Taraflar\u0131n Tan\u0131klar\u0131 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenerek Taraf Beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ve Savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n Al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 Mahkeme Hakimince Edinilen Mahkeme G\u00f6zlemi de Tutana\u011fa Yaz\u0131larak Tutanakta Ayr\u0131ca Davac\u0131n\u0131n Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Daval\u0131ya Pay Satan\u0131n Ayr\u0131 Ayr\u0131 Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcmler Bulunup Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Belirlenerek \u00c7eli\u015fkili Beyanlar Varsa Giderilerek ve Tan\u0131klarca G\u00f6sterilecek Yerler Uzman M\u00fchendis Bilirki\u015fice D\u00fczenlenecek Krokide Denetime Elveri\u015fli \u015eekilde \u0130\u015faretlenmek Suretiyle Eylemli Payla\u015fman\u0131n Mevcut Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Saptanmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi )<\/p>\n

6100\/m.27,288\/1,290<\/p>\n

4721\/m.2<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZET: Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, \u00f6n al\u0131m hakk\u0131na dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta; mahkemenin ta\u015f\u0131nmazda fiili taksim olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rma yeterli de\u011fildir. Fiili taksim olgusu mahkemece re’sen dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden, \u00f6ncelikle y\u00f6reyi iyi bilen mahalli bilirki\u015fi isimleri tespit edilmeli, sonras\u0131nda mahalli bilirki\u015filer ve taraflar\u0131n g\u00f6sterdikleri tan\u0131klar yap\u0131lacak ke\u015fifte ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda dinlenmelidir. Sat\u0131c\u0131 zaman\u0131nda; \u00f6nal\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanan davac\u0131n\u0131n ve daval\u0131ya pay satan\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki kulland\u0131klar\u0131 yerlerin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenmesi gerekir. Bilirki\u015filerden; ke\u015ffi izlemeye ve denetlemeye elveri\u015fli krokili rapor haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 istenmelidir. T\u00fcm bu i\u015flemlerin akabinde, ta\u015f\u0131nmazda fiili taksimin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilerek bir karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

Ne var ki; yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda \u00f6nal\u0131ma konu pay\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda ke\u015fif yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de tan\u0131klar ke\u015fif s\u0131ras\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ba\u015f\u0131nda dinlenmemi\u015f, daval\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc fiili taksim savunmas\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun olarak ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u00d6zetle; taraflar\u0131n g\u00f6sterdikleri tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131, mahalli bilirki\u015fi beyanlar\u0131 ve \u00f6zellikle daval\u0131 vekilinin fiili taksime y\u00f6nelik iddialar\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece ke\u015fif mahallinde dinlenip tutanak alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekirken, usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda dinlenilmeleriyle yetinilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

O halde HMK’n\u0131n 288. ve 290. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkeme hakimi huzurunda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ba\u015f\u0131nda bilirki\u015filerin, taraflar\u0131n ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131 suretiyle usul\u00fcne uygun ke\u015ffin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu c\u00fcmleden olmak \u00fczere; HMK’n\u0131n 259\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00f6reyi iyi bilen mahalli bilirki\u015filer, taraflar\u0131n tan\u0131klar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ba\u015f\u0131nda dinlenerek, taraf beyanlar\u0131 ve savunmalar\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p, taraflar\u0131n beyan ve savunmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin mahkeme hakimince edinilen mahkeme g\u00f6zlemi de tutana\u011fa yaz\u0131larak, tutanakta ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve daval\u0131ya pay satan\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmler bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenerek, \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlar varsa giderilerek ve tan\u0131klarca g\u00f6sterilecek yerler uzman m\u00fchendis bilirki\u015fice d\u00fczenlenecek krokide denetime elveri\u015fli \u015fekilde i\u015faretlenmek suretiyle eylemli payla\u015fman\u0131n mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptanmal\u0131, var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmelidir. Mahkemesince, de\u011finilen hususlar g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek aksine karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

DAVA : Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u00f6n al\u0131m hakk\u0131na dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemli davadan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekili ve dahili daval\u0131 … taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun HMK’n\u0131n 353\/1-b-1. maddesi gere\u011fince esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR : I. DAVA<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n 271 ada 2 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 …. ili, … il\u00e7esi, …. mevkinde de yer alan ta\u015f\u0131nmazda payda\u015f oldu\u011funu, bu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 11\/80 pay\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer payda\u015flar taraf\u0131ndan 05.06.2020 tarihinde 220.000,00 TL bedelle daval\u0131 …’ye satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkillerinin s\u00f6z konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda pay sahibi olduklar\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkillerinin Almanya’da ikamet etti\u011fini, sat\u0131\u015f i\u015flemininden yeni haberdar oldu\u011funu, \u00f6n al\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmak istediklerini, pay\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f bedelinin 220.000,00 TL oldu\u011funu, hissenin m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na kay\u0131t ve tescilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. CEVAP<\/p>\n

1. Daval\u0131 …’ T\u00fcfek\u00e7i; dava konusu hisseyi 31.08.2020 tarihinde satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sat\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte bu davadan haberinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hisseyi satm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 sebebiyle hakk\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

2. Dahili daval\u0131 … vekili; hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 405.000,00 TL ye sat\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olup i\u015flemde muvazaa bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eldeki davadan haberdar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek; davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi’nin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/p>\n

A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi’nin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili ve dahili daval\u0131 … istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri<\/p>\n

1. Davac\u0131 vekili; mahkemece verilen karar\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n fiilen taksiminin s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki duvar\u0131n uzun y\u0131llar \u00f6ncesinde hissedarlardan biri taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan bir duvar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi b\u00f6l\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddia edilen k\u0131sm\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilinin malik bulundu\u011fu k\u0131sm\u0131 da m\u00b2 olarak kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7ok hisseli bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz olup mevcut duvar\u0131n hissedarlar aras\u0131nda fiilen taksim yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmeyece\u011fini, iddia edilen b\u00f6l\u00fcnmenin paylara \u00f6zg\u00fclenmedi\u011fini belirterek; karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. Dahili daval\u0131 …; karar\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc kendisine ay\u0131r\u0131p \u00fczerine ev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 30 y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n bir s\u00fcredir duvarla ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc sadece kendisinin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer hissedarlar\u0131n onun taraf\u0131na ge\u00e7medi\u011fi gibi kendisinin de di\u011fer tarafa ge\u00e7medi\u011fini, \u015fufa hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcniyetli oldu\u011funu, karar\u0131n vekalet \u00fccreti hesab\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, fiili taksim iddias\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya dayanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011funu, tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n dinlenilmedi\u011fini belirterek; karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi’nin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; “… \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi’nin vak\u0131a ve hukuki de\u011ferlendirmesinde usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131…” gerek\u00e7esiyle; davac\u0131 vekili ile dahili daval\u0131 … vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun HMK’n\u0131n 353\/1-b-1. maddesi gere\u011fince esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n

A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi’nin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili; istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ayn\u0131 nedenlerle h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etmi\u015f, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n

1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<\/p>\n

Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, \u00f6n al\u0131m hakk\u0131na dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n

1. \u015eayet \u00f6n al\u0131m davalar\u0131nda fiili taksim s\u00f6z konusu ise;<\/p>\n

– Daval\u0131, davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda fiili taksim savunmas\u0131nda bulunabilir.<\/p>\n

– Fiili taksim hususunun mahkemece de re’sen g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

\u00d6n al\u0131m davas\u0131na konu pay\u0131n ili\u015fkin bulundu\u011fu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz, payda\u015flarca \u00f6zel olarak kendi aralar\u0131nda taksim edilip her bir payda\u015f belirli bir k\u0131sm\u0131 kullan\u0131rken bunlardan biri, kendisinin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeri ve bu yere tekab\u00fcl eden pay\u0131 bir \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fahsa satarsa, zaman\u0131nda bu yerde hak iddia etmeyen davac\u0131n\u0131n tapuda yap\u0131lan sat\u0131\u015f nedeniyle \u00f6n al\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 TMK’n\u0131n 2. maddesinde yer alan d\u00fcr\u00fcst davranma kural\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmaz. K\u00f6t\u00fcniyet iddias\u0131, 14.02.1951 tarihli ve 17\/1 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilece\u011fi gibi, mahkemece de kendili\u011finden nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu durumda savunman\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi de s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Eylemli payla\u015fman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde davan\u0131n reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n

2. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun \u201cHukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 27. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

\u201c(1) Davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131, m\u00fcdahiller ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n di\u011fer ilgilileri, kendi haklar\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahiptirler.<\/p>\n

(2) Bu hak;<\/p>\n

a-) Yarg\u0131lama ile ilgili olarak bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n

b-) A\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n

c-) Mahkemenin, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dikkate alarak de\u011ferlendirmesini ve kararlar\u0131n somut ve a\u00e7\u0131k olarak gerek\u00e7elendirilmesini, i\u00e7erir.\u201d<\/p>\n

3. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 288\/1. maddesi; “H\u00e2kim, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu hakk\u0131nda bizzat duyu organlar\u0131 yard\u0131m\u0131yla bulundu\u011fu yerde veya mahkemede inceleme yaparak bilgi sahibi olmak amac\u0131yla ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verebilir.” h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir.<\/p>\n

6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 288 ve 290. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkeme hakimi huzurunda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ba\u015f\u0131nda bilirki\u015fi, taraflar\u0131n ve \u015fahitlerin haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131 suretiyle ke\u015ffin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n

Yine ayn\u0131 Yasa’n\u0131n 259\/2. maddesi; “Mahkeme, ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekliyse, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi veya \u015feyin bulundu\u011fu yerde dinlenilmesine karar verebilir.” h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc, 290\/2. maddesi ise; “Mahkeme ke\u015fif s\u0131ras\u0131nda tan\u0131k ve bilirki\u015fi dinleyebilir. Ke\u015fif s\u0131ras\u0131nda, yap\u0131lan t\u00fcm i\u015flemler ve beyanlar\u0131 i\u00e7eren bir tutanak d\u00fczenlenir. (Ek c\u00fcmle:22.07.2020-7251\/25 md.) Tutana\u011fa, h\u00e2kimin ke\u015fif konusu ve mahalliyle ilgili g\u00f6zlemleri de yaz\u0131l\u0131r. Plan, \u00e7izim, foto\u011fraf gibi belgeler de tutana\u011fa eklenir.” h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini d\u00fczenlemektedir.<\/p>\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n

1. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta; mahkemenin ta\u015f\u0131nmazda fiili taksim olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rma yeterli de\u011fildir. Fiili taksim olgusu mahkemece re’sen dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden, \u00f6ncelikle y\u00f6reyi iyi bilen mahalli bilirki\u015fi isimleri tespit edilmeli, sonras\u0131nda mahalli bilirki\u015filer ve taraflar\u0131n g\u00f6sterdikleri tan\u0131klar yap\u0131lacak ke\u015fifte ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda dinlenmelidir. Sat\u0131c\u0131 zaman\u0131nda; \u00f6nal\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanan davac\u0131n\u0131n ve daval\u0131ya pay satan\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki kulland\u0131klar\u0131 yerlerin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenmesi gerekir. Bilirki\u015filerden; ke\u015ffi izlemeye ve denetlemeye elveri\u015fli krokili rapor haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 istenmelidir. T\u00fcm bu i\u015flemlerin akabinde, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda fiili taksimin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilerek bir karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

2. Ne var ki; yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda dava konusu \u00f6nal\u0131ma konu pay\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda ke\u015fif yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de tan\u0131klar ke\u015fif s\u0131ras\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ba\u015f\u0131nda dinlenmemi\u015f, daval\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc fiili taksim savunmas\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun olarak ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

3. \u00d6zetle; taraflar\u0131n g\u00f6sterdikleri tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131, mahalli bilirki\u015fi beyanlar\u0131 ve \u00f6zellikle daval\u0131 vekilinin fiili taksime y\u00f6nelik iddialar\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece ke\u015fif mahallinde dinlenip tutanak alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekirken, usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda dinlenilmeleriyle yetinilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

4. O halde HMK’n\u0131n 288. ve 290. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkeme hakimi huzurunda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ba\u015f\u0131nda bilirki\u015filerin, taraflar\u0131n ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131 suretiyle usul\u00fcne uygun ke\u015ffin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu c\u00fcmleden olmak \u00fczere; HMK’n\u0131n 259\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00f6reyi iyi bilen mahalli bilirki\u015filer, taraflar\u0131n tan\u0131klar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ba\u015f\u0131nda dinlenerek, taraf beyanlar\u0131 ve savunmalar\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p, taraflar\u0131n beyan ve savunmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin mahkeme hakimince edinilen mahkeme g\u00f6zlemi de tutana\u011fa yaz\u0131larak, tutanakta ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve daval\u0131ya pay satan\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmler bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenerek, \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlar varsa giderilerek ve tan\u0131klarca g\u00f6sterilecek yerler uzman m\u00fchendis bilirki\u015fice d\u00fczenlenecek krokide denetime elveri\u015fli \u015fekilde i\u015faretlenmek suretiyle eylemli payla\u015fman\u0131n mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptanmal\u0131, var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

5. Mahkemesince, de\u011finilen hususlar g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 : A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n

1. Temyiz olunan, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine ili\u015fkin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ORTADAN KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgiliye iadesine,<\/p>\n

Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n

04.04.2024 tarihinde kesin olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

Kazanc\u0131 Elektronik ve Bas\u0131l\u0131 Yay. A.\u015e.ne ait Kazanc\u0131 Hukuk Otomasyon veritaban\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00a9 T\u00fcm Haklar\u0131 Sakl\u0131d\u0131r<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. YARGITAY 7. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2023\/2455 K. 2024\/1999 T. 4.4.2024 \u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi ) KE\u015e\u0130F ( \u00d6n Al\u0131m Hakk\u0131na Dayal\u0131 Tapu \u0130ptali ve Tescil \u0130stemi – Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi ) EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA ( HMK 259\/2. Maddesi Gere\u011fince Mahalli Bilirki\u015filer Taraflar\u0131n Tan\u0131klar\u0131 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenerek Taraf Beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ve Savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n Al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 Mahkeme Hakimince Edinilen Mahkeme G\u00f6zlemi de Tutana\u011fa Yaz\u0131larak Tutanakta Ayr\u0131ca Davac\u0131n\u0131n Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Daval\u0131ya Pay Satan\u0131n Ayr\u0131 Ayr\u0131 Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcmler Bulunup Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Belirlenerek \u00c7eli\u015fkili Beyanlar Varsa Giderilerek ve Tan\u0131klarca G\u00f6sterilecek Yerler Uzman M\u00fchendis Bilirki\u015fice D\u00fczenlenecek Krokide Denetime Elveri\u015fli \u015eekilde \u0130\u015faretlenmek Suretiyle Eylemli Payla\u015fman\u0131n Mevcut Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7430","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 - KE\u015e\u0130F - EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 - KE\u015e\u0130F - EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. YARGITAY 7. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2023\/2455 K. 2024\/1999 T. 4.4.2024 \u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi ) KE\u015e\u0130F ( \u00d6n Al\u0131m Hakk\u0131na Dayal\u0131 Tapu \u0130ptali ve Tescil \u0130stemi – Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi ) EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA ( HMK 259\/2. Maddesi Gere\u011fince Mahalli Bilirki\u015filer Taraflar\u0131n Tan\u0131klar\u0131 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenerek Taraf Beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ve Savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n Al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 Mahkeme Hakimince Edinilen Mahkeme G\u00f6zlemi de Tutana\u011fa Yaz\u0131larak Tutanakta Ayr\u0131ca Davac\u0131n\u0131n Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Daval\u0131ya Pay Satan\u0131n Ayr\u0131 Ayr\u0131 Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcmler Bulunup Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Belirlenerek \u00c7eli\u015fkili Beyanlar Varsa Giderilerek ve Tan\u0131klarca G\u00f6sterilecek Yerler Uzman M\u00fchendis Bilirki\u015fice D\u00fczenlenecek Krokide Denetime Elveri\u015fli \u015eekilde \u0130\u015faretlenmek Suretiyle Eylemli Payla\u015fman\u0131n Mevcut Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-24T08:33:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"13\u00a0Minuten\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 – KE\u015e\u0130F – EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-24T08:33:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2536,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\",\"Uncategorized\"],\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 - KE\u015e\u0130F - EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-24T08:33:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 – KE\u015e\u0130F – EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 - KE\u015e\u0130F - EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 - KE\u015e\u0130F - EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA","og_description":"T.C. YARGITAY 7. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2023\/2455 K. 2024\/1999 T. 4.4.2024 \u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi ) KE\u015e\u0130F ( \u00d6n Al\u0131m Hakk\u0131na Dayal\u0131 Tapu \u0130ptali ve Tescil \u0130stemi – Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda \u00d6nal\u0131ma Konu Pay\u0131n Bulundu\u011fu Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Ba\u015f\u0131nda Ke\u015fif Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se de Tan\u0131klar Ke\u015fif S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenmedi\u011fi Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Fiili Taksim Savunmas\u0131 Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/HMK 288. ve 290. Maddeleri Gere\u011fince Mahkeme Hakimi Huzurunda Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Bilirki\u015filerin Taraflar\u0131n ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Haz\u0131r Bulundurulmas\u0131 Suretiyle Usul\u00fcne Uygun Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi ) EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA ( HMK 259\/2. Maddesi Gere\u011fince Mahalli Bilirki\u015filer Taraflar\u0131n Tan\u0131klar\u0131 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Ba\u015f\u0131nda Dinlenerek Taraf Beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ve Savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n Al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 Mahkeme Hakimince Edinilen Mahkeme G\u00f6zlemi de Tutana\u011fa Yaz\u0131larak Tutanakta Ayr\u0131ca Davac\u0131n\u0131n Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Daval\u0131ya Pay Satan\u0131n Ayr\u0131 Ayr\u0131 Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcmler Bulunup Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Belirlenerek \u00c7eli\u015fkili Beyanlar Varsa Giderilerek ve Tan\u0131klarca G\u00f6sterilecek Yerler Uzman M\u00fchendis Bilirki\u015fice D\u00fczenlenecek Krokide Denetime Elveri\u015fli \u015eekilde \u0130\u015faretlenmek Suretiyle Eylemli Payla\u015fman\u0131n Mevcut Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2024-10-24T08:33:00+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit":"13\u00a0Minuten"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 – KE\u015e\u0130F – EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA","datePublished":"2024-10-24T08:33:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/"},"wordCount":2536,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler","Uncategorized"],"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/","name":"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 - KE\u015e\u0130F - EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-10-24T08:33:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/on-alim-hakkina-dayali-tapu-iptali-ve-tescil-istemi-kesif-eylemli-paylasma\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u00d6N ALIM HAKKINA DAYALI TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 – KE\u015e\u0130F – EYLEML\u0130 PAYLA\u015eMA"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7430"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7430\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}