ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/177<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/40<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 11\/2\/2025<\/p>\n
R.G.Tarih-Say\u0131 : 29\/4\/2025-32885<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara 20. \u0130dare Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 23\/1\/1953 tarihli ve 6023 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Tabipleri Birli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun 39. maddesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 38. ve 135. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: Davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda verilen 3 ay s\u00fcreyle meslekten al\u0131koyma cezas\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. <\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu 39. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cMadde 39 \u2013 Haysiyet Divan\u0131, evrak\u0131 kendisine tevdi edilen azalar\u0131n fiil ve hareketlerinin mahiyetine g\u00f6re a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki inzibati cezalar\u0131 verir:<\/p>\n
a) Yaz\u0131l\u0131 ihtar,<\/p>\n
b) (De\u011fi\u015fik: 23\/3\/2006 \u2013 5477\/6 md.) O y\u0131lki en y\u00fcksek y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fcye aidat\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 kat\u0131ndan az, be\u015f kat\u0131ndan fazla olmayan para cezas\u0131,<\/p>\n
\u00a0c) 15 g\u00fcnden 6 aya kadar ge\u00e7ici olarak sanat icras\u0131ndan meni,<\/p>\n
\u00a0d) Bir m\u0131ntakada \u00fc\u00e7 defa sanat icras\u0131ndan meni cezas\u0131 alm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131 o m\u0131ntakada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktan meni. <\/p>\n
Haysiyet divanlar\u0131, bu cezalar\u0131n verilmesinde s\u0131ra g\u00f6zetmeksizin geni\u015f takdir hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rlar.\u201d<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME<\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA, Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN, Basri BA\u011eCI, Engin YILDIRIM, R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7, Recai AKYEL, Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ, Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU, Selahaddin MENTE\u015e, \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN, Kenan YA\u015eAR, Muhterem \u0130NCE, Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L, \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR ve Metin KIRATLI\u2019n\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131yla 17\/10\/2024 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda dosyada eksiklik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verilmi\u015ftir<\/p>\n
III. ESASIN \u0130NCELENMES\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Burcu TA\u015eYAPAN taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin rapor, itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc, dayan\u0131lan Anayasa kurallar\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7eleri ile di\u011fer yasama belgeleri okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. \u0130tiraz\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esi<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; itiraz konusu kuralda disiplin uygulamalar\u0131yla ilgili olarak herhangi bir ilkenin belirlenmedi\u011fi, hangi disiplin fiillerine ne t\u00fcr cezalar\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi, idareye an\u0131lan cezalar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 konusunda s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir takdir yetkisinin tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla ayn\u0131 fiil nedeniyle en hafif cezan\u0131n uygulanabilece\u011fi gibi en a\u011f\u0131r cezan\u0131n da uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, bu h\u00e2liyle disiplin su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve cezalar\u0131 konusunda kanuni g\u00fcvencenin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bireylerin hangi fiile hangi hukuki yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine yasal \u00e7er\u00e7evede imk\u00e2n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi belirtilerek kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 38. ve 135. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019ya Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k Sorunu<\/p>\n
4. 6023 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu 39. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda tabip odas\u0131 haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n evrak\u0131 kendisine tevdi edilen oda \u00fcyeleri hakk\u0131nda fiil ve hareketlerinin mahiyetine g\u00f6re yaz\u0131l\u0131 ihtar, o y\u0131lki en y\u00fcksek y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fcye aidat\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 kat\u0131ndan az be\u015f kat\u0131ndan fazla olmayan para cezas\u0131, on be\u015f g\u00fcnden alt\u0131 aya kadar ge\u00e7ici olarak sanat icras\u0131ndan men ve bir m\u0131nt\u0131kada \u00fc\u00e7 defa sanat icras\u0131ndan meni cezas\u0131 alm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131 o m\u0131nt\u0131kada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktan men \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenen disiplin cezalar\u0131ndan birini uygulayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f, ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda da haysiyet divanlar\u0131n\u0131n bu cezalar\u0131n verilmesinde s\u0131ra g\u00f6zetmeksizin geni\u015f takdir yetkisine sahip oldu\u011fu h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Anayasa Mahkemesi 22\/9\/2021 tarihli ve E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda 25\/1\/1956 tarihli ve 6643 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Eczac\u0131lar\u0131 Birli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun eczac\u0131 odalar\u0131 haysiyet divan\u0131na itiraz konusu kurala benzer y\u00f6nde g\u00f6rev ve yetki veren 30. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015f ve s\u00f6z konusu k\u0131sm\u0131 eczac\u0131 odalar\u0131 haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n meslek mensuplar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 uygulama yetkisini kullanmalar\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda bireylerin hangi somut fiil ve olguya hangi hukuksal yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine yasal \u00e7er\u00e7evede imk\u00e2n tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bularak iptal etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. An\u0131lan kararda ilk olarak ilgili k\u0131s\u0131mda eczac\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda uygulanabilecek disiplin cezalar\u0131 say\u0131lmakla birlikte s\u00f6z konusu maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde say\u0131lan h\u00e2llerde hangi disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir d\u00fczenlemenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62, 22\/9\/2021, \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
7. Bu kapsamda haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n kendisine intikal eden bir dosyaya konu eylemin s\u00f6z konusu kuralda say\u0131lan h\u00e2llerden birisinin kapsam\u0131na girdi\u011fi kanaatine varmas\u0131 durumunda yine maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda say\u0131lan disiplin cezalar\u0131ndan herhangi birisine h\u00fckmedebilece\u011fi, haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n hangi fiile hangi cezay\u0131 uygulayaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda herhangi bir kay\u0131t ve \u015fartla ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p tamamen serbest b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eczac\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 uygulanabilecek h\u00e2ller say\u0131lmakla ve disiplin cezalar\u0131 da g\u00f6sterilmekle birlikte maddede say\u0131lan disiplin su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131 aras\u0131nda yeterli ba\u011flant\u0131n\u0131n kurulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi durumunda fiil ve hareketin niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n verilebilece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmekle birlikte bu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n muhataplar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli bir hukuki g\u00fcvence sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62, 22\/9\/2021, \u00a7 18).<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6te yandan disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi konusunda haysiyet divan\u0131na s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir takdir yetkisinin tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu ba\u011flamda haysiyet divan\u0131na disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi durumunda ilgili k\u0131s\u0131mda yer alan disiplin cezalar\u0131ndan istedi\u011fini uygulayabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 haiz k\u0131l\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n bu yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 uygularken an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131ray\u0131 g\u00f6zetme zorunlulu\u011funa da tabi tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62, 22\/9\/2021, \u00a7 19).<\/p>\n
9. An\u0131lan kararda Anayasa Mahkemesi s\u00f6z konusu k\u0131s\u0131mda haysiyet divan\u0131na tan\u0131nan yetkinin somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zelliklerine, eylemin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131na, olu\u015fan zarar\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6re kamu yarar\u0131 ve hizmet gereklerine uygun olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flaman\u0131n yan\u0131nda i\u015flenen disiplinsizlik eylemi ile tayin edilen disiplin cezas\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin g\u00f6zetilmesini sa\u011flayacak gerekli ve yeterli mekanizmalar\u0131n kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, verilecek disiplin cezalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan keyf\u00ee yorum ve uygulamalara kar\u015f\u0131 hukuki g\u00fcvencenin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (AYM, E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62, 22\/9\/2021, \u00a7 20).<\/p>\n
10. \u0130tiraz konusu kural bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da Anayasa Mahkemesinin an\u0131lan karar\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kural Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130ptali gerekir.<\/p>\n
Kural, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclerek iptal edildi\u011finden ayr\u0131ca Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. ve 135. maddeleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130PTAL KARARININ Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011eE G\u0130RECE\u011e\u0130 G\u00dcN SORUNU<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cKanun, Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesi veya T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ya da bunlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkar. Gereken hallerde Anayasa Mahkemesi iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilir. Bu tarih, karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.\u201d denilmekte, 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda da bu kural tekrarlanarak mahkemenin gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2llerde Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7memek \u00fczere ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilece\u011fi belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n
13. 6023 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 39. maddesinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle do\u011facak hukuksal bo\u015fluk kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak dokuz ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
V. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
23\/1\/1953 tarihli ve 6023 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Tabipleri Birli\u011fi Kanunu’nun 39. maddesinin Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve \u0130PTAL\u0130NE, iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince KARARIN RESM\u00ce GAZETE\u2019DE YAYIMLANMASINDAN BA\u015eLAYARAK DOKUZ AY SONRA Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011eE G\u0130RMES\u0130NE 11\/2\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 11\/2\/2025 tarihli, 2024\/177 esas – 2025\/40 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI \u00a0 Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/177 Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/40 Karar Tarihi : 11\/2\/2025 R.G.Tarih-Say\u0131 : 29\/4\/2025-32885 \u00a0 \u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara 20. \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 23\/1\/1953 tarihli ve 6023 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Tabipleri Birli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun 39. maddesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 38. ve 135. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir. OLAY: Davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda verilen 3 ay s\u00fcreyle meslekten al\u0131koyma cezas\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu 39. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir: \u00a0\u201cMadde 39 \u2013 Haysiyet Divan\u0131, evrak\u0131 kendisine tevdi edilen azalar\u0131n fiil ve hareketlerinin mahiyetine g\u00f6re a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki inzibati cezalar\u0131 verir: a) Yaz\u0131l\u0131 ihtar, b) (De\u011fi\u015fik: 23\/3\/2006 \u2013 5477\/6 md.) O y\u0131lki en y\u00fcksek y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fcye aidat\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 kat\u0131ndan az, be\u015f kat\u0131ndan fazla olmayan para cezas\u0131, \u00a0c) 15 g\u00fcnden 6 aya kadar ge\u00e7ici olarak sanat icras\u0131ndan meni, \u00a0d) Bir m\u0131ntakada \u00fc\u00e7 defa sanat icras\u0131ndan meni cezas\u0131 alm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131 o m\u0131ntakada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktan meni. Haysiyet divanlar\u0131, bu cezalar\u0131n verilmesinde s\u0131ra g\u00f6zetmeksizin geni\u015f takdir hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rlar.\u201d II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME 1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA, Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN, Basri BA\u011eCI, Engin YILDIRIM, R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7, Recai AKYEL, Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ, Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU, Selahaddin MENTE\u015e, …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n