T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
Ceza Genel Kurulu<\/p>\n
2011\/1-51 E., 2011\/42 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Tebli\u011fname : 2011\/33773
\nYarg\u0131tay Dairesi : 1. Ceza Dairesi
\nMahkemesi : MERS\u0130N 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza
\nG\u00fcn\u00fc : 22.03.2010
\nSay\u0131s\u0131 : 185-135<\/p>\n
Kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, bu su\u00e7a azmettirme ve kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan san\u0131klar\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 sonunda san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 81, 29, 62 ve 53. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 15 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, di\u011fer san\u0131klar F. \u015e. M. A., A. S., B.\u00c7., M. \u00c7.ve S.S.\u2019un ise beraatlerine ili\u015fkin Mersin 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 16.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 89-549 say\u0131l\u0131, san\u0131k D.K.\u2019ya verilen ceza y\u00f6n\u00fcnden re\u2019sen temyize tabi olan h\u00fck\u00fcm, san\u0131k D.K. ve m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan da temyiz edilmekle, dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 13.02.2009 g\u00fcn ve 8066-577 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
\u201c…2-) Karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda su\u00e7 yerinin yaz\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 mahallinde giderilebilir eksiklik olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3-) Toplanan deliller karar yerinde incelenip, san\u0131k D.\u2019nin kasten adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 kanuna muhalefet su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcbutu kabul, olu\u015fa ve soru\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fi tayin, takdire ili\u015fen cezay\u0131 azalt\u0131c\u0131 sebeplerin nitelikleri ve dereceleri takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, savunmalar\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle reddedilmi\u015f, incelenen dosyaya g\u00f6re verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde ele\u015ftiri ve bozma nedenleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin bir nedene dayanmayan ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine,<\/p>\n
Ancak;<\/p>\n
A-) San\u0131klar S. S., A. S., F.\u015e., M.\u00c7., B. \u00c7. ve M.A.\u2019n\u0131n haklar\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde;<\/p>\n
Olu\u015fa ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re; makt\u00fbl\u00fcn k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 tan\u0131k M.ile san\u0131klardan B.\u2019in arkada\u015f\u0131 tan\u0131k M.\u2019in ayn\u0131 gazinoda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, M.ile M.\u2019in aras\u0131nda anla\u015fmazl\u0131k \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu durumu M.\u2019in san\u0131k B.\u2019e anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve olaydan birka\u00e7 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce M.\u2019in i\u015fine son verildi\u011fi, M.\u2019in bu durumu makt\u00fble iletti\u011fi, makt\u00fbl\u00fcn de sinirlenerek san\u0131k F.\u2019a telefon a\u00e7\u0131p, \u2018gel gazinoya gidece\u011fiz\u2019 dedi\u011fi, F. ve M.\u2019n\u0131n yanlar\u0131nda san\u0131k D. oldu\u011fu halde makt\u00fblle bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131, makt\u00fbl\u00fcn S. ve B.\u2019ye k\u00fcfretti\u011fi, san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n yanlar\u0131nda i\u015f\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 san\u0131k A.\u2019ye bu olay\u0131 iletti\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine B., A. ve D.\u2019\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fcn ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yere gelerek, makt\u00fbl\u00fc hep beraber \u015fehir merkezi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u0131ss\u0131z ormanl\u0131k bir yere g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fckleri, san\u0131k F.\u2019un soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda verdi\u011fi 24.02.2005 tarihli ifadesindeki anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ile san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n 25.09.2006 tarihli oturumda mahkemeye verdi\u011fi ve i\u00e7eri\u011fini kabul etti\u011fi dilek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fi aras\u0131ndaki uyum, 13.01.2005 tarihli otopsi raporunda makt\u00fbl\u00fcn cesedinin muhtelif yerlerinde \u00e7ok say\u0131da darp ve cebir izleri bulundu\u011funun belirtilmesi, san\u0131k S.ve B. ile makt\u00fbl aras\u0131nda kad\u0131n meselesinden dolay\u0131 husumet bulunmas\u0131, san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n A..ve B.\u2019in i\u015f\u00e7isi oldu\u011fu halde olay yerinde bulunan bu san\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k D.\u2019a hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde engel olmad\u0131klar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n en lehine kabul ve yorumla su\u00e7a yard\u0131m eden s\u0131fat\u0131yla kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, san\u0131klar\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde beraatlerine karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n
B-) San\u0131k D.hakk\u0131nda kasten adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek, tehdit ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 kanuna muhalefet su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde;<\/p>\n
a-) Olay\u0131n olu\u015funa ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine, san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n 25.09.2006 tarihindeki celsede mahkemeye verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7enin i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve mahkemedeki beyan\u0131, san\u0131k F.\u2019un soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda verdi\u011fi 24.02.2005 tarihli ifadesindeki anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re, olayda makt\u00fbl\u00fcn, san\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir haks\u0131z hareketi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanarak eksik ceza tayini\u201d isabetsizliklerinden bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Mersin 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ise 22.03.2010 g\u00fcn ve 185-135 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
\u201c…Makt\u00fbl A. Y.\u2019\u0131n, K. Bar Gazinosunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan M. I.isimli bayanla dost hayat\u0131 ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klardan B. \u00c7.\u2019in bayan arkada\u015f\u0131 olan E. takma isimli M.K.\u2019\u0131n da ayn\u0131 gazinoda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve M. ile M. aras\u0131ndaki s\u00fcrt\u00fc\u015fme nedeniyle S. S. ve B.\u00c7.\u2019in talebi \u00fczerine gazino sahibi V.A.taraf\u0131ndan M.I.\u2019\u0131n i\u015fine son verildi\u011fi, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc makt\u00fbl A.Y. ile M. A. ve F. \u015e.\u2019in Bitlis \u0130linden Mersin\u2019e d\u00f6nd\u00fckleri ve hep birlikte makt\u00fbl\u00fcn Pozcu\u2019daki evine gittikleri, burada A.\u2019\u0131n dostu M.\u2019\u0131n telefon etmesi \u00fczerine M. A. ile F.\u015e.\u2019in, makt\u00fbl\u00fc M. I.\u2019\u0131n oturdu\u011fu siteye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcp b\u0131rakt\u0131klar\u0131, M. A.n\u0131n araba ile dola\u015fmaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, F. \u015e.\u2019in de D.K.\u2019n\u0131n evine gitti\u011fi, F. \u015e. ile D. K.\u2019n\u0131n evde bulunduklar\u0131 s\u0131rada makt\u00fbl A.\u2019\u0131n, F.\u2019u telefonla arayarak birlikte dostunun i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gazinoya gideceklerini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, A.\u2019\u0131n ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde M. A.\u2019y\u0131 da arayarak araba ile gelip kendisini almas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fi ve M. ile A.\u2019\u0131n birlikte araba ile F.\u2019u almak \u00fczere D. K.\u2019n\u0131n ikamet etti\u011fi yere geldikleri, makt\u00fbl A.\u2019\u0131n alkoll\u00fc ve sinirli bir vaziyette F.\u2019u u\u011furlayan D. K. ile konu\u015ftu\u011fu ve dostunun i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle g\u0131yaplar\u0131nda gazinocu, B. ve S. aleyhine k\u00fcf\u00fcrler etti\u011fi, A., F. ve M.\u2019n\u0131n araba ile ayr\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra D.K.\u2019n\u0131n kahvehaneye giderek orada bulunan S.\u2019nin karde\u015fi A. S. ve B. \u00c7. ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ferek A.\u2019dan duyduklar\u0131n\u0131 onlara anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, A.S.\u2019un telefonla A. Y.\u2019\u0131 arayarak S.. abisine neden k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fini sordu\u011fu, A.\u2019\u0131n k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fini kabul etmeyerek D.K. ile y\u00fczle\u015fmek istemesi \u00fczerine g\u00f6\u00e7men kav\u015fa\u011f\u0131nda bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131, bulu\u015fma yerine A.’\u0131n arabas\u0131 ile A., M.ve F.\u2019un, A.\u2019nin arabas\u0131 ile de A., B. ve D.\u2019\u0131n geldikleri, burada A. ile A.\u2019\u0131n kendi aralar\u0131nda biraz konu\u015ftuktan sonra A.\u2019\u0131n arabas\u0131na binerek dola\u015fmaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131 ve G. Restoran\u0131n yukar\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131nda durarak konu\u015fmaya devam ettikleri, bu arada A.\u2019\u0131n alkol almaya devam etti\u011fi, A.\u2019a M.\u2019dan, A.ye de B.\u2019den telefon gelmesi \u00fczerine bir arada bulunan M., F., B.ve D.\u2019\u0131n da A. ile A.\u2019nin bulundu\u011fu yere geldikleri, M.A.\u2019n\u0131n telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi nedeniyle arabay\u0131 park ettikleri yerde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011ferlerinin A. ve A.’nin bulundu\u011fu tepelik k\u0131sma \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131, D. K.\u2019y\u0131 g\u00f6ren makt\u00fbl A.\u2019\u0131n sen benim arkada\u015flar\u0131mla aram\u0131 m\u0131 a\u00e7mak istiyorsun diyerek k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fi, D.\u2019\u0131n da ben duydu\u011fumu s\u00f6yl\u00fcyorum, yalan m\u0131 s\u00f6yl\u00fcyorum diyerek A.\u2019\u0131n arkada\u015flar\u0131na g\u0131yaplar\u0131nda k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011finde \u0131srar etmesi \u00fczerine makt\u00fbl\u00fcn san\u0131k D.\u2019a k\u00fcf\u00fcr ederek tokat att\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunun \u00fczerine makt\u00fbl ile D.\u2019\u0131n bo\u011fu\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, taraflar\u0131 ay\u0131rmak isteyen F.\u015e.\u2019in de D.\u2019\u0131n kafa atmas\u0131 sonucu duda\u011f\u0131ndan ve burnundan yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131, bo\u011fu\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131k D.K.\u2019n\u0131n ruhsats\u0131z silah\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekerek 35-40 cm. mesafeden makt\u00fbl A.\u2019\u0131 aln\u0131ndan vurdu\u011fu, makt\u00fbl A.\u2019\u0131n san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n ayaklar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu kez san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n yerde yatan makt\u00fble yak\u0131n mesafeden bir el daha ate\u015f etti\u011fi, olaya m\u00fcdahale etmek isteyen ve olay yerinde bulunan di\u011fer san\u0131klara elinde silah oldu\u011fu halde y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fcn, gidiyoruz dedi\u011fi ve hep birlikte olay yerinden A. S.\u2019un arabas\u0131 ile ayr\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, mezarl\u0131k civar\u0131na geldiklerinde A.S. ve M.A.n\u0131n ayr\u0131lmalar\u0131na kimseye bir \u015fey anlatmamalar\u0131 ko\u015fulu ile izin verdi\u011fi ve A.\u2019nin i\u00e7inde bulunduklar\u0131 A.\u2019ye ait ara\u00e7la gitmesi \u00fczerine taksici \u015e.A.\u2019\u0131 \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k \u015e.A. geldi\u011finde olay yerinde c\u00fczdan\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc fark eden san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n taksici \u015e.\u2019den el feneri istedi\u011fi, el fenerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenmesi \u00fczerine tek ba\u015f\u0131na makt\u00fbl\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yere gitti\u011fi ve d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde c\u00fczdan\u0131n\u0131 buldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, taksici \u015e. A.\u2019\u0131n arac\u0131na D., F. ve B.\u2019in bindi\u011fi, Adana istikametine do\u011fru gitmeye ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, yolda iken san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n tan\u0131k polis memuru H. G.\u2019yi cep telefonundan arayarak A.\u2019\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, Ceyhan \u0130l\u00e7esi civar\u0131nda iken san\u0131k B. \u00c7.\u2019in de kimseye bir \u015fey anlatmamas\u0131 ko\u015fulu ile ayr\u0131lmas\u0131na izin verdi\u011fi, F. \u015e.\u2019i b\u0131rakmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015eanl\u0131urfa \u0130line geldiklerinde de F. \u015e.\u2019i serbest b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015e.A.\u2019\u0131n da D. K.y\u0131 \u015eanl\u0131urfa\u2019da b\u0131rakarak d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bilahare san\u0131klardan M. A.\u2019n\u0131n olay\u0131n ertesi g\u00fcn\u00fc jandarmaya giderek olay\u0131 anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, makt\u00fbl A.\u2019\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrme eylemini san\u0131k D.K.\u2019n\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fcn kendisine k\u00fcf\u00fcr etmesi ve tokat atmas\u0131 sonucu hafif tahrik alt\u0131nda tek ba\u015f\u0131na ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi, olay yerinde bulunan A.S., B.\u00e7., M. A. ve F. \u015e.\u2019in \u00f6ld\u00fcrme eyleminin icras\u0131n\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131racak, te\u015fvik edecek veyahut azmettirecek herhangi bir eylemlerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klardan S.S., M. \u00c7., H.T.ve \u015e. A.\u2019\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrme olay\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda olay yerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 gibi S. S. ve M. \u00c7.\u2019in olay ile ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, H. T.\u2019nun makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tarihten \u00f6nce vefat etmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle olay yerinde bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n imkans\u0131z oldu\u011fu, bu nedenlerle S. S. M. \u00c7.ve H.T.\u2019nun san\u0131k D.\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi \u00f6ld\u00fcrme fiilinin azmettiricisi, yard\u0131m ve te\u015fvik edeni konumunda olamayaca\u011f\u0131, her ne kadar san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n san\u0131k M. A.y\u0131 \u2018bu olaydan kimseye bahsetme yoksa seni \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcr\u00fcm\u2019 diyerek silahla tehdit etti\u011finden bahisle \u015fartl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015f ise de san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n aksi kan\u0131tlanamayan ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n da teyit edici beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n sadece olaydan kimseye bahsetmemelerini istedi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca san\u0131k D.’\u0131n taksi s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc san\u0131k \u015e. A.\u2019\u0131 silahla \u00f6l\u00fcmle tehdit etti\u011finden bahisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015f ise de, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na yeterli, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil elde edilemedi\u011fi, san\u0131k \u015e.A.\u2019\u0131n su\u00e7 faillerini ve delillerini saklama su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair \u00f6ld\u00fcrme olay\u0131n\u0131 duymad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin aksi kan\u0131tlanamayan savunmas\u0131 haricinde delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, her ne kadar san\u0131k D. K.son celselerde \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131ndan vazge\u00e7erek makt\u00fbl\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrme eylemini B. \u00c7. ile M. A.\u2019n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini ve para kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7u \u00fcstlendi\u011fini savunmu\u015f ise de, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u tek ba\u015f\u0131na i\u015fledi\u011fine dair hakim huzurundaki ikrarlar\u0131, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n bunu do\u011frulayan beyanlar\u0131, M. A.\u2019n\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrme sebebinin bulunmamas\u0131 gibi makt\u00fbl\u00fcn yak\u0131n arkada\u015f\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca B.(B.) \u00c7.\u2019in k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 M. ile makt\u00fbl A.\u2019\u0131n dostu M. aras\u0131ndaki s\u00fcrt\u00fc\u015fmeden dolay\u0131 bu olay\u0131n meydana gelmesi nedeniyle olay\u0131n m\u00fcsebbibinin B. (B.) \u00c7. oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmesi nedeniyle kendisinin bo\u011fu\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda makt\u00fbl\u00fc kazaen vurdu\u011funa ili\u015fkin savunmas\u0131n\u0131 desteklemeyen ve ikinci kez yerde yatan makt\u00fble ate\u015f etti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyen bu san\u0131klar\u0131n olay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclerek san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n azmettirme, yard\u0131m ya da te\u015fvik olmaks\u0131z\u0131n eylemi tek ba\u015f\u0131na ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesinin bozma ilam\u0131nda S.S., A. S., F.\u015e., M. \u00c7., B. \u00c7. ve M. A.n\u0131n en lehe kabul ve yorumla su\u00e7a yard\u0131m eden s\u0131fat\u0131yla kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 kabul edilerek cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ise de; mahkememizce bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc yukar\u0131da da ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere san\u0131klardan M. A.ve F.\u015e. makt\u00fbl\u00fcn en yak\u0131n arkada\u015flar\u0131d\u0131r. Olay \u00f6ncesi ve olay yerine gelinceye kadar makt\u00fbl s\u00fcrekli olarak M. A. ve F. \u015e. ile ayn\u0131 arabada olup, A. ile birlikte yaln\u0131z oldu\u011fu zamanda da F.ve M.ile telefon arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile s\u00fcrekli irtibat halindedir. T\u00fcm san\u0131klar\u0131n a\u015famalarda da de\u011fi\u015fmeyen t\u00fcm ifadelerine g\u00f6re M.A. makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda olay yerinde yoktur. Olay yerine B., F. ve D. ile birlikte geldiklerinde M.arabay\u0131 park etti\u011fi s\u0131rada kendisine gelen telefon \u00fczerine geride kalm\u0131\u015f, di\u011ferleri makt\u00fbl ile A. S.’un bulundu\u011fu ormanl\u0131k alandaki G… Restoran\u0131n \u00fcst taraf\u0131ndaki piknik alan\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, tepelik k\u0131sma \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Makt\u00fbl\u00fcn k\u0131z arkada\u015f M.’in i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131na B. ve S.’nin sebep oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek makt\u00fbl ile B. ve S. aras\u0131nda husumet olu\u015ftu\u011fu kabul edilse bile S. ve B.’in makt\u00fbl A.’\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrtmek i\u00e7in san\u0131k D. K.’y\u0131 azmettirdiklerine dair hi\u00e7bir delil bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Azmettirme ile ilgili olarak san\u0131klar ya da tan\u0131klar hi\u00e7bir a\u015famada bu \u015fekilde bir beyanda bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 gibi san\u0131k D.K. sonradan de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fi (mahkememizce itibar edilmeyen) ifadesinde bile san\u0131k S.’nin kendisini azmettirdi\u011fine dair bir beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015f, sadece olay\u0131n B.’in k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 M. ile makt\u00fbl\u00fcn k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 M.’in s\u00fcrt\u00fc\u015fmesi sonucunda bu noktaya geldi\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek, bir anlamda bu olay\u0131n meydana gelmesine B.’in sebebiyet verdi\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek makt\u00fbl\u00fc B.’in \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015feklinde bir savunma de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131k A. S. ile ilgili olarak t\u00fcm a\u015famalarda t\u00fcm san\u0131klar D.’\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fc vurmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u2018ne yapt\u0131n, biraz d\u00f6v\u00fcp ders verecektik\u2019 tarz\u0131nda tepkide bulundu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015flerdir. Hatta san\u0131k D.K.mahkememize hitaben yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6ld\u00fcrme olay\u0131n\u0131 B.ile M.’n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi dilek\u00e7esinde dahi B. ile M.’n\u0131n makt\u00fbl A.’\u0131 d\u00f6vd\u00fckleri s\u0131rada A.S.’un \u2018yapmay\u0131n\u2019 diyerek d\u00f6vme olay\u0131n\u0131 engellemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmektedir.<\/p>\n
Ayr\u0131ca san\u0131k M. \u00c7.’in B.’in karde\u015fi olmas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olayda methali bulunmamaktad\u0131r. B.haricindeki t\u00fcm san\u0131klar M. \u00c7.’i tan\u0131mad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve onun olay mahallinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmektedirler. San\u0131k M \u00c7 de olay tarihinde kendisinin Kilis-Gaziantep aras\u0131ndaki \u015fantiyede \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta oldu\u011funu savundu\u011fu ve bu savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n da aksi kan\u0131tlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re M. \u00c7.’in de beraat\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi olayda makt\u00fbl\u00fcn san\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir haks\u0131z hareketinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ise de; san\u0131klar D. K., F. \u015e., A. S., B.\u00c7.ve M. A.n\u0131n aksi kan\u0131tlanamayan savunmalar\u0131na g\u00f6re, makt\u00fbl A.Y.’\u0131n k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 M.’in i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebiyle S. S.ve B. \u00c7.’e D.K.’n\u0131n yan\u0131nda iken k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fi, D.’\u0131n bu durumu A.S.ve B. \u00c7.’e anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu olay\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fmas\u0131, A. ile D.’\u0131n y\u00fczle\u015ftirilmesi amac\u0131yla olay mahalline gelindi\u011finde A.Y.’\u0131n S. ve B.’e k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fini kabul etmemesi nedeniyle D. K. ve makt\u00fbl aras\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131z m\u00fcnaka\u015fas\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u2018sen bizim aram\u0131z\u0131 a\u00e7mak m\u0131 istiyorsun\u2019 diyerek D.K.’ya k\u00fcf\u00fcr edip tokat atmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, D. K.n\u0131n aniden silah\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekip makt\u00fbl A.’\u0131 vurdu\u011fu sabittir. Olay\u0131n aniden geli\u015fmesi ve san\u0131k D. K.’n\u0131n belindeki tabancay\u0131 \u00e7ekip A.Y.\u0131 vurmas\u0131 eylemini di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n \u00f6nceden \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesi ve san\u0131k D.’\u0131 engellemelerinin bu san\u0131klardan beklenemeyece\u011fi, kald\u0131 ki san\u0131k D.’\u0131n az \u00f6nce A. Y.’\u0131 tabanca ile vurmu\u015f olmas\u0131 ve halen elinde tabanca bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n bu duruma m\u00fcdahale etmelerinin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ters oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle de san\u0131k D. K.lehine haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131 ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n da adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye i\u015ftirak su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan beraatlerine karar verilerek \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcmde direnilmesine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle ilk h\u00fck\u00fcmde direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
San\u0131k D.K.hakk\u0131nda kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan verilen ceza y\u00f6n\u00fcnden re\u2019sen temyize tabi olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan da temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131klar S. S. ve M. \u00c7. hakk\u0131nda \u201conama\u201d, di\u011fer san\u0131klar hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ise \u201cbozma\u201d istekli 21.02.2011 g\u00fcn ve 33773 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesi ile Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>\n
CEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n
Makt\u00fbl A. Y.\u2019\u0131 13.01.2005 tarihinde kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan san\u0131k D.K.\u2019n\u0131n lehe oldu\u011fu kabul edilen 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 81, 29, 62 ve 53. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 15 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, di\u011fer san\u0131klar F.\u015e., M.A., A.S., B. \u00c7., M. \u00c7.ve S. S.un ise beraatlerine karar verilen somut olayda, \u00d6zel Daire ile yerel mahkeme aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar;<\/p>\n
1-) San\u0131k D. K. hakk\u0131nda haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131nda isabet bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n,<\/p>\n
2-) San\u0131klar F.\u015e., S. S., A.S., B.\u00c7., M. \u00c7.ve M. A.n\u0131n kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una yard\u0131m eden olarak kat\u0131l\u0131p kat\u0131lmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
\u0130ncelenen dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden;<\/p>\n
13.01.2005 tarihinde Mersin \u0130li G\u00f6zne Yolunda G.isimli restoran\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131ndaki ormanl\u0131k alanda \u00f6l\u00fc olarak bulunan makt\u00fbl\u00fcn ba\u015f\u0131nda iki adet ate\u015fli silah yaras\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, mermilerden birinin aln\u0131n solundan girip kafa sol arka yan k\u0131sm\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 35-40 cm. mesafeden yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f at\u0131\u015f sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilebilece\u011fi, di\u011fer at\u0131\u015f\u0131n ise a\u011f\u0131z i\u00e7erisinden yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve bu at\u0131\u015fa ait bir adet mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011finin kafa i\u00e7erisinden otopsi s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, makt\u00fbl\u00fcn sol g\u00f6z etraf\u0131nda ve burun s\u0131rt\u0131nda solda 1×2 cm. ebatlar\u0131nda ekimozun, sa\u011f diz \u00fcst\u00fcnde 1 cm., sol bacak \u00f6n tarafta ayn\u0131 hat \u00fczerinde 1×0,5 cm. ile 1,5×3 cm. ebatlar\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fen 5 adet taze s\u0131yr\u0131\u011f\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yerinden elde edilen 7.65 mm \u00e7ap\u0131ndaki iki adet bo\u015f kovan\u0131n ayn\u0131 silahtan at\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, makt\u00fbl\u00fcn kan\u0131nda %156 mgr. alkol bulundu\u011fu,
\nMersin Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde g\u00f6revli Polis Memuru H. G.taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 13.01.2005 tarihli rapora g\u00f6re; su\u00e7 i\u015flemeye meyilli bir ki\u015fi olarak bilinen san\u0131k D. K. isimli \u015fahs\u0131n gece 01.53 ve 01.59 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda kendisini cep telefonundan arayarak \u201cben A.\u2019y\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fcm, sizinle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilir miyim, kafam \u00e7ok iyi gelip size teslim olaca\u011f\u0131m\u201d dedi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Adana Ruh Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Hastanesinin 14.12.2005 g\u00fcn ve 13775 say\u0131l\u0131 raporuna g\u00f6re; san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n cezai ehliyetinin tam oldu\u011fu,
\nT\u00fcm dosya i\u00e7eri\u011findeki delillerden; san\u0131klardan M.A.’n\u0131n cezaevinde iken tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 makt\u00fbl ile tahliye edildikten sonra da arkada\u015f oldu\u011fu ve ayn\u0131 evi payla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131k F. \u015e.’in de makt\u00fbl\u00fcn arkada\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc hep birlikte gitmi\u015f olduklar\u0131 Bitlis \u0130linden yine birlikte ayn\u0131 ara\u00e7la Mersin \u0130line d\u00f6nd\u00fckleri, san\u0131klar F.ve M.’n\u0131n makt\u00fbl A.Y.\u0131 birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bir gazinoda \u015fark\u0131c\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta olan tan\u0131k M.in evine b\u0131rakt\u0131klar\u0131, bundan bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce M.’in ayn\u0131 gazinoda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta olan M.isimli bir bayanla aralar\u0131nda anla\u015fmazl\u0131k \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, M. isimli bayan\u0131n bu durumu arkada\u015f\u0131 san\u0131k B.\u00c7.’e anlatmas\u0131 \u00fczerine san\u0131klar B. \u00c7.ve S.S.’un gazino sahibi tan\u0131k V. A.’a bask\u0131 yapmas\u0131 sonucu M. I.’\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay gecesi M.’in evine gitti\u011finde bu durumu \u00f6\u011frenen ve a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 derecede alkoll\u00fc olan makt\u00fbl\u00fcn san\u0131k S.’ye telefon ederek san\u0131klar S.ve B.’e y\u00f6nelik tehdit ve hakaret i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zler sarfetti\u011fi, ard\u0131ndan telefonla irtibat kurdu\u011fu san\u0131k M.’n\u0131n araba ile gelerek makt\u00fbl\u00fc M.’in evinden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, birlikte o s\u0131rada san\u0131k D. K.n\u0131n evinde olan san\u0131k F. \u015e.’i ald\u0131klar\u0131, bu s\u0131rada birbirleriyle tan\u0131\u015fmakta olan san\u0131k D.K.ile makt\u00fbl\u00fcn bir s\u00fcre konu\u015ftuklar\u0131, makt\u00fbl\u00fcn san\u0131klar B. ve S.’ye ili\u015fkin k\u00fcf\u00fcr ve tehdit i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zleri san\u0131k D. K.’n\u0131n yan\u0131nda da s\u00f6ylemeye devam etti\u011fi, san\u0131k D.’\u0131n bu s\u00f6zleri san\u0131klar A. S. ve B. \u00c7.’e iletti\u011fi, maktul\u00fcn gazino sahibi tan\u0131k V. A.’a telefon ederek M.’in neden i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011fu ve gazinoya gitmek \u00fczere yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131, bu s\u0131rada san\u0131k S.’nin karde\u015fi olup ayn\u0131 zamanda makt\u00fbl\u00fc de tan\u0131yan san\u0131k A. S.’un makt\u00fble telefon ederek bulu\u015fmak istedi\u011fi, san\u0131k A. S.’un san\u0131klar D. K. ve B.\u00c7. ile birlikte gelerek ara\u00e7la yol kenar\u0131nda beklemekte olan makt\u00fbl ve san\u0131klar M.A.ile F. \u015e.’in yan\u0131na geldi\u011fi, san\u0131k A. S.’un makt\u00fbl\u00fcn arac\u0131na bindi\u011fi, san\u0131klar M. A. ile F. \u015e.’in de san\u0131klar B. ile D.’\u0131n bulundu\u011fu araca ge\u00e7tikleri, san\u0131k A. ile makt\u00fbl\u00fcn kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile G\u00f6zne Yolu olarak isimlendirilen mevkideki ormanl\u0131k alana gittikleri ve konu\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, bir s\u00fcre sonra buraya di\u011fer san\u0131klar M. A., F. \u015e., D. K.ve B. \u00c7.’in de geldi\u011fi, burada san\u0131k D. K.’n\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fc san\u0131klar S. ve B.’e y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6zleri nedeniyle d\u00f6vmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, makt\u00fbl\u00fcn bunun \u00fczerine san\u0131k D. K.ya bug\u00fcne kadar kendisine maddi yard\u0131mda bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zler s\u00f6yleyerek s\u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, san\u0131klar A Ve B.’in birlikte i\u015flettikleri kahvehanede \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131k D.’\u0131n ruhsats\u0131z tabancas\u0131yla otopsi raporuna g\u00f6re 35-40 cm. mesafeden makt\u00fbl\u00fcn ba\u015f\u0131na ate\u015f etti\u011fi, bununla da yetinmeyerek makt\u00fbl\u00fcn a\u011fz\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inden bir el daha ate\u015f ederek makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden oldu\u011fu, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131klar M. A. ve F.\u015e.’in san\u0131k D. K.’n\u0131n sald\u0131rgan davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 nedeniyle makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesine engel olamad\u0131klar\u0131, olaydan sonra san\u0131k D.K.’n\u0131n san\u0131k M. A.’y\u0131 olay\u0131 kimseye anlatmamas\u0131 konusunda tehdit ederek gitmesine izin verdi\u011fi, san\u0131klar A., B. ve D.’\u0131n biraraya gelerek yapt\u0131klar\u0131 durum de\u011ferlendirmesi sonucu verdikleri karar gere\u011fi hakk\u0131ndaki beraat h\u00fckm\u00fc kesinle\u015fen \u015e.A.’\u0131n kullanmakta oldu\u011fu ticari taksi ile san\u0131klar D. K., B. \u00c7.ve F. \u015e.’in Adana istikametine do\u011fru yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131k B. \u00c7.in Ceyhan \u0130l\u00e7esinde ara\u00e7tan indi\u011fi, san\u0131k D. K.’n\u0131n san\u0131k F. \u015e.’in gitmesine izin vermedi\u011fi, san\u0131k D. K.’n\u0131n yolda telefonla Mersin Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta olan polis memuru tan\u0131k H..G..’yi arayarak makt\u00fbl\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve gelip teslim olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, san\u0131klar\u0131n ticari taksi ile \u015eanl\u0131urfa’ya gittikleri, burada bir s\u00fcre sakland\u0131ktan sonra bir yolunu bulan san\u0131k F. \u015e.’in san\u0131k D.’n\u0131n yan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131larak Mersin \u0130line d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve kollu\u011fa gelerek teslim oldu\u011fu, san\u0131k D. K.’n\u0131n da olaydan uzun bir s\u00fcre sonra 21.04.2005 g\u00fcn\u00fc Mersin’e gelmekte oldu\u011fu s\u0131rada otob\u00fcste kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klar S. S.ve M. \u00c7.’in olay yerinde olduklar\u0131na ve makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi su\u00e7una kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir kan\u0131t\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,
\nAnla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Haks\u0131z tahrik 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 51 ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 29. maddelerinde ceza sorumlulu\u011funu azaltan neden olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Her iki d\u00fczenleme aras\u0131ndaki fark, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019da tahrikin hafif ve a\u011f\u0131r olmak \u00fczere iki \u015feklinin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesi, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019da ise bu ayr\u0131m\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Her iki d\u00fczenlemenin ortak yan\u0131 ise, su\u00e7un, haks\u0131z bir eylemin do\u011furdu\u011fu \u00f6fke veya elemin etkisi alt\u0131nda kal\u0131narak i\u015flenmesi halinde, failin cezas\u0131ndan tahrik nedeniyle indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Haks\u0131z tahrik, failin haks\u0131z bir fiilin yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hiddet veya \u015fiddetli elemin etkisi alt\u0131nda hareket ederek bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemesini ifade eder ki, bu durumda fail su\u00e7 i\u015fleme y\u00f6n\u00fcnde \u00f6nceden bir karar vermeksizin, d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan gelen etkinin ruhsal yap\u0131s\u0131nda yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonucu olarak su\u00e7 i\u015flemeye y\u00f6nelmektedir.<\/p>\n
Yerle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131sal kararlarda kabul edildi\u011fi \u00fczere, gerek fail gerekse, makt\u00fbl\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 haks\u0131z davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmas\u0131 halinde, tahrik uygulamas\u0131nda kural olarak, haks\u0131z bir eylem ile makt\u00fbl\u00fc tahrik eden fail, kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tepkiden dolay\u0131 tahrik alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcremez. Ancak maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 tepki, kendi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 bir hal alm\u0131\u015fsa, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle tepkide a\u00e7\u0131k bir orans\u0131zl\u0131k varsa, bu tepkinin art\u0131k ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na haks\u0131z bir nitelik almas\u0131 nedeniyle fail bak\u0131m\u0131ndan haks\u0131z tahrik olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 tahrik olu\u015fturan eylemlerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde, fail ve makt\u00fbl\u00fcn tahrik olu\u015fturan haks\u0131z davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 birbirlerine oranla de\u011ferlendirilmeli, \u00f6ncelik-sonral\u0131k durumlar\u0131 ile birbirlerine etki-tepki bi\u00e7iminde geli\u015fip geli\u015fmedikleri g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmal\u0131, ula\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 boyutlar, vahamet d\u00fczeyleri, etkileri ve dereceleri gibi hususlar dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131, buna g\u00f6re; etki-tepki aras\u0131nda denge bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek, failin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7taki haks\u0131z davran\u0131\u015f\u0131na g\u00f6sterilen tepkide a\u015f\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir orans\u0131zl\u0131k saptanmas\u0131 halinde, failin haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 yoluna gidilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Yard\u0131m etme, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 65. maddesinde;<\/p>\n
\u201c I – Su\u00e7 i\u015fleme\u011fe te\u015fvik veya su\u00e7u irtikap karar\u0131n\u0131 takviye ederek yahut fiil i\u015flendikten sonra muzaheret ve muavenette bulunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vadeyleyerek,<\/p>\n
II – Su\u00e7un ne suretle i\u015flenece\u011fine m\u00fctaallik talimat vererek yahut fiilin i\u015flenmesine yar\u0131yacak i\u015f veya vas\u0131talar\u0131 tedarik ederek,<\/p>\n
III – Su\u00e7 i\u015flenmeden evvel veya i\u015flendi\u011fi s\u0131rada m\u00fczaharet ve muavenetle icras\u0131n\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rarak su\u00e7a i\u015ftirak eden \u015fah\u0131s, i\u015flenmi\u015f fiile mahsus olan ceza a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131 ise yirmi y\u0131ldan, m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131 ise onalt\u0131 y\u0131ldan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamak \u00fczere a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Sair hallerde kanunen muayyen olan cezan\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131 indirilir.<\/p>\n
Bu maddede yaz\u0131l\u0131 fiillerden birini i\u015fleyen kimsenin i\u015ftiraki inzimam etmeksizin fiilin irtikab\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olamayaca\u011f\u0131 sabit olan hallerde o kimse yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen tenzilattan istifade edemez\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
01 Haziran 2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Yasas\u0131nda su\u00e7a i\u015ftirakta, faillik ve \u015feriklik ay\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, azmettirme ve yard\u0131m etme \u015feriklik kavram\u0131 i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u201cYard\u0131m etme\u201d 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 39. maddesinde; \u201c(1) Su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesine yard\u0131m eden ki\u015fiye, i\u015flenen su\u00e7un a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmesi h\u00e2linde, onbe\u015f y\u0131ldan yirmi y\u0131la; m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmesi h\u00e2linde, on y\u0131ldan onbe\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 verilir. Di\u011fer h\u00e2llerde cezan\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131 indirilir. Ancak, bu durumda verilecek ceza sekiz y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.<\/p>\n
(2) A\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki h\u00e2llerde ki\u015fi i\u015flenen su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 yard\u0131m eden s\u0131fat\u0131yla sorumlu olur:<\/p>\n
a) Su\u00e7 i\u015flemeye te\u015fvik etmek veya su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131n\u0131 kuvvetlendirmek veya fiilin i\u015flenmesinden sonra yard\u0131mda bulunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vaat etmek.<\/p>\n
b) Su\u00e7un nas\u0131l i\u015flenece\u011fi hususunda yol g\u00f6stermek veya fiilin i\u015flenmesinde kullan\u0131lan ara\u00e7lar\u0131 sa\u011flamak.<\/p>\n
c) Su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesinden \u00f6nce veya i\u015flenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda yard\u0131mda bulunarak icras\u0131n\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmak\u201d \u015feklinde, \u201cBa\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131\u201d da Yasan\u0131n 40. maddesinde; \u201c(1) Su\u00e7a i\u015ftirak i\u00e7in kasten ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flenmi\u015f bir fiilin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeterlidir. Su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015fine i\u015ftirak eden her ki\u015fi, di\u011ferinin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleyen ki\u015fisel nedenler g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmaks\u0131z\u0131n kendi kusurlu fiiline g\u00f6re cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
(2) \u00d6zg\u00fc su\u00e7larda, ancak \u00f6zel faillik niteli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131yan ki\u015fi fail olabilir. Bu su\u00e7lar\u0131n i\u015fleni\u015fine i\u015ftirak eden di\u011fer ki\u015filer ise azmettiren veya yard\u0131m eden olarak sorumlu tutulur.<\/p>\n
(3) Su\u00e7a i\u015ftirakten dolay\u0131 sorumlu tutulabilmek i\u00e7in ilgili su\u00e7un en az\u0131ndan te\u015febb\u00fcs a\u015famas\u0131na varm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir\u201d bi\u00e7iminde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Su\u00e7un icras\u0131na i\u015ftirak etmekle birlikte, i\u015fleni\u015fine bulundu\u011fu katk\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi yasal tan\u0131mdaki fiili ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeyen di\u011fer su\u00e7 ortaklar\u0131na \u201c\u015ferik\u201d denilmekte olup, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019nda \u015feriklik, azmettirme ve yard\u0131m etme olarak iki farkl\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, yasal tan\u0131mdaki fiili ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeyen veya \u00f6zel faillik vasf\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in fail olamayan bir su\u00e7 orta\u011f\u0131, ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen fiilden Yasan\u0131n 40. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131 uyar\u0131nca sorumlu olmaktad\u0131r.
\nTCY\u2019n\u0131n 39\/2. maddesindeki d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re, yard\u0131m etme; maddi yard\u0131m ve manevi yard\u0131m olarak ikiye ayr\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
1-Maddi yard\u0131m: bir su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesine maddi yard\u0131mda bulunma \u00e7ok \u00e7e\u015fitli \u015fekillerde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmakla birlikte maddede;<\/p>\n
a)Su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesinde kullan\u0131lan ara\u00e7lar\u0131 temin etmek,<\/p>\n
b)Su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesinden \u00f6nce veya i\u015flenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda maddi yard\u0131mda bulunarak icras\u0131n\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmak olarak say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2-Manevi yard\u0131m ise:<\/p>\n
a)Su\u00e7 i\u015flemeye te\u015fvik etmek,<\/p>\n
b)Su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131n\u0131 kuvvetlendirmek,<\/p>\n
c)Su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesinden sonra yard\u0131mda bulunmay\u0131 vaad etmek,<\/p>\n
d)Su\u00e7un nas\u0131l i\u015flenece\u011fi konusunda yol g\u00f6stermek, \u015feklinde belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer taraftan, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli ilkelerinden biri olan \u201cin dubio pro reo\u201d yani \u201cku\u015fkudan san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r\u201d kural\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir su\u00e7tan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n temel ko\u015fulu, su\u00e7un ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyen bir kesinlikle ispat edilmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme \u015fekli ku\u015fkulu ve tam olarak ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f olaylar ve iddialar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine yorumlanarak mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulamaz. Ceza mahk\u00fbmiyeti, yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde toplanan kan\u0131tlar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ve di\u011fer bir k\u0131sm\u0131 g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilerek ula\u015f\u0131lan ihtimali kan\u0131ya de\u011fil, kesin ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir ispata dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ispat, hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fku ve ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc bir olu\u015fa olanak vermeyecek a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131kta olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Y\u00fcksek de olsa bir olas\u0131l\u0131\u011fa dayan\u0131larak san\u0131\u011f\u0131 cezaland\u0131rmak, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli amac\u0131 olan ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015fmadan, varsay\u0131ma dayal\u0131 olarak h\u00fck\u00fcm vermek anlam\u0131na gelir. O halde ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet, b\u00fcy\u00fck veya k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir olas\u0131l\u0131\u011fa de\u011fil, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ku\u015fkudan uzak bir kesinli\u011fe dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Adli hatalar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesinin tek yolu budur.<\/p>\n
Yap\u0131lan bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan sonra uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konular\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenebilmesi i\u00e7in a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
1- San\u0131k D. K.hakk\u0131nda haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi:<\/p>\n
San\u0131klar A. S. ve B. \u00c7.’in i\u015fletti\u011fi kahvehanede \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131k D. K.’n\u0131n olaydan \u00f6nce makt\u00fbl\u00fcn S. ve B.’e y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6yledi\u011fi s\u00f6zler nedeniyle makt\u00fbl A.Y.’\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye karar verdi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, \u00f6ld\u00fcrme karar\u0131n\u0131n verilmesine kadar ge\u00e7en zamanda maktul\u00fcn san\u0131k D. K.’ya y\u00f6nelik tahrik olu\u015fturabilecek herhangi bir haks\u0131z davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Makt\u00fbl\u00fcn san\u0131klar S. ve B.e y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6zlerinin ise san\u0131k D. a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan haks\u0131z tahrik olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.
\nKald\u0131 ki, G\u00f6zne Yolu Mevkiindeki ormanl\u0131k alanda san\u0131k D.’\u0131n maktul\u00fc d\u00f6vmeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 \u00fczerine makt\u00fbl\u00fcn de kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak san\u0131k D.’a bug\u00fcne kadar maddi yard\u0131mda bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zler s\u00f6yleyerek s\u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, san\u0131k D.\u2019\u0131n da bundan sonra biri a\u011fz\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inden olmak \u00fczere ba\u015f\u0131na iki el ate\u015f ederek makt\u00fbl\u00fc kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, b\u00f6yle bir kabulde bile makt\u00fbl\u00fc d\u00f6vmesi nedeniyle ilk haks\u0131z hareketin san\u0131k D.K. taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi ortadad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu nedenle, yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcnde san\u0131k D. K. hakk\u0131nda haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131 suretiyle eksik ceza tayin edilmesi isabetli de\u011fildir.
\nBununla birlikte, yerel mahkemece san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda lehe yasa de\u011ferlendirmesi haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan bu yeni durum nedeniyle lehe olan yasan\u0131n yeniden belirlenmesinde de zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
San\u0131k D. K. hakk\u0131ndaki \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan bir k\u0131s\u0131m Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi; \u201csan\u0131k hakk\u0131nda haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131nda dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re bir isabetsizlik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi\u201d d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2- San\u0131klar F. \u015e.ve M.A.\u2019n\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fcn kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi su\u00e7una yard\u0131m eden olarak kat\u0131l\u0131p kat\u0131lmad\u0131klar\u0131:<\/p>\n
San\u0131klar F. \u015e. ve M. A.\u2019n\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesinden \u00f6nce ve sonraki baz\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi eylemine yard\u0131m eden olarak kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 yolunda bir kanaat do\u011fmas\u0131na neden olmakta ise de; makt\u00fbl ile samimi arkada\u015f olmalar\u0131, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc birlikte Bitlis \u0130linden Mersin \u0130line ayn\u0131 ara\u00e7 i\u00e7inde gelmeleri, san\u0131k M.A.\u2019n\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u015fof\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yapmas\u0131, aralar\u0131nda makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesini istemelerini gerektirecek bir nedenin bulunmamas\u0131, olay \u00f6ncesinde di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gruba kar\u015f\u0131 makt\u00fbl ile birlikte hareket etmi\u015f olmalar\u0131, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda ve sonras\u0131nda san\u0131k D.\u2019nin etrafa ve bu san\u0131klara y\u00f6nelik sald\u0131rgan davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 gibi hususlar dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi ile birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, san\u0131klar F. \u015e. ve M.A.’n\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fcn kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi olay\u0131na yard\u0131m eden olarak kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 ku\u015fku boyutunda kalmakta ve s\u00fcbuta ermemektedir.<\/p>\n
Bu itibarla, yerel mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc san\u0131klar F. \u015e.ve M. A. hakk\u0131nda verilen beraat karar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden isabetlidir.<\/p>\n
San\u0131klar F. \u015e. ve M.A. hakk\u0131ndaki \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan bir k\u0131s\u0131m Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi; \u201csan\u0131klar\u0131n olay \u00f6ncesinde, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda ve olay sonras\u0131nda davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una yard\u0131m eden olarak kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 sabit oldu\u011fundan yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bu san\u0131klar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi\u201d d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3- San\u0131klar S.S.\u2019un kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una azmettiren ya da yard\u0131m eden, san\u0131k M. \u00c7.\u2019in ise yard\u0131m eden olarak kat\u0131l\u0131p kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131:
\nSan\u0131k A. S.\u2019un a\u011fabeyi olan san\u0131k S.S.\u2019un makt\u00fbl\u00fcn bayan arkada\u015f\u0131 M.\u2019in \u015fark\u0131c\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 gazinodaki i\u015finden, gazinonun sahibine bask\u0131 yapmak suretiyle at\u0131lmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011fu, makt\u00fbl\u00fcn de bayan arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sorumlusu olarak g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc san\u0131k S.\u2019ye olay \u00f6ncesinde hakaret etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakta ise de, bu san\u0131\u011f\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi konusunda di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131 azmettirdi\u011fi ya da kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una yard\u0131m etti\u011fine dair cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na yeterli kan\u0131t bulunmay\u0131p bu husus ku\u015fku boyutunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k B. \u00c7.\u2019in karde\u015fi olan san\u0131k M. \u00c7.\u2019in ise \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una yard\u0131m etti\u011fine dair savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n aksini kabule elveri\u015fli hi\u00e7bir kan\u0131t elde edilemedi\u011finden yerel mahkemece an\u0131lan san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi isabetlidir.<\/p>\n
4- San\u0131klar A. S. ve B. \u00c7.\u2019in kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una yard\u0131m eden olarak kat\u0131l\u0131p kat\u0131lmad\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesine gelince;
\nSan\u0131klar A.ve B.’in, san\u0131k D.’\u0131 makt\u00fbl\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrmesi konusunda azmettirdikleri yolunda yeterli kan\u0131t bulunmamakta ise de, birlikte i\u015flettikleri kahvehanede \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n, olay \u00f6ncesinde A.’nin a\u011fabeyi S.ile B.’e y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6zleri nedeniyle makt\u00fbl\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye karar verdi\u011fi, hatta makt\u00fbl\u00fcn s\u00f6zlerini bu ki\u015filere iletti\u011fi, san\u0131klar A.ile B.’in de makt\u00fcl\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye karar veren san\u0131k D.’\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrme karar\u0131n\u0131 takviye ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, eylemlerinin her iki TCY kapsam\u0131nda da kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle san\u0131klar A. S. ve B. \u00c7.in kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7undan lehe yasa de\u011ferlendirmesi de yap\u0131larak cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekirken, yerel mahkemece beraatlerine karar verilmesinde isabet bulunmamaktad\u0131r.
\nSan\u0131klar A. S. ve B.\u00c7. hakk\u0131ndaki \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan bir k\u0131s\u0131m Ceza Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi; \u201csan\u0131klar\u0131n makt\u00fbl\u00fcn kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi su\u00e7una yard\u0131m ettikleri hususu dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ku\u015fkulu oldu\u011fundan yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bu san\u0131klar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi\u201d d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak:<\/p>\n
San\u0131klar F. \u015e., M. A., S. S. ve M. \u00c7. hakk\u0131nda verilen beraat kararlar\u0131 isabetli bulundu\u011fundan yerel mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bu san\u0131klara ili\u015fkin olarak onanmas\u0131na, san\u0131k D. K. hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn haks\u0131z tahrik indirimi yap\u0131lmas\u0131, san\u0131klar A.S.ve B. \u00c7. hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ise kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una yard\u0131m eden olarak kat\u0131lmalar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n beraatlerine karar verilmesi isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
San\u0131k D. K. hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn Ceza Genel Kurulunca bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, 22.04.2005 tarihinden bu yana tutuklu olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutukluluk durumunun 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 102\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca de\u011ferlendirilmesi zorunlulu\u011fu ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:
\n5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n \u201cTutuklulukta ge\u00e7ecek s\u00fcre\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 102. maddesi;<\/p>\n
\u201c(1) A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine girmeyen i\u015flerde tutukluluk s\u00fcresi en \u00e7ok bir y\u0131ld\u0131r. Ancak bu s\u00fcre, zorunlu hallerde gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek alt\u0131 ay daha uzat\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n
(2) A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine giren i\u015flerde, tutukluluk s\u00fcresi en \u00e7ok iki y\u0131ld\u0131r. Bu s\u00fcre, zorunlu hallerde, gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6sterilerek uzat\u0131labilir; uzatma s\u00fcresi toplam \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.<\/p>\n
(3) Bu maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen uzatma kararlar\u0131, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n, \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k ile m\u00fcdafiinin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra verilir\u201d \u015feklinde olup, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan maddede yaz\u0131l\u0131 s\u00fcreler 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 5739 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 12. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 31.12.2010 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Maddedeki d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re; a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmeyen su\u00e7larda tutukluluk s\u00fcresi bir y\u0131l\u0131, zorunluluk halindeki uzatmalar ile birlikte en \u00e7ok bir y\u0131l alt\u0131 ay\u0131, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan iki y\u0131l\u0131, zorunlu hallerdeki uzatmalar ile birlikte ise en \u00e7ok be\u015f y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emeyecektir. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 252\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 250\/1-c maddesinde say\u0131lan su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tutukluluk s\u00fcreleri iki kat olarak uygulanaca\u011f\u0131ndan, bu su\u00e7larda tutukluluk s\u00fcresi zorunlu hallerdeki uzatmalar ile birlikte on y\u0131ldan fazla olamayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ancak an\u0131lan maddede belirtilen tutukluluk s\u00fcrelerinin hesab\u0131nda yerel mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcm verilinceye kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131, buna kar\u015f\u0131n yerel mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan h\u00fckm\u00fcn verilmesinden sonra tutuklu san\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fckmen tutuklu hale gelmesi nedeniyle temyizde ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre hesaba kat\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Zira, hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmakla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi yerel mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte ve bu a\u015famadan sonra tutuklulu\u011fun dayana\u011f\u0131 mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc olmaktad\u0131r. Nitekim Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi de A\u0130HS\u2019nin 5. maddesinin uygulamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak verdi\u011fi kararlarda tutuklulukla ilgili makul s\u00fcrenin hesab\u0131nda, ilk derece mahkemesinin mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcnden sonra ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreyi dikkate almamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Somut olayda, 22.04.2005 tarihinde tutuklanan san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n Ceza Genel Kurulundaki inceleme tarihi itibar\u0131yla CYY\u2019n\u0131n 102\/2. maddesinde belirtilen be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011fu ve bu nedenle tahliyesine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilecek ise de, yerel mahkemenin h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihi olan 22.03.2010 tarihinde hen\u00fcz be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin dolmam\u0131\u015f bulunmas\u0131 ve temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin maddede yaz\u0131l\u0131 azami tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin hesab\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmayacak olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, yasal olarak tahliyesine karar verme zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu itibarla, hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn aleyhe bozulmu\u015f olmas\u0131 da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda san\u0131k D.K.\u2019n\u0131n tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi H. Y.A.; \u201cKoruma tedbirlerinden tutuklaman\u0131n s\u00fcresi Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun (CMK) 102. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Madde \u2018Tutuklulukta ge\u00e7ecek s\u00fcre\u2019 ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. A\u011f\u0131r Cezal\u0131k su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre, maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u2018A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine giren i\u015flerde, tutukluluk s\u00fcresi en \u00e7ok iki y\u0131ld\u0131r. Bu s\u00fcre, zorunlu hallerde, gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6sterilerek uzat\u0131labilir; uzatma s\u00fcresi toplam \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.\u2019 \u015feklindedir.<\/p>\n
Koruma tedbiri olmas\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tutuklaman\u0131n ancak \u015f\u00fcpheli\/san\u0131kl\u0131k stat\u00fcs\u00fcyle ilgili oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. CMK\u2019nun 2. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131; \u2018a) \u015f\u00fcpheli soru\u015fturma evresinde, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015fiyi, b) San\u0131k: Kovu\u015fturman\u0131n ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan itibaren h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015fiyi\u2019 tan\u0131mlamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
An\u0131lan normatif d\u00fczenlemeler birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde tutuklama ve buna ili\u015fkin uzatma s\u00fcrelerinin i\u00e7ine ilk derece mahkemesi ile Yarg\u0131tay\u2019da ge\u00e7ecek s\u00fcrelerin dahil oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. D\u00fczenlemeden de g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi \u00fczere ana s\u00fcre iki y\u0131l, uzatma s\u00fcresi ise \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ld\u0131r. Tutukluluk s\u00fcresi denildi\u011finde m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran ana s\u00fcre anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Maddenin yaz\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kan budur. \u00d6te yandan uzatma s\u00fcresine ayr\u0131ca \u2018zorunlu hallerde\u2019 denilmek suretiyle ilave ko\u015ful getirilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle de \u2018uzatma s\u00fcresi\u2019 daha s\u0131k\u0131 ko\u015fullara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Muhakeme hukukunda k\u0131yas olanakl\u0131 ise de \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bu kural\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 vard\u0131r. S\u0131n\u0131rlay\u0131c\u0131 ve istisnai h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde k\u0131yas yasak oldu\u011fu gibi koruma tedbirlerinin kanunili\u011fi ilkesi nedeniyle de k\u0131yas olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r. (Yener \u00dcnver-Hakan Hakeri: Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku, 4. Bask\u0131, Ankara, 2011, S. 26 vd.) Uzatma s\u00fcresi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 kurallar\u0131n konulmu\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, bu nedenle, tutukluluk s\u00fcresi dolduktan sonra verilecek uzatma kararlar\u0131nda \u2018g\u00f6sterilecek gerek\u00e7e ilk tutuklama karar\u0131ndan daha kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi- i\u015fleme \u015f\u00fcphesi bulundu\u011funun ortaya konmas\u0131 gerekir\u2019 (Ay\u015fe Nuho\u011flu: \u2018Koruma Tedbiri Olarak Tutuklama\u2019 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun 3 Y\u0131l\u0131, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuk Derne\u011fi Yay\u0131n\u0131, \u0130stanbul, 2009, S. 175-191)
\nA\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine giren su\u00e7larda toplam tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin be\u015f y\u0131l kabul edilmesi halinde Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin (S\u00f6zle\u015fme) 5. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmi\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6\u011fretide ifade edilmektedir. (\u00d6r. Kunter\/Yenisey\/Nuho\u011flu: Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku, 16. Bas\u0131, \u0130stanbul, 2008, S. 887; \u00dcnver-Hakeri, age, S. 372 vd) S\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi yorumlayan ve uygulayan Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesinin (A\u0130HM) 60 y\u0131ll\u0131k i\u00e7tihad\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fme ile bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olu\u015fturmakta ve W\/\u0130svi\u00e7re (1993) davas\u0131ndaki 4 y\u0131ll\u0131k tutukluluk s\u00fcresi istisnas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutukluluklar bu s\u00fcrenin alt\u0131nda kalsa dahi ihlal kararlar\u0131 verilmektedir. Dahas\u0131 C.Demirel\/T\u00fcrkiye (2009) karar\u0131nda T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin normatif d\u00fczenlemesi de s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmu\u015ftur. A\u0130HM\u2019nin istisna kararlar\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki uzatma s\u00fcresiyle birlikte toplam tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin, istisnan\u0131n da \u00fczerinde oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. (R\u0131za T\u00fcrmen: \u2018Tutukluluk, A\u0130HM ve 90. madde\u2019 Milliyet, 10 Ocak 2011)<\/p>\n
Normatif d\u00fczenleme, uygulama ve A\u0130HM.nin kararlar\u0131 birlikte g\u00f6zetilerek \u00f6\u011fretide \u2018A\u011f\u0131r Cezal\u0131k su\u00e7lardaki bu be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 5 inci maddesinde g\u00f6sterilen makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015far nitelikte g\u00f6z\u00fckmektedir. Bu nedenle maddeyi maksada uygun \u015fekilde yorumlamal\u0131 ve s\u00fcrenin uzatma ile birlikte \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emeyece\u011fi anlam\u0131n\u0131 maddeye vermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmal\u0131d\u0131r\u2019 (Kunter\/Yenisey\/Nuho\u011flu, age, s. 887) de\u011ferlendirilmesi yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
CMK\u2019nun 2\/1-a-b ve 102. maddelerin birlikte ele al\u0131nmas\u0131nda i\u00e7 hukukumuzda tutuklama ile s\u00fcre getirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve bu s\u00fcrenin kapsay\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte bulunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda da A\u0130HS ve A\u0130HM i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re d\u00fczenlemenin lehe oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. Yeter ki A\u0130HM i\u00e7tihad\u0131ndaki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler g\u00f6zetilsin!<\/p>\n
A\u0130HM\u2019nin an\u0131lan s\u00fcreye, \u00fcst mahkemede ge\u00e7ecek s\u00fcreyi dahil etmemesi tutuklulu\u011fun 4 y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 makul g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlam\u0131na al\u0131nma yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmemelidir. \u0130\u00e7 hukuktaki d\u00fczenleme Yarg\u0131tay\u2019da ge\u00e7ecek s\u00fcreyi kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, \u00fcst mahkemedeki s\u00fcreyi dahil etmeyen A\u0130HM.nin Wemhoff v. Almanya (1968) karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rnek al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 ve uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lmaz. Normatif d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re Yarg\u0131tay\u2019da ge\u00e7ecek s\u00fcre dahil oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in A\u0130HM.nin an\u0131lan karar\u0131 uygulanamaz. Kald\u0131 ki A\u0130HM.nin an\u0131lan karar\u0131 s\u00fcrenin miktar\u0131na ili\u015fkin de de\u011fildir. D\u00f6rt y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcreyi ancak istisnai karar\u0131nda kabul ederek ve s\u00fcrekli olarak bu s\u00fcrenin alt\u0131ndaki s\u00fcreleri s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6ren kararlar ve \u00f6zellikle kullan\u0131lan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. Wemhoff v. Almanya karar\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck verilmesi Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 90\/son maddesine de ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Bu arada hemen ifade edilmelidir ki somut olayda yerel mahkemedeki tutuklama s\u00fcresi Wemhoff Karar\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ilk derece mahkemesinde ge\u00e7mi\u015f bulunan s\u00fcre A\u0130HM i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re de uzundur.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan Anayasan\u0131n 90\/son maddesinde, s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile i\u00e7 hukukun \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131nda, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131n\u0131rken i\u00e7 hukukun aleyhe olmas\u0131 hali dikkate al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u201890. maddedeki de\u011fi\u015fiklikte, de\u011fi\u015ftirme d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinin arka plan\u0131nda temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ili\u015fkin milletleraras\u0131 antla\u015fmalar\u0131n i\u00e7 hukukta y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulmu\u015f kanunlara nazaran daha lehe h\u00fck\u00fcmler getirmi\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00f6n kabul\u00fc yatmaktad\u0131r.\u2019 (H.Y.Aktan: \u2018Uluslararas\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Dairelerine Uygulanmas\u0131\u2019 \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Uluslararas\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin \u0130\u00e7 Hukukta Do\u011frudan Uygulanmas\u0131-Anayasa, md. 90\/son, T\u00fcrkiye Baralor Birli\u011fi Yay\u0131n\u0131, Ankara, 2004, S. 141-149) Ger\u00e7ekten de Anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin genel gerek\u00e7e\u2019sinde \u2018\u2026di\u011fer yandan, d\u00fcnyada geli\u015fen yeni demokratik a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131mlara uyum sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve bu a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131ma uygun bir \u015fekilde temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin, evrensel d\u00fczeyde kabul edilmi\u015f standart ve normlar ile Avrupa birli\u011fi kriterleri seviyesine \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla kanunlar\u0131m\u0131zda d\u00fczenlemeler yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ihtiyac\u0131 temel yasam\u0131z olan Anayasa\u2019da da de\u011fi\u015fiklikler yapma zorunlulu\u011fu do\u011furmu\u015ftur.\u2019 denilmi\u015f, 90. maddenin (son) f\u0131kras\u0131na ili\u015fkin madde gerek\u00e7esinde ise \u2018insan haklar\u0131na\u2019 ili\u015fkin uluslararas\u0131 antla\u015fmalardan s\u00f6z edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
D\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re uluslararas\u0131 antla\u015fmalar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile i\u00e7 hukukun \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ve antla\u015fma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn lehe olmas\u0131 halinde i\u00e7 hukuk kural\u0131 uygulanamayacakt\u0131r. Hatta Anayasan\u0131n 90\/son maddesindeki d\u00fczenleme, uluslararas\u0131 denetim organlar\u0131n\u0131n kararlar\u0131n\u0131n da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. (Mesut G\u00fclmez: \u2018\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Uluslararas\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin \u0130\u00e7 Hukukta Do\u011frudan Uygulanmas\u0131\u2019 \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Uluslararas\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin \u0130\u00e7 Hukukta Do\u011frudan Uygulanmas\u0131- i\u00e7inde- s. 38-83)
\nWemhoff v. Almanya (1968) karar\u0131 uluslararas\u0131 denetim organ\u0131 olan A\u0130HM taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f, ancak \u00fcst mahkemedeki s\u00fcresini tutukluluk s\u00fcresinden saymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve CMK\u2019nun 2 ve 102. maddeleriyle \u00e7at\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve i\u00e7 hukuk lehe oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in Anayasan\u0131n 90\/son maddesine g\u00f6re an\u0131lan karara \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck ve \u00f6ncelik tan\u0131namaz. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle Wemhoff Karar\u0131 nitelik olarak insan haklar\u0131na, \u00fcst mahkemedeki s\u00fcreyi dahil eden i\u00e7 d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re daha geridedir. Yarg\u0131tay\u2019da ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreyi dahil eden i\u00e7 d\u00fczenleme, A\u0130HM\u2019nin genel i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ile birlikte d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmeli ve bu ba\u011flamda d\u00f6rt y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7memek \u00fczere yorumlama yap\u0131larak uygulama yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki \u00fcst mahkemede ge\u00e7ecek s\u00fcrenin s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 6. maddesine g\u00f6re ihlali beraberinde getirece\u011fi de unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00c7o\u011funlu\u011fun yorumlamas\u0131, 90\/son maddenin, d\u00fczenlenme gerek\u00e7esine ve i\u00e7eri\u011fine ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fmektedir. \u2018\u00c7at\u0131\u015fma halinde s\u00f6zle\u015fme uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r\u2019 kabul edilirse bir \u00f6rnek verilmelidir: Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere TCK\u2019nun 80. maddesi insan ticareti su\u00e7unu d\u00fczenlemekte ve fuhu\u015f yapt\u0131rmak ama\u00e7l\u0131 insan ticaretini yapt\u0131r\u0131m alt\u0131na almaktad\u0131r. Madde gerek\u00e7esi de bu konudaki \u2018S\u0131n\u0131ra\u015fan \u00d6rg\u00fctl\u00fc Su\u00e7lara Kar\u015f\u0131 Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019 ve \u2018Kad\u0131n ve \u00c7ocuk Ticaretinin \u00d6nlenmesine, Durdurulmas\u0131na ve Cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Protokol\u2019 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin gere\u011finin yerine getirilmesi i\u00e7in d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret etmektedir. S\u00f6zle\u015fmeye Ek Protokol\u2019\u00fcn 3\/a maddesine g\u00f6re fuhu\u015fun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra cinsel istismar\u2019\u0131n da cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131ma al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u0130\u00e7 hukuka (TCK. m. 80) nazaran Protokol\u2019\u00fcn kapsam\u0131 (m. 3\/a) daha geni\u015ftir. San\u0131k haklar\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma s\u00f6z konusudur. Cinsel istismar ama\u00e7l\u0131 insan ticareti i\u00e7 hukuk y\u00f6n\u00fcnden olanaks\u0131z olmakla birlikte \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun yorumlanmas\u0131na g\u00f6re bu m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olacakt\u0131r. Oysa T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununda (m. 80) cinsel istismar ama\u00e7l\u0131 insan ticareti d\u00fczenlenmesi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi (TCK. m. 2; Ay. m. 38) gere\u011fi mevcut madde kapsam\u0131nda ceza verilemeyecektir. Keza, muhakeme hukukunda kimi zaman A\u0130HM taraf\u0131ndan dikkate al\u0131nan \u2018delil tart\u0131m\u0131\u2019 uygulamas\u0131 i\u00e7 hukuktaki d\u00fczenlemeler (Ay. m. 38\/7; CMK. m. 217) kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda uygulama alan\u0131 bulamayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
– \u0130\u00e7 hukuktaki d\u00fczenlemenin lehe oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek Yarg\u0131tay\u2019da ge\u00e7en tutukluluk s\u00fcresi nazara al\u0131nmal\u0131,<\/p>\n
– Bu s\u00fcre nazara al\u0131n\u0131rken bu kez A\u0130HM.nin bu konudaki genel i\u00e7tihad\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmal\u0131,<\/p>\n
– Farkl\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde dahi adil yarg\u0131lanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn (s\u00f6zle\u015fme, m. 6) ihlal edilmi\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131 unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00c7o\u011funlu\u011fun yorumlamas\u0131na\/uygulamas\u0131na bu nedenlerle kat\u0131labilmek olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki \u00e7o\u011funluk Singh C. Re\u2019publique Tche\u2019que ve Karar\u0131n\u0131 da g\u00f6z ard\u0131 etmi\u015ftir. Bu kararla ilgili \u00f6\u011fretide \u2018Mahkeme (A\u0130HM), ki\u015finin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck hakk\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren koruman\u0131n sadece k\u0131sa s\u00fcre\u2019de tutuklulu\u011fun d\u00fczenlenmesine ili\u015fkin bir yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda, iki dereceli yarg\u0131lama sistemini benimsemi\u015f \u00fclkeler i\u00e7in, ilk derece mahkemesini oldu\u011fu kadar temyiz muhakemesini de kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtmektedir.\u2019 (\u00dcnver-Hakeri, age, s.372-373; karar\u0131n Frans\u0131zcas\u0131 i\u00e7in bknz: Deux\u0131eme Sect\u0131on, Affa\u0131re S\u0131ngh c. Republique Tcheque, 60538\/00, 25.4.2005, http:\/\/ cmiskp.echr.coe.int\/tkp\u2026) Hatta birden fazla su\u00e7 i\u00e7in dava ve tutukluluk karar\u0131 mevcut olsa dahi s\u00fcre buna g\u00f6re uygulanmaktad\u0131r. (Bknz. Baltac\u0131\/T\u00fcrkiye, ba\u015fvuru no: 495\/02, 18.7.2006; Solmaz\/T\u00fcrkiye, ba\u015fvuru no: 27561\/02, Sinan Tumlukol\u00e7u: \u2018Tahliyeler Stresi Alt\u0131nda CMK\u2019nin 102. Maddesi\u2019 G\u00fcncel Hukuk, Nisan 2011\/4-88, s. 52\/55)\u201d d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle,<\/p>\n
\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi A. K.<\/p>\n
\u201cA) Tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n Konusu:<\/p>\n
Tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n konusunu, adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan 22.4.2005 tarihinden beri tutuklu olan ve hakk\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc bozulan san\u0131k D.’\u0131n, azami tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin dolup dolmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak sal\u0131verilmesi gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B) Ceza Genel Kurulu \u00c7o\u011funlu\u011funun Benimsedi\u011fi G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f:<\/p>\n
\u00c7o\u011funluk taraf\u0131ndan, CMK’n\u0131n 102. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami tutukluluk s\u00fcresine, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’nin kararlar\u0131 gere\u011fince, ilk derece mahkemesinin mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131ndan sonra ge\u00e7ecek s\u00fcrenin dahil edilemeyece\u011fi ve bunun sonucu olarak 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k azami tutukluluk s\u00fcresi dolmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in san\u0131k D.\u0131n sal\u0131verilemeyece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C) Konuyla \u0130lgili Uluslararas\u0131 ve Ulusal Normlar:<\/p>\n
1- \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131n\u0131n ve Temel \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin Korunmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (A\u0130HS):
\nMadde 5- \u20181. Herkesin ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fine hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen haller ve yasada belirlenen yollar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hi\u00e7 kimse \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n
a) Ki\u015finin yetkili mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbm edilmesi \u00fczerine usul\u00fcne uygun olarak hapsedilmesi;
\n…c) Bir su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi hakk\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunan veya su\u00e7 i\u015flemesine ya da su\u00e7u i\u015fledikten sonra ka\u00e7mas\u0131na engel olmak zorunlulu\u011fu inanc\u0131n\u0131 do\u011furan makul nedenlerin bulunmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bir kimsenin yetkili merci \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmak \u00fczere yakalanmas\u0131 ve tutulu durumda bulundurulmas\u0131;
\n…3. Bu maddenin 1.c f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ko\u015fullar uyar\u0131nca yakalanan veya tutulu durumda bulunan herkes hemen bir yarg\u0131\u00e7 veya adli g\u00f6rev yapmaya yasayla yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f di\u011fer bir g\u00f6revli \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131r; kendisinin makul bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yarg\u0131lanmaya veya adli kovu\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmaya hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Sal\u0131verilme, ilgilinin duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak bir teminata ba\u011flanabilir…\u2019<\/p>\n
Ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc: \u2018A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da imzas\u0131 bulunan Avrupa Konseyi \u00fcyesi h\u00fck\u00fcmetler, Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 10 Aral\u0131k 1948’de ilan edilen \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Evrensel Bildirisi’ni, bu Bildiri’nin, metninde a\u00e7\u0131klanan haklar\u0131n her yerde ve etkin olarak tan\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 ve uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamay\u0131 hedef ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, …Avrupa devletlerinin h\u00fck\u00fcmetleri s\u0131fat\u0131yla, Evrensel Bildiri’de yer alan baz\u0131 haklar\u0131n ortak g\u00fcvenceye ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flama yolunda ilk ad\u0131mlar\u0131 atmay\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131rarak, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki hususlarda anla\u015fm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r: …\u2019<\/p>\n
Madde 53- \u2018Bu S\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden hi\u00e7biri, herhangi bir Y\u00fcksek S\u00f6zle\u015fmeci Taraf\u2019\u0131n yasalar\u0131na ve onun taraf oldu\u011fu ba\u015fka bir S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019ye g\u00f6re tan\u0131nabilecek insan haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve temel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri s\u0131n\u0131rlayamaz veya onlara ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fecek \u015fekilde yorumlanamaz.\u2019<\/p>\n
2- T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131:<\/p>\n
Madde 90\/5- \u2018Usul\u00fcne g\u00f6re y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulmu\u015f milletleraras\u0131 andla\u015fmalar kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcndedir. Bunlar hakk\u0131nda Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131 ile Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurulamaz. Usul\u00fcne g\u00f6re y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulmu\u015f temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ili\u015fkin milletleraras\u0131 andla\u015fmalarla kanunlar\u0131n ayn\u0131 konuda farkl\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmler i\u00e7ermesi nedeniyle \u00e7\u0131kabilecek uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda milletleraras\u0131 andla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri esas al\u0131n\u0131r.\u2019<\/p>\n
3- 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu (CMK):<\/p>\n
Madde 2- \u2018(1) Bu Kanunun uygulanmas\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
a) \u015e\u00fcpheli: Soru\u015fturma evresinde, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015fiyi,<\/p>\n
b) San\u0131k: Kovu\u015fturman\u0131n ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan itibaren h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015fiyi,<\/p>\n
…e) Soru\u015fturma: Kanuna g\u00f6re yetkili mercilerce su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin \u00f6\u011frenilmesinden iddianamenin kabul\u00fcne kadar ge\u00e7en evreyi,<\/p>\n
f) Kovu\u015fturma: \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fcyle ba\u015flay\u0131p, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar ge\u00e7en evreyi,..\u0130fade eder.\u2019
\nMadde 102- \u2018(1) A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine girmeyen i\u015flerde tutukluluk s\u00fcresi en \u00e7ok bir y\u0131ld\u0131r. Ancak bu s\u00fcre, zorunlu hallerde gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek alt\u0131 ay daha uzat\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n
(2) A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine giren i\u015flerde, tutukluluk s\u00fcresi en \u00e7ok iki y\u0131ld\u0131r. Bu s\u00fcre, zorunlu hallerde, gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6sterilerek uzat\u0131labilir; uzatma s\u00fcresi toplam \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.<\/p>\n
(3) Bu maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen uzatma kararlar\u0131, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n, \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k ile m\u00fcdafiinin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra verilir.\u2019
\nMadde 104 \u2013 \u2018(1) Soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma evrelerinin her a\u015famas\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k sal\u0131verilmesini isteyebilir.<\/p>\n
(2) \u015e\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na veya sal\u0131verilmesine h\u00e2kim veya mahkemece karar verilir. Ret karar\u0131na itiraz edilebilir.<\/p>\n
(3) Dosya b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesine veya Yarg\u0131taya geldi\u011finde sal\u0131verilme istemi hakk\u0131ndaki karar, b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi veya Yarg\u0131tay ilgili dairesi veya Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunca dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lacak incelemeden sonra verilir; bu karar re’sen de verilebilir.\u2019<\/p>\n
4- 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun (CGT\u0130HK):<\/p>\n
Madde 4- \u2018(1) Mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e infaz olunamaz\u2019<\/p>\n
D) Konuyla \u0130lgili Normlar\u0131n Yorumu:<\/p>\n
1- A\u0130HS’nin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ve 53. maddesi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n
a) A\u0130HS insan haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve temel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri asgari \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde koruyan bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmedir. Zamanla koruma s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
b) A\u0130HS’ye taraf olan devletler, i\u00e7 hukuklar\u0131nda insan haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve temel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri daha fazla koruyacak d\u00fczenlemeler yapabilirler veya bu konuda ba\u015fka bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi kabul edebilirler. A\u0130HS’nin hi\u00e7bir h\u00fckm\u00fc, bu nitelikteki d\u00fczenlemelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fecek \u015fekilde yorumlanamaz. Ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla, A\u0130HS’ye taraf olan devletlerin, i\u00e7 hukuklar\u0131nda veya kabul ettikleri ba\u015fka bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yer alan insan haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve temel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri daha fazla koruyan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, A\u0130HS’ye ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclemez.<\/p>\n
2- A\u0130HS’nin 5. maddesine g\u00f6re, tutuklu bulunan herkesin, mak\u00fbl bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmaya hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Tutukluluk, mak\u00fbl s\u00fcreden fazla olamaz.<\/p>\n
3- Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi, A\u0130HS’nin 5. maddesindeki tutuklulukta ge\u00e7ecek \u2018mak\u00fbl s\u00fcre\u2019 kavram\u0131n\u0131 yorumlarken, bu s\u00fcrenin, ilk derece mahkemesinin mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcnden sonraki a\u015famay\u0131 kapsamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir. Ancak, A\u0130HS’nin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile 53. maddesine g\u00f6re, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye taraf olan devletler kendi yasalar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc daha fazla koruyucu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere yer verebilirler. Bu nitelikteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin A\u0130HS’ye ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclemez.<\/p>\n
4- CMK’n\u0131n 2, 102 ve 104. maddeleri ile CGT\u0130HK’n\u0131n 4. maddesine g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n
a) \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fcnden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar ge\u00e7en evre, kovu\u015fturma evresidir.<\/p>\n
b) Su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015finin, iddianamenin kabul\u00fcnden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar ge\u00e7en evredeki s\u0131fat\u0131 san\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
c) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, hakk\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz edildi\u011fi tarihe kadar ge\u00e7en evredeki s\u0131fat\u0131 ise h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
d) CMK’n\u0131n 102. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen azami tutukluluk s\u00fcrelerine, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreler de dahildir.<\/p>\n
E) Konunun \u0130rdelenmesi:<\/p>\n
Somut olayda, kasten adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan san\u0131k D., 22.04.2005 tarihinden, Ceza Genel Kurulu’nda yap\u0131lan inceleme tarihine kadar, 5 y\u0131l 9 ay 20 g\u00fcnden beri tutuklu bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011fa isnat olunan ve a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine giren su\u00e7 i\u00e7in, CMK’n\u0131n 102. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 5 y\u0131ld\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 kanunun 2 ve 104. maddeleri ile CGT\u0130HK’n\u0131n 4. maddesine g\u00f6re, bu s\u00fcreye, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre de dahildir.<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve g\u00fcvenlik hakk\u0131n\u0131n daha geni\u015f olarak korunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u00e7 hukukumuzdaki d\u00fczenlemeleri A\u0130HS’ne ayk\u0131r\u0131 saymaya olanak yoktur. Tersine A\u0130HS daha geni\u015f koruma sa\u011flayan i\u00e7 hukuk normlar\u0131n\u0131n A\u0130HS’ye ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fecek \u015fekilde yorumlanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan, ilk derece mahkemesinin h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihi 22.03.2010 olup, bu tarihe kadar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutuklu kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre 4 y\u0131l 11 ay 2 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu s\u00fcre esas al\u0131nsa bile \u2018mak\u00fbl s\u00fcre\u2019 a\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
CMK’n\u0131n 102. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k tutukluluk s\u00fcresi dolmu\u015f olan san\u0131k D.’\u0131n sal\u0131verilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
F) Sonu\u00e7:<\/p>\n
H\u00fck\u00fcm tarihinden sonraki a\u015faman\u0131n da CMK’n\u0131n 102. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami tutukluluk s\u00fcresi kapsam\u0131nda olmas\u0131 ve bu d\u00fczenlemenin A\u0130HS h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 say\u0131lmas\u0131na olanak bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle, s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k azami s\u00fcreden fazla bir s\u00fcreden beri tutuklu bulunan ve hakk\u0131ndaki direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc bozulan san\u0131k D.’\u0131n sal\u0131verilmesi gerekti\u011fi kan\u0131s\u0131nda oldu\u011fumdan, \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun aksi y\u00f6ndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum\u201d d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle,
\n\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi G.Y.;<\/p>\n
Ceza Genel Kurulunca 12.04.2011 tarihinde yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan, 22.04.2005 tarihinde tutuklan\u0131p, inceleme tarihine kadar 5 y\u0131l 9 ay 20 g\u00fcn, ilk derece mahkemesinin h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihi olan 22.03.2010 tarihine kadar da 4 y\u0131l 11 ay 2 g\u00fcn tutuklu kalan san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n tutukluluk durumu ile ilgili yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede, Kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca, temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin tutukluluk s\u00fcresi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan nazara al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6yle bir yorumun A\u0130HS\u2019nin 5. maddesi ile sa\u011flanan g\u00fcvenceler ile 2709 say\u0131l\u0131 TC Anayasas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 90. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131na uygun oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn benimsenmesi nedeniyle konuyla ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerimizin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu do\u011fmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Hemen belirteyim ki, tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler, ne A\u0130HS\u2019ne ne de pozitif hukuk normlar\u0131na uygundur. S\u00f6zle\u015fme ile tan\u0131nan haklara s\u0131n\u0131rlama y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kullan\u0131lan bu gerek\u00e7e, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ilkeleri ve amac\u0131yla taban tabana z\u0131t oldu\u011fu gibi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almak amac\u0131yla ihdas edilen bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin, bu \u015fekilde yorumlanmas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile getirilen koruma sistemine de a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Konuya y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki hukuk normlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda,<\/p>\n
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 100. maddesinde tutuklama nedenleri, 101. maddesinde tutuklama karar\u0131 ile ilgili y\u00f6ntem ve ko\u015fullar, 102. maddesinde ise, tutuklulukta ge\u00e7ecek azami s\u00fcreler ve uzatma s\u00fcreleri ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan madde uyar\u0131nca, genel g\u00f6revli mahkemeler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tutuklulukta ge\u00e7ecek azami s\u00fcreler A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine girmeyen i\u015flerde bir y\u0131l, A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine giren i\u015flerde ise en \u00e7ok iki y\u0131l olup, bu s\u00fcreler zorunlu hallerde gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6sterilerek uzat\u0131labilecektir. Ancak, uzatma s\u00fcresi A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine girmeyen i\u015flerde alt\u0131 ay\u0131, A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine giren i\u015flerde ise toplam \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015famayacakt\u0131r. Uzatma s\u00fcreleri de dahil olmak \u00fczere, tutukluluk s\u00fcreleri A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine girmeyen i\u015flerde bir y\u0131l alt\u0131 ay, A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine giren i\u015flerde ise be\u015f y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015famayacak, bu s\u00fcre doldu\u011funda, yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131 ba\u015fkaca hi\u00e7bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmadan tutuklulu\u011fa son vereceklerdir, g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi 102. maddedeki s\u00fcrelerin dolmas\u0131 halinde art\u0131k bir tutuklama yasa\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131nca tutuklama karar\u0131 verilemeyece\u011fi gibi tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131na da karar verilemeyecektir. An\u0131lan h\u00fckm\u00fcn iki istisnas\u0131 olup, bunlardan ilki s\u00fcre a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 252\/2. f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki d\u00fczenleme, ikinci istisna ise 112. madde uyar\u0131nca adli kontrol gere\u011fini yerine getirmeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fkaca bir ko\u015ful aranmaks\u0131z\u0131n tutuklanabilmesidir. Yasada tutukluluk s\u00fcreleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan herhangi bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, azami s\u00fcrelerin hesab\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrelerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi zorunlu olup, yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131nca da bu konuda herhangi bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
Yine 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n tan\u0131mlar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 2. maddesinde; kovu\u015fturman\u0131n, iddianamenin kabul\u00fcyle ba\u015flay\u0131p, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar ge\u00e7en evreyi ifade etti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015f olup, kovu\u015fturma evresi an\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcm uyar\u0131nca ola\u011fan yasa yollar\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00fcreci de kapsamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle, azami s\u00fcrelerin ancak ilk derece mahkemelerince h\u00fck\u00fcm verilinceye kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreyi kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu mahkemelerce g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulaca\u011f\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay denetiminde dikkate al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u00e7o\u011funluk kabul\u00fc Yasan\u0131n 2. maddesine de a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A\u0130HM\u2019nin, kimi kararlar\u0131ndaki bir k\u0131s\u0131m ifade ve ibarelerinin yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 ve eksik bir de\u011ferlendirme ile daha uzun tutukluluk s\u00fcrelerine gerek\u00e7e yap\u0131lmas\u0131, kararlardaki ana d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyi dikkate almayan eksik hatta yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 bir de\u011ferlendirmedir. Zira A\u0130HM, \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen her ba\u015fvuruda somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zelliklerine g\u00f6re inceleme yap\u0131larak, makul s\u00fcre de\u011ferlendirilmekte, ilk derece mahkemesinin mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcnden sonra da tutukluluk hali devam ediyorsa bu s\u00fcreyi de makul s\u00fcrenin denetlenmesinde toplam s\u00fcreye ilave etmekte, g\u00f6rece k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli tutukluluklar dahi s\u0131k\u0131 bir denetime tabi tutulmakta, gerek\u00e7esiz tutuklama kararlar\u0131 tolere edilmemekte, yetkili makamlarca tutuklama kararlar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi ne olursa olsun, ikna edici bi\u00e7imde gerek\u00e7elendirilmesi aranmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca, nedeni ne olursa olsun, makul olmayan yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrelerine, birde makul olmayan tutukluluk s\u00fcreleri eklenmemelidir. Kamuoyu bask\u0131s\u0131, ne kadar iyi niyetli olursa olsun, hukuk d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kabul edilebilecek bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye veya uygulamaya yol a\u00e7mamal\u0131d\u0131r. Gerek tutuklama kararlar\u0131, gerekse tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ikna edici bir \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7elendirilmelidir. Hukuk devleti olabilmenin ve hak ihlalleri ile A\u0130HM\u2019nin g\u00fcndemine gelmemenin yeg\u00e2ne \u00e7aresi budur.
\nDi\u011fer y\u00f6nden 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 CGT\u0130K\u2019nun 4. maddesinde, mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e infaz olunmayaca\u011f\u0131, CMK\u2019nun 2. madddesinde, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015finin kovu\u015fturman\u0131n ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar san\u0131kl\u0131k stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015f olup, tutuklulu\u011fu adeta pe\u015fin bir infaz olarak yorumlayan ve h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmekle san\u0131\u011f\u0131 adeta h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak de\u011ferlendiren \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc, pozitif hukuk normlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi masumiyet karinesini de ihlal eder niteliktedir.<\/p>\n
\u0130nceleme konusu somut olayda h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k aleyhine bozuldu\u011fu nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, y\u00fcksek \u00e7o\u011funluk\u00e7a var\u0131lan sonucun adaleti zedelemeyece\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilirse de, var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 ilkesel a\u00e7\u0131dan \u00f6nemli olup, sorun salt bu somut olayla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmemelidir. Bu t\u00fcr \u00e7eli\u015fkilerin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ebilmenin yolu hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131 zorlamak de\u011fildir. Ne zamanki yarg\u0131lamalar makul surede sona erer, tutuklaman\u0131n pe\u015fin bir ceza olmay\u0131p, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyetiyle s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 bir tedbir oldu\u011fu kabul edilir, tutuklaman\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyet, tahliyenin ise beraat olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 toplumsal alg\u0131s\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fir, i\u015fte o zaman tutuklamadan kaynaklanan sorunlarda kendili\u011finden ortadan kalkar.<\/p>\n
Yasadaki azami s\u00fcrelerin dahi bug\u00fcnk\u00fc uygulama bi\u00e7imiyle, S\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemelerindeki yarg\u0131lamalarda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n pe\u015finen be\u015f y\u0131l tutuklu olarak yarg\u0131lanabilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki uygulaman\u0131n da, S\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fcsb\u00fct\u00fcn peki\u015ftirdi\u011fi nazara al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n, bu s\u00fcreler de yetmezcesine yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzamas\u0131n\u0131n faturas\u0131n\u0131 san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fckleyerek, soruna \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm arayan \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun, tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n belirtilen nedenlerle tahliyesi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde oldu\u011fumdan kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum,<\/p>\n
\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan Ceza Genel Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve di\u011fer bir k\u0131s\u0131m Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi de; \u201c5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 102. maddesinde tutuklulukta ge\u00e7ecek azami s\u00fcrelerin g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, buna g\u00f6re a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7larda bu s\u00fcrenin zorunlu hallerdeki uzatmalar ile birlikte be\u015f y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emeyece\u011fi, ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 2\/1-f maddesinde kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131n\u0131n iddianamenin kabul\u00fcyle ba\u015flay\u0131p, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine kadar ge\u00e7en evreyi ifade etti\u011fi, bu ba\u011flamda yerel mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcm verildikten sonra temyizde ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin de kovu\u015fturma evresine dahil oldu\u011funda ku\u015fku bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle CYY\u2019n\u0131n 102\/2. maddesinde belirlenen s\u00fcrenin hesab\u0131nda temyizde ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin esas al\u0131nmamas\u0131n\u0131n yasal bir dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6yle bir uygulamaya Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesinin kararlar\u0131n\u0131n dayanak olamayaca\u011f\u0131, zira A\u0130HS\u2019nin insan haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve temel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri asgari \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde koruyan bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme oldu\u011fu ve buna ili\u015fkin asgari ko\u015fullar\u0131 belirledi\u011fi, bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi imzalayan devletlerin s\u00f6zle\u015fmede asgari s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 belirtilen haklardan daha geni\u015f haklar\u0131 d\u00fczenleme konusu yapabilece\u011fi, bu ba\u011flamda CYY\u2019n\u0131n 102. maddesindeki d\u00fczenlemenin azami tutukluluk s\u00fcresi belirlemesi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden daha ileri haklar \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu durumda daha geni\u015f koruma getiren i\u00e7 hukuktaki bu d\u00fczenlemenin uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin hi\u00e7bir zaman insan haklar\u0131 ve temel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri k\u0131s\u0131tlama y\u00f6n\u00fcnde yorumlanamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve bu y\u00f6ndeki uygulamalara dayanak yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, bunun s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ruhuna ve amac\u0131na tamamen ters oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten bu yana be\u015f y\u0131ldan fazla bir s\u00fcre ge\u00e7en san\u0131k D.K.\u2019n\u0131n CYY\u2019n\u0131n 102\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tahliye edilmesinin zorunlu oldu\u011fu\u201d d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle,
\nKar\u015f\u0131oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7:<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n
1- Mersin 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 22.03.2010 g\u00fcn ve 185-135 say\u0131l\u0131 direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn san\u0131klar F. \u015e., M. A., S. S. ve M. \u00c7. hakk\u0131nda verilen beraat kararlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden isabetli oldu\u011fundan ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n
2- Yerel mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn san\u0131klar D.K., A. S. ve B. \u00c7. hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
3- Tutuklu san\u0131k D.K.\u2019n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 102\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tahliye edilmesine YER OLMADI\u011eINA ve TUTUKLULUK HAL\u0130N\u0130N DEVAMINA,<\/p>\n
4- Dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 05.04.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede san\u0131klar D. K., A. S. ve B. \u00c7. hakk\u0131nda oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla, san\u0131klar S.S.ve M. \u00c7. hakk\u0131nda ise oybirli\u011fiyle, san\u0131klar F. \u015e. ve M.A. ile san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n tutukluluk durumu hakk\u0131nda ise 05.04.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan birinci m\u00fczakerede yasal \u00e7o\u011funluk sa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan 12.04.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan ikinci m\u00fczakerede oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n
1-) San\u0131klar D. K., S. S., M. \u00c7., B. \u00c7., A. S. haklar\u0131nda oylama:<\/p>\n
2-) San\u0131klar D. K.\u2019n\u0131n tutukluluk hali ile F. \u015e., M. A.haklar\u0131nda oylama:<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 12.04.2011 tarihli, 2011\/1-51 E., 2011\/42 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu 2011\/1-51 E., 2011\/42 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Tebli\u011fname : 2011\/33773 Yarg\u0131tay Dairesi : 1. Ceza Dairesi Mahkemesi : MERS\u0130N 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza G\u00fcn\u00fc : 22.03.2010 Say\u0131s\u0131 : 185-135 Kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, bu su\u00e7a azmettirme ve kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan san\u0131klar\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 sonunda san\u0131k D. K.\u2019n\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 81, 29, 62 ve 53. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 15 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, di\u011fer san\u0131klar F. \u015e. M. A., A. S., B.\u00c7., M. \u00c7.ve S.S.\u2019un ise beraatlerine ili\u015fkin Mersin 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 16.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 89-549 say\u0131l\u0131, san\u0131k D.K.\u2019ya verilen ceza y\u00f6n\u00fcnden re\u2019sen temyize tabi olan h\u00fck\u00fcm, san\u0131k D.K. ve m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan da temyiz edilmekle, dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 13.02.2009 g\u00fcn ve 8066-577 say\u0131 ile; \u201c…2-) Karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda su\u00e7 yerinin yaz\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 mahallinde giderilebilir eksiklik olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3-) Toplanan deliller karar yerinde incelenip, san\u0131k D.\u2019nin kasten adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 kanuna muhalefet su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcbutu kabul, olu\u015fa ve soru\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fi tayin, takdire ili\u015fen cezay\u0131 azalt\u0131c\u0131 sebeplerin nitelikleri ve dereceleri takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, savunmalar\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle reddedilmi\u015f, incelenen dosyaya g\u00f6re verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde ele\u015ftiri ve bozma nedenleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin bir nedene …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64872","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n