ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/238<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/2<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 16\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: \u0130stanbul 2. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 321. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 50. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: \u0130flasta s\u0131ra cetveline y\u00f6nelik kay\u0131t kabul davas\u0131nda itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu kural\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 321. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201cH\u00fck\u00fcm<\/p>\n
MADDE 321- (1) Tahkikat\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra, mahkeme taraflar\u0131n son beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131r ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sona erdi\u011fini bildirerek karar\u0131n\u0131 tefhim eder. Taraflara beyanda bulunabilmeleri i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca s\u00fcre verilmez.<\/p>\n
(2) Karar\u0131n tefhimi, mahkemece h\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. Ancak zorunlu h\u00e2llerde, h\u00e2kim bu durumun sebebini de tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irmek suretiyle, sadece h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00f6zetini tutana\u011fa yazd\u0131rarak karar\u0131 tefhim edebilir. Bu durumda gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n en ge\u00e7 bir ay i\u00e7inde yaz\u0131larak tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.\u201d<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME<\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Mehmet AKTEPE taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
2. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 152. ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 40. maddelerine g\u00f6re bir davaya bakmakta olan mahkeme, o dava sebebiyle uygulanacak bir kanunun veya Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6rmesi veya taraflardan birinin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131n\u0131n ciddi oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varmas\u0131 durumunda bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin iptali i\u00e7in Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurmaya yetkilidir. Ancak an\u0131lan maddeler uyar\u0131nca bir mahkemenin Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurabilmesi i\u00e7in elinde y\u00f6ntemince a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir davan\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
3. 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Adli Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 5. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda asliye ticaret mahkemesinde bir ba\u015fkan ile yeteri kadar \u00fcyenin bulunaca\u011f\u0131, iflas, iflas\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, iflas\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131, konkordato ve yeniden yap\u0131land\u0131rmadan kaynaklanan i\u015f ve davalar\u0131n dava de\u011ferine bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n heyet\u00e7e karara ba\u011flanaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Bak\u0131lmakta olan dava, iflas tasfiyesinde d\u00fczenlenen s\u0131ra cetveline y\u00f6nelik kay\u0131t kabul\u00fc talebine ili\u015fkindir. An\u0131lan madde gere\u011fince bak\u0131lmakta olan davan\u0131n t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lama safhalar\u0131n\u0131n heyet\u00e7e y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek ve sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lacak dava ve i\u015fler kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n yap\u0131lan incelemede itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran mahkemenin g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi belgeler aras\u0131nda heyet taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen ba\u015fvuru tutana\u011f\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Bu itibarla asliye ticaret mahkemesinin heyet\u00e7e karar verece\u011fi davalarda bir kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi i\u00e7in bir ba\u015fkan ve iki \u00fcyenin kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131yla olu\u015fan mahkeme heyeti taraf\u0131ndan karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi h\u00e2lde somut ba\u015fvuruda mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n imzas\u0131yla ba\u015fvuru tutana\u011f\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenerek itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle ba\u015fvurunun Mahkemenin yetkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 321. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlesinin iptaline karar verilmesi talebiyle yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunun Mahkemenin yetkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle REDD\u0130NE 16\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 16\/1\/2025 tarihli, 2024\/238 esas – 2025\/2 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI \u00a0 Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/238 Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/2 Karar Tarihi : 16\/1\/2025 R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi. \u00a0 \u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: \u0130stanbul 2. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi \u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 321. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 50. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir. OLAY: \u0130flasta s\u0131ra cetveline y\u00f6nelik kay\u0131t kabul davas\u0131nda itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu kural\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 321. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir: \u201cH\u00fck\u00fcm MADDE 321- (1) Tahkikat\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra, mahkeme taraflar\u0131n son beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131r ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sona erdi\u011fini bildirerek karar\u0131n\u0131 tefhim eder. Taraflara beyanda bulunabilmeleri i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca s\u00fcre verilmez. (2) Karar\u0131n tefhimi, mahkemece h\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. Ancak zorunlu h\u00e2llerde, h\u00e2kim bu durumun sebebini de tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irmek suretiyle, sadece h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00f6zetini tutana\u011fa yazd\u0131rarak karar\u0131 tefhim edebilir. Bu durumda gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n en ge\u00e7 bir ay i\u00e7inde yaz\u0131larak tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.\u201d II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME 1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Mehmet AKTEPE taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc okunup incelendikten sonra …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n