T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y. Y. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/35402)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 15\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u015fenur TUNCER<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda tutuklu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6nderilen mektubun ekindeki foto\u011fraflar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131na idarece sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulunarak el konulmas\u0131n\u0131n haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetini ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu Kocaeli 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Kurum) tutuklu olarak bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada taraf\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen toplamda 2 sayfa ve 14 adet foto\u011fraf \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131ndan olu\u015fan mektup, okuma komisyonu taraf\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulunarak disiplin kuruluna sevk edilmi\u015ftir. Kurum Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu) 22\/10\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131nda; toplamda2 sayfa ve 14 adet foto\u011fraftan olu\u015fan mektubun 3 adet foto\u011frafl\u0131k k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) ait haberle\u015fme niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yabilece\u011fi, sosyal medyada ya da gazetelerde yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak yay\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve i\u00e7eri\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmayabilece\u011fi ve g\u00fcvenlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulundu\u011fu kanaatiyle kurumda muhafazas\u0131na, 2 sayfa ve 11 adet resimden olu\u015fan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na verilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde 16\/7\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 9 g\u00fcn boyunca fiziksel ve ruhsal i\u015fkenceye maruz b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fkenceye ili\u015fkin gazetelerde ve internet sitelerinde foto\u011fraflar yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu bu konuda Anayasa Mahkemesine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurusunun reddedilmesi \u00fczerine Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine (A\u0130HM) ba\u015fvurmak i\u00e7in bu foto\u011fraflar\u0131n ailesi taraf\u0131ndan kendisine g\u00f6nderilmesini istedi\u011fini, ancak g\u00f6nderilen foto\u011fraflar\u0131n kendisine teslim edilmedi\u011fini, bu nedenle etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucunun Disiplin Kurulu karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Kocaeli \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet, ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na yer verilerek reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Karar gerek\u00e7esinde, \u015fik\u00e2yete konu mektup ekindeki 3 adet foto\u011fraf\u0131n incelenmesinde birinin gazete man\u015fetinden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu, di\u011fer ikisinin ise T\u00fcrkiye’de \u00e7ekilip \u00e7ekilmedi\u011finin dahi belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fik\u00e2yet edenin bu foto\u011fraflar i\u00e7inde yer al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da insanlar\u0131n y\u00fczlerinin g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemesi sebebiyle anla\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu h\u00e2liyle \u015fik\u00e2yet edenin belgeleri hukuksal ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda delil olarak kullanaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilemeyece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n incelenmesinde ise Kocaeli 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan kararda usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir husus olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan itiraz\u0131n reddine kesin olarak karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 24\/9\/2019 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 14\/10\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Komisyonca, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa; haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ise kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011funu belirten ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir (Mehmet \u015eerif Ay, B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013).<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7te i\u015fkence, eziyet ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla A\u0130HM’e ba\u015fvuru yapabilmek i\u00e7in ailesinden internet sitelerinde, sosyal medyada ve \u00e7e\u015fitli yay\u0131m organlar\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanan foto\u011fraflar\u0131n taraf\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmesini istedi\u011fini ancak g\u00f6nderilen mektubun ekinde bulunan 3 adet foto\u011frafa el konulmas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015fkence yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin, \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ifade h\u00fcrriyetinin, e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
9. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetleri incelenirken Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fc, kendisine g\u00f6nderilen mektubun ekinde bulunan 3 adet foto\u011fraf\u0131n Disiplin Kurulunca sak\u0131ncal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclerek al\u0131konulmas\u0131 nedeniyle haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin engellenmesine ili\u015fkindir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda bu t\u00fcr ba\u015fvurular haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyeti kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir (Ahmet Temiz, B. No: 2013\/1822, 20\/5\/2015, \u00a7 23; \u00d6zkan Kart (2), B. No: 2013\/1201, 20\/5\/2015, \u00a7 22; Akif \u0130pek, B. No: 2013\/9456, 24\/6\/2015, \u00a7 23; Ramazan Vural, B. No: 2013\/1148, 7\/7\/2015, \u00a7 24; Eren Y\u0131ld\u0131z, B. No: 2013\/759, 7\/7\/2015, \u00a7 25; Mustafa Aydin, B. No: 2013\/275, 6\/10\/2015, \u00a7 24). Somut ba\u015fvuruda da bu durumdan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirecek bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Somut olayda Disiplin Kurulu, ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6nderilen mektubun ekinde yer alan 3 adet foto\u011fraf\u0131n sak\u0131ncal\u0131 oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirerek al\u0131konulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla an\u0131lan i\u015flem ile kamu makamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetine bir m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Ahmet Temiz karar\u0131nda, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi veya kendilerine g\u00f6nderilen mektuplara ceza infaz kurumunun ilgili kurullar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalelere ili\u015fkin genel ilkeler belirtilmi\u015ftir (Ahmet Temiz, \u00a7\u00a7 28-34). Buna g\u00f6re haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetine yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale \u00f6ncelikle kanunla \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmelidir. M\u00fcdahalenin yasal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan mevzuat\u0131n ula\u015f\u0131labilir, yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k ve belirli bir eylemin gerektirdi\u011fi sonu\u00e7lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekir. \u0130kinci olarak s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcdahale me\u015fru bir amaca dayanmal\u0131, demokratik bir toplumda gerekli ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 68. maddesinin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131ndan yapt\u0131klar\u0131 yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n denetimi ve s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Ahmet Temiz, \u00a7\u00a7 37-46).<\/p>\n
14. Mektubun ekinde yer alan foto\u011fraflar\u0131n sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulunarak al\u0131konulma sebebi; sosyal medyada ya da gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen bu foto\u011fraflar\u0131n yay\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve i\u00e7eri\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131, bu nedenle ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmayabilece\u011fi ve g\u00fcvenlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulundu\u011fu kanaatidir. Ayr\u0131ca foto\u011fraflardan birinin gazete man\u015fetinden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu, di\u011fer ikisinin ise T\u00fcrkiye’de \u00e7ekilip \u00e7ekilmedi\u011finin dahi belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fik\u00e2yet edenin bu foto\u011fraflar i\u00e7inde yer al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da insanlar\u0131n y\u00fczlerinin g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemesi sebebiyle anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylelikle ba\u015fvurucunun belgeleri hukuksal ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda delil olarak kullanaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilemeyece\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu kapsamda ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6nderilmek istenen mektubun ekinde yer alan 3 adet foto\u011fraf\u0131n Disiplin Kurulunca denetlenmesi suretiyle haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetine yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin kamu d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131, su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi ile ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda asayi\u015f ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunun da Anayasa’n\u0131n haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetine ili\u015fkin 22. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda me\u015fru bir ama\u00e7 oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Ahmet Temiz, \u00a7\u00a7 47-55).<\/p>\n
15. Ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz sonucu olarak su\u00e7un \u00f6nlenmesi ve disiplinin temini gibi ceza infaz kurumunda g\u00fcvenli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kabul edilebilir makul gerekliliklerin olmas\u0131 durumunda h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n sahip olduklar\u0131 haklar s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131labilir (Turan G\u00fcnana, B. No: 2013\/3550, 19\/11 \/2014, \u00a7 35). Bu ba\u011flamda ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131, Anayasa’n\u0131n 22. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda istisnalar\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 kamu kurumlar\u0131ndand\u0131r (Mehmet Koray Erya\u015fa, B. No: 2013\/6693, 16\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 74-76).<\/p>\n
16. Somut olaya konu ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6nderilen mektubun ekinde yer alan 3 adet foto\u011fraf\u0131n Disiplin Kurulu ve H\u00e2kimlik taraf\u0131ndan incelendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yay\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilemedi\u011fi, i\u00e7eri\u011finin ger\u00e7ekli\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle g\u00fcvenlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucuyla ilgisinin ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen 3 adet foto\u011fraf\u0131n sak\u0131ncal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclerek el konulmas\u0131 \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 22. maddesi anlam\u0131nda kamu d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131 ve su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi i\u00e7in ihtiya\u00e7 duyulan demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fcdahalenin ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7la \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda al\u0131konulan foto\u011fraflara \u00f6zg\u00fc tespitleri i\u00e7eren ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7enin Disiplin Kurulu ve H\u00e2kimlik kararlar\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu ba\u011flamda somut olayda haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetine y\u00f6nelik bir ihlalin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 15\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 15\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2019\/35402 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Y. Y. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/35402) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 15\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Ay\u015fenur TUNCER Ba\u015fvurucu : \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda tutuklu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6nderilen mektubun ekindeki foto\u011fraflar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131na idarece sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulunarak el konulmas\u0131n\u0131n haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetini ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu Kocaeli 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Kurum) tutuklu olarak bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada taraf\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen toplamda 2 sayfa ve 14 adet foto\u011fraf \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131ndan olu\u015fan mektup, okuma komisyonu taraf\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulunarak disiplin kuruluna sevk edilmi\u015ftir. Kurum Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu) 22\/10\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131nda; toplamda2 sayfa ve 14 adet foto\u011fraftan olu\u015fan mektubun 3 adet foto\u011frafl\u0131k k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) ait haberle\u015fme niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yabilece\u011fi, sosyal medyada ya da gazetelerde yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak yay\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve i\u00e7eri\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmayabilece\u011fi ve g\u00fcvenlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulundu\u011fu kanaatiyle kurumda muhafazas\u0131na, 2 sayfa ve 11 adet resimden olu\u015fan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na verilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde 16\/7\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 9 g\u00fcn boyunca fiziksel ve …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n