ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/219<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/218<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 25\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih \u2013 Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Elbistan \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 51. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: Denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesi nedeniyle ertelenmi\u015f hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 talebiyle yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un 51. maddesinin itiraz konusu (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201c(7) H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemesi veya kendisine y\u00fcklenen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklere, infaz h\u00e2kiminin uyar\u0131s\u0131na ra\u011fmen, uymamakta \u0131srar etmesi halinde; ertelenen cezan\u0131n k\u0131smen veya tamamen infaz kurumunda \u00e7ektirilmesine infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fince karar verilir.\u201d<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME<\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Mehmet AKTEPE taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
2. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un \u201cAnayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemelerce ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesinde Anayasa Mahkemesine itiraz yoluyla yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda izlenecek y\u00f6ntem d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu maddenin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda bir davaya bakmakta olan mahkemenin bu davada uygulanacak bir kanun veya Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6rmesi veya taraflardan birinin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131n\u0131n ciddi oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varmas\u0131 durumunda bu f\u0131krada say\u0131lan belgeleri dizi listesine ba\u011flayarak Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f; an\u0131lan f\u0131kran\u0131n (b) bendinde \u201cBa\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi\u201d Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilecek belgeler aras\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Maddenin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmayan itiraz ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin gerek\u00e7eleriyle reddedilece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. An\u0131lan \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 46. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde de \u201cBa\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi\u201d Anayasa Mahkemesine sunulacak belgeler aras\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Yine \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 49. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendinde Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan ilk incelemede ba\u015fvuruda eksikliklerin bulundu\u011funun tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde itiraz yoluna ili\u015fkin i\u015flerde esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin ba\u015fvurunun reddine karar verilece\u011fi, (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise an\u0131lan (b) bendi uyar\u0131nca verilen karar\u0131n itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran mahkemenin eksiklikleri tamamlayarak yeniden ba\u015fvurmas\u0131na engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Yap\u0131lan incelemede itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli kararla itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu ancak g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi belgeler aras\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011finin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu itibarla ba\u015fvurunun y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendi ile \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 46. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 51. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n iptaline karar verilmesi talebiyle yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunun 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan REDD\u0130NE 25\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 25\/12\/2024 tarihli, 2024\/219 esas – 2024\/218 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI \u00a0 Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/219 Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/218 Karar Tarihi : 25\/12\/2024 R.G. Tarih \u2013 Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi. \u00a0 \u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Elbistan \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi \u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 51. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir. OLAY: Denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesi nedeniyle ertelenmi\u015f hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 talebiyle yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc Kanun\u2019un 51. maddesinin itiraz konusu (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir: \u00a0\u201c(7) H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemesi veya kendisine y\u00fcklenen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklere, infaz h\u00e2kiminin uyar\u0131s\u0131na ra\u011fmen, uymamakta \u0131srar etmesi halinde; ertelenen cezan\u0131n k\u0131smen veya tamamen infaz kurumunda \u00e7ektirilmesine infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fince karar verilir.\u201d II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME 1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Mehmet AKTEPE taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: 2. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un \u201cAnayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemelerce ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesinde Anayasa Mahkemesine itiraz yoluyla yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda izlenecek y\u00f6ntem d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n