T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R. F. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/50390)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 6\/2\/2025 – 32805<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muhammed Nuri \u00d6ZG\u00dcR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ey\u00fcp Can KARACA<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7uyla ilgili olarak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131sal yorumlar\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmamas\u0131 ve su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmayan eylemlerin mahk\u00fbmiyete esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuruda ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 1984 do\u011fumlu olup ba\u015fvuru konusu olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Amasya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde Y.S.E., S.K., \u00d6.Y. ve K.V.nin tan\u0131k olarak ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y.S.E., S.K. ve \u00d6.Y. ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde Merzifon Polis Meslek Y\u00fcksekokulu (POMEM) \u00f6\u011frencileri ile ilgilenen ki\u015filerin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 evlerden ve bu evlerde kalanlardan sorumlu oldu\u011funu, Cihat kod adl\u0131 \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. K.V. ise ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6rg\u00fct evlerine yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fini, kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 evin abisi olan ba\u015fvurucunun Trabzon’da \u00fcniversitede okudu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde Trabzon POMEM \u00f6\u011frencilerinin abili\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Tan\u0131k K.V. ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun Merzifon POMEM’deki polislerin ve abilerden olan C.B., \u00d6.Y., N.K., Y.S.E., S.K.n\u0131nabili\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ev abilerini toplayarak g\u00fcndem hakk\u0131nda bilgi verdi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda al\u0131nan ifadelerinde ba\u015fvurucu 2003-2007 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00fcniversite okudu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait \u00f6\u011frenci evlerinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mezun olduktan sonra 1,5 y\u0131l s\u00fcreyle bu evlerde kalmaya devam edip \u00f6rg\u00fcte m\u00fczahir dershanede \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te dershane m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc ve yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 talimatla \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait \u00f6\u011frenci evlerine \u00f6\u011frenci yerle\u015ftirdi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda devlet kurumlar\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flamas\u0131 ile \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait evden ve yap\u0131lanmadan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tan\u0131klar K.V. ve Y.S.E.nin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 eve ziyaret i\u00e7in gitti\u011fini, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel herhangi bir faaliyette bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde di\u011fer delillerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra tan\u0131klar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 24\/3\/2020 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Amasya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi iddianameyi kabul etmi\u015f, yetkisizlik karar\u0131 vererek dosyay\u0131 \u0130stanbul A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (Mahkeme) g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. Mahkeme yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde Y.S.E., S.K., \u00d6.Y. ve K.V.nin tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadelerini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tan\u0131klar S.K., \u00d6.Y. ve K.V. genel itibar\u0131yla soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda verdikleri ifadelerini tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tan\u0131k Y.S.E. ise ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait evlerde kalmas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda verdi\u011fi ifadenin daha do\u011fru oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Yarg\u0131lama sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan su\u00e7tan 8 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda tan\u0131k Y.S.E.nin ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 ve di\u011fer tan\u0131k ifadeleriyle uyumlu soru\u015fturma ifadesine itibar edildi\u011fi, tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun FET\u00d6\/PDY b\u00fcnyesinde Merzifon POMEM \u00f6\u011frencilerinden sorumlu mahrem abilerin \u00fcst\u00fc konumunda mahrem hizmetler abisi oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Gerek\u00e7ede ayr\u0131ca mahrem hizmetler yap\u0131lanmas\u0131yla ilgili \u015fu bilgilere yer verilmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
“FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc, emniyet yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6zel programlara g\u00f6re yeti\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve emniyete s\u0131zd\u0131rabildi\u011fi mensuplar\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ba\u011flar\u0131n\u0131n devam ettirilmesi ve g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmesi maksad\u0131yla, \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde ‘mahrem hizmetler’ ad\u0131 verilen ayr\u0131 bir birimiyle idare etmi\u015f, \u00f6\u011frencilik d\u00f6neminde ve mezuniyet sonras\u0131nda mensuplar\u0131n\u0131 ‘mahrem hizmetler abisi’ ad\u0131 verilen ve kod ad\u0131 kulland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 sivil \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131na takip ettirmi\u015ftir. Dinlenen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc hiyerar\u015fisinde, Merzifon Pomem okulunda okuyan polis okulu \u00f6\u011frencilerden sorumlu olan mahrem abilerden sorumlu ‘mahrem hizmetler abisi’ konumunda oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, belirtilen nedenlerle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sabit olan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan eylemine uyan TCK’nun 314\/2 maddesi gere\u011fince ve su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131n yo\u011funlu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisindeki konumu, su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f \u015fekli, \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde ge\u00e7irmi\u015f oldu\u011fu s\u00fcre, aleyhine delil yo\u011funlu\u011fu ve tehlikenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek te\u015fdiden cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7u 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 3. maddesi gere\u011fince ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u say\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 5\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince verilen cezadan yar\u0131 oran\u0131nda art\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.” <\/p>\n
8. Mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 kanun yolu denetiminden ge\u00e7erek 16\/9\/2021 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 21\/10\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 10\/11\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyon; ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131, gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 ile su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan haklara ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Su\u00e7ta ve Cezada Kanunilik \u0130lkesinin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu; FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi tarihlerde yasal olarak kurulan ve faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir e\u011fitim kurumunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131, sendikaya \u00fcye olmas\u0131 ve bankada ola\u011fan hesap i\u015flemleri yapmas\u0131 \u015feklindeki eylemleri nedeniyle \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6re kanunlar\u0131n geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bi\u00e7imde yorumlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi ihlal edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, ayr\u0131ca etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131ktan faydalanan tan\u0131klar\u0131n polis okulu \u00f6\u011frencileriyle ilgilendi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir beyanlar\u0131 olmamas\u0131na ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan eylemlerin 2009 y\u0131l\u0131 \u00f6ncesine ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen mahrem hizmetler abisi olarak kabul edildi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan delillerin ve ba\u015fvurucunun eylemlerinin ili\u015fkilendirildi\u011fi, kanun yolu incelemesinde de mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygun bulundu\u011fu, a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyf\u00eelik nedeniyle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetinin temelden sars\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve usule ili\u015fkin g\u00fcvencelerin anlams\u0131z h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanarak ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unun i\u015flendi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle verilen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015f; kanun maddelerinin mahk\u00fbmiyete kar\u015f\u0131 etkili \u00f6nlemler sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde yorumlanarak uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lan Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetleri su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi hukuk devletinin kurucu unsurlar\u0131ndand\u0131r. Kanunilik ilkesinin genel olarak b\u00fct\u00fcn hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin d\u00fczenlenmesinde temel bir g\u00fcvence olu\u015fturman\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n belirlenmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6zel bir anlam\u0131 ve \u00f6nemi olup bu kapsamda ki\u015filerin kanunen yasaklanmam\u0131\u015f veya yapt\u0131r\u0131ma ba\u011flanmam\u0131\u015f fiillerden dolay\u0131 keyf\u00ee bir \u015fekilde su\u00e7lanmalar\u0131 ve cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 \u00f6nlenmekte; buna ek olarak su\u00e7lanan ki\u015finin lehine olan d\u00fczenlemelerin geriye etkili \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131 sa\u011flanmaktad\u0131r (Karlis A.\u015e., B. No: 2013\/849, 15\/4\/2014, \u00a7 32; Adnan \u015een [GK], \u00a7 104; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 60).<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. maddesine ko\u015fut olarak 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 2. maddesinde de d\u00fczenlenen ilke, yasaklanan eylemlerin ve bu yasak eylemlere verilecek cezalar\u0131n hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fkuya yer b\u0131rakmayacak bi\u00e7imde kanunda g\u00f6sterilmesini, kural\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k, anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belli olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Ki\u015filerin yasak eylemleri \u00f6nceden bilmeleri d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine dayanan bu ilkeyle temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Fikriye Aytin ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/6154, 11\/12\/2014, \u00a7 51; AYM, E.2010\/69, K.2011\/116, 7\/7\/2011; AYM, E.2019\/9, K.2019\/27, 11\/4\/2019, \u00a7 13; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 61).<\/p>\n
16. Ceza verme yetkisinin keyf\u00ee ve hukuk d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ama\u00e7larla kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenebilmesi kanunilik ilkesinin kat\u0131 bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilir. Bu kapsamda yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca yap\u0131lacak yorumun ceza normlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcyle \u00e7eli\u015fmemesi ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekir. Yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131 ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131 da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan su\u00e7a veya cezaya ili\u015fkin olgular\u0131 de\u011ferlendirirken, \u00f6zellikle fiillerin bir su\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelip gelmedi\u011fini belirlerken su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesini anlams\u0131z k\u0131lacak \u015fekilde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir yakla\u015f\u0131mda bulunmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Mehmet Emin Karamehmet ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2017\/4902, 28\/1\/2020, \u00a7 47; Adnan \u015een, \u00a7 107; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 62). Bu kapsamda somut olayda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unun kapsam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olarak geni\u015fletici bir yoruma tabi tutulup tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r (Ahmet Aslan, B. No: 2021\/23949, 6\/10\/2022, \u00a7 68; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 62). Bu nedenle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin denetlenmesinde normun mevcut deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde somut olaya uygulan\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7iminin yasal d\u00fczenlemeyle ba\u011fda\u015fmaz ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir sonuca yol a\u00e7\u0131p a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenmelidir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 62).<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuruya konu mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 314. maddesidir. Yarg\u0131 mercilerine g\u00f6re bir su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc, ba\u015ftan itibaren su\u00e7 i\u015flemek \u00fczere kurulmu\u015f yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir yap\u0131 olabilece\u011fi gibi yasal olarak faaliyet g\u00f6stermekte olan bir sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn sonradan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne hatta ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi de m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 26\/9\/2017 tarihli ve E.2017\/16.MD-956, K.2017\/370 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131).<\/p>\n
18. Bir ki\u015finin yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in hen\u00fcz bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekmez. \u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na cezaland\u0131r\u0131lan bir su\u00e7tur. Bu itibarla \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesinin faaliyetinin mutlaka \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen su\u00e7lara kat\u0131lma \u015feklinde olmas\u0131 da gerekmez. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u, \u00fcye ve hatta \u00f6rg\u00fct hen\u00fcz bir su\u00e7 i\u015flememi\u015f olsa dahi \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn toplum i\u00e7in yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tehlikeyi cezaland\u0131ran ve bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle bir yandan da \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesini engelleme amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan bir su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr (Metin Birdal [GK], B. No: 2014\/15440, 22\/5\/2019 4\/12\/2013,\u00a7\u00a7 60, 61).<\/p>\n
19. Bir olu\u015fumun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funa dair kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131ndan biri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nemle \u00e7izmek gerekir. \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteliklerinin mahkemece belirlenmesi bir tespit karar\u0131d\u0131r (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 14). Aksinin kabul\u00fc, hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 bulunmayan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin eylemlerinin unsur yoklu\u011fu nedeniyle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamamas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furur. Yukar\u0131da al\u0131nt\u0131lanan Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n da g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi gibi bir olu\u015fumun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak tespitine dair kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n bu su\u00e7 \u00f6zelinde en \u00f6nemli fonksiyonu, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne hukuki varl\u0131k kazand\u0131rmas\u0131 ve bu ba\u011flamda yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funu bilinebilecek h\u00e2le getirmesidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hen\u00fcz ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funa dair yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla herkes\u00e7e bir ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak bilinebilir h\u00e2le gelmedi\u011fi s\u0131rada bir \u00f6rg\u00fct ile irtibatl\u0131 ve iltisakl\u0131 olan ki\u015filerin kas\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konulmas\u0131 hayati \u00f6nemdedir (Ahmet Aslan, \u00a7\u00a7 50, 51; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 50).<\/p>\n
20. O h\u00e2lde bir kimsenin FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteli\u011fini ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fi, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olmay\u0131 istedi\u011fi ve \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn hayatta kalmas\u0131na, ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesine devaml\u0131 bir irade ile katk\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir. Bu gereklili\u011fin bir sonucu olarak Yarg\u0131tay ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma veya yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan kas\u0131t ve \u00f6zel saikle i\u015flenebilen su\u00e7lar oldu\u011fu da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin ger\u00e7ek y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc ortaya koyan operasyonlara ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu yap\u0131n\u0131n kamuoyu ve medya taraf\u0131ndan tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r h\u00e2le geldi\u011fini, \u00fcst d\u00fczey h\u00fck\u00fbmet yetkilileri ve kamu g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda paralel yap\u0131 veya ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin tespitler ve uyar\u0131lar\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Mill\u00ee G\u00fcvenlik Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan da ayn\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmelerin payla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7ten \u00f6nce icra edilen faaliyetlerin nitelik, i\u00e7erik ve mahiyeti itibar\u0131yla ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn amac\u0131na hizmet etti\u011fi ve san\u0131klarca da bunun bilindi\u011fi somut delil ve olgularla ortaya konulmad\u0131k\u00e7a \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet kapsam\u0131nda kabul edilemeyece\u011fini, ki\u015filerin hukuki durumlar\u0131n\u0131n kusurluluk ve hata ba\u011flam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zaruret bulundu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle Yarg\u0131tay bir ki\u015finin s\u00f6z konusu \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in sempati ve iltisak boyutunu a\u015farak ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc niteli\u011fini ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bilerek \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011funu ispat etmeye yeterli delillere dayan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u015fart ko\u015fmaktad\u0131r (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7\u00a7 11-19, 51).<\/p>\n
21. Bu sebeple Yarg\u0131tay, FET\u00d6\/PDY davalar\u0131nda da \u00f6rg\u00fcte sadece sempati duymay\u0131 ya da \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131, de\u011ferlerini, ideolojisini benimsemek, buna ili\u015fkin yay\u0131nlar\u0131 okumak, bulundurmak, \u00f6rg\u00fct liderine sayg\u0131 duymak gibi eylemleri ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00f6rmemektedir. Yarg\u0131taya g\u00f6re FET\u00d6\/PDY \u00fcyesinin \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek kat\u0131lmas\u0131, kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteli\u011fini ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bilmesi, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olmay\u0131 istemesi, \u00f6rg\u00fcte kat\u0131lma iradesinin devaml\u0131l\u0131k arz etmesi, saikinin su\u00e7 i\u015flemek olmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131 aranmal\u0131d\u0131r (Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 i\u00e7in bkz. Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 13).<\/p>\n
22. Yukar\u0131daki de\u011ferlendirmelerden hareket eden ve FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerince \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenen hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zeten Yarg\u0131tay; \u00fcst d\u00fczeyde bulunan \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteliklerini, ama\u00e7 ve y\u00f6ntemlerini bildi\u011finin, su\u00e7 i\u015flemek saiki ile hareket etti\u011finin, ayr\u0131ca \u00f6rg\u00fcte kat\u0131lma iradesinin devaml\u0131l\u0131k arz etti\u011finin kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay, FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin olduk\u00e7a uzun s\u00fcre yasal zeminde faaliyet g\u00f6stermesi ve nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 gizli tutmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zellikle s\u00f6zde me\u015fruiyet vitrini olarak kullan\u0131lan katlar\u0131yla irtibatl\u0131 oldu\u011fu tespit edilen ki\u015filerin \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011finin ortaya konmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7\u00a7 11-13, 19; ayr\u0131ca bkz. Adnan \u015een, \u00a7 114; \u0130lhami Aksu, B. No: 2018\/36918, 15\/6\/2022, \u00a7 21).<\/p>\n
23. Derece mahkemelerinin ve Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n de\u011ferlendirmelerinden \u00e7\u0131kan sonuca g\u00f6re FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin daha alt katlar\u0131yla irtibatl\u0131 oldu\u011fu tespit eden ki\u015filerin -\u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 bildikleri ortaya konmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcddet\u00e7e- \u00f6rg\u00fcte bir ahlak ve e\u011fitim hareketi, g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fcler hareketi, din\u00ee bir cemaat oldu\u011fu zann\u0131 ile sempati duyduklar\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fctle irtibat ve iltisakl\u0131 olduklar\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7una ba\u011flanan a\u011f\u0131r cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde -\u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilindi\u011finin kabul edilebilece\u011fi kesin bir tarih vermek yoluna gidilmemi\u015f olmakla birlikte- \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilinir h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi olaylardan (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 11) \u00f6nce yasal zeminde faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile hareket ederek hataya d\u00fc\u015fenler ile FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin ama\u00e7 ve y\u00f6ntemlerini bilen \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n birbirlerinden dikkatli bir \u015fekilde ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 yoluna gidilmi\u015ftir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 54).<\/p>\n
24. \u00d6te yandan vurgulamak gerekir ki bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunda Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucu itibar\u0131yla adil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmek de\u011fildir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda isnat edilen ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi olma su\u00e7unun s\u00fcbuta erip ermedi\u011fi veya toplanan delillerin su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutu i\u00e7in yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 meselesi, ilkesel olarak Anayasa Mahkemesinin ilgi alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r (Metin Birdal, \u00a7 47; Y\u0131lmaz \u00c7elik [GK], B. No: 2014\/13117, 19\/7\/2018, \u00a7 45). Bundan ba\u015fka bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda hangi delillerin h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nabilece\u011fi meselesi de esas itibar\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r (T\u00fcrk ceza muhakemesi hukuku uygulamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin baz\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Metin Birdal, \u00a7\u00a7 67-71).<\/p>\n
25. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 314. maddesi gere\u011fince hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; mahk\u00fbmiyetine konu edilen eylemlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu iddia edilen yap\u0131n\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fini, eylemlerinin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7una v\u00fccut vermesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle ba\u015fvurucu, temel bir sorun olarak ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fiyle ilgili hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131sal yorumlar\u0131n bu su\u00e7un \u00f6z\u00fcyle ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca mahk\u00fbmiyetinde su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmayan eylemlere dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Somut olaydaki ana mesele, darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc \u00f6ncesindeki d\u00f6nemde FET\u00d6\/PDY ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak i\u015flenen baz\u0131 fiillerin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi veya benzeri su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyete esas al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilmesidir. Zira bu d\u00f6nemde i\u015flenen baz\u0131 fiiller ile ilgili olarak -te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn arkas\u0131ndaki yap\u0131lanma olan- FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin illegal bir yap\u0131 oldu\u011funun hen\u00fcz herkes taraf\u0131ndan bilinmedi\u011fi veya \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kendisini gizlemek amac\u0131yla sivil alanda legal faaliyetlerde bulundu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
26. Mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda Mahkeme, FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili olarak \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn amac\u0131n\u0131, eylem plan\u0131n\u0131, bu plan\u0131 takip ederken \u015fiddete ba\u015fvurup ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015ftir. Mahkemeye g\u00f6re silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcyelik su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fctle organik ba\u011f kurulmas\u0131 ve kural olarak s\u00fcreklilik, \u00e7e\u015fitlilik, yo\u011funluk gerektiren eylem ve faaliyetlerin bulunmas\u0131 gerekir. Mahkeme FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin emniyet yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6zel programlara g\u00f6re yeti\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve emniyete s\u0131zd\u0131rabildi\u011fi mensuplar\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ba\u011flar\u0131n\u0131n devam ettirilmesi ve g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmesi maksad\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde mahrem hizmetler ad\u0131 verilen ayr\u0131 bir birimle idare etti\u011fini, \u00f6\u011frencilik d\u00f6neminde ve mezuniyet sonras\u0131nda mensuplar\u0131n\u0131 mahrem hizmetler abisi ad\u0131 verilen ve kod ad\u0131 kulland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 sivil \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131na takip ettirdi\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme; bu de\u011ferlendirmelerden sonra tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun FET\u00d6\/PDY hiyerar\u015fisinde Merzifon POMEM’de okuyan polis okulu \u00f6\u011frencilerini takip eden mahrem abilerden sorumlu mahrem hizmetler abisi s\u0131fat\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerde bulundu\u011fu, eylemlerinin bu kapsamda \u00e7e\u015fitlilik, yo\u011funluk, s\u00fcreklilik i\u00e7erdi\u011fi kanaatine ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu gerek\u00e7eyle ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi olma su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar veren Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7indeki bu konumunu da g\u00f6zeterek cezada te\u015fdit uygulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemenin bu yorumunun kanun koyucunun yasak olarak belirledi\u011fi fiilin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n kanunili\u011fi ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde geni\u015fletti\u011finin, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fine ili\u015fkin kural\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcyle \u00e7eli\u015fti\u011finin ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemektedir. Mahkeme, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131 netle\u015ftirirken su\u00e7u d\u00fczenleyen kural\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir \u015fekilde yorumlam\u0131\u015f ve kural\u0131n mahiyetine uygun davranma konusunda \u00f6zen g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde gizlenmek amac\u0131yla mahrem yap\u0131lanmada \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetler g\u00f6steren ba\u015fvurucunun, bu yap\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla kuruldu\u011funa ve \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131 bilebilecek konumda oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin olarak var\u0131lan sonucun temelsiz oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
27. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucunun gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden cezas\u0131nda te\u015fdit uygulanmas\u0131 ve kanun yolunda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar de\u011ferlendirilmeden h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n Yasemin Ek\u015fi (B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 56, 57) ve Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri ([GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 31-39), hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n Ahmet Sa\u011flam (B. No: 2013\/3351, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 43-46) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 31\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 31\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/50390 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 R. F. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/50390) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 6\/2\/2025 – 32805 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Muhammed Nuri \u00d6ZG\u00dcR Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Ey\u00fcp Can KARACA \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7uyla ilgili olarak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131sal yorumlar\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmamas\u0131 ve su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmayan eylemlerin mahk\u00fbmiyete esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuruda ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 1984 do\u011fumlu olup ba\u015fvuru konusu olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r. 3. Amasya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde Y.S.E., S.K., \u00d6.Y. ve K.V.nin tan\u0131k olarak ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y.S.E., S.K. ve \u00d6.Y. ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde Merzifon Polis Meslek Y\u00fcksekokulu (POMEM) \u00f6\u011frencileri ile ilgilenen ki\u015filerin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 evlerden ve bu evlerde kalanlardan sorumlu oldu\u011funu, Cihat kod adl\u0131 \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. K.V. ise ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6rg\u00fct evlerine yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fini, kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n