T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
FEVZ\u0130 ARSLAN BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/25150)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 21\/1\/2025 – 32789<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Murat BA\u015ePINAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Fevzi ARSLAN<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mustafa Itri \u015eENALP<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan temyiz ba\u015fvurusunun s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Konya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 19\/7\/2018 tarihli iddianamesinin kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Konya 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince g\u00f6r\u00fclen yarg\u0131lamada ba\u015fvurucunun kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs ve yasak silah bulundurma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf ba\u015fvurusu, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan tefrik edilerek ayr\u0131 bir esasa kaydedildikten sonra Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi (Ceza Dairesi) taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131lmak suretiyle 18\/12\/2019 tarihinde incelenmi\u015f ve temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafiinin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ceza Dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131nda kanun yoluna ili\u015fkin \u015fu hususlara yer verilmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
“Dair, san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafiinin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131, di\u011ferlerinin yoklu\u011funda, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n huzurunda, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tefhimden\/tebli\u011fden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde dairemize verilecek dilek\u00e7e veya tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmek \u00fczere zab\u0131t k\u00e2tibine beyanda bulunmak veyahut da bir ba\u015fka B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Ceza Dairesi veya \u0130lk Derece Ceza Mahkemesi arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla dilek\u00e7e g\u00f6nderilmek, tutuklu san\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca ceza infaz kurumu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne beyanda bulunmak veya dilek\u00e7e vermek suretiyle, Yarg\u0131tay ilgili Ceza Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan incelenmek \u00fczere TEMY\u0130Z yolu; .. a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere 18\/12\/2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle verilen karar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a okunup usulen anlat\u0131ld\u0131.”<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii, h\u00fckm\u00fcn y\u00fcze kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131ndan (tefhimden) itibaren s\u00fcresinde 18\/12\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile temyiz talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ceza Dairesi, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fcdafiine 31\/12\/2019 tarihinde elektronik tebligat (e-tebligat) yoluyla g\u00f6ndermi\u015f, tebligat ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, 5\/1\/2020 tarihinde mevzuat gere\u011fi otomatik olarak okundu say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii 16\/1\/2020 tarihinde temyiz sebeplerini g\u00f6sterir ek dilek\u00e7eyi Ceza Dairesine sunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi 1\/3\/2021 tarihinde, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiine 5\/1\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesine ra\u011fmen temyiz sebeplerini g\u00f6sterir dilek\u00e7enin 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 295. maddesinde belirtilen yasal s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra sunuldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle temyiz isteminin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar \u015fu \u015fekilde al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n
“Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan 18.12.2019 tarihinde; san\u0131k ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermeyen s\u00fcre tutum dilek\u00e7esi verildi\u011fi, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine 05.01.2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesine ra\u011fmen CMK’nin 295. maddesinde belirtilen s\u00fcrede gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esi sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, CMK’nin 298\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz isteminin REDD\u0130NE”<\/p>\n
6. Nihai karar\u0131 19\/4\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenen ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii 20\/5\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresinde sunuldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde hatal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu temyiz isteminin reddedilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
9. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, konuya ili\u015fkin mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile yarg\u0131sal kararlara de\u011finilerek ihlal iddialar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilirken bu hususlar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvuru, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00d6zkan \u015een (B. No: 2012\/791, 7\/11\/2013), Cemile Aky\u0131ld\u0131z (B. No: 2014\/1382, 22\/9\/2016), Ertu\u011frul Dalba\u015f (B. No: 2014\/7805, 25\/10\/2017), Hasan \u0130\u015ften (B. No: 2015\/1950, 22\/2\/2018), Nihal Uslukol (B. No: 2016\/73086, 25\/9\/2019) ve H\u00fcseyin Volkan Kurt (B. No: 2019\/42687, 8\/3\/2023) kararlar\u0131nda mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda, Ceza Dairesinin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011fi sonras\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresinde verilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle temyiz talebinin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
14. An\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde belirtilen ko\u015fullar\u0131 yerine getirmedi\u011fi m\u00fcddet\u00e7e Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinin ihlalini te\u015fkil edecektir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 mutlak olmay\u0131p s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara konu olabilir. Ancak Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde yer alan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesi uyar\u0131nca an\u0131lan s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131n mahkemeye eri\u015fimi imk\u00e2ns\u0131z h\u00e2le getirmemesi ya da a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 derecede zorla\u015ft\u0131rmamas\u0131 gerekir. Ki\u015finin mahkemeye ba\u015fvurmas\u0131n\u0131 engelleyen hukuki veya fiil\u00ee s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edebilir (\u00d6zkan \u015een, \u00a7 52).<\/p>\n
16. Mahkemelerin i\u00e7 i\u015fleyi\u015flerine ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7lerdeki aksama ve hatalardan kaynaklanan sorumlulu\u011fun yarg\u0131sal koruma talep eden bireylere y\u00fcklenmesi mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na bir m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil edebilir. Bu bak\u0131mdan yarg\u0131sal ba\u015fvurulara dair dilek\u00e7elerini ilgili mevzuatta \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen usule uygun olarak yetkili yarg\u0131 merciine sunan ki\u015filerin kendilerine atfedilemeyen ve tamamen mahkemelerin i\u00e7 i\u015fleyi\u015finden kaynaklanan hata ve aksamalardan sorumlu tutularak mahkemeye eri\u015fimlerinin engellenmesi bu hakka yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleyi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz k\u0131labilir. \u00d6zellikle kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki istek ve iradesini ortaya koymu\u015f olan ba\u015fvurucular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bu t\u00fcr m\u00fcdahaleler, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline sebep olabilir (bir k\u0131s\u0131m de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Hasan \u0130\u015ften, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
17. \u00d6te yandan bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunun ikincillik niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi, ilgili mevzuat\u0131 yorumlamak derece mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revi olup Anayasa Mahkemesinin bireysel ba\u015fvuruda inceledi\u011fi husus Anayasa’da g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fidir. Bu kapsamda kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma s\u00fcresinin hangi tarihte ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirlemek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi olmay\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesi, kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihle ilgili olarak derece mahkemelerinin yorumlar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’da g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edip etmedi\u011fini incelemektedir.<\/p>\n
18. Somut olayda Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi, ba\u015fvurucunun -yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck- yasal s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra temyiz sebeplerini g\u00f6sterir dilek\u00e7e sundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 298. maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz isteminin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Ceza Dairesinin h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tefhim\/tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren on be\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar\u0131n temyiz edilebilece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir (bkz. \u00a7 3). 2\/3\/2024 tarihli ve 7499 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 21. maddesiyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 295. maddesinde ise temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda temyiz nedenleri g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015fse temyiz ba\u015fvurusu i\u00e7in belirlenen s\u00fcrenin bitmesinden veya gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz olunan b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesine bu nedenleri i\u00e7eren bir ek dilek\u00e7e verilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. 11\/2\/1959 tarihli ve 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu’nun “Elektronik tebligat” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 7\/a maddesinde ve 6\/12\/2018 tarihli ve 30617 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Elektronik Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin “Elektronik tebligat\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 ve muhataba ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 9. maddesinde elektronik yolla tebligat\u0131n, muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvuru konusu yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecine ili\u015fkin Ceza Dairesi karar\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun avukat\u0131na e-tebligat yoluyla tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. \u0130lgili mevzuat uyar\u0131nca e-tebligat yolunun kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6nderiler, muhatab\u0131n hesab\u0131na ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f say\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re somut olayda tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda “Tebligat al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131na iletilmesini m\u00fcteakip mevzuat gere\u011fi belirlenen s\u00fcre sonunda otomatik olarak okundu say\u0131ld\u0131.” \u015feklindeki delil kayd\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fturuldu\u011fu 5\/1\/2020 tarihi tebli\u011f tarihidir (Far\u0131s \u0130nan, B. No: 2020\/20279, 4\/10\/2023, \u00a7 19).<\/p>\n
22. Olay tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan -7499 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’la 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da yap\u0131lan ve 1\/6\/2024 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren de\u011fi\u015fiklikler \u00f6ncesinde- 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 291. maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmak i\u00e7in h\u00fckm\u00fcn y\u00fcze kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131ndan (tefhimden) itibaren on be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck bir s\u00fcre \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. H\u00fckm\u00fcn y\u00fcze kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumda ise bu s\u00fcre tebli\u011f tarihinden ba\u015flayacakt\u0131r. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 294. maddesine g\u00f6re temyiz eden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 neden istedi\u011fini temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda g\u00f6stermek zorunda olup temyiz sebebi ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuki y\u00f6n\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olabilir. Ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 295. maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda temyiz nedenleri g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015fse temyiz ba\u015fvurusu i\u00e7in belirlenen s\u00fcrenin bitmesinden veya gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz olunan b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesine bu nedenleri i\u00e7eren ek bir dilek\u00e7e verilir (H\u00fcseyin Volkan Kurt, \u00a7 54).<\/p>\n
23. Bununla birlikte yeni sistemde temyiz kanun yoluna ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemelerle ilgili olarak Yarg\u0131tay ceza dairelerinin ve Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda yorum farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 olu\u015fmu\u015ftur. Gelinen noktada \u00f6zellikle kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yollar\u0131n\u0131n, \u015feklinin, s\u00fcrelerinin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ilgililere eksik bildirildi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde yasal s\u00fcrelerin ne zaman ve hangi \u015fartlarda ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131nda bir uygulama birli\u011finden s\u00f6z edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemektedir. Bu durum ilgililer y\u00f6n\u00fcnden belirsizli\u011fe yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi eksik bildirim yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bir i\u015flev de g\u00f6rmektedir. Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kuruluna g\u00f6re de yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n bu konuda farkl\u0131 sonu\u00e7lara varmas\u0131 taraflar i\u00e7in kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sorun olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r (H\u00fcseyin Volkan Kurt, \u00a7 55). An\u0131lan ele\u015ftiriler neticesinde 7499 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’la 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da birtak\u0131m de\u011fi\u015fiklikler yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve 1\/6\/2024 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
24. S\u00fcresinde temyiz sebeplerini g\u00f6sterir dilek\u00e7e sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle temyiz talebinin reddine karar verilmesinin, ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na a\u011f\u0131r bir m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil etti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu a\u011f\u0131r m\u00fcdahale kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda mahkemelerin birtak\u0131m tedbirleri\/imk\u00e2nlar\u0131 devreye sokmas\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bu a\u011f\u0131r m\u00fcdahaleyi dengeleyebilir. \u00d6rne\u011fin temyiz talebiyle ilgili karar verilmeden \u00f6nce temyiz sebeplerinin bildirilmemesinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun bilgilendirilmesi bu a\u011f\u0131r m\u00fcdahaleyi dengeleyecek niteliktedir. Somut olayda Ceza Dairesi, temyiz i\u00e7in genel s\u00fcre mahiyetindeki on be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ihtarda bulunmu\u015f ancak gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren temyiz gerek\u00e7elerini ihtiva eden ek dilek\u00e7enin verilmesi i\u00e7in yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ihtar yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle Ceza Dairesi, temyiz s\u00fcrecini bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirmemi\u015f; gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren temyiz gerek\u00e7elerini ihtiva eden ek dilek\u00e7e vermesi konusunda ba\u015fvurucuyu eksik bilgilendirmi\u015ftir. Dahas\u0131 Ceza Dairesi h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tefhim\/tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren on be\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar\u0131n temyiz edilebilece\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 3). Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi de temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan eksik bilgilendirme i\u00e7eren bir karara y\u00f6nelik olarak ba\u015fvurucunun temyiz talebini -yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra- temyiz sebeplerini g\u00f6sterir dilek\u00e7e sundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n baz\u0131 dengeleyici tedbirleri\/imk\u00e2nlar\u0131 devreye sokmaks\u0131z\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun temyiz talebini reddetmesinin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucuya a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fi i\u00e7in orant\u0131s\u0131z oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. H\u00fcseyin Volkan Kurt, \u00a7 56).<\/p>\n
25. Ayr\u0131ca somut olayda 31\/12\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiinin elektronik adresine ula\u015fan ve ayn\u0131 tarihte ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131larak okunan gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n 5\/1\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck temyiz s\u00fcresinin 20\/1\/2020 tarihinde dolaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re 16\/1\/2020 tarihinde verilen gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesinin gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin verilme s\u00fcresinin hesaplanmas\u0131na dairyapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvenceye ba\u011flanan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesine (E.2020\/2553, K.2021\/2764) iletilmek \u00fczere Konya 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2018\/369, K.2019\/231) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi (E.2019\/2361, K.2019\/2514) ile Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 31\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 31\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/25150 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 FEVZ\u0130 ARSLAN BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/25150) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 21\/1\/2025 – 32789 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Murat BA\u015ePINAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Fevzi ARSLAN Vekili : Av. Mustafa Itri \u015eENALP \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan temyiz ba\u015fvurusunun s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Konya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 19\/7\/2018 tarihli iddianamesinin kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Konya 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince g\u00f6r\u00fclen yarg\u0131lamada ba\u015fvurucunun kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs ve yasak silah bulundurma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere karar verilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf ba\u015fvurusu, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan tefrik edilerek ayr\u0131 bir esasa kaydedildikten sonra Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi (Ceza Dairesi) taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131lmak suretiyle 18\/12\/2019 tarihinde incelenmi\u015f ve temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafiinin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ceza Dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131nda kanun yoluna ili\u015fkin \u015fu hususlara yer verilmi\u015ftir: …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26493","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n